Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
devastating floods
Five killed in France and Germany as some areas endure worst flooding in a century
The waters are expected to keep rising for the coming days.
8.24am, 2 Jun 2016
29.7k
33
Screengrab:AP
Screengrab:AP
FLOODS HAVE DEVASTATED regions across France in the last 24 hours. Some areas experienced the worst flooding seen in a century or more yesterday.
The Seine River overflowed its banks, one French town was evacuated, travellers trapped on a submerged highway were rescued by soldiers and boat cruises in Paris were cancelled.
Meteorologists said more bad news is coming — the waters are expected to keep rising for days.
In neighbouring Germany, floods hit an area of Bavaria near the Austrian border, inundating some small towns and leaving four people dead.
The French government pressed to rescue thousands of people trapped in homes or cars in provincial towns, while drenched tourists were rearranging plans and schools in one region were shut down.
Emergency workers have carried out more than 8,000 rescue operations from the Belgian border south to Burgundy over the past two days, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said.
Paris City Hall closed roads along the shores of the Seine from the Left Bank in the east to the Eiffel Tower neighbourhood in the west, as water levels rose at least 4.3 metres higher than usual.
Jordan Muller, a 25-year-old from Seattle who is living in Paris, jogged along the Seine quay despite its slippery cobblestones.
“Well, my normal running route is completely gone,” she said.
I usually run up the stairs (toward) the Eiffel Tower. Got to the stairs and they are underwater. So I had to turn around. I have to find a new running route today.
Advertisement
Cruises cancelled
Signs for the Seine’s popular Bateaux-Mouches tourist boats in French, English and Japanese read “Due to flood waters, all cruises are cancelled.”
Unusually heavy rain has pummeled France and other European countries in recent days, causing exceptional delays at the French Open and forcing the evacuation of two prisons.
The town of Nemours, southeast of Paris, was the worst hit. Authorities were evacuating the centre of town yesterday even as Environment Minister Segolene Royal rushed to the site. Members of a canoe club were among those helping in the rescue, France-Info radio reported.
President Francois Hollande expressed his support for flood victims during a cabinet meeting, while Cazeneuve said the government is working to protect flood victims and pledged to pay for rescue and cleanup efforts.
Parts of neighbouring Germany also have seen storms and heavy rain since the weekend. Floods that hit the southwest on Sunday and Monday left four people dead.
Yesterday heavy rain caused floods in Bavaria, in the southeast, that inundated the towns of Simbach am Inn and Triftern.
Police said three bodies were found yesterday evening in a house in Simbach, but didn’t give further details. In nearby Julbach, the body of a woman was found in a stream.
In Germany, some 250 children in Triftern and 350 in Simbach were stuck at their schools for several hours after access roads were flooded, but they were able to leave yesterday evening as the water began to recede.
In Paris, the rain eased yesterday but more showers are expected today. City authorities warned residents and visitors to be vigilant around river banks and said high river levels were expected to peak tomorrow.
Paris houseboat resident Jean-Edwin Rhea, 47, had to cut power to his boat to avoid electrical problems.
“Apart from that, we find it very entertaining. Children loved it,” he said.
We were here last night and had some drinks on the terrace. It was beautiful, with lots of lights, the rain.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
What exactly do they expect to happen with every other part of society open? People travelling in and out, 30 kids in every classroom?
Do they want to have 2-3 cases in a capital city, with 1.4 million people literally on top of each other in the second smallest county.
Because that’s not ever going to happen, until there’s a vaccine and enough herd immuntiy.
@David Lee: we need to live with it and keep the economy moving. Locking down the country is not the way to go. People are losing jobs and livelihoods. Grandparents can’t see grandchildren, older people are being isolated. The government need to think of other options-sadly they cannot.
@Edel O’Dea: your so right the amount of older people now with severe depression and anxiety is so unfair . I’m even struggling at min and Jesus the younger people I’m so sad about the whole thing . Older people won’t even go to shops for food /heating so afraid very sad. I’m not a holy person at all but I’m praying and hoping we can sort this
@David Lee: you have heard of an immune system protecting you and me for thousands of years. But for some reason to now think your immune system will do what it’s designed to do make ya a conspiracy theorist
@David Lee: 30 kids in every classroom !!
Where, what country ??
If you can find one 2nd class of this size please I’d be impressed.
F8ll of sh8te everyday.
@David Lee: so if the numbers go down, even a fraction..then thats the justification they will take to imoliment these lockdowns for as long as they wish……….which of course should logically lead them to lockdown much sooner rather than wait for a specific number to be achieved, ..I apologise to all for mentioning logic
@Bain triail aisti: All 3 of my kids have/had 30+ with 32 being the smallest class size.
Youngest lad is in a class of 35 at present.
In Tallaght, one of the hotspots reported on 2 weeks ago as having high levels if cases.
All local primary schools are jammed with kids.
@ed o brien: No obviously the immune response differs in different people. Thats why I wouldn’t use a blanket statement that your immune system will protect you from this virus. It may not. I’m specifically talking about the 100+ “healthy” people who died even though they had no underlying condition?
@David Lee: lockdown in kildare, people still travelled in and out of it, schools open and people working but still managed to reduce numbers and get out of lockdown. So why can’t Dublin, just because there’s more people doesn’t mean the same affect can’t happen if everyone bothers their arse. Stop blaming the airports, they don’t all travel just to stay in Dublin. Its down to the individual
@Tom Jones: tell that to HIV, SARS or ebola patients. How the hell can you immune sysm2fight something it’s never come across from the other side of the world ffs.
@NotMyIreland: yes, and your immune system works less well the older you are, and work on changing that is still in its infancy. As of now, you could “boost” your immunity all you want and still end up sick or dead, years before your time. So those who need a good immune system the most are the least likely to have one.
Also, since an overactive immune system can create a cytokine storm and kill a COVID patient, maybe “boosting” the immune system – even if we knew how to do that appropriately – might not be the best thing to do.
@NotMyIreland: the data from HSPC report says there is more deaths with underlying conditions than confirmed cases of covid-19. The full figure has possible and probable cases and the underlying conditions deaths is larger number than confirmed cases.
Where did you get 100 healthy people from?
There’s around 100 under 55 maybe.
Vitamin D deficiencies should be included as am underlying condition which it isn’t but all deaths correlated with Vitamin D levels.
So, if the measures introduced don’t help reduce the numbers, that means that restaurants and gastro pubs weren’t the issue in the first place and should be allowed to re-open.
@Joe: or it means that the level of non-adherence to guidelines has increased and there seems to be plenty of evidence to support that. I’m not sure that pubs and restaurants were ever blamed for increases but as they are places where people congregate and share facilities indoors, it was seen as prudent to temporarily close them until cases are back to a tolerable level.
@GrumpyAulFella: Exactly its a case of when the infection rates rise, limiting the places where people can congregate to those with the greatest importance to society as a whole. Like hospitals and schools over pubs and restaurants.
@GrumpyAulFella: they were specifically blamed. NPHET then turned around and said that contract tracers don’t bother to ask where you have been but only who your close contacts are. In other words that had no evidence to support this claim.
It then turned out that restaurants in Ireland were being blamed on the back of a study carried out in the US.
I understand that that the job NPHET has is extremely difficult, but they need to deal in facts and talk about how things relate directly to Ireland!
They have caused people to lose jobs and businesses to close on the back of studies carried out on the other side of the world where adherence to Covid restrictions is a lot more relaxed!
@Joe: I actually didn’t know that NPHET blamed pubs and restaurants for the spread. Is there a source for that? The only comments I saw from NPHET on it was a reluctance to open them at the same time as schools and they being a likely ground for virus spread so to close temporarily when cases spiked to attempt to control spread.
Looking more like NPHET and this Government is failing daily withing the Casedemic numbers, blamed the pubs and restaurants, closed them from serving indoors, masks obligatory going into shops, nothing is working.
Just points to the fact that they are wrong on so many levels.
Open up the whole country, let those with issues isolate if they wish, they are old enough to take that responsibility on themselves. Ditch the obligatory mask wearing, unless an individual wishes to do so. Keep the 2 metre rule, and reiterate on washing of hands more often as this is a contact virus Not airborne.
And let people who want to, get on with their lives.
Because everything else is just fluff and feeding their own egos, this Govt have failed in their responsibility to govern, absolved themselves of anything to do with this Casedemic, and handed it off to NPHET who are just going around in circles head scratching.
@PeeedOff: You didn’t see the research conducted here in the Mater hospital that showed the viral droplets released can travel further than 2m and hang in the air for up to an hour and a half? Not quite fully airborne but certainly not only from contact. Other international studies also show only 1 in 5 cases have been contracted through contact with infected surfaces.
@NotMyIreland: that’s a physics experiment, there’s no actual infection study there, so they’ve no evidence that hanging air particles can deliver a viral load to infect.
To trace infections most cases show close contacts so the amount of possible infections from tiny hanging particles is very much unknown and the mater study doesn’t further the unknown effect of breathing in exhaled air.
The time spend in close contact is shown to be majority traced spread.
@NotMyIreland: that’s true but similar research has been made in Japan months ago already. It’s not a new fact. The difficult Truth to accept is there’s nothing we can do about it unless we lock ourselves at home for a year. Which we cannot do.
@NotMyIreland: so I accept the concept that droplets hang in the air for up to an hour and a half. Did they test the virulence of the virus after different time slots? How infectious is the virus after 90 minutes of hanging around? What sort of viral load is there if I walk through the space where someone coughed an hour ago? What are the chances of occupying the coughed in area an hour after someone else was there? Studies can’t be evaluated in isolation from real life scenarios. 6 months ago there were YouTube videos of how to wash your shopping because some study found traces of virus on surfaces after 48 hours. The fact that it’s was non-viable was ignored.
@Derdaly: Here ya go. It’s a contact Virus. Even WHO acknowledge this and every other health body. It is NOT an airborne virus, they even state 1 metre is plenty of space, we are working on 2 metres beyond the travel of a mucus attached virus.
“Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 spreads between people through direct, indirect (through contaminated objects or surfaces), or close contact with infected people via mouth and nose secretions. These include saliva, respiratory secretions or secretion droplets. These are released from the mouth or nose when an infected person coughs, sneezes, speaks or sings, for example. People who are in close contact (within 1 metre) with an infected person can catch COVID-19 when those infectious droplets get into their mouth, nose or eyes.
To avoid contact with these droplets, it is important to stay at least 1 metre away from others, clean hands frequently, and cover the mouth with a tissue or bent elbow when sneezing or coughing. When physical distancing (standing one metre or more away) is not possible, wearing a fabric mask is an important measure to protect others. Cleaning hands frequently is also critical.”
It’s the first question answered on the Who website here.
@Derdaly: Yeah I take your point on the fact it is only a study of droplets and how they behave. There is the possibility they are infectious. Has it been proven they aren’t? Otherwise best err on the side of caution until it is proven either way. Re the surfaces. The original experiment sprayed huge quantities on to the surfaces and checked the viability of the virus after set times. But when they checked real world doses in a fresh experiment the times were reduced to minutes and hours instead of days. Again there was absolutely no harm in taking the precautions until it had been disproved.
@Isabel Oliveira: I know its not a new fact. I only highlighted it as its Irish research, which may help it resonate more with people in this country. There is plenty we can do about it Isabel. Other nations have reduced the spread far more effectively than we have. Yes there will be outbreaks but its about limiting them. Keeping strictly to the 2m distance reduces the risk, as does limiting the time spent in indoor areas, as does correct mask wearing, as does washing your hands. These are the things that have slipped recently. The things we need to do are not hard, the hard part is staying alert and motivated enough to stick with them. We could also start by limiting numbers to 50 persons indoors in pubs and restaurants at anyone time, less in smaller premises, hence reducing their risk factor and allowing them all to open and stay open. Like they do in Sweden.
@NotMyIreland: So it’s another “so what” study. Unless it’s linked with a virulence study it’s just another piece of noise. All the evidence points to the fact that it is unlikely to catch the virus through casual contact. It’s spread in households, workplaces, other residential environments such as nursing homes, prisons, hospitals, schools and universities, events such as religious services, choirs etc seem to be an issue as people project their voices. So the message hasn’t changed, keep your distance, mask up when inside public places, wash your hands. People will catch this but we need to get on with life. The risk is those either not seeking or getting treatment in the current environment becoming the actual victims of epidemic.
@PeeedOff: Here’s something from your own source, something you left out:
“There have been reported outbreaks of COVID-19 in some closed settings, such as restaurants, nightclubs, places of worship or places of work where people may be shouting, talking, or singing. In these outbreaks, aerosol transmission, particularly in these indoor locations where there are crowded and inadequately ventilated spaces where infected persons spend long periods of time with others, cannot be ruled out. More studies are urgently needed to investigate such instances and assess their significance for transmission of COVID-19.”
Hundreds of scientists signed an open letter calling for the recognition that airborne transmission is a reality:
“Studies by the signatories and other scientists have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that viruses are released during exhalation, talking, and coughing in microdroplets small enough to remain aloft in air and pose a risk of exposure at distances beyond 1–2 m from an infected individual …..Hand washing and social distancing are appropriate but, in our view, insufficient to provide protection from virus-carrying respiratory microdroplets released into the air by infected people. This problem is especially acute in indoor or enclosed environments, particularly those that are crowded and have inadequate ventilation [17] relative to the number of occupants and extended exposure periods (as graphically depicted in Figure 1). For example, airborne transmission appears to be the only plausible explanation for several superspreading events investigated that occurred under such conditions [10], and others where recommended precautions related to direct droplet transmissions were followed.” https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa939/5867798
@NotMyIreland: I agree. I also think that while the vast majority of us stick to the guidelines out shopping or travelling – ie among relative strangers, where we didn’t always feel safe – that we weren’t sticking to them so much with our extended family and friends, where we felt safe. If someone sticks out their hand to say goodbye, you automatically grab it rather than offend. Likewise with a hug. Over and over, I was in groups where social distancing started out ok, but gradually eased off the longer we were together – almost the opposite of what’s needed. And nobody wants to be the killjoy and mention it. So I think cutting contacts for a while, by 50% or whatever, is good advice.
@Chris Murray: 100% agree and to be fair I’m guilty of that too. I was only thinking how I actually end up putting the ones closest to me at risk when I go out of my way to maintain the distance with strangers. I’d add work to the list of places it slips quickest too as you dont want to be the guy or girl in the workplace who is getting at others, well I don’t anyway. I probably mentioned it once or twice at the beginning but you end up just giving up. I guess its when your in environments that are so familiar that its easiest to feel more comfortable and let your guard down.
@Chris Murray: So you mean like Schools, Meat processing Plants, Factories, Offices, Buses, Taxis. Is that what you mean, because they ain’t closing those and they are infested. But no point to the ones where there have been no clusters. Hmmm!!!
@PeeedOff: They closed them as they are not essential, very important true but we can survive without them, just about.
They are however where lots of different people are in the same space and that is why they were closed.
So you do not care about anybody getting sick or dying.
@PeeedOff: It’s like what Ronan Glynn/NPHET have been saying for weeks if not months – we’re trying to open up society again – prioritising work/schools again, while keeping the bug under control. There’s a pretty direct link between the number of total human contacts and the number of cases. It’s basically a zero sum game. If we increase our contacts in one area, we need to decrease them in another until we get things back under control again.
I’m optimistic we can do it. Social distancing etc. should reduce flu numbers and will hopefully keep COVID at bay until the new fast tests – the best news for ages – come online in sufficient quantity to break COVID. But that will be months away, sometime next year, and we have to get through the winter first.
There’s a cover up going on here in relation to schools, Dublin on Level 3, cases the same or worse, schools still open. It’s as plain as the bald cone head on the Minister for propaganda….sorry Health head that cases have skyrocketed since schools reopened!!
@Shinners Abú: I tend to agree with you on that one.Seems they are determined to keep schools open and the pubs/restaurants are the scapegoats. Numbers were low all summer when they were open.
But added to that there is a level of complacency and not giving a sht to contend with too.
It’s never ‘just 2/3 weeks’. Maybe this video from the Seanad Covid Committee will give people some perspective on ‘Covid’ deaths and hospital numbers.
@Anna Anna: The Chief Clinical Officer of the HSE, Dr Colm Henry said he didn’t know the cycle threshold of the PCR test when questioned on it’s results. It’s 35-45 cycles. No more than 30 is recommended, otherwise you’re likely picking up a lot of dead viral material. Cillian de Gascun tweeted about the cycle threshold last week and said it is not decided by them but by the manufacturer of the test kits. He also said that if we develop our own in-house tests we could re-evaluate the cycle threshold https://youtu.be/y_cl63FgAhQ
@Anna Anna:
They tell us to follow the science.
Except when the science isn’t what they want to hear and goes against the approach they are recommending for the country.
And when you ask them for the science that supports their approach, “I’ll get back to you” is usually the answer, just like the guy who couldn’t respond to Mr McNamara at the committee hearing yesterday.
I think Mr McNamara will be waiting a while if he’s expecting a reply.
@Anna Anna: Do you know why the Gov’t has not appointed a full time CMO? We have had a partime CMO Dr Glynn for a number of months now since Dr Holohan stepped down, It seems strange that in a Pandemic it is not a priority of Gov’t to do so, have made enquiries in my local constituency Dublin North West but no one in authority has an answer. Hoping you can answer as you seem to be very knowledgeable on the Covid situation.
@Anna Anna: just as we were discussing here a few days back Anna. It is astounding .
It is simply not possible to apply severe & devastating public policy restrictions based on totally skewed statistics. It won’t even be possible to conduct valid research in this manner.
Simple calculations such as CFR or Percentages hospitalised are skewed and the public is given a scenario that does not relate to reality.
@Anna Anna:
has anything changed since may ?
Only 5 autopsy’s from 1458 deaths on may 11th.
irish times article..I can’t post link
how can they adjust numbers if they don’t know ?
@SquintEastwood: there’s only been a few denotifications in the last few months so not much has changed. As Michael McNamara highlighted there are serious delays with getting the coroner’s report through the system. I’d say it’ll be next year before we hear about all the denotified deaths from the last 6 months.
@Divad Nayr: Masks mandatory in all outdoor areas in Madrid and other parts of Spain for months now, huge compliance & strict on the spot fines, Just look how they’re getting on.
@Anna Anna: says it all! That’s completely my take on this ridiculous recording of cases/deaths! Meanwhile the economy is being run into the ground and those awaiting hospital appointments are being left on the very very long finger, many who will not have a good outcome as a result.
@Divad Nayr: I agree masks are easy for 99% of people and there should be a zero tolerance approach indoors. No shirt, shoes or mask means no service. Shops are still letting too many people in without them.
@Joan Featherstone: how will matters improve for those awaiting appointments if we open up in full and hospitals become flooded with admissions and ICU cases? That’s the whole point of lockdown, to get these services running and control admissions.
@Divad Nayr: what ever about those who claim not to be able (majority of them are BS), the people who wear masks on the chin should be fined and should be ashamed of themselves
@Tom Purcell: Jesus Tom you’re heavy on fines on everybody. Let people be. They may need to do so to alleviate breathing for a while. I sometimes must remove mine for a minute or two as I struggle on some days.
@Divad Nayr: If you want to wear a mask 24 hours a day, go ahead.
Making it mandatory for all outdoors will stop people from going outside and getting valuable fresh air and contribute to depression, anxiety and everything that goes with it.
@David Lee: Huge compliance? The usual suspects didn’t seem to comply, according to this El Pais article “How Spain’s face mask rules are being broken”……
@Chris Murray: it was a very unwise decision to make masks mandatory outdoors by Spain. Thank god we didn’t do that in Portugal as I certainly wouldn’t want my mum walking outside with a mask on. She is already a liability for falling and I find the surgical masks make it even worse as they climb up your face and end up in your eyes if your face is a certain shape . Furthermore I want her to get fresh air & sun when she goes out during autumn and winter , not sun on the forehead only. It’s a nonsensical rule for walking around in the street or at the beach. People tend to ignore rules like that. Also implementing rules like that in September when it’s still rather hot is crazy.
@Isabel Oliveira: I agree with you about the masks getting into your eyes and impeding vision, which is one reason I wear a face shield rather than a mask when I can, especially outdoors, even though face shields may be less effective as a barrier. They’re also “friendlier” than masks, and it’s easier for hard of hearing people, like me, to communicate with someone wearing a face shield. But I would have no problem with someone elderly wearing neither, if there was a physical or psychological risk, if that’s what they chose to do.
Also agree that masks aren’t necessary outdoors except where it’s not possible to social distance ie in crowds and if virus levels are high.
Headline should read there is no evidence to keep the county under these restrictions. It’s shocking that all death ‘with covid’ are marked as ‘of covid’ until the coroner reverses it, which can take up to six months ? What is wrong with people that can’t see this as been wrong
@SB: Why would Glynn be like that? Why would so many politicians, who hate to do bad news stuff, who hate to do anything that might be unpopular, support him and the rest of NPHET?
@Chris Murray: tell me why Ireland has some of the most most strict covid restrictions in Europe, most other countries in Europe pubs and restaurants are open and people are just getting on with their lives as best they can, but NPHET are out on their own and have constantly blamed pubs and foreign travel when the reality is anything but, hardly any cases and no spikes are related to pubs or travel, yet they continue to demonise and punish pubs and travel foreign travel, its clear for all to see.
@Chris Murray: we have such an incompetent spineless government they are terrified to make any rational decisions themselves so they are just doing what NPHET tell them, that’s your answer.
@SB: Many of those countries are now getting COVID spikes much worse than ours. NPHET will probably soon have the cast-iron 100% evidence that you need, showing pubs to be a factor in COVID spread, although you’ll be determined ignore common sense and to pick all manner of holes in that evidence too. Every sector is blaming somebody else, but COVID doesn’t appear by magic. The studies in the US, Germany and elsewhere clearly show pubs and restaurants play a role, and it’s hardly likely that our boozy/anti-establishment culture – much less socially distant than others – is somehow less responsible for COVID spread.
ALL our COVID cases came originally from foreign travel. NPHET figures showed foreign travel responsible for about 20% of new cases back in June. Since then NPHET has said that foreign travel accounts for 2%, which shows me that NPHET are honest enough about the figures, and is not “demonising” foreign travel.
@SB: But why are they like that when you, according to yourself, are not?How did you escape when all of NPHET and practically every politician became irrational, spineless etc.?
@Adam Conroy: NPHET needs to be totally disbanded and replaced with a team of professionals who are highly experienced in virology, and not just doctors, and who make sensible and rational decisions, and not knee jerk reactions which will ultimately destroy the economy and people’s mental health.
@SB: NPHET looks pretty broad based to me. Isn’t Cillian de Gascun a virologist? Do you want Sam MacConkey on board too? (Head of Viral Disease Research Programme, at MRC Laboratories The Gambia 2003-2005)
Nobody wants to close schools. What people want is to be able to work & the reopening of the sectors paralysed by the government & NPHET.
Pubs had 1 outbreak last week, 2 outbreaks open status in total
Schools 13 outbreaks, 36 open in total
9 open direct provision, 1 open in poultry processing, 26 open in nursing homes, 3 in community hospitals, 33 in residential care, 4 in hospitals.
People do not appreciate being lied to & want the reopening of their businesses and travel.
I saw lonely elderly people being asked to leave an esplanade yesterday after 1h45 although nobody else was waiting for tables and they were happy reading their book in a social environment, having a meal & enjoying a glass of wine or a coffee. From an esplanade in the open air. This is absolutely bonkers.
@Brian Flavin: how will it, they are recording deaths wrong the PCR test is flawed picking up old virus. It should only be reported by hospital number as this will give a true indication, we also have the CDC saying it is not airborne. You love to scare people who hate you in charge permanent lockdown with you.
@Karl Mc Cauley: It’s a contact Virus. Even WHO acknowledge this and every other health body. Only recommendation is to be 1 Metre away from another person. The molecules are too dense to travel any distance.
“Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 spreads between people through direct, indirect (through contaminated objects or surfaces), or close contact with infected people via mouth and nose secretions. These include saliva, respiratory secretions or secretion droplets. These are released from the mouth or nose when an infected person coughs, sneezes, speaks or sings, for example. People who are in close contact (within 1 metre) with an infected person can catch COVID-19 when those infectious droplets get into their mouth, nose or eyes.
To avoid contact with these droplets, it is important to stay at least 1 metre away from others, clean hands frequently, and cover the mouth with a tissue or bent elbow when sneezing or coughing. When physical distancing (standing one metre or more away) is not possible, wearing a fabric mask is an important measure to protect others. Cleaning hands frequently is also critical.”
It’s the first question answered on the Who website here.
@John Doyle: A new study conducted here in the Mater hospital showed the viral particles can travel more than the 2m and hang in the air for more than an hour and a half. Not truly airborne but certainly is contained in the air, especially in settings without ventilation.
@John Doyle: Read the study from the Mater. And learn how gravity works dude. The lighter the object the longer it takes to fall. Drop a feather and a stone from a rooftop, you’ll quickly see how it works. Lol!!
@Alan: Virus particles are denser, attached to mucus, they are even denser still. This is a known fact. But don’t let the facts get in the way of your non exist ant knowledge of particles and gravity.
@Mark Behan: You are misrepresenting what the CDC says. Here it is:
“Current data do not support long range aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, such as seen with measles or tuberculosis. Short-range inhalation of aerosols is a possibility for COVID-19, as with many respiratory pathogens. However, this cannot easily be distinguished from “droplet” transmission based on epidemiologic patterns. Short-range transmission is a possibility particularly in crowded medical wards and inadequately ventilated spaces3. Certain procedures in health facilities can generate fine aerosols and should be avoided whenever possible.”
So, even under pressure from Trump, CDC do NOT say the virus is “not airborne”.
“There have been reported outbreaks of COVID-19 in some closed settings, such as restaurants, nightclubs, places of worship or places of work where people may be shouting, talking, or singing. In these outbreaks, aerosol transmission, particularly in these indoor locations where there are crowded and inadequately ventilated spaces where infected persons spend long periods of time with others, cannot be ruled out. More studies are urgently needed to investigate such instances and assess their significance for transmission of COVID-19.”
@PeeedOff: As I already posted, you have omitted some relevant quotes from your own WHO source. Furthermore, that evolution in WHO thinking came about as a result of an open letter signed by 239 scientists:
“It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
We appeal to the medical community and to the relevant national and international bodies to recognize the potential for airborne spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There is significant potential for inhalation exposure to viruses in microscopic respiratory droplets (microdroplets) at short to medium distances (up to several meters, or room scale), and we are advocating for the use of preventive measures to mitigate this route of airborne transmission.
Studies by the signatories and other scientists have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that viruses are released during exhalation, talking, and coughing in microdroplets small enough to remain aloft in air and pose a risk of exposure at distances beyond 1–2 m from an infected individual”
Dear Dubliners, it shows you can learn from all the culchies on how to follow guidelines and keep numbers down. Just stay in your own county and please try to resist the urge to drive down to other counties for a sneaky pint. We know who you are and WE WILL REPORT you!! :-))
@ed o brien: Of course it is. dubs are always at fault. Like Carlinford refusing a Dublin couple and they have one of the highest infection rates in the country
Water safety boss calls for new measures after teens' deaths in Buncrana
Eimer McAuley
5 hrs ago
1.4k
New York
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs was violent but there was no sex trafficking, court told
Updated
7 hrs ago
8.5k
Road Safety
CCTV from petrol station captured clear images of crash that killed Garda Kevin Flatley
Updated
16 hrs ago
112k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 187 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 126 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 165 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 129 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 92 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 150 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 88 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 95 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 111 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 100 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 83 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say