Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

One of Google's secret projects was to build automated vertical farms

The idea was part of X, the company’s secretive research department, but the experiment was eventually scrapped.

THE WORLD’S FIRST robot-run farm is opening in 2017, courtesy of a company called Spread. But in an alternate universe, Alphabet’s X unit (formerly Google X) might have been behind it.

At the TED2016 conference in Vancouver, Astro Teller – the head of X – revealed that the secretive moonshot lab once tried to create an automated vertical farming system.

When X looks for “moonshot” projects to pursue, it follows three steps: find a huge problem that affects millions of people, propose a radical solution to solve the problem, and come up with a reason to believe the technology to create that radical solution could be built.

“One in nine people suffer from undernourishment, and vertical farming uses 10 times less water, 100 times less land than conventional farming,” says Teller.

Vertical farming, the practice of growing crops indoors on racks that stack atop one another, is a potential radical solution to the problem of global hunger. Take human labor out of the equation and it becomes even more attractive.

X made progress in automated harvesting and efficient lighting technology, and managed to grow some greens. But the Google lab couldn’t grow staple crops like grains and rice using the technique.

As a result, X ultimately killed the project.

During his TED talk, Teller also discussed another X project that was killed before it got off the ground: a lighter than air cargo ship that didn’t need a runway to land. That project got the axe because it would have cost $200 million (€178 million) to make the first prototype.

“It’s just way too expensive because X is structured with a tight feedback loop of making mistakes, learning, and creating new designs. You can’t spend $200 million on the first data point of a project,” says Teller.

Failure is an important part of X’s work, according to Teller. “The Silicon Valley hype machine has created this myth of visionaries who effortlessly create the future. Don’t believe the hype,” he says. “We spend most of our time breaking things, and trying to prove we’re wrong.”

Read: Apple has acknowledged the ’1970’ bug but isn’t saying when a fix will arrive >

Read: Adobe has fixed an update that deleted important files without notice >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 8 comments
Close
8 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds