Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The September 2004 issue of Playboy Playboy

This Playboy issue is the reason Google's founders almost never do interviews

You could say they were caught with their pants down.

ALPHABET EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN Eric Schmidt gave a talk at a computer-science class at California’s Stanford University recently.

During the session, he told a story about why Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have hardly ever talked to the press in the last 11 years.

They apparently had the bad experience of giving an interview to Playboy that risked derailing their company’s initial public offering, according to a transcript of the class.

Schmidt was asked: “How did the relationship with Larry and Sergey develop?”

Here’s his response:

“I knew that it was Larry and Sergey’s company, and I acted that way.

“For example, I never did any press. Right before the IPO (Initial Public Offering), Larry and Sergey did an interview with Playboy — no pictures. It turns out that the interview was at the wrong time in the quiet period and it put the IPO in jeopardy.”

But the even more correct answer is no problem, we’ll fix this. From that moment on, they’ve never given an interview. That was 12 years ago. When they wanted to do interviews, they did them. Once they didn’t want to do it anymore, I did them. It’s their company.”

Google Browser Google co-founders Sergey Brin, left, and Larry Page AP Photo / Paul Sakuma AP Photo / Paul Sakuma / Paul Sakuma

You can read the September 2004 Playboy interview here (don’t worry — it’s safe for work). The interview was controversial at the time because it revealed that the true state of Google had changed since the information the company filed in its S-1 IPO filing, according to CNET’s report from the time:

For instance, Google said that it now has more than 2,000 employees, not the 1,000 cited in the article, and that its Gmail service no longer has the significant advantage in storage space that it had over rival free e-mail services earlier this year.

By Jim Edwards, Business Insider UK

READ: The latest version of Android is out, but it’s unlikely you’ll see it anytime soon >

READ: US companies keep $2.1 trillion profits in overseas tax havens (and Ireland has its fair share) >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 4 comments
Close
4 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds