Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Leinster House Gareth Chaney/Photocall Ireland

Media representatives call for Freedom of Information fees to be dropped

Journalists speaking before the Finance Committee today also said the whole administrative system needs reform.

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE media today appealed to the government to commit to a real review of the Freedom of Information legislation.

The main focus for representatives appearing before the Finance Committee today was the the €15 charge for requests which they all said should be dropped.

Emma O’Kelly, RTÉ’s Education Correspondent said that even a small fee “goes against the spirit of the legislation which should be for openness and transparency”.

Seamus Dooley of the National Union of Journalists told the committee that the idea of a registered user fee would be considered by the NUJ whereby journalists would pay a set annual fee instead of individual payments for each request.

Dooley went on to say that there was not one body he could think of that should not be covered by the law. “That doesn’t mean you can’t have protection,” he said. “There will be circumstances where exclusion is appropriate but that should not be the norm.”

Richard Boyd Barrett said he was “worried that the issue of commercial sensitivity is being used as a catch all phrase for stopping people getting information that is very much in the public interest”, particularly when it comes to bodies like NAMA.

Journalist Ken Foxe said that reporters tend to “tailor requests” so that they are sending them to bodies they know will cooperate and that they will get valuable information from.

RTÉ journalist Colm O Mongain told the committee that the same request could be sent to two different bodies and a reporter could get back documents with two completely different approaches.

“It could be that one department takes a more stringent approach due to the volume or the ethos in that department,” he said.

On the issue of payment for request, the committee chair Ciaran Lynch questioned whether there was a justification for a fee based on the fact that the media are working on a business model and profiting from the information.

The committee will now discuss the findings of today’s meetings and make recommendations on whether the legislation should be ammended.

Read: Information Commissioner welcomes Freedom of Information reform>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
15 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Mullins
    Favourite Pat Mullins
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 2:23 PM

    Surely someone is getting paid to copy all these documents and to make a decision on the request. A fair fee should be payable to cover such costs. All taxpayers pay for services such as getting birth certificates etc. why should media be any different? Otherwise they get would their stories for free at taxpayers expense and then make money selling the story revealed. Makes no sense .

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Oireachtas Retort
    Favourite Oireachtas Retort
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 2:30 PM

    I can get FOI from the UK where I pay no tax, no so here. The fees are a very deliberate disincentive.

    Freedom of information is an extension of freedom of speech, as recognized in international law.

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Oireachtas Retort
    Favourite Oireachtas Retort
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 2:32 PM

    Here is the thestory.ie Oireachtas submission

    http://thestory.ie/2013/02/01/submission-to-oireachtas-committee-on-foi-amendment/

    Only six or pages, worth a read to anyone.

    6
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 2:44 PM

    I think it’s probably worth pointing out that while the media might be the most regular users of FOI requests, they’re not the only ones.

    In fact, you’d probably find more ordinary punters willing to send in requests and encourage greater transparency in the workings of the state if they didn’t have to get a cheque or postal order for €15 to do so.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Little Jim
    Favourite Little Jim
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 2:56 PM

    You’re not wrong there Gavin.
    The idea seems to be to keep joe soap out of the loop, then complain that the public are apathetic.
    And who came up with the postal order bit, that’s just weird.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Harry Price
    Favourite Harry Price
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 3:20 PM

    THE cover up still goes on

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Paul Hayes
    Favourite John Paul Hayes
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 7:20 PM

    It is in digital format. However, retrieving it in a meaningful way is far from simple since it is exists in badly designed and disconnected systems. There have been many botched attempts at correcting this. Botched due to both complete lack of understanding the scale of the problem and the unwillingness (for many reasons) of those “inside” to help alleviate the problem.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute made
    Favourite made
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 3:16 PM

    The reason the government charge is because they don’t want the information out there in the first place and by putting a fee on it it puts most people off sending in requests.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Patrick Cadogan
    Favourite Patrick Cadogan
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 4:08 PM

    This info is owned by the citizenry and not just taxpayers….it should be free to access

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Professor Mehoop
    Favourite Professor Mehoop
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 3:33 PM

    How can this service possibly be made free? Imagine all the loopers sending in spurious requests just for the hell of it. That, and why should one sector of society (the meeja) be subsidised by the taxpayer, and not any other? Maybe we should call for sports photographers to get free travel so they can go to sports events around the country? Meeja doing itself proud today, as always. I’ve often said that too many people do useless degrees, end up in meeja or “writing” blogs, being “politics junkies” (please!), and here’s just more evidence of that.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gavin Sheridan
    Favourite Gavin Sheridan
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 5:39 PM

    Loopers are citizens, though. But voluminous, vexatious or manifestly unreasonable requests can be rejected under Section 10.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Paul Hayes
    Favourite John Paul Hayes
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 7:27 PM

    All “loopers” should have access to all government information and access should be free since they are already paying for it. Besides, its what one does with the information that is key.
    An uninformed or worse, misinformed citizenry is only a good thing for a government. The reverse is the ideal for society. Our elected representatives should be kept on their toes at all times.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seamus Dooley
    Favourite Seamus Dooley
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 7:44 PM

    The NUJ position is there should be no fees – we did not say it should be free only for journalists. If fees are retained there should be a public interest test.

    Personal information (which account for 70pc of requests) can be secured without any fee.

    . In calculating costs to the State you need to consider the money saved as a result of FOI requests which have revealed waste.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Al S Macthomais
    Favourite Al S Macthomais
    Report
    Feb 6th 2013, 5:57 PM

    Stop the public gaining any information on back room deals between politicians, business donations and other shady practices.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds