Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo of the Facebook home page. Dave Thompson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Facebook sued for allegedly using your private messages to tailor ads

An American blogger is suing the social media giant, claiming the messages are “systematically intercepted”.

AN AMERICAN LAWYER and political blogger has sued Facebook for allegedly using data from private messages to target ads.

Matt Campbell, author of the left-leaning website Blue Hog Report, filed a class-action complaint on Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Campbell is suing the tech giant alongside co-plaintiff Michael Hurley, an Oregon resident who was unavailable for comment.

“Systematically intercepted”

The core of their complaint concerns the access advertisers have to messages. From the complaint:

“Contrary to its representations, “private” Facebook messages are systematically intercepted by the Company in an effort to learn the contents of the users’ communications…”

“This practice… enables Facebook to mine user data and profit from those data by sharing them with third parties — namely, advertisers, marketers, and other data aggregators.”

A Facebook spokesperson said: “We continue to believe the allegations in this lawsuit have no merit and we will defend ourselves vigorously.”

Lack of transparency

Campbell and Hurley’s case is essentially based on Facebook’s alleged lack of transparency regarding the tally of a company’s “likes” on its network.

An advertiser can only send ads to a user if that user has some connection to the brand in question. A connection can include group membership or a “like” of that brand’s corporate page.

Hacker News revealed back in Oct. 2012 that a shared link within a private message between Facebook users also counts toward the total. Facebook admitted this to the Wall Street Journal in that publication’s follow-up story. In that same response, Facebook said that “absolutely no private information has been exposed.” Users can create as many likes as they want by sending links in messages, even if they don’t actually like a page.

Without consent

Now, Campbell and Hurley are accusing Facebook of invading users’privacy by reading personal messages without their consent.

This past October, Campbell sued Arkansas Lt. Gov. Mark Darr for violating the Freedom of Information Act when he refused to release his personal cell phone number in response to an open records request.

Campbell previously used his blog to point out problems in Darr’s campaign finance records, highlighting illegal funding and dubious expenses. Darr ended his congressional bid after just 17 days due to the controversy Campbell’s report created.

Campbell and Hurley are asking the court to make Facebook change its policy of scanning links from private messages, and give a monetary award for users whose messages were scanned.

- Richard Feloni

Read: Facebook and banks face lawsuit over misleading investors >

More: How to keep your social profiles safe >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 14 comments
Close
14 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds