Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRISH CENTRAL BANK chief Philip Lane, who is running for the vice-presidency of the European Central Bank, has won the backing of a key European Parliament committee.
After talking to Lane and his rival for the job, Spanish Economy Minister Luis De Guindos, in an informal hearing “the majority of the political groups considered Governor Lane’s performance more convincing”, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs chairman Roberto Gualtieri said.
“Some groups expressed reservations for Minister De Guindos’ appointment,” he added in a statement.
Eurozone finance ministers are scheduled on Monday to pick their favourite to succeed Portugal’s Vitor Constancio, whose eight-year mandate expires in May, as the ECB’s number two.
The final decision will be taken on 22 March at an EU summit after consultations with the European Parliament and the ECB’s Governing Council.
Luis de Guindos said this month he was “convinced” he will have enough support to clinch the post after Madrid officially nominated him for the job.
Constancio’s replacement is being watched closely in European capitals as it is the first in a series of changes due at the top of the ECB over the coming two years, including the post of the chief of the bank currently held by Italian Mario Draghi.
The committee today also said it “regrets that no female candidates have been put forward, as requested, and calls for a more gender-balanced representation in the ECB”.
Only one woman currently sits on the ECB’s ruling body, German national Sabine Lautenschlaeger.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
There’s an awful lot of people in this country that have worked hard to be able to get a deposit together to buy a home and pay a mortgage. Though no fault of their own, they seen their pay decimated and jobs disappear. There should be a total ban on repossession proceedings starting until 18 months after the Covid crisis is declared over. No point in compounding an already terrible housing situation by make more people homeless. There’s very few “legitimate” buyers out there to buy repossessed houses at the moment. We’ll be left with foreign vulture funds buying up our housing stock.
@Nomad: what about the cases where a tenent can and just refuses to pay rent? Should they even though they have the money to pay just refuse. What should happen to those people?
@Chris Mc: I’m talking about honest and hardworking people – anyone taking the p1ss should be dealt with accordingly.
people are unable to pay a mortgage on €203 a week and should definitely get help,
and as usual it’ll be the landlords to get financial help, not the tenants…
@Mr A: what financial help do you think landlords are getting or get? Right now they cannot do anything about tenants not paying rent
@Craic_a_tower: untrue. There is financial assistance to landlords. The first is the mortgage break and the second the same available for other businesses and self-employed. The RTB has assisted them, the landlords, to get this money.
The expectation is the landlords transfer it to the tenants, by rent breaks, rent reduction and writing off rent in arrears. There isn’t any reason for kicking a family out of their home. Only the Dole landlords are trying to kick out people before the Authorities Carey’s out checks, a screening
If there are people who claimed the PUP four times …. It is realistic to landlords have done similar fraudulent claims …. the only way to get away with it is by creating a tsunami of homelessness
We’ll see what the Cabinet decided today, would they go against the Health executive?
@Maria Quinn: I asked a question so how is it untrue? The mortgage break costs money the landlord pays. The RTB are not giving money to landlords. Why do you expect landlords to subsidise people and take a hit? You seem to be under the impression it costs them nothing. If somebody isn’t paying rent who exactly do you think should foot that bill? Are you expecting any other industry to give their services for free? Or paying for something seems like a very valid reason to not provide a service.
If people are acting fraudulently what has that got to do with landlords? My tenants are getting more money as they are students only allowed work a limited time but getting full PUP. Why would I reduce their rent?
@Craic_a_tower: some people don’t understand how it works so they take their anger out on landlords.
The valid argument for them would be to state that government should ban investment into residential property apart from if its your own primary residence.
Otherwise by just saying landlords should foot the bill is akin to them saying a person who say invested €100K into a Dominos pizza franchise should give out free pizza.
@Mr A: what financial help exactly do landlords get
The solution is instant affordable legal assistant. People needs a solicitor to assist them to renegotiate the mortgage, to engage with the banks at earlier stages.
The creation of a quasi-judicial body without providing solicitors wouldn’t resolve anything at all.
Banks are not employers, neither landlords. Banks and financial institutions are heavily regulated, screens and controlled.
The language and formalities are the issue, the ability to get a solicitor is crucial for these families
Free Legal Aid has waiting times of over a years, 56 weeks in same centres. They do not take “property” cases, meaning any case to help the people keeps their homes, both owner and tenants. They are by Law banned in quasi-judicial bodies. In quasi-judicial bodies a team of barristers and solicitors are permitted …. like a Court room … but without the chance to be refunded for the legal costs …. and as private solicitors say – there isn’t any money in quasi-judicial proceedings, they don’t worthy their time-
And then, there is a specific free legal aid for those who face deportation ….. pure non sense …. people can stay in the country but people cannot stay in their homes, totally absurd
If they can place a ban on renters being evicted the same should apply for home owners
It’s one rule for the tenters and another ridiculous rule for homeowners
have your say