Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
HASBRO SAYS IT will soon reveal a gender-neutral Easy Bake Oven after meeting with a New Jersey girl who started a campaign calling on the toy maker to make one that appeals to all kids.
She was prompted to start the petition after shopping for an Easy Bake as a Christmas present for her 4-year-old brother, Gavyn Boscio, and finding them only in purple and pink.
Hasbro invited McKenna and her family to its headquarters to meet with its Easy Bake team earlier this week. During the meeting, Hasbro executives showed off a prototype of their newest Easy Bake: one that’s black, silver and blue.
Advertisement
Hasbro has been working on the new color scheme and design for about 18 months, and decided to invite McKenna to see it and offer her thoughts, said John Frascotti, Hasbro’s chief marketing officer.
McKenna said the company is doing everything she asked, including putting boys in the ads.
I think that they really met most or even all of what I wanted them to do, and they really amazed me.
Frascotti pointed out that the classic toy has had about a dozen different color schemes, from yellow to green to teal to silver, since first being introduced in 1963. The most recent iteration, introduced in 2011, is mostly purple with pink accents.
He said it’s sold well since then, and that prompted the company to look for a way to update it and to broaden the consumer base by doing it in different colors.
It’s actually a product that’s played with by both boys and girls. We will continue to offer the existing product too because it’s so popular.
Hasbro plans to introduce the new color scheme at the industry’s Toy Fair in New York in February. Frascotti said people are likely to see it on shelves next summer.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
“Of course the ongoing hate campaigns never rests…
There is at least one new conspiracy theory a day.
The latest – and perhaps most entertaining – spin is that ”I can see CO2 with my own eyes”.
This is of course a metaphor from a book taken out of it’s context, taken from a German newspaper.
No one has said that I can literally see CO2… that is beyond stupid.
This should of course not be necessary to mention but since some respected newspapers have written about this without realizing that this is a fake news campaign I thought it was best to point this out.
While I am at it I also want to point out that when I say that ”our civilisation is almost like a castle built in the sand” or that ”our house on fire” these are metaphors too:)
PS This book is written by my family and our earnings from this book will go to charity.”
@Paraic: Memetics is the study of information and culture. Why does information warfare ring a bell, wouldn’t have anything to do with Alex Jones would it?
@➕The Gray➕: Don’t forget to keep flooding the net with fascist memes, there’s a good troll. Don’t stub you’re toe in the rock when you’re getting back under it.
@FlyingDogThing: We’re still only wheeling her out because we enjoy watching a child do the adults work. Realistically she is a marketing stunt, but a very good one at that!
@DaveevaD: u say religious fundamentalist but the way people react when questions are asked about certain points of climate change makes me think they have their own version of fundamentalism going on. Nothing wrong with being cynical. Also Gretta met with president Obama yesterday I believe and he agrees with her that climate change is going to submerge coastal islands in the coming years so much he bought a $15m mansion on Martha’s Vineyard. Something amiss ni?
You seem to be the kind of eejit that gets your nonesense from the likes of The Journal, RTÉ and of course 16 year old girls that are so ignorant and obnoxious they don’t even have to go to school to lecture the world.
@Diarmuid Hunt: Rob Porter, The Gay and Vote4Pedro are Pro-Life, anti-vaxx, tinfoil hat merchants, as per their Twitter feeds and past brainfarts on The Journal. They believe Jesus turned water into wine, the 14 year old Virgin Mary was impregnated by a ‘holy spirit’ and zombies that rose from the dead, science isn’t really their bag, a trio of absolute melts!
@Vote4Pedro, the gray, rob porter etc: what has she said that isn’t true? Listen to your scientists and act on their advice??? Yup absolutely mad stuff.
@Mairead1990: God bless u mairead, I had quite the laugh at that, I’m not anti-vaxx. I work in a scientific field actually but yes I do go to mass, I’m sorry if that helps. U seem angry, deep breaths and gently nod off to sleep and lay off the w(h)ine
@Vote4Pedro: theology isn’t s science just because it has ology on the end of it, I’m afraid. Given the lies you spout elsewhere on the thread, I seriously doubt that anyway.
@DaveevaD: Those scientists are selling an exaggerated lie, they are getting big funding, that Michael Mann the guy who started all this mess with the hockey stick graph was in court lately bringing a case against the founding member of Greenpeace Patrick Moore who said Michael Moore should be In state Penn instead of Penn State for spreading junk science, the asked me Mann to produce his work on this graph he refused that he was not on trial, he was then ordered to on the next sitting he still didn’t produce his work so the judge awarded all costs against me Mann. The latest news is he has lost them its starting to unravel. Another case was lost in Australia when a university sacked a professor for saying the great barrier reef is healthy. temperatures don’t follow co2, global temperatures are going down co2 going up, co2 is good for plants. The polar bears are doing fine numbers gone up to over 25 thousand from around 7 thousand. Antarctic ice is increasing as is the arctic ice. Over 33 thousand scientists have signed up in support of the scientists that are voicing concern’s on the unnecessary climate alarmism.
@Diarmuid Hunt: 33 thousand more in the scientists have signed a petition of support for the above named scientists. And this 97% was 97% of 75 scientists agreeing to consensus that man is changing the planets temperature. Its just a giant money making scam and its out of control from the junk science getting huge funding to industry making billions selling batteries,windmills and solar panels. Just have a look at youtube channel of tony Heller just be broad-minded and look at a dozen or so. he shows his work and more is available if you email him.
@brendan H: 97% of 75 scientists? Bull. 97% of scientists is correct as is 97% of peer-reviewed papers on climate change agree with ACC. Do a bit if research, their is plenty of evidence for that claim, at least 7 peer-reviewed papers on the percentage of consensus gave figures between 91% and 100%, with the majority hovering around 97%. Tony Heller aka Steven Goddard that has a degree in geology and electrical engineering, oh come of it. I don’t ask geologist for advice on climate change just like I don’t ask an electrical engineer for medical advice. Out of those 33’000 scientists how many have actual degrees relevant to the subject? There’s 4.7 million people with science degrees in the US alone, 33’000, that’s 0.007%. 1/2
@brendan H: You want to talk about financial backing from green energy companies and fail to mention the amount the petrochemical industries give to ACC deniers. I think you may have opened your mind so much that your brain fell out.
@Diarmuid Hunt: *0.7% sorry for the mistake. Also remember that is global 33’000 and US 4’700’000, the global number of scientists is larger again meaning the figure is actually <0.7%.
A child, remember that she is a child, that she is on the autism spectrum is a real cause for worry. Where are her parents, they “pushed”her on the world stage at 14, it’s totally unethical.
@Aine Power: You have it the wrong way, she ‘pushed’ her parents. She wants to do this, her parents were brave enough to encourage her. You should support that.
@Tim Pot: they have allowed her onto the political stage, where she will receive vile criticism from people with no horse in the race, that’s neglectful! Also, the reason they have allowed her to do this is because any tough questions put to her are shouted down with “leave her alone shes autistic”
@Aine Power: The fact that she is has Asperger’s merely means that she possesses super powers. She tends to see things very logically and is highly focused on climate science. Science says, that our house is burning down. Logically, it makes no sense to her, that the house is burning down, and yet we aren’t acting with extreme urgency. A person with Asperger’s needs to reconcile this discrepancy. Logically, the only thing for her to do, is to explain to as many people as possible that the house is burning down and that they need to act. And to point out that whatever excuse they may have for failing to act, is not backed up by science. It’s Asperger’s that’s driving her, not her parents or anyone else.
@Aine Power: Yet another keyboard warrior putting down someone that’s trying to do something positive for the planet while contributing nothing themselves. Your parents must be very proud that you are a Microsoft certified professional.
@Badger the witness: Save the planet? What are you talking about? You do realise that worst case scenario with climate change is that the planet becomes uninhabitable for humans, right? But the planet will still be there afterwards. Your turn of phrase is embarrassing…
@Edmund Spencer: At least his sentiment is in the right place, wish more people would realise that it’s not the planet we need to save, it’s ourselves/future human generations.
@Maureen: The usual brain dead argument. “I don’t care if the house is burning down because, it’s perfectly comfortable where I am.” (Hiding inside the fridge).
@Paraic: as a matter of curiosity, did you ever see a brain dead person having an argument?? Also, you must have a pretty big fridge to be able to physically get into it. I’d imagine the creation of it and the running cost of it is having a serious negative impact on the environment. Cop yourself on and store your perishable items in the bog like I do!!
Ud swear she was the 2nd coming of christ the way people are treating her, how in all fairness does a 14 year old foreign child get to address the house without fierce backing from vested interests, and I dont mean true environmentalists. Theres serious money to be made from spreading terror about the forthcoming apocalypse, and this to me is a phoney war among 2 corporate sides of the arguement.
@Vote4Pedro: It must be awful for you not understanding how a young “foreigner” can already achieve so much more than you ever will. Ever stop to wonder why no one is queing up to sponsor your viewpoint?
@Paraic: Technically to US Congress she is a ‘foreigner’ not that it makes one iota of difference where she’s from. Says more about the commenter than it does Greta by including that fact in their argument.
Does she not go to school?
And who funding all this campaign?
Travel. Food .Accommodation?
And is she going back on same boat to save climate change or a plane?
And is she been driven around in gas swallowing cars while there ?
Just wondering !!
@Kipper O Keeffe: You can argue the funding if you want but is there infrastructure in place for her to travel carbon-neutral all the time? This argument that climate activists use transport and aren’t living an ascetic lifestyle and are therefore hypocritical is ridiculous, if that option was there they wouldn’t have to be climate activists would they?
It’s interesting how the word science and scientist are used to prop up one’s argument. The fact is though that scientists are not unanimous on the origin of global warming. True, the bigger and louder part might be, but not all of them. And whose to say the bigger and louder part of them is correct?
Critical thinking is in order here. Hype, money and financial interests might be hiding behind this campaign. Following Greta blindly is not the way for me.
@Rob Porter: I heard it from Obama? Obama has nothing to do with it for me, dont know why you’d try and bring him into it, almost like you have an agenda or something. Feel free to give me your source of where it has been debunked.
If you also read the paper by Cook et al. You’ll easily identify that the vast majority of scientists didn’t even bother to respond to his survey.
It’s a bit like sending a survey out to 100 people, and only three respond. Two say they like the taste of Barry’s tea over Lyons and then it’s proclaimed on that basis the majority of people surveyed agree Barry’s tea taste better.
Much of the Arctic has already melted – 12 billion tons melting in just one day -and without Earth cooler to cool Earth down and no ice to reflect heat back into space – global warming will supercharge at an even faster pace. Warmer air holds more water so more rain and warmer waters fuel even more powerful storms and hurricanes. In Antarctica too an ice berg size of Florida is already in its death throes melting from above and the bottom.
@GO GREEN: You picked the wrong website to be posting facts on. The Tin Foil Hate party will be along shortly to correct you based on that post they saw on Facebook that one time or whatever nonsense it is today.
@GO GREEN: Will you ever cop on with that rubbish the arctic is doing fine, polar bear numbers are up over 25k from 6k. Antarctic ice is increasing where are you getting this silly info. Noaa and nasa have all the satellite info. The arctic calfs millions of tons every spring and summer daily, its stopped now because its getting colder, if the arctic didn’t get rid of its ice it would be piled up higher than mount Everest. Are you an adult with common since or a child with an active imagination listening to scientists who are selling the biggest scam ever for big funding because who would argue against them because they are scientists and every one else is not so believe what we say, but that is coming to an end now because other scientists are starting to question them. Listen to the other side of the argument.
@brendan H: Yes and maybe should look at the satellite data – Antarctica’s Ice Loss Has Reached 250 Billion Tons Per Year -https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/antarcticas-ice-loss-has-reached-250-billion-tons-year-180971280/
@brendan H: There is no other side of the argument only facts. You are the only child swallowing propaganda from vested interests. Burying your head in the sand won’t change the outcome.
@Bryan Yelahw: Pot kettle black how do you think is going to make a load of money from this so called man made climate scam, ya didn’t think it through because your head is buried deep in the sand. Open the mind there fella.
@Bryan Yelahw: you don’t have facts anymore than a parrot has opinions.
That’s the problem. You accept a narrative 97% of scientists believe AGW to be true save yourself the bother of fact checking this and then prattle on like you’ve researched the topic and have come to you own conclusion.
@Gilly Mor: the only shame is you haven’t researched any of the stats yourself. That’s why you latch on to a child’s nightmares to clothe yourself in virtuous sanctimony.
@Rob Porter: You think your ability to interpret the stats is better than somebody who has studied for years in the field? If you go (re)searching you can find “evidence” for the world being flat.
@Rob Porter: I prefer to leave that in the hands of those qualified enough to understand what they are looking at, have collectively agreed on what the data says and have the ability to put it into context for the rest of us rather than a Joe soaps personal take if it’s all the same to you.
Much in the same way i listen to my doctors instead of people’s personal opinions when it comes to my health.
The only real shame lies with people with no formal education in the sciences and no research whatsoever conducted of their own try to educate the rest of us on how they are right and those with an actual clue what they are talking about are wrong.
@Gilly Mor: humans have been in denial at their peril since time began and will continue to do so till the end of time, anyone who thinks humans will change is in denial too
Meanwhile whilst the little people pay a carbon tax “JPMorgan Chase, which is America’s largest bank and the world’s most valuable by market capitalization. In the three years since the end of the Paris climate talks, Chase has reportedly committed a hundred and ninety-six billion dollars in financing for the fossil-fuel industry, much of it to fund extreme new ventures: ultra-deep-sea drilling, Arctic oil extraction, and so on.” https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/money-is-the-oxygen-on-which-the-fire-of-global-warming-burns
@Shakka1244: and when the last trope has been used, along with any semblance of originality or independent though, you’ll no longer be able to rely on irrelevant analogies.
@Vote4Pedro: The Amazon is not the lungs of the world. It’s actually very close to been carbon neutral due to the vast array of wildlife within it. It’s the oceans of the world that are the lungs of the world creating in the region of 60% of the oxygen within our atmosphere.
People are more likely to believe in superstitions than 97% of scientific fact. Watch out for those ladders, salute a lone magpies and if you’ve broken a mirror I feel for you, 7yrs.. unluckly
Attacks on the messenger by many commentators here. A 16 year old girl that’s brave enough to take her message to the world. I find it pretty disturbing and extremely worrying.
@Shakka1244: They’re fundamentalist Catholics, easily manipulated by conspiracy theorists like Gemma O’Doherty, incredibly dumb individuals who performed poorly in school and with relationships, now they just want to watch the whole world burn because their feelings are hurt.
@Diarmuid Hunt: Mairead’s entire outlook is coloured by the red-tinted progressive glasses that view any opinion as invalid if it does not ideologically align to her own cause.
This is the embryonic mentality that leftists use to justify things such as expropriation, collectivisation and gulags once their ideology gains traction. If you don’t conform to the puritanical worldview then you are guilty by association and your opinions, voice and rights cease to exist.
@Rob Porter: I see the same sort on the right, it is not a right/left thing, you have just used the same kind of generalisations to paint everybody on the left with the same brush as she did to the right. You’re two sides of the same coin if you ask me.
@➕The Gray➕: “Does this slow-down in the warming mean that the idea of anthropogenic global warming is no longer valid? The short answer is ‘no’.” Copy and pasted from the link you shared, just because there’s a lot of text and most people won’t bother to read it, and the url seems to back what you want to believe doesnt make it true. Try harder.
@➕The Gray➕: ‘Hysterical and uppity’ and ‘clown’? Dont go melting before you make your counter-argument. You did post a link to some scientific data, which agrees with ACC, so you do believe in anthropogenic climate change as your link suggests?
@➕The Gray➕: Also despite your attempted insults I’d like to thank you for posting that link, it’s very interesting and gives many reasons as to why a slowdown in the rising temperatures could have happened while ACC is the driving force behind the long-term rise in temperatures. Considering your other posts on this thread it was a beautiful own goal.
@➕The Gray➕: The link you posted is about Microwave sounding satellites. They measured the heat of the atmosphere in the microwave region from space. Satellites can be affected by cloud cover, volcanic haze and radiation in space. They are not accurate.
How do I explain this Satellite versus thermometer thing?
It is like trying to count the number of people in Croke Park by Satellite versus directly counting the number of people who entered the stadium at the turn styles.
These Satellites are far inferior to direct weather station measurements, on the ground, thermometers are Gold Standard of directly measuring the temperature of the Earth.
Thermometers on the ground show no pause is warming.
@Nowa Huta: She bases her beliefs on modern science, David Koresh based his beliefs on the writings of archaic middle-eastern nomads, definitely the same thing.
@Rob Porter: So at 16 you had no cognitive ability? Come on, you have obviously grown in your cognitive ability since then but to suggest teenagers know nothing is just downright stupid.
When the last tree has been cut down… Funny that. There doesn’t seem to be joined up thinking with regard to climate change if planting trees and creating ecosystems for bees is a good thing. Trees are being cut down left right and centre while we are being told the planet is at crisis point and we need to pay carbon tax and stop eating animal products. There is no consistency. We eschew local produce for something that has flown across the world after being grown in far less favourable conditions. The mind boggles. Greta probably means well but her Asperger’s might not help her see through less genuine campaigners who are riding the gravy train.
@Leo Lalor: Her issue is that eventually others after her won’t get a chance to enjoy their childhood due to the actions of their predecessors. Fairly noble to give up her own childhood for the sake of others’.
@Diarmuid Hunt: by taking a large expensive carbon producing cruise across the Atlantic or jetting here there and everywhere. This puppet is just a sideshow distraction . Her parents should be reported to childline.
Scary how many twitter bots are in the comments here. Just shows how important she is when people invent fake accounts to make it sound as though there’s a lot of people against her.
Just remember folks, you’ve descended to the comments section of a Greta Thunberg article. Expect vile attacks on the girls character from a bunch of know it all conspiracy theorist. Like sharks to chum.
Austistic children are exceptionally intelligent…and she is a credit to the human race…this young girl is trying to make us all see the damage thats being done to our planet..she should be supported and applauded…you only have to listen to the scientist’s and if thats not enough have a good look at the catastrophic w3ather events over the last 5 years all over the world..
Amazing how many bots in the comments here. Goes to show the lengths people will go to disprove facts. If they are creating fake accounts to make it seem as though a lot of people agree with them it’s not really working either.
Dublin student Oscar Despard leads team to victory in final of BBC's University Challenge
Updated
20 mins ago
13.9k
34
good evening
Here's What Happened Today: Monday
36 mins ago
647
Road Safety
CCTV from petrol station captured clear images of crash that killed Garda Kevin Flatley
Updated
8 hrs ago
104k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 187 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 126 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 165 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 129 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 92 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 150 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 88 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 95 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 111 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 100 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 83 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say