We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT Eamon Ryan has expressed concern about Dublin Port’s plan to redevelop the south port area, known as the Poolbeg Peninsula, and increase its capacity.
The 3FM Project is the third and final part of Dublin Port’s Masterplan project, which anticipates that the port will maximise its capacity for an annual throughput of 3.1 million trailers and containers by 2040.
Under the plans, Dublin Port Company will construct a new 2.2km Southern Port Access Route (SPAR) with a 190m bridge across the Liffey adjacent to the existing Tom Clarke Bridge and running parallel to the East Link toll road.
It will also construct a new container terminal, which would be the largest in Ireland, with a capacity to handle 353,000 units annually – more than twice the number of containers handled in all other ports in the country last year.
The plan is currently open to public consultation.
The Green Party leader has written a letter to the board of Dublin Port expressing concern over the plan.
Speaking on RTÉ’s Morning Ireland, he said the port’s planned expansion will double its capacity.
“It already handles about half of all traffic in and out of the country. Most of that is by truck, either by roll-on, roll-off or lift-on, lift-off containers, but it’s planned to double that,” Ryan said.
He said he did not think that level of growth was feasible or in line with the country’s climate and circular economy targets.
“The ongoing reliance on trucks, taking that massive increase – up to 77 million tonnes from 35 million tonnes today – onto an M50 that’s already at full capacity and relying on a truck-based system, rather than looking to the future as other countries and other ports are doing, to decarbonise and to start bringing back rail freight,” he continued.
He said reviving rail freight would be a “key project” for the Government and that “major investment” is planned for Shannon Foynes, Cork Port and Rosslare Port to “help take some of the trucks off our roads to reduce emissions and make us a more efficient and forward-looking country in our transport system.
“We cannot see our roads continue to be clogged, emissions continue to rise and an ongoing projection of just doubling everything in a way that is not sustainable.”
Ryan said it is also “critical” that some of the port land is used for the provision of housing, adding that Dublin Port “are engaged with the Land Development Agency, but I want to see that actioned now”.
He also said that the planned use of the Poolbeg Peninsula for large areas of trailer storage and container storage “in my mind, is not the best use of that land”.
“We need to extend the nature reserve in the Poolbeg Peninsula because the biosphere in Dublin Bay is important. It’s important to any new developments we do. We do give space for nature.”
Asked if his coalition colleagues in Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael agree with his view, Ryan said he was “in constant touch with my colleagues in what we’re doing on our transport strategies, and yes, it is Government policy”.
“I’ve got great Government support for investing in Cork, Rosslare, Shannon Foynes, Waterford ports, so that we don’t just see all the development on the east coast of the country.
“I have a particular responsibility as Minister for Transport to make my views clear, particularly when it comes to the provision of housing in public lands, for our use of public lands for housing. Government is absolutely committed to take action there so that we use public lands to help address our housing crisis.”
Asked if he thought Dublin Port Company would revise the plans due to his letter, Ryan said the reasons he has expressed are “rational”.
“We carried out some analysis within our Department and looking at what we see as the projected needs, and it’s roughly half of what is set out and it’s a very ambitious plan, I believe that rational argument will, in the end, see a development that’s more sustainable,” he said.
“There are other very significant developments happening at Dublin Port. They’re building in the Alexandra Basin at the moment. There’s major developments taking place. It’s not saying no to the development of Dublin Port, but it’s saying it has to be in line with a more sustainable vision of the future.”
In a statement, Dublin Port Company said it “notes the Minister’s comments and looks forward to engaging further with him in this regard”.
“The 3FM project is consistent with the Dublin Port Masterplan 2040 which was first published in 2010 and has already seen planning secured for two other major capital projects,” the statement reads.
“Dublin Port is fully committed to the sustainable development of its assets in line with its statutory responsibilities and the national priorities and we will take all views and feedback into account as part of this process.
“The Masterplan, including the 3FM project, is fully aligned with EU policy, national policy, regional policy and local policy.”
Tailored shorts should be no issue in the workplace.
@Peter Cavey:
As Monty Python sang: “I’m a lumberjack…..”
@Peter Cavey: oooowww, taaailored shorts!
@Peter Cavey: yes, fine if you’re working from home.
Bizarre in 2019 that so many are still in favour of forcing people to wear certain kinds of clothing despite knowing it’s making them uncomfortable.
@Rochelle: Shorts fine outdoors, not indoor working. If it’s uncomfortable, change job.
@Niall O’Neill: Why on earth do you even care?
@Rochelle: Can I go to work in a mankini? What’s comfortable for me may not be comfortable for those around me.
@Conall: If shorts on someone else makes you uncomfortable though, yer a bit sensitive.
@Conall: it’s shorts we’re talking about…. SHORTS
@Conall: Do you really think a man wearing shorts is some kind of radical statement? This is hilarious!
@Niall O’Neill: can I wear a skirt or dress instead?
@Shawn O’Ceallaghan: depends on what your legs look like and if you’re wearing flats or heels.
@Niall O’Neill: if your that sensitive maybe you should change jobs
@Niall O’Neill: Lol! So Irish, still horrified by the world without constant rain.
@Niall O’Neill: ah cmon a pair of shorts is no harm at alll
If you cant wear it into a meeting then don’t wear it to work. Can you imagine you go in and all of a sudden a top boss calls you into a board meeting to give your view on something. Here you are looking like you heading to the beach in Barcelona.
@Arya: What? How does this look like you’re going to the beach https://pin.it/7pwrac4zg37u25
@Arya: in my experience, men in expensive suits are no more likely to display intelligence than those in shorts. Take Richard Branson for example. It’s the content of the message that counts not the package that delivers it. That said, I do accept that there is a certain expectation regarding dress code but maybe it’s time to move forward?
@Paul Shepherd: Branson’s a ballix
@Ryan: Board shorts for the board room. Perfectly cromulent attire.
@Ryan: Correction Branson’s a rich ballix.
@Arya: WTF has that got to do with your ability to do the job ???? All this best foot forward stiff upper lip BS. As long as they look respectable it stupid to make them an issue
@Arya: have you seen the way some td’s dress. Someone in smart shorts would look alot better.
@Paul Shepherd: I’ve found the opposite. I found men in suits are not as intelligent as the guy in shorts in a heatwave.
@Ian Breathnach: they look like two saps, so that’s a NO, for work.
it’s acceptable for women to have bare legs when wearing skirts, why not men?
As long as they aren’t hot pants
@Michael Byrne: nobody wants a bit of ball scrag popping out to say hello when Barry is giving his forecasts for the year ahead.
@Bruce Van der Gutschmitzer: Barry is in a mankini.
@Michael Byrne: who loves short shorts? I love short shorts?
@Leadóg: no hiding there
Shorts – are they suitable for work? Do you for mean men and women? If yes then how could shorts be unsuitable if skirts are? I have a half memory of men in some job abroad starting to wear skirts because they were allowed in the uniform code and shorts were not. Then there the issue of short skirts and short shorts but that’s for another day.
@Phil O’ Meara: Train drivers and conductors in Stockholm. I teach in Stockholm, and had that “strike” in mind when I was told I couldn’t wear shorts and it was 32 degrees. I told them I’d come in the next hot day in a dress. They weren’t willing to risk it, and they were right not to.
The whole shorts/skirt debate I get but I guess historically, women weren’t allowed wear trousers to work at one point and had to wear a skirt, so it’s perceived as “dressy”.
Generally, if a woman is wearing a skirt to work, she has it dressed up with a top or blouse and a pair of shoes. She isn’t going to be wearing a tshirt or football jersey and runners, which is kind of what you imagine when you think of shorts on men. So if they want to wear shorts, they’d have to wear sensible suit style shorts and shoes in the same way a woman dresses up a skirt.
Personally, I want to wear neither, quite happy in my jeans
@JC: how historical do you want to go back? Women have been wearing trousers in work for over half a century. Further back men were high heels. Time has moved on
@Craic_a_tower: I never said I agreed, I said that is probably where the perception came from. At no point were shorts something men would traditionally wear to work. Traditionally shorts were what little boys wore until they grew up and could get into long trousers
@JC: Jeans are not work attire either unless you work on a building site.. Maybe okay on casual day but that’s about it.
@Gerry O’Sullivan: I’m currently in an office in my jeans. And I’m in the financial software industry.
Sure I’ll wear a suit / business outfit if I’m meeting a client but normally it’s denims, boots and a tee shirt with a movie quote.
Would ya ever feck off with your building site nonsense.
@Gerry O’Sullivan: I work in IT – I’m not going to ask my staff to come in suited and booted to crawl under peoples manky desks to replace cables and whatnot.
@JC: 25 years ago I was working in the USA in an office and wore shorts. I was by no means the exception and it was a very large international company. As for wearing jeans pretty much every company I have worked for has no issue. The one place that had a strict dress code was the most lowly skilled office job that had no dealings with the public. What was worse was the men’s dress policy was 4 times larger. Ridiculous stuff like no print pattern ties.
@Craic_a_tower: again “traditionally”. Great that you could wear shorts in the USA but there are a lot of company’s who are very stuffy about their dress policy so don’t think that would be the norm in Ireland.
Personally, unless its a public customer facing role, I couldn’t give a f*ck what someone was wearing. Someone wearing a suit & tie isn’t going to do more work than someone in jeans and a tshirt. In fact, if the latter is more comfortable to someone, that would probably result in better work output.
I’m currently wearing shorts in work so I hope so!
@Dave Byrne: Are you a lifeguard by any chance,ok, two more guesses…..are you a boxer,no, ok , do you work for a shorts company…..I give up, no, do you own the company….any vacancies in this weather.
@Dave Byrne: I hope you’re not on the phone in goal…
@Honeybee: He’s a center forward for Liverpool so it’s ok.
Of course they’re suitable.
If woman can wear skirts (and I suspect no one would bat an eyelid at tailored capris / shorts) than i can’t imagine anyone complaining about men wearing tailored shorts would have a leg to stand on ;)
But then I’d have zero issue if they chose to wear a skirt either. Or a kilt. As long as it’s respectable (of that’s the office you have) wear whatever you damn well please.
All that being said, the minute you move into Client facing situations you might wanna revisit that :)
@Tricia G: Everybody seems to be equating men wearing shorts with women wearing skirts, but is that really equivalent? Would women wearing shorts be equivalent to wearing skirts? I’m not so sure.
@Squiddley Diddley: That’s why I specifically mentioned ” tailored capris / shorts”.
@Tricia G: Ok sorry. Personally I don’t care what people wear, I spend a lot of time in building sites where lumberjack shirts often talk more sense than suits and ties. Speaking of which I think men should abandon ties in warm weather.
@Squiddley Diddley: Ties make very little sense to me. They’re mainly decoration, a follow on from a previous age. Although they are more aesthetically pleasing than just a buttoned up shirt……
@Squiddley Diddley: ok let’s equate it men wearing sarongs then instead.
That evens it out.
Equality works both ways, weird and all as it may sound.
Women can wear skirts. So if you think that men can’t wear shorts, you’re an evil sexist monster!
@Greg Ward: men can wear skirts / bring our your inner Beckham
@Greg Ward: Would it be strange to see a woman at work in shorts? Just asking, don’t Have any opinion either way…
@Squiddley Diddley: Depends on the shorts. Capri shorts, no, short shorts, yeah, that would be a tad weird.
I think it’s acceptable to wear shorts in a job where you don’t have to interact with people outside of your office colleagues. In a job where you have to meet clients and business partners, then obviously first impression is important and you should present yourself in a respectable manner.
@will: Is dressing in a way that makes you sweaty, irritated and unable to focus being “respectful” to the customer?
Some people are far too hung up on the deception of professionalism rather than acting in a professional way.
I’m in UK at moment. So many guys in shorts, truly horrific mostly, great nobly knees, and it don’t stop at shorts, then its flip flops. A whole other issue.
@David J Warren:
Knobbly sorry
@David J Warren: No noble knees?
I am surprised Leo has not invited the government and TDs to attend work wearing shorts … would be remarkable photo opps too
The picture you’ve used to illustrate the article appears to be a gentleman working in a pair of pink boxers. He is unsurprisingly working alone.
The only strange thing I noticed was that he apparently has to wear a long-sleeved shirt with it. Maybe for video-conferencing? Personally I can’t stand pink, but each to their own. I have no issues with shorts. It’s hot enough out. Most of us commute. The more comfortably we can dress, the better.
For many men, wearing shorts would certainly kill of the risk of dating fellow employees … so that may be a good thing
Depends how much ya packing
@Davei:
That can be …….. augmented!
My lot are lucky I’ve any clothes on at all today!
Depends on the job I suppose. In general though many places have a professional dress code and you just have to follow it.
Depends on the shorts. If all the guys started turning up in my place wearing short shorts, I’m ringing in sick! And yes I’d have the same reaction if the women start doing it too!
It should be acceptable to wear anything. What one wears has no bearing whatsoever on how one performs.
Totally against this, don’t see why I should have to cover up and wear shorts.
Shorts and open-toe shoes are completely unacceptable in a work environment in my opinion.
Short answer?- …
Has no-one been to the Middle East and beyond, where long, light and loose clothes are traditional for men and women alike. Not just to dissipate heat and sweat but also as protection from the sun. Shorts might be a bit too casual for many businesses but those should have airconditioning. For others, they might be ok provided they’re not too short or painted on.
This poll discriminates against everyone who’s not a soft handed office worker.
Tis more acceptable to change your gender than your pant attire
Depends on your work. In office work, depends if you are front- or back office, if you have external visitors/seminars etc. In my view shorts are basically ok in everyday work. But dont greet a foreign delegation or pitch your gig in shorts.
Little difference between tailored shorts and a skirt above the knee. A dress policy doesn’t constitute professionalism, collective progressive attitude and culture do. Shorts are common practice across the world in warmer countries and, where safety and health (common sense) permit, I personally don’t have an issue.
As an Irishman who’s lived in Australia for 20 years, this is hilarious.
We are not allowed to wear shorts to work until temps are over 35C.
20C and you want to wear shorts to work??!!!
I’ve obviously acclimatised. I’m in a wooly jumper in 20C lol
He’ll yeah . Try work outdoors all day in that heat in long trousers. Not nice
You would need to be a lunatic to think shorts are inappropriate. Ability to do job is most important. Weird puritan dress codes have no basis in current society apart from PPE.
I think a plain coloured short that came to the knee should be allowed. Wouldn’t think the pink ones in the photo would be appropriate.
Would you ever get over yourselves? It’s 18 degrees out there and you’re talking about wearing shorts at work??
No problem women wearing sleeveless outfits. why men can wear smart casual shorts??
If people can were their cultural / religious clothing. Shorts are part of ours normal worn when hot. There was never a reason not to. Just like those whom wear cultural / religious clothing. There should not be a problem at all.
Not acceptable for men, acceptable for some wowen.
Sure if its ok for men to wear skirts why wouldn’t it be ok to wear shorts
My first answer is no way. But for the first time ever, the comments here have caused me to stop and think. If women can wear skirts, why can’t guys wear shorts?
I think it would be up to the “experts” in fashion and design to come up with an appropriate look of men’s shorts that would work in a corporate setting. What socks and shoes would they wear with it? What kind of shirt? Would it look professional? Maybe this will actually become a thing but at the moment I don’t know of any style of men’s shorts that would really work.
I work in construction and its not allow from a safety stand point
Short trousers for this warm weather YES
Just wear a skirt and identify as female for the day.
If women can have skirts and dresses then men can have shorts.
Iv worn a dress when I was told shorts weren’t allowed. My boss changed his mind after 2 hours
If women can have skirts and dresses then men can have shorts.
Iv worn a dress when I was told shorts weren’t allowed. My boss changed his mind after 2 hours
Normal shorts about knee length yes.. Them 3/4 length girly ones with the the no socks malarky no.
How about everyone goes naked? Problem solved.
Tis more acceptable to change your gender than your pant attire
37% at the time o read this are just bitter C***s
If women can have skirts and dresses then men can have shorts.
Iv worn a dress when I was told shorts weren’t allowed. My boss changed his mind after 2 hours
119 = 4% 96=5%
Something wrong here lads
Shorts fine. Flip flops feck off
If women can have skirts and dresses then men can have shorts.
Iv worn a dress when I was told shorts weren’t allowed. My boss changed his mind after 2 hours
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say