Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The security hut at Government Buildings. RollingNews.ie

Final cost of Government Buildings security hut almost €300,000 above budget

New documents reveal more details about the controversial building.

THE CONTROVERSIAL SECURITY hut at Government Buildings cost 28% more than originally estimated.

Figures released under Freedom of Information show the original budget costs in May 2022 came to €1,138,904, including VAT.

TDs and Senators were told last September that the final costings came to €1,429,000 – a difference of €291,096.

Last year, Tánaiste Micheál Martin called the cost of the hut “ridiculous” and said he was shocked to hear the figure.

The head of the Office of Public Works (OPW), John Conlon, said at the time he did not believe the cost of the hut was excessive.

The security hut issues were raised with OPW representatives when they were questioned in September at the Oireachtas Finance and Public Expenditure committee about the €336,000 Leinster House bike shelter.

New documents released

The Project Business Case Document, dated 31 May 2022, has now been released to Waterford Local Radio under the Freedom of Information Act.

It shows the estimated costs were divided between building costs (€895,070 + VAT = €1,015,904) and Professional Fees (€100,000 + VAT = €123,000) and a figure of 1% for ‘ART’.

The combined figures appear substantially below that which was the final cost of €1,429,000.

Under ‘costs and benefits’, the document states that the project was to be co-funded by the Department of Agriculture and the OPW, with each body meeting 50% of the overall costs.

The consultants appointed were Mullarkey Pedersen Architects (for design and tender and construction phases); and Lawler Consulting Engineers (to look after design, tender and installation of mechanical & electrical services of the project.

The 10-page document has a number of lines redacted — including a number under the ‘anticipated outcomes’ headings; and one under ‘approvals’, including the name of the person who approved it and the title and organisation that person is with.

There are no specific details in the business case as to how the ‘roof’ was chosen, and no references to it. The roof is considered is a stand-out feature.

Security Hut-6_90713634 The controversial hut. RollingNews.ie RollingNews.ie

Under ‘anticipated outcomes’, it outlines how the hut or pavilion as it’s called would provide accommodation for two officers to include counters, four lockers and a small tea station; heating and air conditioning; power and data points for PCs; security screens and access control linked to the main control room in government buildings.

The case also outlines how the new structure would meet the requirements of An Garda Síochána’s security report.

John Conlon, the head of the OPW, told the Oireachtas committee meeting last September that “in future, the OPW will ensure that the Oireachtas Commission is fully informed of costs for all elective projects in Leinster House”.

The OPW, in defending the cost of the hut, said the structure was a ‘critical piece of infrastructure’ and needed extensive renovation to meet the requirements of security at Government Buildings, noting that it was becoming an ‘increasingly serious issue’.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 43 comments
Close
43 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds