Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
LAST UPDATE | 28 Mar 2019
FACEBOOK IS EXTENDING its ban on hate speech to prohibit the promotion and support of white nationalism and white separatism.
The company previously allowed such material even though it has long banned white supremacists.
The social network said today that it didn’t apply the ban previously to expressions of white nationalism because it linked such expressions with broader concepts of nationalism and separatism — such as American pride or Basque separatism (which are still allowed).
But civil rights groups and academics called this view “misguided” and have long pressured the company to change its stance.
Facebook said it concluded after months of “conversations” with them that white nationalism and separatism cannot be meaningfully separated from white supremacy and organised hate groups.
Critics have “raised these issues to the highest levels at Facebook (and held) a number of working meetings with their staff as we’ve tried to get them to the right place,” said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a Washington DC-based legal advocacy group.
“This is long overdue as the country continues to deal with the grip of hate and the increase in violent white supremacy,” she said.
We need the tech sector to do its part to combat these efforts.
Though Facebook said it has been working on the change for three months, it comes less than two weeks after Facebook received widespread criticism after the suspect in shootings at two New Zealand mosques that killed 49 people was able to broadcast the massacre on live video on Facebook.
As part of the change, people who search for terms associated with white supremacy will be directed to a group called Life After Hate, which was founded by former extremists who want to help people leave the violent far-right.
Clarke called the idea that white supremacism is different than white nationalism or white separatism a misguided “distinction without a difference.”
She said the New Zealand attack was a “powerful reminder about why we need the tech sector to do more to stamp out the conduct and activity of violent white supremacists.”
New Zealand reaction
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern welcomed Facebook’s move but said more needed to be done in the wake of the Christchurch mosque attacks.
She made it clear she believed it was a direct response to the criticism that has since been levelled at Facebook, which the accused gunman used to livestream the attack.
“Arguably these categories should always have fallen within (Facebook’s) community guidelines on hate speech,” she told reporters.
“But it’s positive that clarification has now been made in the wake of the attack here in Christchurch.”
Ardern added “there’s more work to do” and said New Zealand would play an active role in the debate.
“There are lessons to be learned here in Christchurch and we don’t want anyone to have to learn those lessons over again,” she said.
Ardern said the goal was to limit harmful content “while preserving a free, open and secure internet”.
She added that a global approach was needed.
“We can all promote good rules locally, but these platforms are global and I believe, therefore, that the solutions will need to be too,” she said.
“I think there would be a benefit for there being a globally coordinated response, that is what New Zealand will be looking for.”
On Tuesday, Australia warned social media executives they could be jailed for failing to quickly take down extremist material.
Social media platforms “can get an ad to you in half a second,” Prime Minister Scott Morrison told reporters ahead of the meeting.
“They should be able to pull down this sort of terrorist material and other types of very dangerous material in the same sort of time frame and apply their great capacities to the real challenges to keep Australians safe,” he added.
Ardern also spoke to Taoiseach Leo Varadkar yesterday evening.
Varadkar said he passed on the sympathies of the Irish people following the Christchurch attack.
“[We] spoke about how we might work together to take on the root causes and enablers of such attacks,” he added.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Seems one sided .
@DMur: shouldn’t it be all extremism?
Wonder will the do the same for the black hebrew Israelites. They are super racist homophobic and basically anti everything else!
@DMur: Yup it is. It should be identity politics for everyone or identity politics for no one.
@DMur: Sounds like something a white supremacist would say.
@Keith O’Reilly: No it actually doesn’t.
@andyearley: what about what about what about? What about? What about? Zzzzzzzzz
@DMur: This is open to ferocious abuse from the left. The definition of a white supremacist has been diluted so much recently that simply having a conservative opinion on immigration for example is enough to render you a Nazi in the public eye. Accusations such as these have already been seen to destroy the lives and careers of people who don’t conform to the narrative. Facebook is on a precipice right now and if they continue to find ways to clamp down on free speech (which is what all this is really about) then it’s going to collapse like tower seven never to be seen again.
Let it be said I detest the idea of white supremacy but for the screechers here I feel I have to point it out.
What constitutes “hate speech”? Who decides? Is every person still allowed to express their opinion on something, even if other people may find it distasteful?
@Sirius:
hate speech
noun
abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.
Amazing news, Trump supporters trying to put rational people into ovens again.
@Orla Smith: another dilusional liberal. Funny how hateful y’all are and then you want to point the fingers at everyone else. The only racists are democrats
I made one negative comment about turnips and now I’m banned from Facebook.
Yet another move by the turnip industry to silence us
@Brian Guilfoyle: This is worse than when Big Parsnip removed my Bebo
@Brian Guilfoyle: that was quite a turnip for the books.
@Brian Guilfoyle: Banned for swede f*-all
@Sean O’ Donovan: Can’t they just lettuce say what we want?
@Brian Guilfoyle: They carrot allow that.
Always best to prohibit and censor the expression of opinions and ideas that you’re unable to counter with reason and debate. Don’t think there’s any precedents in history where driving movements underground has resulted in those movements strengthening as a result either. A win win so, the hard of thinking don’t need to exercise their brains to deal with opinions with which they disagree, and if Facebook says the movements are gone then they’re definitely gone and will never return in the future.
@Orla Smith: the only racist here is trash like you. That symbol on your profile might as well be a swastika.
@Winston Smith: Shares in Homestore just rocketed…
@Orla Smith: Problem is people like yourself cant counter ‘rascit b.s.’ – real or imagined. All you seem to be able to do is call people names instead of providing a rational counter argument. Look back at your comment history, seriously!
GO’D won’t be happy…
About time.
One attack on Muslim’s everything get banned, years of use by ISIS to recruit followers all over the world and nothing happens.
About time.
What took so long?
(((Civil rights groups and academics)))
It’s crazy to see people on one side getting silenced, while the left can spout all the hate they like. Surly this isn’t right
have your say