We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
YOUTUBE STARS ARE becoming more and more like Hollywood celebrities, with hordes of screaming fans and generous incomes.
But it turns out that they may be making even more money than you think.
AdAge recently published a ranking of the top YouTube stars according to their estimated monthly earnings.
The data was compiled by Outrigger Media, who focused on the top-earning channels in two genres: beauty and style, and food and cooking.
The top earner in the food and cooking genre is a channel called CharlisCraftyKitchen, which features videos of an 8-year-old named Charli sharing baking tips.
According to Outrigger’s estimates, Charli’s channel generates an average of $127,777 (€118,000) in ad revenue per month. That’s taking into account YouTube’s cut of revenue. The channel gets an average of 29 million views each month — in March, it had 29,133,270.
Charli began making her videos in 2012, when she was 6. Her 5-year-old sister, Ashlee, also plays a role as chief taste tester. The girls have made tutorials for everything from Minnie Mouse Oreo pops to jello popsicles inspired by “Frozen”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Dredging the Shannon, if done in the correct way would solve most of the problems with flooding. A small handful of properties need to bite the bullet and accept demolition of their one-off bungalow bliss and be relocated to higher ground as nearby as possible.
The simple reality is that the volume of a river’s capacity needs to be at the maximum potential to swiftly move these amounts of water to the sea as quickly as possible. Once this has been addressed, we need to seriously look at land management in the western two-thirds of this island.
Long gone are the days of farming on low-yield soils and long gone are the days of cutting away bogs. Bog restoration would provide a natural sponge to hold back large rainfalls and release it slowly, whereas returning low-yield farmland to forestry (deciduous type) would help soak up ground water from soils already saturated for much of the year.
We need a land management agency and a waterways management agency under one roof planning and singing from the same hymn sheet. It can be done, it should be done, it needs to be done.
Otherwise stuff like this will continue to haunt the Shannon area: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CM9ZP-FWoAAS0LX.jpg
@Laois Weather: Just to add to the above piece:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/image-117.png
A picture paints a thousand words.
@Laois Weather: eh, the expert in the article just explained why dredging would be of no benefit – whether it’s done ‘properly’ or not! At best it would move the problem to the people downriver. Dredging is needed on a tiny percent of the length of the Shannon, and it’s more to do with boat navigation than flooding.
@Laois Weather: That being true (bite the bullet) the government should relocate people and reimburse those with land as it was their planning departments that allowed it in the first place. Otherwise people will be ruined.
@Laois Weather: a little bit of hobest civil engineering with whiile lacking the the brown envelopes might do the trick as in. Ask Denmark
@Seamus Mc Nulty: the government doesn’t own or control planning departments, or make county-by-county planning policy.
@Laois Weather: it would solve nothing.
The shannon drops 100 feet from Carrick on shannon to Limerick, and most if that drop consists of four sudden steps at Jamestown, athlon, meelick and parteen. Tge river is essentially actually flat, and dredging it just deepens the channel and creates a hole that immediately fills up with water — it night as well be filled with concrete for all the effect it would have on the flow.
The shannon has a broad floodplain which floods when heavy rain falls on saturated ground. Any developments on flood plains will flood too.
Dredging the shannon is an effective tool for politicians seeking votes; it has worked in that way for as long as I remember. It does nothing for water levels though, you can’t defy gravity or make water flow up hills.
@John Mulligan: absolutely. It’s a flat river and, if you’ll excuse the pun, everything flows from that.
@John Mulligan: while you are right in a way increasing capacity by deepening the channel means less water spills out of the channel. If you pour a litre of water into a pint glass it spils out, if you pour it into a litre jug none spills out. By dredging the shannon you also increase capacity by helping the water thats in it to escape to the sea quicker. The main thing is the water needs to be able to get to the sea and that dredging happens from the sea back up to the source. You would still likely get flooding but it wouldn’t be as high as it is currently
@Brian Burke: Brian you don’t think logic. Dredging should be done by Dutch experts. Dredging can not be done here and there only than is it becoming a problem.
@Laois Weather: “long gone are the days of farming on low yield soils “
You do realise that most of the farmland around the Shannon region is some of the best soil around ? Most of the lands are under limestone . It ain’t Connemara
@Dino: and if you pour a 5 gallon container of water into the jug it spills over. The amount of water in these floods can’t be contained in the main river channel. The only solution is to slow down the water getting into the main river channel
@Dino: the additional capacity achieved by dredging the channel is insignificant in the context of the problem.
The headline really says it all , as in it would seem they don’t know their arse from their elbow. So many of these places were never suitable for building homes on in the first place, so how did they get PP? Then you have other homes that have been in the family for generations & being flooded for the first time. Perhaps that’s down to doggie drainage as a result of bad planning.
@Colette Kearns: In the general case, planners often refuse permission, but a word is had with a local TD or councillor, and it is granted. Family land, help the elderly parents, can’t afford a house in town, etc.
@George Salter: remember that Councillors decide planning policy, not planners. The planning system is not there to prevent people making decisions which turn out to be unwise.
It’s hilarious the denial. We’ve had an unprecedented number of storms bringing rain in from the Atlantic on a continuous conveyer belt. This isn’t normal rainfall for Ireland, it’s climate change. It was predicted by climate modelling decades ago. Dredging won’t fix it. Many of these houses are built in areas that have never flooded in the past. It’s exactly the same story in the UK. Blaming and pointing fingers is like Australians blaming policymakers for the forest fires instead of 5 consecutive years of heatwaves caused by climate change. If you want to blame someone, it’s YOUR fault having such a dependency on fossil fuel.
@Paraic: You know more than the experts then?
From: https://www.met.ie/cms/assets/uploads/2020/02/FebRain.pdf (Met Eireann)
“In Met Éireann, basic trend analysis has been performed on a number of high quality rainfall stations over a fifty year period. Some stations show an increase in the frequency of heavy precipitation (>10mm) / very heavy precipitation (>20mm) days over the past decades, however other stations show a decrease, there is large regional variation and occasionally conflicting trends from stations that are geographically relatively close. The fact that rainfall displays such a high degree
of variability, both temporally and spatially makes it difficult to be definitive about trends.”
And from: https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0227/1117988-storms-ireland
“The causes of the high storminess during the Little Ice Age continue to be debated, but one theory is that powerful storms were produced by a strong cooling of the North Atlantic. There are several pieces of evidence supporting this North Atlantic cooling. Records from Iceland show that there was a greater persistence of sea ice around the coastline at this time. There were recurrent collapses of the cod fishery on the Faroe Islands during the Little Ice Age, which is an indication of colder temperatures as cod do not survive in water below 2°C”
I wonder what fossil fuels were burned around 1400AD to cause those storms? The green loons trying to link *every* weather event to Climate Change and slurring people who argue against this as “deniers” is as dishonest as one can be. Climate Change always happened – and to say that humans are 100% responsible for this is pure folly.
The endless list of failed predictions by the Climate Change Alarmists should be enough evidence for people to see through the agenda – apparently not though, 12 voted in TDs shows how gullible the youth are.
@Daniel Dunne: Cherry pick much?
” Human-caused climate change intensifies the heaviest downpours. More than 70% of the planet’s surface is water, and as the world warms, more water evaporates from oceans, lakes, and soils. Every 1°F rise also allows the atmosphere to hold 4% more water vapor. So when weather patterns lead to heavy rain, there is even more moisture available for stronger downpours, increasing the risk and severity of flooding.” I don’t claim to know more than the experts, I just know how to listen to them.
@Paraic: Should we add that to the list of failed predictions?
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
@Daniel Dunne: I don’t see any specific reference in either of the articles you posted that supports the idea that the increased precipitation we are witnessing is not due to climate change. Basically what you are trying to imply is that variation between rainfall measuring stations = no unusual rainfall happening. Storms thousands of years ago = No climate change now. Really weak arguments. Classic confirmation bias at work in fact.
@Paraic: the climate changes constantly, the reasons for it are whats debatable. In this article alone the “expert” mentions a drough that lasted a decade in Ireland in the 1800s, I guess that was caused by global warming too? I was reading about a pre incan civilisation in south America a couple of weeks ago and it is thought that they were wiped out by floods followed by extended drought back in 1100 or so. I understand your fear and feel sorry for the alarmists running around telling everyone the end is nigh but its not, its just nature. I bet you’re one of the people in a panic over this corona viris too? Some people just like to panic I guess
@Daniel Dunne: If you want to get your facts from a denialist blog, suit yourself. Literally nobody is saying that tabloid newspapers should be treated like peer reviewed research papers. But it’s typical of denialist loons to argue a point that nobody made. Personally, I listen to 100% of climatologists.
@Dino: The “I read about stuff that happened before” argument is more denialist tripe. Don’t you think that climatologists know about climatological events in the past and take them into account? The Shannon basin is very badly flooded, the worst in my living memory and there’s no sign of the rain abating. How does that fit into the “they said stuff would happen but it didn’t” argument? How about “They said there would be more flooding, more forest fires, polar ice melting, rising seas, more intense storms, more heatwave and that’s exactly what we are seeing”?
@Paraic: read my comment again, I never said the climate wasn’t changing, it is and always has. The reasons for it are whats debatable and there is absolutely nothing anyone in Ireland can do to reverse it despite your ridiculous crusade!
@Daniel Dunne: Rubbish you think that burning millions of years of stored carbon oil gas in just 200 years has not changed our climate is utter nonsense.
@Dino: It’s not debatable. The science and debating was done decades ago, it came to the conclusion that man is the cause of the rapid climate change we are witnessing. The science is irrefutable. Only fools will still try to insist something is false that we already know for sure to be true. I mean you’ve got Daniel there asking if I should add the prediction that the Shannon basin will experience more and intense flooding to the “list of failed predictions”. Do you realise how utterly idiotic that is?
What else can you expect when you place an almost 100ft dam across the
the Shannon which then discharges within a couple miles of the sea, the
continued use of the ESB Hydro Station to generate 84 odd Megawatts
on the Shannon is no longer feasible or indeed viable as its output in
respect of the national load demand 4400 Mw, couple this with the systems
design which envisaged 6 turbines with a design flow of 600 Cm/s of which
only four were installed, yet the storage or design was not adjusted to
take account of the reduced discharge at 400 Cm/s, there is also the
issue of giving of permission almost in secret to the ESB in the mid 70′s
to further raise levels at the time of the Oil Crisis, how much has this
contributed to flooding, is the Shannon system and other Hydro Stations
being used as a spinning reserve to deal with wind generation flucuations
and for peaking morning and evening, the time has come to take the ESB
and the ir 95% shareholder the Government and never mind all this nonsense
about flood barriers
I think the problem is far bigger than the dam ~ @Clonagh Ri:
@Clonagh Ri: the dam has no impact on the shannon floodplain. If you looked at the river profile in detail you would see the height of the dam relative to the flooded areas. If it was an issue, the water would be twenty to thirty feet over the top of the dam.
The problem is that the channel between ree and derg can’t take the flood because it’s too flat. Tge water can only go sideways after heavy rain, across the flood plain.
The dam is an easy target for simplistic answers, but it isn’t the problem.
@Clonagh Ri: should be pulled down like other dams accross Europe as it is a barrier to fish migration.
Our salmon, eels and lampreys were nearly wipes out.
Castleconnel was the greatest salmon fishery in the world at one time
@Ciarán FitzGerald: but no impact on flooding
@John Mulligan: The system is dammed incrementally from Lough
Allen to Parteen and water is released in stages from one holding
basin to the next ,what is held back at the various basins as far as
Jamestown weir cannot be released until each stage is spilled and
released until it eventually reaches the Parteen Dam, from the late
1920′s and into the 30′s the ESB were given Statutory Authority by
Act and Statutory Order/Instrument to raise water levels and impuond
it, there is also an additional Instrument made in the Mid 70′s further
raising levels in response to ’73 Oil Crisis, all level raising has to be
referenced to the historic levels pertaining at the commencement of
the Shannon Navigation Works in the 1840′s, you simplistic assertion
that the Pateen Dam would have to be at the same level as the Jamestown Sluice is somewhat ridiculous, when in fact the system
is controlled in stages, as it stands the entire original project has
now to reassessed in light of current energy requirements,which
is of today 4400 Mw of which Ardnacrusha is just under 84 Mw, all
those affected need to take a class action against the Government
and the ESB for damages, what other Nation would allow one of
its largest rivers to put lives and property at risk for a project that
did fulfill an energy requirement initially but is longer feasible or
viable under the current conditions
In the 1600s they brought in a Dutch man to deal with a major problem on the Ouse and he supervised the construction of what’s known as the Ouse Wash.
Sometimes its best to look for a known expert in the field and the Dutch have all the people we need.
What we don’t have is the willingness of some State agencies to surrender their patch and maybe dont have the willingness of politicians to provide .the money.
Totally incorrect ~~ Dredging on a schedule would enable the the engineering and flood specialists to mitigate flooding in many areas ~~ Dredging must be a constant not an emergency operation ~~ Planting trees and flooding bogs would also be pertinent ~~ Stopping greedy politicians egos might help ~ Maybe !
@JP Pilibin: Don’t build houses beside/on flood plains!
@JP Pilibin:
If you “mitigate” flooding in one area, you create or exaserbate flooding in another. The dredging campaign is misinformed nonsense, the Healy Raes are behind it, that should be warning enough.
There’s a simple solution:
STOP BUILDING HOUSES ON FLOOD PLANES
jesus, use floodplanes to plant forests or something, not ever scrap of land needs to be developed, the population is sparse enough as it is.
That headline is totally wrong, Dr Mary Burke was on the Pat Kenny show yesterday and stated that dredging is not the solution in any form for the Shannon.
@Frank Carty: we had her visit us inishowen in the wake of the 2017 floods. She is an excellent authority figure on the issue of flooding and natural flood mamagment
If you build houses on a flood plane, expect floods.
If you take measures to stop flooding in a flood plane, you create flooding somewhere else.
Feel bad for the suckers who bough houses on a flood plane not knowing any better, but they should direct their anger at the local gombeens who allowed houses to be built on a flood plane, not “dem ‘uns up in Dublin ignoring us”.
Some of these flood planes are on maps from the middle ages, we have a serious problem with planning in Ireland where local gombeens have too much power, and civil engineers have too little.
All talk and excuses as usual. We should have thousands of years data on Ireland biggest river maybe even ask the locals instead of downloading data sets. The plan seems to be protect towns and industry with peace meal defences. Identify farmland to flood and refuse to dredge because some plants and tiny aminals may loose their home. Blocking rivers that feed into the Shannon further up so more farmland can flood.
Dredging will bring more activity maybe jobs. Build up banks to plant trees.
You would swear that councils along the Shannon are more interested in using it to dispose of human sewage than listening and acting on locals concern. Rural Ireland forgotton while Dublin gets a metro line.
Dredging the Shannon it brings back memories of years gone by it was always a big topic in the daily and more recently when it was mooted that some of the water would be piped to Dublin there was uproar how times have changed
@Sean Doheny: It’s not in constant flood you have to realise…the river can get very low in the summer months especially in a drought. Navigation gets very difficult.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say