Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

RollingNews.ie

Gerry Adams lashes 'new Redmondites' and 1916 College Green banner

The Sinn Féin leader was speaking at Arbour Hill ahead of this weekend’s centenary events.

SINN FÉIN LEADER Gerry Adams has said he was not surprised to learn that the idea for a controversial Dublin City Council banner commemorating the Easter Rising came from the Department of the Taoiseach.

The College Green banner features four historical figures – including former Irish Parliamentary Party leader John Redmond, who explicitly condemned the rebellion – that favoured constitutional politics.

The banner was met with a largely negative reaction on social media, with some calling it “absurd” and “confusing”.

The three other politicians pictured on the banner – Henry Grattan, Daniel O’Connell, Charles Stewart Parnell – had died decades before 1916.

Dublin City Council defended the move last week, saying the banner was one of a series of installations in the capital marking the commemoration. It said the figures displayed at College Green were “as much a part of the historical narrative of Irish nationalism as anyone else”.

Addressing a party rally in Arbour Hill today, Adams said the idea for the banner was in line with the thinking behind the much-criticised 1916 video, Ireland Inspires 2016, that failed to include any reference to the uprising.

The Sinn Féin leader accused “some” individuals of seeking to “revive Redmondism and denigrate the leaders of 1916″.

“The time has come to confront this insidious and dishonest campaign,” he said.

Capture The Sinn Féin rally proceeds to Arbour Hill from Kilmainham Jail. Emer McLysaght Emer McLysaght

‘Ahistorical nonsense’

Adams criticised those who were “worried that honouring the 1916 leaders would retrospectively justify violence” and yet said nothing about “Redmond’s role in sending tens of thousands of Irish to fight Germans, Austrians and Turks” during World War I.

“Was John Redmond not a ‘man of violence’?  Ireland, as a submerged nation within the UK, was carried into [that war] without any say in the matter,” he said.

This is the ‘democracy’ which the new Redmondites claim would have led inevitably to Irish independence. Such ahistorical nonsense.

Read: Voices of 1916: ‘John Healy, 14, a schoolboy, had his brain hanging all over his forehead’

Read: Dublin City Council is standing by its controversial 1916 banner

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
197 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds