Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
EARLY YESTERDAY, THE Colombian government announced that it will cease shelling positions held by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia or FARC, taking a major step towards peace for the first time since 1964.
Peace talks between the Bogota government and the rebels have been under way since 2012 but President Jose Manuel Santos’ gesture was an unprecedented step towards ending the conflict, which has killed more than 200,000 people and displaced more than five million.
The origin of the conflict
Fighting in Colombia has been ongoing since 1948, when populist president Jorge Eliecer Gaitan was assassinated. This led to a decade-long civil war that claimed over 200,000 lives and destabilised the country. In 1962, a US counterinsurgency team recommended the Colombian government attack communist groups which they claimed would attempt to wrest power from the US-supported government.
Special Warfare Centre commander General William P. Yarborough told the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that it should commit “paramilitary, sabotage and/or terrorist activities against known communist proponents” The Colombian army began attacking communist areas, attempting to reunify the country under the control of the national government. In response, the communist party, the PCC, formed FARC in 1964.
A shift in policy
At 1982 meeting, FARC altered its policy on fighting government forces. A boom in the cocaine market had seen their income rise dramatically and they moved from fighting in rural areas to attacking government forced in urban areas and regions rich in natural resources. This led president Belisario Betancur to negotiate a peace deal with FARC, which would last from 1984 to 1987. In this time, FARC members founded a political party, Union Patriotica (UP). The leftist party drew members from unions and among working classes, not just FARC members. In 1990, while talks were ongoing, government forces attacked a compound housing the FARC national executive. The government claimed this was because FARC was not committed to the peace process. Around 10,000 FARC soldiers fought government groups along 70 fronts between 1996 and 98.
Kidnappings and the IRA
In April 2002, the US House of Representatives Committee on International Relations found that at least 15 IRA members had been travelling in and out of Colombia since 1998.
It added that the IRA had received at least $2 million in funding from FARC drug operations.
This followed the arrest of two IRA men and a Sinn Féin representative in Colombia in August 2001. The Colombia Three were charged with training FARC-EP members in bomb-making. They would eventually be found guilty of travelling on false passports, but not guilty of training FARC members.
That decision was reversed after an appeal by the Attorney General of Colombia and they were sentenced to 17-year terms. The men vanished while on bail and returned to Ireland.
The US
In 1994 kidnapped an American scientist, and in 1999 they killed three US humanitarian workers. This increased pressure from Washington on successive Colombian governments.
However, it’s not as if the murder of their citizens is what sparked US involvement. The New York Times reports that America has spend $9 billion helping fight FARC since 1964.
Colombia is strategically important to the US both for its location in Latin America and its role as a leading producer of cocaine. FARC is estimated to make around $300 million a year from drugs and other illegal activity.
Modern times
In 2008, hundreds of thousands of people marched on the streets of Colombian towns and cities, demanding the end of FARC violence. In 2009 and 2010, FARC would release soldiers and hostages, some held for over a decade.
However, that did not mean an end to violence. In 2010, FARC killed 460 soldiers.
At the same time, key FARC leaders were killed. On 26 February 2012, the FARC announced that they would release their remaining ten political hostages, releasing the men that April.
That would lead to the talks in Havana which started that August and led to yesterday’s major step.
The future
Political scientist Jaime Zuluaga said the peace process is going in the right direction. “This is an step forward, one of the most significant in recent months,” Zuluaga said. Analyst Ariel Silva of the Peace and Reconciliation Foundation said Santos is pressuring the rebels to negotiate. “It is what any president would have done,” said Silva.
Negotiators seeking to end the more than five-decade guerrilla war at the talks in Havana are under growing international pressure to guarantee justice for crimes committed during the conflict.
Former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan warned during a recent visit to Havana that the International Criminal Court could step in if the final peace deal did not bring justice for victims of the war. Cuba and Norway are guarantors of the peace process. Now in recess, the full-fledged talks are due to resume March 17.
With reporting from AFP
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Not the only kind of snow that there will be plenty of there this week.
The rich really like to rub our noses in it.
63 inches of snow?
None of my 3 kids have ever even seen snow.
@Phil O’ Meara: And who’s fault is that? You could take them to Lapland for a few hundred euros if you set your mind to it!
@Neal Ireland Hello.: whoosh
@Hall Monitor: Don’t mock. It’s snow joke…
@Phil O’ Meara: Oh dear. What happens if they get stuck there and can’t get home? Helicopters at the ready?
Yes I am jealous snow, great food, good chat and a helicopter ride at the end of it all.
And no doubt they’ll be there to discuss global warming
Who cares?….These darlings won’t be shivering in bus queues….
Mother Nature Trumps Money
@Willie Bill Bryan: Trumping Trump also.
@Arfer Daly: It’s the heaviest snowfall in almost 20 years. Snow here is, of course, expected in Winter, especially in the mountains, but this amount is not normal. Zermatt has been cut off twice this month already, there are landslides and avalanches across the Alps. It’s definitely unusual.
@Arfer Daly: It is unusual in that the snowfall was so heavy. A once in 20yr event. Just accept your first comment was incorrect and move on. No shame in not reading the entire article and then posting a comment from a position of ignorance. It happens a lot around here.
No chance of an avalanche..
Delighted. And Leo and paschal will be late. Hurray.
An omen.
Poor devils
Luckily inside the volcano is quite warm. All the villains that attend can watch poor people being lowered into the piranhas tank in comfort.
Jesus god help them. 2 whole hours at one particular moment in time to travel the last 12 Km’s. There souls must be destroyed. I, like many others, endure that twice a day, 5 days a week on the M50. Go and pull the other one would ya
that’s tomorrow’s peasant hunt canceled so,ah feck
have your say