Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
GARTH BROOKS HAS no plans to play in Cork next year, according to his spokesperson.
There was speculation the country music star would play in Páirc Uí Chaoimh in summer 2017 after the Lord Mayor of Cork, Des Cahill, said talks about staging a gig were underway.
However, a spokesperson for Brooks told TheJournal.ie: “We know of no such plans on his schedule.”
He said negotiations with both stars are underway, stating: “June was the date I heard for Garth Brooks and July was the date I heard for Adele.”
Brooks’ fans were left heartbroken two years ago when he cancelled concerts planned for Croke Park.
Aiken Promotions had planned to bring the country singer to Dublin for five concerts, but the gigs were scrapped after Dublin City Council only licenced three.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
And why do you think the government allegiances lye with apple? I’m in two mind where I stand on this whole situation. But I say I do know where the employee of Apple and all the other employee of multi national company’s stand.
Ok, do people realise that this 13bn would belong to every country in the world, not Ireland? That in essence, their profits could (not necessarily should) have been greater in every other country and that those countries are (debatably) entitled to this rebate, if not legally, certainly morally.
People on here moralising about how evil Apple are…. but want Ireland to take the 13Bn… Taking what isn’t ours is stealing, what way do your moral compasses point?
The story here for me is that Apple’s margins on iphones is enormous, suggesting, people are paying a lot more than the product is worth… The 200Bn in cash that Apple have is a reflection of people’s poor buying choices more than an evil corporation.
“Do people realise that this 13bn would belong to every country in the world, not Ireland?” I think you are right about that. If the Irish government hold Apple’s money in the Escrow account and then Apple are successful in their appeal they would want their money paid back by Ireland WITH INTEREST which they would be fully entitled to. So the Irish tax payer would have to pay the interest. If, as you said, “this 13bn would belong to every country in the world, not Ireland”, we won’t get much of it anyway if the Apple appeal fails.
In an ideal world of course not. However you have to be practical when dealing with tens of thousands of peoples jobs. You’d appreciate that if you ever had a job other than spouting left wing nonsense all day every day on this website.
“The Irish government has done absolutely nothing wrong” – says Tim Cook, DoB, et al…
At this stage, it’s quite obvious where our ‘government’s’ loyalties are.
Even the slightest hesitation to accept €13 Billion on behalf of the Irish people has tipped their hand.
if I had any doubts, I don’t have any now.
@sup – same government, by the way. Just different people sitting in the seat.
Btw: It was the current government that had a mandate to renegotiate this, and had advice from economics as well as regular protests outlining how to do it from the likes of the Ballyhea Bondholders Protest, and semi support from the EU who stated that Ireland had to initiate any reqeust to renegotiate or assess separation of EU-wide debt from genuine Irish accrued debt.
The current government NEVER EVEN ASKED, and instead transferred it to impossible to separate sovereign debt. I am really hoping that Michael Noonan is severely incompetent, and possibly blackmailed, because if he made the decisions he has made in the dept of finance in full compis mentus, then he should be tried for treason.
No interest would be payable by Ireland. The money would be in escrow and, if successful, Apple would receive the interest earned in the escrow account only.
If Ireland were not to appeal and take the money it would undermine Ireland’s entire tax code. The EU has tried for years to whip Ireland into line on various taxes including corporation tax and VRT. They cannot interfere with member countries tax laws so they have, over the years, attempted to get at us through competition law. They tried to abolish VRT citing interference with competition, they have long regarded our corporation tax rates as unfair competition and no they are going down the illegal state aid route.
Either we have control over our own tax law or we do not. The Irish Government gave to fight this ruling tooth and nail or watch this country lose every competitive advantage ,of our economy and become a poverty stricken backwater of Europe.
You mean it might undermine Ireland’s role as de facto tax haven? Charity for big capital and austerity for the majority. Of course the E.U. have pursued this case and exposed Ireland under their own geopolitical agenda. The working class have no friends in either ruling elites of the E.U or within our own Irish state.
This isn’t the first time apple have been caught owing back taxes some where.
Apple pays China $71M in back taxes, $10M fine after misinterpreting law.
Apple has agreed to pay a €318m fine in Italy to settle a long-running investigation into the US technology company’s tax arrangements in the country, according to Italian authorities.
Italy’s tax office said Apple’s subsidiary in the country failed to properly declare its earnings between 2008 and 2013 and alleged that the company should have paid €880m over the period
Following an inquiry by Milan-based prosecutors, Italian authorities and the world’s most valuable company have been locked in negotiation for months. It emerged on Wednesday that Italy’s tax office has accepted a smaller amount to close the case.
@Billy Mooney. 8.13am (not 9am) is when the comment was logged just before I went into work and no it definitely not revenue. Attention to detail wouldn’t be your strongest point because if you actually read my original point I basically said I could see both sides of the argument here. Probably a more important point is, is the €13 Billion our to spend at all even if the EC finds against Ireland in an appeal.
Good to see you beginning to see sense mickmc. And yes it’s ours to spend as per the E.U ruling. And it’s closer to €19 billion with taxes and penalties as we’re focusing on details and all that.
Well I no expert in tax law but those who purport to be would suggest that a number of other countries may well have a claim on some of this €13 billion. Not our yet by a long shot Billy.
MickC, yes correct , we’re only talking about thousands of Irish jobs….last time I checked we had a population of nearly 5 million!! What about the rest of us??
Who pays for the roads? Who pays to educate these marvelous employees that Apple and Co. use? Who pays for the infrastructure? The police the emergency services , health care etc, Govt? Apple need to pay their fair share and stop arranging accounting tricks with the Dept or Finance
@mickmc. Correct. And more to the point, there is no 13Bn. Or 19Bn. Or any Bn actually. That’s cos even if our Govt fails to defend itself and challenges this, we’ll Apple certainly will defend itself. They could throw €10Bn at lawyers and tie this up for a decade in court. …and still win. Which means no-one gets their hands on any Bn. People need to get a grip on reality.
Every body knows now who owns the government .. Big business full stop ….no super quick appeal when eu stole billions from the Irish people to give to bond holders . God forbid
I wonder are the govt interested in taking a stand against the EU for their suggestion of implementing water charges.
NO not likely. It’s pretty clear to all you folk who voted those clowns in. You elected them to look after big business.
We have a housing crisis, a spiralling crime problem,a health service on it’s knees a near third world transport system and this is what they want to spend their time on. Sometimes i think i live in parallel universe.
No, this is Ireland where the state guarantees ever increasing prosperity for the elite and relentless austerity for the working class. Most nations are governed like this.
Apple’s worldwide effective tax rate for 2014 was 26%. They set aside $17 billion to pay tax for that year alone.
Which is why the 0.005% figure bandied about is such nonsense. The EU commisioner is being very selective by picking one of Apples subsidiary companies. I’m sure if one of their subsidiaries made a loss, there would be no profit to tax so she would have claimed they paid 0% tax. The relevant figure for how much tax Apple paid in 2014 is their global figure – $17 billion. The misleading manner in which the commissioner bandied about the 0.005% in figure in front of the media shows how political this is.
It was only last month that Apple was whinging about the lack of housing in Ireland for their staff. The wholesale corporate tax dodging that Apple undertakes makes governments unable to fund social housing construction which would increase the housing stock and make accommodation available for their workers. As ever the corp orates look to maximise their take and minimize their contribution. The stench of corporate hypocrisy and greed is overwhelming:
“Multinationals are increasingly viewing the homelessness crisis in Ireland as an obstacle to economic growth. Intel and Apple recently called on the government to address the lack of housing for staff” http://www.thejournal.ie/housing-crisis-ireland-2-2876298-Jul2016/
So let’s grant Apple their wish now and use their €19 billion to fund a massive program of social and affordable housing construction.
In fairness Fred was on about Apples worldwide tax not the minutiae of housing issues, but in contrast the Eu was on about the minutiae of Apples subsidiary in playing the wild card at the expense of Irish Citizens. The rub is the accountants who we all know advise on tax policy and hey it just happens to create loopholes for companies like Apple to use.. So really who are apple trying to kid.. Let’s be grown up about it. Call it as it is, a scam..
There are plenty of houses in Ireland for everyone. The problem is that we house people who refuse to work right in the heart of where the jobs are… And then that force working people to move ever further out because they do not have the means to compete with the state who has set aside more of our capital city for social housing than any other city in Europe.
People who don’t work should be housed where access to jobs is not an issue, therefore making it affordable for working people (who pay for their lazy compatriots) to have a decent sized house in a decent area on an average salary.
The homeless crisis is caused by a lack of affordable homes and the unemployment crisis is caused very simply by a lack of decent paying jobs. Both shortages exist becasuse they benefit capital at the expense of the majority working class.
Once again there are plenty of affordable homes in Ireland. People who are on the verge of homelessness cannot afford a house whatsoever so it is strange to claim that house prices are causing homelessness. The only crisis is a crisis of people insisting at all costs to live in Dublin, when working people should rise up and say enough is enough, if we are to pay for your house you will take what you are given and where you are given it.
72% of people on the housing waiting list do not contribute one penny to society, yet harp on about how that same society has a “responsibility” to them. Everyone must contribute as without a collective effort Ireland cannot reach it’s full potential.
Fred, Stop spoofing establishment mouthpiece. Apple did not pay €17 billion in taxes in 2014. They “set aside” that amount in case the authorities managed to tax some of the billions they funnel around the globe to avoid tax.
And again the cause of the housing crisis is a lack of affordable homes for purchase and rent. And working people (and everyone else) should indeed be rising up. Though not against the homeless and other victims of the capitalist system but against the corporate parasites like Apple who loot society with the eager assistance of our establishment political class.
And again the cause of the housing crisis is a lack of affordable housing to purchase and rent. Though working people and everyone else should be rising up. Though not against the homeless and other victims of the capitalist system but against the corporate parasites like Apple who loot society with the eager assistance of our establishment political class.
Sure it’s not homeless peoples fault! It’s the government who pays for them to lie in hotels while perfectly good houses in Longford sit empty and could be housing families. This “crisis” could be solved tomorrow if the government would just utilise the empty houses around the country.
Guess what would happen then? Once we housed everyone who needs one outside of Dublin, demand in Dublin would collapse and prices would stabilise at a far more affordable level for working people. You should look at Sweden’s social housing programme and what a disaster it was!
Now I’m off to watch this O’Devaney Gardens propaganda programme to hear about how they are all amazing salt of the commoonity kind of people… And we just misunderstand them.
The problem is that while accepting the billions is tempting you at the same time establish a precedent for allowing the European Commission to interfere in the tax affairs of a sovreign state. The can then proceed to ude this back door to harmonise corporation tax across the EU and god knows what else. It would appear that while Ms Vestager & co are quick to go after US companies such as Apple and Microsoft they are not so quick to look into the sweet deals being made for european companies. The US are already more than tired of the EU tactics to the point where continued membership of NATO is being discussed. This is all a politically fuelled act and the eu should be very careful how they play it.
Everytime i hear these excuses, I put them in the context of the garlic importer… I wonder did revenue consider the jobs and future taxes that were lost be convicting him and chasing down every penny with interest? And did the govt bat his side on that blatantly illegal deal or only on ones they are complicit in?
It’s notable how the law and it’s application is almost invariably a friend to the interests of big capital and an enemy of the majority. ECB illegally coerce Ireland into a Troika bailout under threat of collapsing our banking system. No case taken to the ECJ. In contrast the establishment political parties are tripping over themselves to appeal this E.U ruling against Apple’s epic tax dodging to the courts. Or the case of the Anglo promissory notes which were under a Supreme court challenge but were eliminated in a midnight emergency bill in a Dail full of drunken TDs and converted to government bonds, welding banking debt to the Irish people for 40 years. Hey presto!
The content and the application of the law has always protected the welfare of the wealthy and powerful. It’s not surprising as the establishment parties which make the legislation serve the interests of big capital and have done so since the foundation of the state. So the financial elite were able to destroy the entire banking system and have their political enablers pass their staggering losses on to the working class and the vast majority of this colossal theft was accomplished quite legally.
In contrast, the “crimes” against the interests of capital are always swiftly and efficiently dealt with by the state. So for example, ordinary people who oppose this banker debt being loaded on to their backs through for example opposing water meter installations are faced with the full rigour of the law and will be beaten off their own streets by the Gardai and jailed by the courts if they persist. Or those who sit down in protest behind a ministerial car are charged with “false imprisonment” and face a possible life sentence if convicted. Our crimes are determined by our class in this brave little “republic”.
Tldr Wally But you are right that law exists to protect property and bodily integrity, not imagined economic rights. Which is exactly why Marxists advocate anarchy.
Why then did Irish law fail so badly to protect the “bodily integrity” of the thousands of children raped, tortured and worse in our industrial schools over many decades? Just one example of many gross failures to protect the welfare of ordinary people..
As I said, the content and the application of the law protects the powerful and the wealthy as they formulate the legislation in their own interests. We see for example in the financial sector where the government allows powerful corporate interest groups to effectively write much of our legislation:
“The International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) Clearing House group – which includes AIB, Bank of Ireland and Citigroup – gets to meet in private with government officials four or five times per year………………. Department of the Taoiseach Secretary General Martin Fraser admitted that the “bulk” of the group’s recommendations had been adopted in the Finance Act which implemented the Budget…………………… However, Labour TD Kevin Humphreys said it appeared that the recommendations of the group were being adopted “lock, stock and barrel”. And Socialist Party TD Joe Higgins said the group had unprecedented influence on government policy…….. The other members of the IFSC Clearing House group include Bank of America, Barclays, KPMG, Deloitte, and Ernst and Young.”
The comparison was between the importer and his supplier, and Ireland and apple… The imposter caught by revenue, Apple caught by the EU. The importer knew he was misrepresenting the tax he was supposed to pay, so did Apple/FF/FG.
Ireland was transformed from its backwards, socialist DeValeria, “sick man of Europe” utopia by the Tallaght Strategy, to abandon protectionism and attract investment by the big multinationals such as Apple. Those decisions transformed Ireland.
You AAA/PBP wallys would have us return the the politics of the 1916 heroes?
Buster, if Apple workers were responsible for assembling Billy’s phone so what? Apple only built it because it was government funded research which enabled the technology to be developed, hard to accept I know. You would think in a fair system the inventor (government) would benefit at least equally to the assembler of technology or not?
Buster,
Our “independence” in the Republic is largely a failure. All we’ve achieved was to swap a British ruling capitalist class for an Irish one and so we’ve had a century of domestic poverty, state and religious repression, mass unemployment and mass emigration while the pampered elite in business, politics, media, religion and the law viciously protected the status quo which serves them so well.
And the multinationals are another international exploitative force. The corporates always take more from society than they contribute. That’s how they make their profits and profit maximization is the sole reason for their existence.
The multinationals only operate in Ireland in order to exploit our workers, infrastructure and generous tax regime etc. It’s us who are bestowing favors on them and they’ll be gone as soon as another nation offers a sweeter deal as the Dell abdication to Poland shows.
The collective society bears the cost of providing the labour force for the multinationals and also its customers. We feed, clothe and care for our children, we build the schools and colleges, and employ the teachers to educate them, construct the hospitals and hire the medical staff to care for them etc until they reach adulthood. At this point the multinationals step in and cherry pick which people they choose to employ.
And capital only ever employs labour in order to exploit it to a greater or lesser degree. The sole objective of capitalist enterprise is the accumulation of profit and that profit is generated by the workers in the excess value they create over and above their wages. That is the essence of capitalism and it’s inherently exploitative. Capitalist enterprise will not create a single job or produce a single product or service without the expectation of profit.
Society builds the power stations and electricity networks and other utilities which feed the capitalists’ factories. We constructed the communications networks that they depend on and roads, ports and airports which transport their products. All private commercial activity ultimately depends on the human and infrastructural resources which society has created collectively. Capital does labour no favours. Precisely the opposite in fact. The working class bears the cost of providing the infrastructure and the next generation of workers both for capital to exploit.
The state if it’s acting in the interests of a majority can attempt to recoup some of the corporate profit back through taxation which can then be redistributed back to the majority who actually created the profit via social supports like health, education, infrastructure etc. (This assumes of course that the democratic state is acting in the interests of the majority which we know is not the case as the catastrophic bank bailout clearly demonstrated.)
Now it’s clear that even this bare minimum level of fairness is no longer possible in the world of corporate profit shifting and tax avoidance which allows the multinationals to make virtually no contribution to the workers and society which they prey on.
So it’s the corporations who desperately need the working class both to produce and buy their productive output in order that that can accumulate profit. They need us, far far more than we need them.
The solution is to manage our economic activity with the objective of meeting human need (in the broadest sense) rather than for the purposes of accumulating profit into private hands as occurs under capitalism.
The reality is that there is more than enough real resources (land, energy labour etc) to provide everyone on the planet with proper nutrition, a decent home, healthcare, education and a job. It’s a political and ideological choice to deny people these basics, not economic misfortune.
Eh, no. Closing a loophole only works going forward. By definition a loophole is a legal means of avoiding tax, you can’t go looking for it back afterwards. If you don’t pay tax that you should be paying in the first place, that’s a different story.
They’re not really loopholes though as the Irish state is fully aware and approves of the mechanisms through which the multinationals avoid tax and indeed allows the finance sector to design many of those same “loopholes”. Ireland’s role as a tax haven is no accident, it’s government policy. Charity for the corporate vultures and vicious austerity for the rest of us.
See the headline has changed from this morning. Now the headline is
The Irish government has done absolutely nothing wrong” – Tim Cook.
Earlier the headline was.
We should be talking about future taxes, not old ones” – Tim Cook.
The Irish government has done nothing wrong…claim Apple who are up Billions… The Irish people are about to be screwed again though, we will see how the crooked politicians vote on friday, no doubt in the favor of Apple and not the people who elected them.
A Tax Expert Takes Tim Cook’s EU Letter Apart Point By Point
Cook blasted an EU ruling that Apple used Irish subsidiaries to avoid billions in taxes, but his defense is only one side of the story.
Tim Cook’s position is reasonable. The EU are using Ireland for political reasons. Their arrogance knows no bounds and they have learned nothing from Brexit. My bet is the EU will collapse within 5 years. We should stop taking it seriously now.
No his position is not reasonable. His company made billions of Euro of profit in Europe through its Irish subsidiary. It then reduced that profit to zero effectively by having another Irish company charge royalties to the first company. The second company, although incorporated in Ireland, was tax resident in the Cayman Islands so it paid no tax on the royalties. How can an Irish registered company collecting royalties from another Irish registered company be tax resident in the Cayman Islands? Because it was “managed” from there. Bullsh it! Tim should be thankful he wasn’t smuggling garlic or he might be facing a prison sentence.
The taxes on these profits should all be paid in the US, which is where Apple is based and which is where all of it’s products are created.
The Apple subsidiaries in the EU should only pay corporation taxes that reflect the amount of value added to Apple products in the EU, which is very little.
Denito. That can’t be true. Because of whats said in cooks letter and their annual reports. Here’s a link where a tax expert breaks down Tim cooks letter.
Cook: Taxes for multinational companies are complex, yet a fundamental principle is recognized around the world: A company’s profits should be taxed in the country where the value is created. Apple, Ireland, and the United States all agree on this principle. In Apple’s case, nearly all of our research and development takes place in California, so the vast majority of our profits are taxed in the United States.
Gardner: It sounds like what they’re saying is that these ought to be thought of as U.S. profits, which makes it hard to understand why they have been so eager to report these profits in Ireland up until now. As long as Apple can pretend their profits are being earned in Ireland they won’t have to pay a dime in taxes on them.
It doesn’t appear to be even remotely truthful based on the numbers they publish in their annual reports. Each year they report that the majority of their profits are earned outside the U.S., with roughly a third (on average, over the past five years) coming from the U.S. When you look at the 10K, the annual report for 2015, you see the company reports earnings of $72 billion worldwide, and just one third of those profits are attributed to the U.S. And yet Cook’s statement says that the vast majority of their income is taxed in the U.S.
It called repatriation, it only comes tax due in the US when it lands there. If it hasn’t landed yet, then it in limbo. Just like a shoplifter hasn’t robbed anything until he tries to leave your shop with the goods. Thats where the difference amounts with US tax paid and the foreign amount nobody has been paid tax for, can be said to reside. So he isn’t technically lying, he just hasn’t made a dash for the shop doorway yet.
Yes they colluded with multi nationals to bring jobs here. and yes they are here for the tax breaks. So What?
These are JOBS either way and good ones and they are in Ireland. The AAA headbangers will offer you all nothing if they are gone. Just be aware of that
When you think about this Apple tax deal and add it to the tax avoidance of Vulture funds, all with the blessing of the government, and collusion of the Revenue Commisioners. Add NAMA to it as well. You realise that the governments of FG/Lab and FG/FF have facilitated the defrauding of the state of much needed tax revenue.
We all know about the problems in the country, homelessness, eviction courts, sky high rents, health service problems, medical card problems, wholesale cuts to much needed services, or services cut completely etc. Problems that could be alleviated to a great extent by this money. Just think, Mars Capital pays tax on millions in profit as a minimum wage worker pays in a year.
Kenny, Noonan, Gilmore, and Burton, for starters, should be up in court for defrauding the state.
@ O’Callaghan Stephen
I love it the way all you neo-liberal brain washed FG and FF voters keep calling left wing type ‘Head bangers’ (quoted from Micheal O’Leary no doubt) and ‘Loony lefty’s', it makes me laugh every time!
You guys are so out of date!
Stop pretending and remember that it was you guys with your right wing policies that bankrupted the state, and loaded over ONE HUNDRED BILLION EURO in private gamblers debt on to the back of the tax payer!…oh and don’t forget your other roaring success – the return of mass Emigration, homelessness, an epidemic of suicide, A&E crisis, a two tier health system, child care crisis, a debt to GDP ratio of 200% (in real terms! when you take in private debt)
You guys are the lunatics here Sir !!… so don’t forget it!
Says Paul the…oh wait this is just another Journal permitted anonymous troll account with the ever telling default egg avatar that will spew all sorts of shįte in order to get a reaction. Most likely created by whatever so called journalist who wrote this muck.
Am I missing something really obvious? Why should the Irish government/taxpayer spend a fortune on expensive lawyers when APPLE will obviously be doing the same thing?. Same legal argumentation. Let APPLE pay for the appeal, if they win they win, are lawyers paid for by Irish taxpayers superior to the ones Apple will hire?
Aoife, how would you like if revenue changed the rules now, and then applied them retrospectively? Rules changed in 2014, and the EU now want to apply those changed rules to the period 2003 to 2014.
Fred maybe I’m wrong here but is the dispute to do with apple being given favourable terms not available to others. If the 500 euro per one million euros tax thing is true well that’s got to be wrong hasn’t it. How can anyone compete with that. The argument that they provide employment is besides the point as these jobs are separate to the brass plate company through which the sales from other countries where being routed to here where the 1 or 2% tax is being applied. The EU are saying that’s unfair advantage. Is that the gist of it.
A certain class in this place have gotten used to a ‘two tier’ set up in most walks of life, tax rules that apply to one but not the other, criminality that goes unpunished and heavily punished, healthcare that’s immediately available and long long waits, guaranteed jobs and pensions for some and insecurity for the majority, traffic offenses that can be made disappear for some but heavy fines and penalty points for others. The list could go on and on.
We’ve become a rotten Republic.
Those are all reflections of the battle between the minority capitalist class and the majority working class and the latter is currently on the losing end and will continue to be so until they take the necessary steps to end the exploitation.
Hopefully this is the week the Irish government realises that we need to get out of this eu monster we are living in and tie our economy in with both America and the uk.its come to the stage we also need a referendum on our future for a eirexit
The EU is dead right in this situation. The real crooks are the Irish politicians working hard to create loopholes for corporations. Ever wonder what kind of politician would turn down a 13bn windfall that could win them the next election? The kind that doesn’t need to worry about getting re-elected…
Try winning an election when 300,000+ Irish employees of multinational jobs end up on the scratcher because Ireland is seen as fiscally unstable and not in control of its own tax laws. €13bn windfall is very short-sighted.
You’re right, I forgot politicians are notoriously long-sighted… and 300k jobs would not be lost. The funny thing is, a lot of the apple jobs created have absolutely nothing to do with generating profit, they’re support staff so it makes no sense to move them, since they won’t save any tax by switching countries.
Jesus…do you even know what Apple does in Cork? They have one of the only production facilities in the world run by Apple, yep no profit generating jobs there…. In 1991 Ireland made an immoral pitch that attracted jobs….the alternative reality is without these loopholes we would have been pretty much goosed. A 12.5 corporation tax is also immoral when personal tax is so high, but what is the alternative? Unemployment….Ireland won’t get 13 billion anyway it will be either used for debt write down or we will be challenged by other jurisdictions where the real profit should have been taxed. Sinn Fein again sprouting nonsense when they know full well the reality of the situation.
I said a lot, not all. Feel free to look on their website, support and admin staff outnumber production jobs 2:1. The issue isn’t 12.5% rate at all! If they were actually paying 12.5% on all legitimate profits filtered through Ireland there would be no issue. The European commission has already said Ireland is free to use the money as it wishes. And this isn’t sf/aaa/pbp populist nonsense. I can’t stand the left in this country but they and the EU are in the right here.
Eirexit ?? Nonsense. We do such a good job on getting multi billion dollar businesses to pay tax and contribute their fair share to countries that we don’t need the EU ?? Sucessive Irish Govts have tugged the forelock to US multinationals for far too long whilst effectively neglecting SME’s and riding the PAYE worker for every red cent. It took the EU to finally point that out.
@John O’Brien: It is fact that the rules of the tax regime effective in Ireland at the time were followed by Apple. However you feel about them, they were the rules then. Changing rules retrospectively will give any C-level executive doubt as to whether they can trust Ireland to stick to the rules and they could decide to set-up elsewhere or leave Ireland.
@Shane Carroll,
“Average industrial salary: The average industrial wage in 2012 in the Republic of Ireland was €828.88 per week”
I was being conservative.
Anyway, you completely missed my point.
It’s not Irelands fault that other countries have inadequate tax laws to capture what they believe is their fare share.
You genuinely believe Ireland is entitled to tax all of apple’s worldwide income?
Yes . If apple are funnelling all their European profit through Ireland. Then yes.
The commission said the tax treatment in Ireland enabled Apple to avoid taxation on almost all profits generated by sales of Apple products in the entire EU Single Market.
“This is due to Apple’s decision to record all sales in Ireland rather than in the countries where the products were sold.
If anyone is owed the 13Bn, it’s certainly not Ireland. If the EU want to demand Apple reduce the cost price of the iPhone into those countries, to increase the profit Apple should have made, to increase the taxes Apple pay in those countries, then there’s a logical argument to be made for that (though there is no definition on what an appropriate transfer price is and it’s should not be the EU’s remit to decide that either!).
OECD has done a huge amount of work in recent years to level the tax playing field and remove loopholes. The European Commission’s ENA trained statistics and Marxist experts have long been hostile to low tax rates (they call it tax dumping) and are determined to break the Member States’ exclusive competence to set and collect taxes. EC have taken a tax ruling by the Revenue that a non resident company will not be taxed in Ireland as evidence of State aid. But that was the law when the ruling was made. So not only are the EC trying to interfere in the tax competence, they are trying to usurp Dáil Éireann. In addition the ruling is illogical. Either Ireland is obliged to tax the worldwide profits of Apple or it is not. The Commission cannot say Ireland gave state aid and also that other countries are entitled to some of the tax it says should be paid in Ireland. Is Ireland now supposed to collect tax for France and Greece?
HOTbank considering us Europeans are all supposed to be equal, how is it that the Irish people pay more in taxes on EVERYTHING than their European family. Seems a bit unfair that it’s the Joe Soap and Joan Soap who carry the heavy burdens.!!
Mary, like it or not Ireland is a low tax country for income tax. We get hammered on a range of other taxes though. But that is an Irish Government choice and we elect the Government.
Hotbank, the two companies involved in this highly unethical scheme are Irish. The issue is that despite being incorporated in Ireland, one of the companies is tax resident in the Cayman Islands. This is highly unusual in international tax, possibly unique. How can an Irish company collecting royalties from another Irish company not be liable for any tax in Ireland?
@hotbank – we are not obligated to tax anything on apples global operations, nothing, zero. But if Apple is setup to say that everything is generated in Cork, then it is they who stated they should be taxed in Cork, and nowhere else. This is really simple – Apple could move these companies to the Cayman Islands in the morning and it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference to their obligations to us.
The Irish gov is in charge of irish tax. They’re not gonna win any battle against the EU especially with the shambolic current shower we’ve currently got. Successive irish govs knew this was coming for years, have had years to prepare for this. They did nothing. Now their response is to spend x number of years appealing. Why? Because, especially for Kenny and noonan and a few others, it puts it in the background for the next while and these guys know they’ll be retired on very generous political pensions when it crops up again. It’s nothing to do with what’s best for the country with this lot of shambolic politicians, they know they don’t have the skills and competency to effectively resolve the issue anyway, so they prefer to kick the can down the road, and let it be someone else’s mess when they’re gone. We need proper politicians in this country, not the overpaid incompetent clowns of FG and FF, who decide to ignore issues like this because they don’t have a clue how to fix it anyway, then because they ignore it, the country gets in a mess, these same clowns start blaming everybody else except themselves for their own incompetence, then election time comes, they bribe and hoodwink whoever they can to vote for them, (they seem to have good control over the grey vote) and then we’re back to square one, riddled with these political wasters for another 5 years. Thing have to change politically in this country.
No Tim cook , “We should be talking about future taxes, not old ones” – Tim Cook. If you owe the money for the time investigated between 2004 and 2014. Then you should pay what’s owed. Yes look to the future but you should not or expect a pass on the past.
If there was nothing untoward going on. Why did Michael noonan close down slowly the double Irish after what was exposed in the USA senate? This is what was investigated between 2004 and 2014 where Tim cook admitted in the senate that When asked about its reasons for operating in Ireland, CEO Tim Cook said that the company had received a “tax incentive arrangement” as part of its decision to establish here in 1980. This was also said
ASI is a subsidiary of Apple Operations Europe, another Irish registered company, which is itself a subsidiary of AOI. Until 2012 it had no employees, but last year, in a reorganisation, ASI was assigned 250 employees from its immediate parent Apple Operations Europe.
Time to pay up.
While the working people in this Country were screwed to their ar–s with some multi nationals were enjoying tax free status . Now we know why these big guys were queuing up to employing workers here. Just wondering what more has and is going on ?
When you read what was said at the senate hearings . Then it explains why they quickly shut down the double Irish. Apple and the government keep talking about what apple are doing today. The EU investigation was about the deal apple had between 2004 and 2014 while the double Irish was in effect. That’s what they are not talking about. What’s really sad about this is even by paying the correct tax , these multinationals would still be extremely wealthy. It’s all coming out now like vulture funds operating under charitable status.
There has been no sweet heart deal with Apple …
Thats the line of our corrupt lot.
Thats not what Tim Cooke said in front of the Senate in 2013…..
Do Check it out…
You have to hand it to these clown politicians we’ve got. They only went off and created a homeless crisis from an oversupply of houses and turned an opportunity to steal jobs from Britain into a one where they could take jobs off us. What will these clowns manage to do next?!
All the whingers went out and voted for the political party’s that dreamed up this scam and then enforced it. Thats the truth of it willfull denial yet again then moan . The whole world knows Ireland and its people are easily shafted and easily bought . A beaten dog still loyal to its master .
The lies and spin by the government and the shills about the country not being able to benefit from a 19 billion windfall has been outed by the EU. The money CAN be used for capital expenditure.
The other very positive outcome is that this has blown IW out of the water. If ever there was a lull, or disinterest in the coming 17 Sept anti water charges protest, this Apple debacle has given it a huge impetus. And will probably sway the Independent Alliance not to support the government on the Apple appeal.
The end of the FG/FF coalition. Happy days.
Appeal is the only right course of action: Companies need certainty as to what the rules are and that they won’t change retrospectively. The ‘double-irish’ loophole has been closed since 2014. This won’t happen again. Any of the muppets calling for it to be spent on some emotive issue, such as homelessness, are the kinds of people whose policies drive national debt… zero foresight as to the consequences of today’s actions on tomorrow. If we take the lumpsum now, we’ll lose the annuity FOREVER and then ye’ll have all day to whinge at home, unemployed, about even poorer public services.
explain how we will lose the annuity FOREVER? seeing as this is back tax that hasn`t been paid and not something akin to a lump sum?
A lump sum as in you take it all in one go and never get another penny.
Apple have already stated they are going nowhere,the double irish loophole has been closed, all that is being done is paying BACK TAXES, we will still get taxes from them in the years to come.
My god, and you are a managing director of a company?? methinks you should look closer to home when you are talking about muppets.
@Motherofdivinejebus: Yes, I am and I don’t hide my considered views behind an anonymous nickname either!
As a person who runs a business I am acutely aware of what side the country’s bread is buttered-on and I can see that the lofty held perch, that so many of you reside upon, is not the one that will get the bills paid. Your tunnel vision prevents you from seeing the wider business consequences of choosing to retrospectively change our tax law. Our sovereign tax law!!!
So, to answer your question: No C-level executive is going to look favourably upon Ireland now or in the future if we’re whimsical and blithely change the tax laws retrospectively. Businesses thrive on certainty and we have got to protect our ability to set the rules on our land.
If the public is angry about the ‘double-irish’ and what tax it may have cost us, then fine. But don’t take that out now on a commercial entity that leveraged that law, in the past.
That said, it could be argued, that the double-irish is responsible for catalysing teh hub we’ve now become in respect of Pharma & Tech to the extent that we no longer need it. Hence, we no longer have it and those industries continue to thrive here.
Does our government set the tax rates or does the EU? That’s all I have a problem with. If the EU starts forcing tax rates and back pays god knows how this will effect everyone in this country. They should stay out of our business agreements regardless of what happened.
This has absolutely nothing to do with tax rates. It has everything to do with where Irish companies are tax resident. Shell companies are being set up in Ireland, but tax resident in the Cayman Islands, to charge royalties against other companies taxable profits, to reduce the tax bill. The Cayman Islands resident country then pays no tax on the royalties, effectively shielding profits from the 12.5% rate. So the Corporation tax rate in Ireland is completely irrelevant because apple claims it has little to no profits in Ireland to pay the tax.
If we are to be completely honest with ourselves, the main reason all these big tech companies are here is because of financial incentive. They will always spin the line that they are investing in Ireland because of our availability of talent, access to EU markets and are an English speaking country. In reality that’s mostly untrue, we don’t have enough indigenous talent to fill all of the jobs in the ICT sector that are here and we are heavily reliant in inward migration, significant percentages of the population of other European countries have a high command of the English language and we arguably don’t have the infrastructure or housing to facilitate the large scale operations of these companies. They are here because they can maximise their financial returns basing their EU ops in Ireland and in truth, without them we don’t have an economy without them. So you can see why the government want to at least be seen to be in Apple’s corner on this, lest it put the willies up the other companies that we’re so heavily reliant on.
The Irish govt has done `nothing wrong`, according to Tim Cooke who`s company benefited to the tune of billions of unpaid tax for decades.
`Members cannot give state aid to selected companies`, Margrete Vestager.
The basis of our economic policy fo 30 years has been built on sand, what`s the point of giving tax breaks to these companies in they are going to be given a huge tax bill years later ?
Typical Irish wink and nod approach, ` it will be all right, say nothing`. It is inconceivable that the Irish did not know what they were doing was illegal, but they kept it up and have been found out. They put all their eggs in one basket and are now clueless.
If the Irish are not happy with the billions of tax revenue already being generated by multinationals Apple and others could move to Scotland and just sell into Ireland.
I think Ireland should take Michael O’Leary’s advice and tell this corrupt EU to F*ck off and do their own dirty work. We are not collecting this money on behalf of the EU as the government says it is not owed. If we collect it we are suggesting we got it wrong or that we lied.
Take the money out of this as it’s blinding reason and sense.
If The same commission ruled that retrospectively every man and woman in Ireland who drank 2-3 pints and drove home when it was perfectly Legal to do so pre date x and then decided 5,10,15 years later that we/u all were now convicted by proxy, loose your licences and have to pay a couple of grand in fines all because you were drinking in Irish pubs at home instead of one in france or Belgium would you think this is a legitimate ruling? These tax laws were brought in to encourage development and employment. They dragged us from post 80′s depression up and out. If Apple or who ever was in the EU heartland this would not be happening. Grow up and realise this is politics plane and simple. They have been after our corporate tax rates for years this is just the next move.
The money made by Apple was not earned in ireland. It was earned in other countries. If we get the 13 billion we will have to give it to the countries where the money was earned germany etc. only 0.001% of the 13 billion was made in ireland. We paid 11.3% on that. if we take the money we could loose apple intel amazon etc to a post brexit uk. The government are right for once.
Vomit inducing interview with Tim Cook, he sounded like a right wing, fundamentalist southern Baptist preacher. It was typical brainwashing Apple mantra. The dogs on the street know there was and continues to be sweet deals. I wondered would the actual contribution Apple make to the Irish economy ever reach €13 billion, I doubt it ever would in a life time. His statement was only matched in farcical terms by the clowns elected to the dail, squabbling on how best to appear relevant.
Im sure the UK is licking its lips looking at the complete & utter fxcking stupidity of some on this island. Apple pays ROUGHLY 200,000,000 million in salary per year in this country… Also if the government takes the 13B from apple and people cannot see the wider legal ramification’s & what that means for the other MNC that filter money through this country yet also employ THOUSANDS… This is a giant Trojan horse for this country, nothing more.
Anyone else notice the timing of this news, October 31st is the pay and file deadline…. Pretty much everyone is putting their books together now and not at all happy about it.
And please everyone has know for years that the MNC’S dont even pay close to 12.5%, so why the hype now.
Dont buy the hyperbowl, the EU couldnt care less about the Irish people.
Don’t forget that on top of the $400m paid in 2014 there are also 6000 employees paying tax that work for Apple. Do people want to drive Apple out of Ireland with this anti Apple and anti government BS. A lot of good work done to ensure Apple have routes in Ireland employing massive numbers of high paid people so stop the witch hunt for once!
Pope Francis's remains to be removed to St Peter's tomorrow ahead of funeral
Updated
4 hrs ago
25.3k
103
Ukraine
Zelenskyy says Ukraine will only hold direct talks with Russia after ceasefire is in place
22 mins ago
290
Weather Forecast
Joanna Donnelly surprises viewers with departure from RTÉ News after nearly a decade
14 hrs ago
133k
45
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 175 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 117 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 155 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 121 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 87 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 88 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 42 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 143 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 67 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 83 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 90 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 52 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 28 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 76 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 57 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 96 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 77 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say