Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE GOVERNMENT HAS lost a vote in the Dáil today on a Bill that seeks to ban trade on goods from illegally occupied areas.
In a further blow, some members of the Independent Alliance in government abstained from the vote.
The government lost the vote 75 votes to 45 votes, with three abstentions.
The Bill, does not mention Israel or Palestine specifically, but aims to prohibit Ireland from trading in goods and services from illegally occupied territories by prohibiting “the import and sales of goods, services and natural resources originating in illegal settlements in occupied territories”.
Amazing! First the Seanad, now the Dáil: an overwhelming majority have voted for the Occupied Territories Bill 2018 and a ban on illegal #SettlementGoods! Ireland will always stand for international law + human rights, & we're one step closer to making history. Onwards 👍🇮🇪🇵🇸 pic.twitter.com/28LKTZzAw0
Junior Minister John Halligan said he has long campaigned for Palestinian rights, telling theJournal.ie earlier that he intended to abstain from the vote today.
Transport Minister Shane Ross and Junior Minister for Disabilities Finian McGrath also abstained.
The ministers sought a free vote on the issue from Tánaiste Simon Coveney, but following numerous talks on the issue over the summer, the members decided to abstain.
Impact of government members voting yes
Advertisement
Halligan said Coveney advised the IA members that their concerns about the impact of members of the Irish government voting in favour of this Bill, particularly from the US, he said.
Halligan told TheJournal.ie that he is comfortable with his abstention from the vote, stating that “the important thing is, the Bill will pass”.
The only party opposed to the Bill, which was first introduced in the Seanad by Senator Frances Black, is Fine Gael. Had the numbers been tighter, Halligan said it would have been another story, indicating that he may have voted in favour of the Bill.
He also confirmed that the issue of the Israeli embassy closing because some members of government might vote in favour of the Bill was raised.
Yesterday, Fianna Fáil’s Niall Collins said he “hoped it wouldn’t come to that”, stating that it was “an overreaction”.
The Bill, which was produced in the Seanad by Senator Frances Black, “is an important tool in demonstrating that Ireland is opposed to illegal occupations wherever they occur” said Fianna Fáil’s Niall Collins yesterday.
Tánaiste Simon Coveney told TheJournal.ie that the advice government has received from the Attorney General is the legislation is “not legally sound”.
EU fines
Speaking in the Dáil yesterday, he said the Bill asks the government to do something that it does not have the power to do, adding that if brought into effect, it faces massive EU fines for differentiating our trade rules.
A number of other legal minds, including the former Attorney General Michael McDowell have said the Bill does not contravene European trade law.
Ross is understood to have sought further detail on the advice from the Attorney General.
Related Reads
Concerns over Israeli embassy closing down over Occupied Territories Bill 'an overreaction' say FF
Coveney rules out Occupied Territories Bill support but will discuss free vote with Independent Alliance ministers
Independent Alliance to seek a free vote for Israeli goods trade ban Bill
Fianna Fáil’s Jim O’Callaghan appealed to the government not to put a ‘money message’ on the Bill which would stall the legislation and prevent it from progressing to the next Stage and being heard in committee.
Blocking the Bill
A money message effectively means that the government states that to pass such legislation would cost money to the Exchequer. Opposition Bills are generally not permitted to do so.
Fianna Fáil’s Daragh O’Brien told the Tánaiste yesterday that this Bill was delayed last year in order to allow Coveney to raise the issues at European level. Referencing a letter from Coveney, O’Brien said this was not done.
He said now was the time to act on the issue, and send a moral message internationally, that might encourage other nations to follow suit.
Coveney said it was a “certainty” that a money message would be placed on the Bill – effectively blocking the legislation.
He said the legislation has “legal, political and practical” effects.
Coveney added that Ireland has a powerful voice at EU and UN level to advocate for the Palestinian people, stating that is where Ireland can help, and that is his priority.
Halligan told TheJournal.ie that Independent Alliance members in government would continue to advocate and put pressure on their Fine Gael colleagues to progress the Bill.
People Before Profit Paul Murphy said if the words of Halligan and other members of the IA mean anything over the last number of years they would be “tripping over themselves to vote yes” today.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
121 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Philip Riordan: The chicken came first, as all poultry emerged from a reptillian evolutionary spur i.e. their ancestors hatched over and over and evolved slowly until eventually the first chickens hatched from eggs also.
I’ll take this opportunity once again to remind everyone that Halligan was elected on the promise of getting 24-hour cardiac care for the South East but immediately threw away the significant leverage he had with the government in exchange for a ministerial job and pension.
Constituents of his are still dying because of this.
@Kem Trayle: just another Liar for sale, he did well, but do not forget this , run him from your door next election, he can have his pension, but I wouldn’t sell him a pint of milk down there ,unless ye like being used
@Kem Trayle: Yes one man makes or breaks government policy, your dead right its all his fault of course, the rubbish that is stuck up here is mind blowing it really is.
The Control of Economic Activity (Occupied Territories) Bill 2018 does not mention Israel and the Palestinian territories but will make it an offence “for a person to import or attempt to import settlement goods”.
@Padraic O Sullivan: Therefore it is necessary to remove the word “settlement” and thereby include all parts of the world occupied by other nations otherwise its only drafted against the Israelis. I expect TDs to amend this Bill
@Kilkenny Friends of Israel: it’s the Occupied Territories Bill and it includes all territories recognised as illegally occupied by the UN (both current and future). The illegal Israeli settlements that your referring to is just one example.
Have you gotten yourself confused by the context of the word ‘settlement’? It’s not used exclusively to refer to Israel.
“Halligan said Coveney advised the IA members that their concerns about the impact of members of the Irish government voting in favour of this Bill, particularly from the US, he said. ”
Why are we allowing out government to be intimidated by a foreign state? Nobody should be allowed to interfere with our democratically elected parliament.
They make me sick why do these clowns go into politics the people did not vote you into the to abstain from voting . This is what happens when you take the 30 pieces of silver your a sad bunch.
@Donal Carey: political dynasties with vested foreign investments, using their position as elected representatives to protect their private financial interests, abroad.
@Artugal: Totally agree FF fight every day in the Dail against what FG are doing a d when there is a no confidence vote they obtain or back FG same goes for these Independents
@Kilkenny Friends of Israel: the UN does not recognise Northern Ireland as an occupied territory. The bill targets any and all occupied territories recognised by the UN as illegal, Israel happens to a very obvious example of this, maybe if they didn’t flout international law they wouldn’t have to throw tantrums over how our government operates.
@Paul Whitehead: well I was expecting the old anti semiticism card to be played much earlier in the comments section. You didn’t disappoint after all.
Again confusing justice for racism. Illegal under the UN of which we are a part. Ireland setting the international standard. Superb.
This is where people power comes in regardless of the vote. No one is being forced to buy Israeli goods; just leave them on the shelf if you don’t want them.
@Karen Luby: Some sense here why not have a section with Israeli goods (like the Gluten free areas) and lets see people vote with their own conscience and decide to buy or not to buy these goods.
I’d prefer to see Irish people in homes (not houses) trolleys not necessary in hospitals, an ambulance when I want one, a garda when necessary, a college place & accomodation for our youth, mental health looked after and Suicide beaten & the Banks held responsible for their actions
@Kilkenny Friends of Israel: I didn’t say I have a problem with Israeli goods per se, I am just pointing out people can choose for themselves. Nestle products aren’t banned but I try and avoid them due to their baby milk formula scandal. Same way I try avoid plastic, products containing palm oil etc…
Politicians There nothing in it for me’ by voting in favour of this bill , so by abstaining they’ll be something down the line. Politics is all about, ‘what’s in it for me. – to hell with ye’ and true justice doesn’t get a look in. Actions speak louder than words.
@David Jones: Ireland imports only a few million worth of goods from Israel but exports close to 1 billion euro worth of goods to Israel. As we look for new markets post Brexit, do we really want to kick off a trade war with the only democratic country in the region ?
@Stephen Kearon: democratic country. Lol. Go read something. There are plenty other democratic countries in the Middle East. Look up the definition of democracy. Your ignorance is amusing.
@Stephen Kearon: I’m hoping Israel will BDS Ireland and thousands of Irish and Palestinian jobs are lost. Ireland is Banjaxed and nothing short of a Revolution will save us from the Shinners and terrorist supporters.
Israel would be doing the Irish a favour and the terrorist Jihadi supporters would get their wish.
I think this bill is a mistake. I know many Palestinians work in Israeli factories in the West Bank. I know also that many workers in Gaza were working on Israel prior to Hamas takeover. The West Bank was previously occupied by Jordan. Has it occurred to some that Jordan and Israel have diplomatic relations and flights between the countries. Perhaps Those that support this bill should explain themselves to Apple and other tech and pharmaceutical companies workers should they decide to relocate.
@Michael O’Byrne: the bill got full support from the Palestinians in the West Bank when Senator Black went over there. Do you consider the Israeli bulldozing of Palestinian villages to be replaced with Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank illegal or not?
@Cormac Ó Braonáin: Lol, Mary-Lou visited President-for-life Mahmoud Abbas, who is in year 15 of a 4-year term by the way, and other terrorists in Ramallah, but she didn’t visit Palestinian Human Rights Activist Bassem Eid, any of the 100,000 Palestinians who work in Israel or the other estimated 400,000 Palestinians who earn a living from the Israeli economy.
Sinn Fein and other Jihadi supporters have no problem cutting off the noses of 500,000 Palestinians who oppose BDS, to spite the faces of Jews. Stop spouting rubbish you know nothing about.
@Joe: maybe you will answer my question. Do you consider the Israeli bulldozing of Palestinian villages to be replaced with Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank illegal? Don’t go into hiding now.
@Joe: good man. Didn’t realise you’ve been to Ramallah and the West Bank. The rhetoric that you’re spouting is the greatest load of tripe I’ve heard in my life. If you’ve been there you would realise that Palestinians are in full support of BDS across the West Bank irrespective of where they get their jobs. They’ve lived through worse than having no job. But you’d know that having been there of course.
@Cormac Ó Braonáin:
“West Bank”? You mean Judea and Samaria.
“Settlements”? Jews were ethnically cleansed from Judea and Samaria in 1948 where they lived for millennia, but when they returned home in
1967, but you call them “Settlers”?
I strongly support bulldozing homes of terrorists once convicted.
As for “bulldozing villages”? I strongly support demolishing illegal structures, especially the Bedouin School built from car tyres and junk as it was a danger to the children and was built without planning permission on land they didn’t legally own, especially when Israel gave them free land to build safe structures on.
Any Arab claiming they lost land in 1948 can become an Israeli citizen if they can produce Land Title Deeds and show their names on the Land Registry of the British Mandate or Ottoman Empire. No Arabs lost any land in 1948, none. 850,000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from Arab countries in 1948.
Government loses vote on Israeli goods trade ban Bill, as ministers abstain
Junior Minister John Halligan said he is comfortable with his abstention from the vote, stating that ‘the important thing is, the Bill will pass’. Cowards couldn’t take a proper stand, Scrupleless!
Ahhh the Independent Alliance, abstain on a vote but want to go over to North Korea to talk some sense into Kim Jong.
Disney couldn’t write a script like it.
Dumbo, the seven dwarfs, the king of thieves.
Still nothing as outrageous as the clowns of Leinster House.
Israel please BDS Ireland and thousands of Irish and Palestinian jobs will be lost. Ireland is Banjaxed and nothing short of a Revolution will save us.
In 2016 Ireland exported $2 billion worth of goods to Israel and Ireland imported $83 million from Israel. You don’t need to do business with a country who hates you and you would be doing the Irish a great service. It is likely that POTUS will also have to follow US Law and Ireland will turn into the Venezuelan dream.
The Brain Drain that Ireland has suffered over the years has reached Critical Velocity. It will be unfortunate that so many Palestinians lose their livelihood but I have little concern that the Irish who have been calling for an end to relations with Israel will get their wish, and lose their jobs. Be careful what you wish for.
@Joe: Joe, I for one hate nobody and I 100% approve of this Bill. It’s about human rights, respect and ending occupation, not hate. Give Palestinians the same rights as Israeli’s and stop treating them as an untermenschen in their own land. Martin Luther King day was last Monday, he will be a happy man today. His hopes, vision and dreams live on in this Bill 51 years after his death.
A good day for democracy, Ireland and human rights. In the 1930s if more European countries had actively dissapproved of the treatment of Jews, homosexuals etc in Germany some of the later atrocities might never had happened.
@Charles Williams: Stop conflating Jews with the Holocaust. Jews have lived continuously in Israel for over 3,000 years. The Jews didn’t suddenly come to Israel in 1948 from Europe, Europe systematically eliminated most of its Jews. 850,000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from Arab/Muslim countries and came to Israel in 1948 to join other Jews because no other country would accept them.
The Region which the British Mandate called “Palestine” was divided up and 77% given to Arabs to create the Palestinian State of Jordan. No Country named Palestine ever existed, the myth of the country was created by an Egyptian Terrorist named Yassir Arafat in 1964. It wasn’t until Arabs attacked Israel in 2 wars and lost, that Arabs called themselves “Palestinians”, and only as a means to exterminate Jews and the State of Israel. http://markhumphrys.com/palestine.invented.html
@Joe: wasn’t the founder of Israel a man by the name of David Grün born and raised in Poland and changed his name to Ben-Gurion? Son of Avigdor Grün, leader of the Hovevei Zion movement, and a forefather of modern Zionism?
@Hugh Davison: For a start, 850,000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from Arab countries in 1948 and Israel was the only country that would accept Jews. Also, Arabs are 23% of Israelis. Jews have continued to be ethnically cleansed from other countries for years and the only safe place to be Jewish is the tiny State of Israel.
@Cormac Ó Braonáin: If you want to know the name of who founded Israel you could either;
Read the Holy Qur’an and find that Allah is a Zionist and gave Israel to the Jews until the Day of Judgement, ie; no good Muslim believes in Palestine as it is not mentioned in the Qur’an, neither is Jerusalem mentioned,
Or
You could refer to ancient history going back about 4,000 years and name the kings of Judea and Samaria, and many other Jewish Kingdoms stretching from Egypt to Syria and beyond.
What is a lot more interesting historically is the fact that the mythical Country of Palestine was invented in 1964 by an Egyptian terrorist named Yassir Arafat, but Arabs didn’t begin calling themselves “Palestinians” until they attacked Israel in two wars and lost on the 4 June 1967. Previously Palestine was a Region under the British Mandate and 77% of the land was given to Arabs to create the Palestinian State of Jordan.
They haven’t even got the guts to call it the West Bank Settlements Boycott Act’. Has anyone ever asked any of them to name even one other territory this is going to be applied to?
Amazing, have just read through a vast majority of the comments on here and they are all saying well done. Now let’s see what our leaders, the EU have to say about our activities, we are after all ruled by them. Let’s hope that none of this affects our trade with other countries you short sighted lot.
Thundering disgrace by feeble minded politicians who have given Hamas, ISIS and Bin Laden fellow travellers a slap on the back and used democracy to undermine democracy. They should hang their heads in shame on the anniversary of our own democracy and its inception, the people in Gaza or the West Bank will not benefit from this but the symbolism undermines democracy in the only democratically elected country in the Middle East.
Great Chance now to sack Ross, the other two will be collateral damage but that’s polatics , then when the dust settles let this bill through, and Rid of Ross , everyone is a winner ?
Reading between the lines, looks like this bill will still be blocked further down the line, Today’s vote might be step in right direction, but doubt if it will ever see daylight, Government will find a way to delay and block it indefinitely, Simply Politics;
@Pat O’Brien: Simply don’t vote for FFG. Not that I think SF will probably do much better but FF/FG need to learn they don’t have some divine right to rule, it’s pure conceit at this stage they blithely ignore the populous and just do as they please secure in the knowledge they’ll be re-elected again and again, if we start hitting them where it hurts- their cushy pensions, huge salaries with tax breaks, expense accounts, fancy dinners, dail bar and living like royalty on the taxpayer dime- they might actually sit up and take notice rather than spouting empty promises.
Halligan trying to have his cake and eat it there “I would probably have voted yes” my eye. Now on to phase 2, FG and FF will use the EU as an excuse not to enact this bill, amazing isn’t it when we’re told to clean up and overhaul our massively corrupt legal system by the EU it’s quietly ignored but when we need a new tax or a policy that the government don’t agree with is voted on “The EU cannot be ignored”
@Pragmatist2018: Hmm on closer inspection the problem seems to be “Article 17.2 of the Constitution provides that the Dáil shall not appropriate public money for any purpose unless the Government has first recommended that purpose to the Dáil by a Money Message signed by the Taoiseach. Similarly under Dáil Standing Orders amendments to Bills appropriating public money or imposing taxation are confined to a member of the Government.”. It seems this minority govt is increasingly resorting to the “money message” power to block Opposition bills. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/government-relying-on-little-known-rule-to-block-bills-1.3133081
@Pragmatist2018: The Opposition should take a leaf from John Bercow’s book in the UK. They should ask the Ceann Comhairle to rule on whether in fact the “money measure” can be invoked in this case. That might help get the bill passed.
@Paul Whitehead: Haha, you see, that has been the Zionist way for decades. You prove you understand that by your statement. Manipulation through wealth, throwing money at opposition to their crimes. All that’s happening here is that none of that will work this time. Regardless of how much you want it.
Special Needs Assistants who lose positions in a school to benefit from redeployment scheme
47 mins ago
604
The Morning Lead
Parents of under-18s most sceptical demographic of vaccines in Ireland
Lauren Boland
6 hrs ago
1.9k
Courts
Trial underway for Dublin man charged with murder of girlfriend while on holiday in Spain
12 hrs ago
38.9k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 175 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 117 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 155 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 121 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 87 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 88 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 42 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 143 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 67 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 83 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 90 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 52 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 28 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 76 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 57 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 96 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 77 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say