Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
CLAIMS THAT GARDAÍ involved in the arrest of Clare Daly for alleged drink-driving two years ago are not cooperating with an ombudsman investigation have been rejected today.
Independent TD Mick Wallace told the Dáil yesterday that the Garda Ombudsman Commission (GSOC) had told Daly’s solicitor that gardaí directly involved in her arrest had declined to provide their accounts or cooperate with the investigation.
Wallace claimed the letter stated that GSOC had failed to get the cooperation of gardaí in the releasing documentation related to the arrest.
Daly was pulled over by gardaí for a wrong turn and arrested after a breathaliser failed to register a reading on 28 January 2013. Details of the arrest were subsequently leaked to media. She was subsequently cleared and later complained to GSOC and the Data Protection Commissioner.
GSOC has confirmed the authenticity of the letter Wallace read into the Dáil record yesterday.
Mick Wallace’s #dail contribution on gardaí not cooperating with the GSOC investigation into Clare Daly’s arrest pic.twitter.com/YZesXhtnQu
The garda watchdog said the letter was sent “sometime ago” but declined to confirm exactly when it was sent. Daly and Wallace did not respond to requests for comments today.
Advertisement
Documents seen by TheJournal.ie indicate that the two gardaí who arrested Daly have cooperated with the inquiry. It’s also understood that several other gardaí based in Kilmainham, who were asked to give evidence, also cooperated.
The contents of the GSOC letter are disputed by the Garda Representative Association (GRA), which represents rank-and-file gardaí.
‘Perception of non-cooperation’
GRA spokesperson Damien McCarthy said that its members fully cooperated with every aspect of the investigation and hit out what he said was another example of TDs abusing Dáil privilege.
He said he was not aware of the letter until Wallace’s claims in the Dáil.
We have a perception out there again that we’re failing to cooperate with inquiries and I’m rejecting that. The people I represent fully cooperated with the investigation at all times.
McCarthy said the issue is having a damaging effect on the gardaí he represents and the GRA.
He said that the GRA, through its solicitors, has been writing to GSOC on an almost monthly basis since the investigation was established in early 2013 to obtain an update, but has not received a satisfactory response.
It’s understood that the investigation file is with the Ombudsman Commission for review. A GSOC spokesperson told us: “The investigation is ongoing and is expected to be concluded within the next few months.”
Taoiseach Enda Kenny pledged to raise Wallace’s claims with Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald. However, Fitzgerald said today that GSOC had told her “consistently” in recent months that “they’re happy with the level of cooperation they’re getting”.
“I need to get details of that GSOC letter and precisely when it was written. My understanding is that there is ongoing cooperation between the gardaí and GSOC,” she told reporters.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
I’m no fan of Wallace or Daly. Very much the opposite in truth. But how are they the protagonists here?
If the Gardaí dealt with you like this, staging an arrest and then leaking it, how tweedled would you be? It’s not right and the fact that they are once again beyond being taken to account for it is a travesty. Every attempt to reform the current Garda failings in structure and procedure has been met with nothing short of utter belligerence and contempt. How can anyone following this (and other recent issues) not take the view that our police force considers itself above the laws they are sworn to uphold?
It is corruption at the heart of our civil service, plain and simple.
The arrest was not staged. Clare Daly as she has admitted herself was drinking whiskey on an empty stomach before she got into her car and started driving around Dublin 8. She tried to make an illegal right turn which attracted the attention of gardai who correctly arrested her on suspicion of drink driving so they could obtain a urine sample.
Is Daly now suggesting the Gardai forced whiskey down her gullet? And has the righteous hobo Wallace paid back the 1.5 million euro in VAT that he trousered for himself?
Personally I hope they do get re-elected, because although I disagree with the independent thing, somebody, something needs to stop the madness that is the established stalwart FG, FF and Lab tie up that is doing no favours for Ireland or it’s people
lets face it ..we could get a FF+ Lad or FG +Lad or FF+FG or phuck it FG+FG + LAB and tie the whole thing up..because let me tell you..they dont give a phuck between them as long as they all met up in the dail bar next year and divi up the pay and pensions
“Is Daly now suggesting the Gardai forced whiskey down her gullet? And has the righteous hobo Wallace paid back the 1.5 million euro in VAT that he trousered for himself?”
I’ve said above I have no truck with the politics or general carry on of these people. But that doesn’t mean that agents of the state can abuse them. They may be politicians, and all that sadly entails, but they are still people, they have rights.
Since you at least had the decency to use your words, rather than clicking buttons in a ludicrous internet points charade, please answer me this. Why were the Gardaí driving behind her for so long, in excess of 5 minutes by their own admission? Why did their breathalyser not work? Why was a non threatening and co-operating suspect handcuffed, against Garda procedure (now and at the time) and, as recently established by the Supreme Court in the Cullen case, in breach of her constitutional rights? Why were the details in the press faster than the results of the *negative* urine test could be returned?
These things could all be a grand coincidence, you’re certainly entitled to that opinion although I do not share it. But we (and by that I do me everyone, from leftist loon to corporate drone-iticians) have these protections for reasons that are not political. They are supposed to transcend all of that, although this comments section would seem very inclined to try and disprove that.
Perhaps that is the saddest thing of all. Perhaps the Gardaí are only taking what we are freely giving them. What a horrible thought.
John Considine, who said that she was a “non threatening and co-operating” person? From what we see and hear from her I doubt very much that she was a polite co-operating person on the night of her arrest. You wonder why their equipment didn’t work properly – I’m sure they’d find that funny that a person would ask that question about the equipment they’re supplied with. The Supreme Court decision you refer to does not say that handcuffing any person was a breach of their constitutional rights, it said that a policy of handcuffing every arrested person was not best practice. Any police force around the world would find it ridiculous to think that arrested persons wouldn’t be handcuffed – for the safety of the police officer and the arrested person as they never know the state of mind of the person or whether they are likely to turn violent at some stage. Gardai need to protect themselves from assault and not handcuffing arrested person seems ludicrous to me, unless they were a child. Too many people now jump in with this corruption against AGS allegation at the first opportunity without considering the ramifications of such an allegation. Are the Gardai perfect? Obviously not, but because a loudmouth TD cries foul about what she says wasn’t a lawful arrest do we automatically point the finger at at Gardai about corruption? A dangerous precedent.
She is voluntary rejecting the fine for Shannon airport so how is she distracting from herself? If she wanted to distract from that issue she would pay the fine and issue closed
She won’t pay the fine because she knows she will only do a few hours in prison for non payment. If she thought she would do the full 30 days she would pay for sure. She is full of it. Only lookin for cheap publicity out of this.
Somebody’s telling porkies somewhere! And it seems the guards have documents to prove its not them. GSOC’s telling the minister they’re happy with the level of cooperation they’re getting from the guards. Who does that leave…………?
It has to make ya wonder about the accuracy of other ‘revelations’ and ‘conspiracies’ tweedle dee and tweedle dum are spouting under dail privilege……
But please, by all means, continue to treat this as the political football it absolutely is not. The polls are the correct place to resolve such issues, corrupt policing harms everyone equally, though maybe you are simply too short-sighted to see that. It’s not like it hasn’t happened before.
Hopefully you won’t have to experience Niemöller’s regret, hopefully when they come for you there will still be somebody to speak out.
John Considine you can tell there was a lot of gardai reading your comments with all the red thumbs you are getting they are great for sticking up for themselves even when they know that they are wrong
John Considine, you clearly made a decision to believe one version of events about what’s true & untrue about the level of co-operation from the Gardai in the GSOC investigation into Clare Daly’s arrest – but herself, Wallace and GSOC refuse to say when the letter was sent – so who is being economical with the truth here? It’s seems clear that the Gardai directly involved in the arrest have made statements and it is also clear that the lack of co-operation from AGS is coming from people at Superintendent level or higher. Will they be the subject of a disciplinary sanction within AGS? I think we all know that’s not going to happen, that only comes to the lowest rank in the force. It is obvious that the ones with the political pull are the ones who have been promoted at least 3 times to reach Superintendent or higher and that’s where any hint of corruption lies in the force as a whole – not with the Gardai on the street – not that there’s many of them these days.
The old keystone cops are very practised liars. Ask any lawyer on their antics in courthouses across the land. Stitch you, stitch me squire. Ireland a great little country to do corruption in.
unlike a renua/young FG troll like yerself Paul; in years to come you’ll always be remembered for the brave act of setting up fake accounts on twitter to troll….truely a giant amongst us…
Isn’t it a funny world. Within 24 hours we have an elected representative calling for the law, rules and procedures to be applied. Then we have the same representative, now a convicted criminal, publicly staying that she will not comply with or be bound by the law and pay a Court ordered fine. I could say it’s one rule for her and another for everyone else. However it’s worse than that, the utter hypocrisy of it aside what’s really worrying is the amount of idiots that think this vacuous waste of space is some sort of reforming political messiah. The only thing that Daly has achieved in her term of office is to run up a nice bill for the tax payer with her exorbitant salary and expenses. She’s a champagne socialist and a person with an agenda who even in relation to this story doesn’t appear to be telling the complete truth. I sincerely hope and would be reasonably confident that the people who voted for her will not make the same mistake again and send this clown back to the hole from where she came.
Oh look!…..a topic for Government supporters to troll!……..(they felt a bit left out not being able to troll the IBRC topics about the corruption of their masters.)
And they must have covertly injected the hot whiskey into her too, which allowed the Gardaí who stopped her to suspect drink driving. Can’t completely blame the guards though, Army Intelligence has to have been involved too.
Thank God we have Mick Wallace on the job though. I feel so safe at night knowing he’s around. His flowing silver fetlocks flicking in the breeze.
If this is the fit up that some people claim it to be, then why didn’t the Gardaí go the whole hog & fake a positive result? Are we to believe that they were corrupt enough to put significant resources into mounting a citywide surveillance operation, but not corrupt enough to falsify the print out?
Someone saw her having a drink, someone tracked her across the city, someone was waiting when she made a simple driving error, someone put her in handcuffs and rang the press…..it has taken over two years to investigate this….someone ain’t cooperating
Daly said she had a drink in a friend’s house; are we to believe that there was a garda peering in the window at her to see if she’d had alcohol, then followed her around in the hope that she’d make a mistake? Given that the gardaí can stop a vehicle at any stage, why would they have waited until she went the wrong way down a one-way street if they’d been following her?
A HSE psychologist can label anyone “drunk” without any proof and then put it as fact to any court and no one is allowed to dispute it. The supposedly drunk human had never drank in her entire life.She asked for Gardai to come and do test in their offices, but this was not allowed.The now famous psychologist said she would not be mentioning it in court but she did.
Never ever trust and always get another opinion if possible
The Star’s Michael O’Toole tweeted Wallace earlier asking him to confirm that the GSOC correspondence he was referring to was two years old; Wallace confirmed this. So the accusation that Gardaí have not co-operated is two years old and we’ve no information about the supposed foot-dragging that’s up to date, aside from the GRA absolutely refuting the allegation. It’s looks like the GRA and the Gardaí involved have been vindicated. It’s funny how Wallace chose to mention this at a time when he’s been convicted of a criminal offence. I wonder how much coverage this will be given here?
Apple's Irish subsidiary incurs $25 billion corporation tax charge as pre-tax profits hit $76 billion
22 mins ago
2.3k
8
evening fix
Here's What Happened Today: Friday
45 mins ago
1.1k
arctic reception
JD Vance says US take over of Greenland ‘makes sense’ during scaled back visit
Updated
1 hr ago
32.9k
98
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say