Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

New Ireland boss Heimir Hallgrímsson. Alamy Stock Photo

Heimir Hallgrímsson confirmed as new Republic of Ireland manager

The former Iceland and Jamaica boss will take charge of his first game against England on 7 September.

LAST UPDATE | 10 Jul 2024

HEIMIR HALLGRIMSSON HAS been confirmed as the Republic of Ireland senior men’s team manager.

The former Iceland boss, who led them to qualification for the 2018 World Cup, was most recently in charge of Jamaica for the past two years and has signed a deal for the upcoming Nations League and 2026 World Cup qualifying campaign.

Hallgrímsson left his role with Jamaica after defeats to Mexico, Ecuador and Venezuela in the group stages of this summer’s Copa America.

He will be unveiled at a press conference at Aviva Stadium tomorrow and will take charge of his first match in the same venue when Ireland’s kick off the Nations League against England on 7 September.

Hallgrímsson was also joint manager of his native country with Lars Lagerbäck when they reached Euro 2016, famously beating England in the round of 16 to reach the quarter finals.

FAI director of football Marc Canham says Hallgrímsson was identified as the number one target “earlier this year” and cited his “track record of qualifying for major international tournaments and taking teams up the FIFA World rankings” as key to his appointment.

While Canham also praised the work of former interim boss John O’Shea for “preparing the team impeccably, creating a brilliant environment for the players and achieving positive results on the pitch,” it is Hallgrímsson whose appointment was ratified by the FAI board after being put forward by Canham.

“Ireland is rightly a proud footballing nation which has consistently produced talented players and enjoyed many memorable moments at major international tournaments,” the new manager said.

“We have a young and exciting team that has genuine potential. I am looking forward to working closely with the players to help coach and guide them towards improved performances and results ensuring we qualify and compete at major tournaments on a regular basis. We have important and exciting games coming up in the UEFA Nations League later this year and a massive FIFA World Cup qualification campaign coming up next year.

“Finally, I am also looking forward to getting to know the people of Ireland and in particular the wonderful fans of Irish football. It is my responsibility to coach, prepare and develop our team as best as possible to deliver results on the pitch and to make our supporters happy and proud.”

Canham added: “[He was the] candidate whose capabilities and experience aligned with our criteria. Not only does Heimir have significant experience at international level with two different countries, but crucially he also has a track record of qualifying for major international tournaments and taking teams up the FIFA World rankings.

“It was also important for us that we recruited a Head Coach who is interested in the overall development of football in Ireland as outlined in the FAI’s football pathways plan and in particular someone who is interested in the development of our underage international teams both of which Heimir is hugely passionate about.”

David Courell, the interim chief executive, hailed the appointment as a “significant day for Irish football” and was on the recruitment panel along with Canham, Packie Bonner, People & Culture Director Aoife Rafferty and FAI President Paul Cooke.

“When I met Heimir, I was I extremely impressed by his level of professionalism, experience, integrity, and deep knowledge of the game,” Cooke said.

“I would like to thank my fellow members of the recruitment panel, David Courell, Aoife Rafferty, Packie Bonner and in particular our Director of Football Marc Canham who collectively ran a very thorough and confidential process which was respectful of the candidates involved and which identified and secured the standout candidate.”

Written by David Sneyd and originally published on The 42 whose award-winning team produces original content that you won’t find anywhere else: on GAA, League of Ireland, women’s sport and boxing, as well as our game-changing rugby coverage, all with an Irish eye. Subscribe here.

Author
View 72 comments
Close
72 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anne-Marie McNally
    Favourite Anne-Marie McNally
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:21 PM

    Fantastic initiative by these 3 guys fighting for equality. Stand up and fight with them. Vote With Us. Vote YES! Make your own video and submit it on http://www.votewithus.org

    167
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:50 PM

    Vote yes because it is the right thing to do.

    129
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:54 PM

    YES :)

    86
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Rand
    Favourite Tom Rand
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:31 PM

    No No No NO!

    24
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Rand
    Favourite Tom Rand
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:35 PM

    No no no NO

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:46 PM

    Care to tell us why Tom

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Lang
    Favourite Anthony Lang
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:06 PM

    Even homophobes are entitled to their opinions and to vote no.

    Homophobes have the right to be wrong but not to engage in verbal or physical abuse.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute stopit
    Favourite stopit
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:42 PM

    I’m usually giving out about him these days but fair play to Paul Murphy for calling out a baseless fear that people will use this as a anti-government protest vote.

    117
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Burke
    Favourite Tom Burke
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:16 PM

    Do NOT vote for or against the government – vote on the issue

    74
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute deerhounddog
    Favourite deerhounddog
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:21 PM

    Use your own mind and do what makes natural sense. Leave things as they are and let marriage be for men and women.

    72
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joanna
    Favourite Joanna
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:24 PM

    Marriage isn’t natural….

    106
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:24 PM

    Because discrimination makes sense?! Ha, nice try

    93
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eric
    Favourite Eric
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:27 PM

    Meh, the idea of something being unnatural is a logical fallacy. Everything that happens is a product of the cosmos, therefore everything is natural.

    72
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute TheDoctor
    Favourite TheDoctor
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:52 PM

    “use your own mind and do what I say”

    Thats how I read your ridiculous statement.

    67
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute George Grey
    Favourite George Grey
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:53 PM

    Deerhoundog
    Are you really saying that the feelings of gay people do not make “natural sense”. Do you really think your own feelings make “natural sense” to anybodu else? I thibk you need to go away and try to acquire some “natural sense”!

    57
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Somniac
    Favourite Somniac
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:25 PM

    It feels strange to be asked if I accept or reject the right of strangers to make legal their union with one another. I would not for one second allow anybody to tell me what or with whom I engage my day to day life. It’s unthinkable that I would seek to impose my preferences on others. Yet that it what i am being asked to do. That being so, there is, of course, only one possible answer.

    Reading the comments, I can see I’m alone in being pissed off with a headline which reads ‘What mother wouldn’t want this for her children?’ It’s a bit rich, in an article about equality, to assume that this is something that only ‘mothers’ are concerned about. I’m a father several times over. It matters to me.

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Helen Ryder
    Favourite Helen Ryder
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:33 PM

    Somniac, I think that the heading is a quote from one of the videos and does not in itself remove fathers from the debate.

    34
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Somniac
    Favourite Somniac
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:38 PM

    Thanks Helen. It’s unfortunate that the editor chose to use a discriminatory quote in an article about discrimination. It’s a minor point in the big debate though. The main thing is to get the darn thing passed. Hopefully sense will prevail and prejudice will wither on the vine.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán O'Ceallaghan
    Favourite Seán O'Ceallaghan
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:37 PM

    Voting Yes bacause it doesn’t affect me

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bigus Bear
    Favourite Bigus Bear
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:51 PM

    The decision how to vote must be made with a cool head and not emotional blackmail…

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Wall
    Favourite Stephen Wall
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:05 PM

    Bigus, if people were actively campaigning to prevent you from marrying the person you love, you’d probably feel like letting people know how you feel. It’s far from emotional blackmail. The fact is this referendum affects gay people profoundly. If passed, it will cement their security in the notion that they are fully welcome and equal members of their society. In that context, a little emotion is surely forgivable.

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Catherine Hayward
    Favourite Catherine Hayward
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 4:33 PM

    I am tired of the word homophobic, just because some of us find this latest Marry who you want when you want and how you want , a little difficult to get our head around does not make us weird, just worried about the whole concept, no one should say sorry for being who they are but either should i for being straight…

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Catherine Hayward
    Favourite Catherine Hayward
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:04 PM

    Thats fine Billy, just know the difference ….

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Helen Ryder
    Favourite Helen Ryder
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:19 PM

    Catherine, thank you for your comment. As you can see, the commentators in this forum have become old sparring partners through dozens of similar articles and it can get very heated here. I had my own outburst near the top of the thread, something I have just apologised for.

    For those who have genuine questions as to why our gay and lesbian friends wish to avail of the right to marry under Irish law may I recommend to you this website :
    http://www.marriagequality.ie There is not only a FAQ which demonstrates the 160 differences between civil partnership and full and equal marriage. There are also a number of personal stories by the people whose lives will be changed by your vote in this referendum. Please read the stories, you will see that in every way but one we are the same, and in every single way we have the same hopes and dreams.

    In fairness I also suggest that you look up the No side. I have no direct Web address but obviously the Iona Institute and it’s multiple offshoots have their own argument. In the end, it all comes down to one simple question : Do you believe that Irish citizens should ALL be treated equally under the law?

    36
    See 6 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:28 PM

    Catherine I never got to vote on your right to marry who you like……

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Billy Chenowith
    Favourite Billy Chenowith
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:14 PM

    There you go Catherine. Comments calling people homophobes now being deleted. Your work is done, equality is complete.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán O'Ceallaghan
    Favourite Seán O'Ceallaghan
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:12 PM

    ho·mo·pho·bia

    :irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality orhomosexuals

    Definition of homophobia in English:

    noun

    [MASS NOUN]

    Dislike of or prejudice against homosexualpeople.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Harding
    Favourite Keith Harding
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:25 PM

    I am tired of bigots and homophobes complaining that their outdated views are being lambasted for what they are.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Lang
    Favourite Anthony Lang
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:11 PM

    Not all opposition to same sex marriage is motivated by homophobia. Most of the opposition is homophobic can’t motivated.

    Other opponents of same sex marriage are motivated by an unhealthy level of love for inflexible dictionary definitions.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Lang
    Favourite Anthony Lang
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:18 PM

    Most of the opposition to same sex marriage is homophobically motivated.

    Most random assualts on homosexual people are homophobically motivated.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Helen Ryder
    Favourite Helen Ryder
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:31 PM

    I see that a number of comments have been deleted, including mine, and I want to thank the Journal for that. The comments were beyond what is needed for a spirited dialogue and I am ashamed that I stooped to the level of the post that annoyed and upset me so much. I apologise for my part in that thread.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:32 PM

    We can accept anything, but the truth.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:39 PM

    What truth would that be paddy? Your own track record is not great when it comes to gay related articles.

    37
    See 37 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:54 PM

    @ James Joseph Superior Power
    The most basic truths are always simple. Every child has a mother and a father. Marriage is an institution designed to serve a husband and wife, any children they may have, and society. The proposed redefinition of marriage, denies both of these truths, putting adult desires ahead of children’s rights. Simple really.

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:02 PM

    The most basic truths are always simple. Marriage is a civil right not an institution. Marriage is a right pertaining to the legal union of two adult individuals based on their love to be committed to each other under the law and in the eyes of the state. No more no less.

    Whether they have children before or afterwards is immaterial as a childs parents do not have to be married to be raised in a loving environment. Love and respect and care does that. Not marriage.

    51
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:30 PM

    Paddy as I and several others have explained to you. Marriage is an Institution designed to serve two loving couples. Children are not a requirement for marriage and never have been. Should such loving couples have children as many gay couples do. Marriage provides constitutional protection to these families. Why do you believe that same sex couples and their families should be dined this protection. Children rights will NOT be effected in any way what so ever by the introduction of equal marriage. Tell us exactly what laws in relation to children will change by its introduction. I have asked you this question on several occasions before and you have never provided me with an answer. Stating the the “dogs on the street” know that marriage is about children is not an answer to my question. Stating that “every child has a mother and father” has noting to do with marriage. I think I represent a lot of readers in here when I put it to you that you are telling lies in a deliberate attempt to confuse the children and families relationship bill with the marriage referendum THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING. If I am wrong please provide some evidence that show that they are one and the same thing.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:58 PM

    This indeed is the problem in a nutshell, there is a group of people trying to redefine marriage, who know little or nothing about it.
    When peoe get married I assure you they have much more than a day out in mind.
    Marriage has always been about creating the best environment for children, that is the only reason why the state has an interest in it. Marriage between a man and a woman became natural when they both loved each other enough to want to have children together. It became that binding institution, primarily to ensure men did not abandon the relationship after the children arrived.
    Even “gay marriage” knows this fact, and that is why there is a surge in demand for surrogacy when each country changes the meaning of marriage.
    Let’s put a stop to this abuse of children here and now, vote no.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sheik Yahbouti
    Favourite Sheik Yahbouti
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:10 PM

    Mr scully, I would still like to know who funds your group and its activities. Or perhaps you’d like to have this comment deleted as well.

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Harding
    Favourite Keith Harding
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:24 PM

    You are confusing Marriage and Matrimony, Paddy. Marriage predates most of the major religions in the world.

    Marriage was never about ” creating the best environment for children, that is the only reason why the state has an interest in it. Marriage between a man and a woman became natural when they both loved each other enough to want to have children together. It became that binding institution, primarily to ensure men did not abandon the relationship after the children arrived.”

    In fact, it was a way of uniting families/tribes, and striking alliances, often arranged and never for love, or for children. This was the modus opernadi for a great many years up until very recently. You are talking to your hat and clearly know nothing about the origins of marriage.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:02 PM

    Sorry Conor, but the European Court oh Human Rights ruiled just last year that gay marriage is not a human right. I know you like repeating this, but it’s just not true.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:06 PM

    Paddy your comment makes absolutely no sense what so ever and dose not answer my question. HOW WILL THE LAW IN RELATION TO CHILDREN CHANGE AS A RESULT OF THE INTRODUCTION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGE? Please answer the question you were asked and stop dancing around it with nonsensical drivel. Who ever said marriage was about a day out? It is about loving couples sharing there life together. That goes for bought gay and straight couples.
    ” Marriage between a man and a woman became natural when they both loved each other enough to want to have children together” Are you suggesting that those who chose not to have children don’t love each oater. It is clear if any one doesn’t know what marriage is about it is you. Or are you trying to redefine marriage to exclude all couples that don’t want children. News flash paddy it is natural for many same sex couples to want to have children just the same as it is for many opposite sex couples to want to have children. And no it is not selfish when gay couples want children. If you believe that marriage is the best environment to raise children why do you want to deny that to children being raised by same sex parents. Your augment makes no sense.
    Clearly you don’t have much respect for men if you think that the only thing that stops them from abandoning there children is marriage. Most men or women for that mater don’t abandon there children because the love them. Have you ever thought of that.
    What is is your problem with surrogacy. First of all it is used mostly by straight couples and has noting to do with ssm. Have you considered that maybe just maybe because surrogacy is on the increase anyway by gay people, many gay people want marriage so that they can have constitutional protection for their families and not the other way around. When it comes to ssm the only people abusing children are those trying to stop it and denying those children to have married parents if there parents wish to marry.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Lang
    Favourite Anthony Lang
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:08 PM

    The largest challenge to the passing of the Referendum will be the challenge to confront and to vanquish homophobia.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:27 PM

    I never said it was a human right I said it was a civil right.

    Please go and look up the difference and educate yourself Paddy.

    Oh and why’ll you are at it perhaps you’d like to educate us on the funding of Catholic Comment seeing as though their very informative website contains very little about that. But does contain lots of information about their commenters. Everyone should have a read all about Paddy on there!

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute QtrzRZ6r
    Favourite QtrzRZ6r
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 9:16 PM

    Hey Paddy! If heterosexual marriage is the best for children, when do you suppose heterosexual couples will stop beating, sexually abusing (either by the couple themselves or by entering their children into prostitution) and emotionally abusing their children? Tomorrow? Next year? Seriously, when can I stop reading about children ingesting heroin because their deadbeat STRAIGHT parents left it lying around after a drug binge?

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tony_Kilduff
    Favourite Tony_Kilduff
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 9:41 PM

    Corey, so you can guarantee gay “parents” will do none of the things you mention ? No ? Didn’t think so.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 9:59 PM

    @Tony

    You’re again and I dare say, deliberately, missing the point, nobody claims that same sex couples are better at raising children, they are just as good as heterosexual couples.

    But, and for the umpteenth time, the referendum is simply about the civil marriage of gay people, nothing more, nothing less.

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tony_Kilduff
    Favourite Tony_Kilduff
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:11 PM

    I’m not missing anything. I responded to a post which states some straight couples do terrible things to their kids. I’m merely pointing out that there is every chance that gay couples may do this too so why even bring it up?
    You think a gay couple can replace a mother and father ? Well that’s your opinion, I think it’s airy fairy nonsense.
    Likewise, you believe marriage has nothing to do with kids, again “for the umpteenth time” I would say that is utter rubbish. But you’re entitled to your opinions as am I.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:17 PM

    @Tony

    Then you can probably show me the part in the constitution, that states that for people to get married they have to produce children.

    What about married couples who decide to remain childless, what about married couples who for medical reasons can’t produce children? If marriage is all about children, then, applying your logic, their marriages wouldn’t be marriages.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute QtrzRZ6r
    Favourite QtrzRZ6r
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:53 PM

    Reread my post please Tony. Where, exactly, did I say that I cannot guarantee that gay people would not treat children in such a manner? I will break down my reasoning a little further so that you can comprehend: given the propensity of heterosexual couples to inflict misery and pain upon children, they can hardly be considered “the best configuration of parents for children”. You are quite right that I cannot guarantee that homosexual couples would not treat children in such a manner. You, in turn, cannot also guarantee that homosexuals couples would not succeed in doing a better job of raising children better than heterosexuals. What we do know is this; heterosexual couples have inflicted a great deal of documented abuse on children. Therefore, they are not the best configuration of parents.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:02 PM

    Tony you are entitled to your opinion. But having an opinion doesn’t change facts. The facts are that children raised by gay parents do just as well as those raised by straight parents this is an evidence based facts and not an opinion. Marriage is not about raising children. It never has been. That is also a fact and not an opinion. When opinion contradicts facts then an opinion is no longer an opinion but rather a lie.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:26 PM

    @ James Joseph Superior Power
    Wow, you wrote that really loudly, I’m not sure if my eyes can take it.
    If SSM is passed, all chances of undoing the flawed family legislation, an insult to democracy, will be removed. The legislation and the referendum come from the same ideology, which is built on destroying the roles of mothers and fathers. Children are demoted to been the pawns of adult whims.
    I never attended a wedding ceremony where the married couple were asked if the love each other, as a condition for marriage. So clearly marriage is not about love only, even though that is a bonus. The heterosexual couple of men who married in New Zealand last year, were clearly not in love, but the SSM legislation there makes an ass of the law and marriage in general facilitated their “marriage”.
    The rest of your points are just old hat. If children are acquired by gay couples, then these children need protection, and that should be enacted under civil partnership law. But marriage is a different thing, and children happen in 85% of marriages. These children need protection under the banner of marriage. In this case the children come from their mother and father. No external genomes to the couple were required. If two adult men, or two adult women, choose to satisfy their whims, without regards to the rights of children the choose to create; then I object to redefining marriage to make these adults feel better about what they inflict on a child.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:28 PM

    @ Anthony Lang
    I’m afraid Anthony, there is no evidence of a reduction in homophobia in any of the countries who have redefined marriage.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:30 PM

    @ Conor Buggy
    Well Conor, it is neither a human and/or a civil right.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:38 PM

    @ James Joseph Superior Power
    Sorry James but there is no evidence that children of gay couples do as well as others. The most recent study indicates some problems. But in general, gay or straight, are capable of been good parents. However the evidence that exists indicates a preference for the blood relatives of a child. Many stepfather/stepmother relationships fare poorly when compared to the biological parents.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:30 AM

    Ah so now when faced with the fact you lost your argument you simply resort to a “computer says no” answer! How mature and well thought out.

    Marriage, like voting, like divorce, like legal counsel, like freedom to practice religion, like free speech are all civil rights.

    Human rights include the right to food and water, the right to live in peace, the right to an education.

    Many countries and states around the world have legislated for equal civil marriage as a civil right and those places have not fallen into an apocolypse of children being sold and straights being forced to marry the gays! Thats what your side attempts to do in their poor miseducation campaign.

    Paddy when faced with the truth you actually cannot handle it. You muddle your religion in with what you think civil society is and cant resolve the difference in religious based moral viewpoints and a civil societal viewpoint.

    Oh and you still have not explained where Catholic Comment get their funding from!

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:38 AM
    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:45 AM

    @Paddy

    Marriage us still a CIVIL right. And you still owe us an answer as to where you get your funding from.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:58 AM

    @ Larissa Nikolaus
    Actually Larissa, I owe you nothing but the respect due a fellow commentator. Let me say I try to earn my way in life by work, just like everyone else. I receive no, zero, funding from anyone else. My zeal to defend marriage is purely altruistic. I see it as vital to a healthy society, and I believe SSM is the death blow to an already ailing institution. Those looking for SSM care not for society, they only care for themselves. That is my honest view, and I feel no compulsion to apologise for it.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 8:06 AM

    How about apologising for telling all the victims of laundries who had their babies taken and sold to strangers that it was an act of charity?

    Sick, delluded old man.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 8:07 AM

    And no, it’s not a civil right. It will only become a civil right if the civilians of this country vote in May to redefine marriage, and declare that they wish to create a new right for gay couples to “marry”, and remove the rights of children to a mother and a father.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 8:15 AM

    @ Ailbhe O’Nolan
    I prefer not to engage with persons who display bitterness. I dont believe we should redefine marriage for you Ailbhe. You fain concern for orphaned children, yet fight for the right to have fatherless or motherless children.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 8:47 AM

    @Paddy

    The only one displaying bitterness on here is you.

    You want to discriminate against gay people and deny them the right to marriage, and you keep on falling back to the same fallacies all over again, without any logical or scientific backup just your antiquated system of believe, that makes you blind to the crimes the Catholic Church has committed

    You are spreading nothing but hate and lies.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 9:01 AM

    @ Larissa Nikolaus
    Larissa if I apppear bitter, I apolagise, that is certainly not my intent. I am trying to reply to a few individuals, and the rush may give the impression of abruptness at times. I assure you I try to answer the key points where I can.
    May I again say gay people have the same right, with the same societal restrictions, to marry, as heterosexuals. Indeed many have in the past married, because they wanted a family of their own, above their own sexual preferences.
    But you keep trying to establish there is a “right” to SSM and this is just not true, at the moment. Your introduction of the crimes committed against children, is purley to try and hush any voices that would cry out, children deserve a mother and a father. Well they do, and perceived adult rights, should always be secondary to the actual rights of children.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 10:43 AM

    To quote Paddy – “I assure you I try to answer the key points where I can.”

    Then answer where does Catholic Comment get its funding from because you have been asked multiple times and never ever answer.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 10:50 AM

    At one point in time slaves had no civil rights, ya know something the great catholic church said nothing about, until after the emancipation of the slaves actually occurred.

    Civil society is fluid and is based in law, what is currently a civil right for all citizens – civil marriage – is currently restricted to only those who are either heterosexual or those who are homosexual that enter into a marriage with another heterosexual for an unknown reason other than love. That makes a mockery of marriage as you have so deftly pointed out further back about two straight men abusing the marriage equality law in New Zealand.

    The extension of civil marriage to homosexuals will do nothing except extend the civil rights of homosexuals, it will not tear down the world, which is what the no campaign attempts to portray. Please provide me an example of a country where the sky has fallen in due to the legislation for marriage equality.

    Of course the No campaign hates the term marriage equality and uses same sex marriage instead to make it sound different. Thats why you will never see Paddy refer to equality at all, he wants the gays to remain as second class citizens, which I am sure is what he says to his supposed gay friends all the time.

    So Paddy…. funding for Catholic Comment?????????????????????

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 11:04 AM

    Bitter? On behalf of the people you offend so disgustingly, yes.

    Is this more your style Paddy?
    http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2015/03/calif-attorney-files-for-ballot-initiative-seeking-to-have-all-gays-executed/

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 11:58 AM

    @Ailbhe

    Just read your link, is this guy for real? How can in the 21st century someone like this clown be alloed to practise as a lawyer?

    And then we have Paddy here, painting the US as the big Satan by promoting equality, sad as it is, I fear Paddy may be just one step removed from this Californian lawyer, if he is removed at all in his biased opinions

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 2:02 PM

    @ Paddy Maybe your eyes can’t take it as they are blind to the truth by bigotry. I don’t know you tell me.
    “If SSM is passed, all chances of undoing the flawed family legislation, an insult to democracy, will be removed.” No paddy all chances of undoing the legislation will not be lost. You can campaign for a referendum to undo the fort coming one that will allow the for legislative change. As the fair minded people have done so to bring about this referendum to change legislation to allow ssm. It is your opinion that the legislation is flawed paddy that doesn’t make it flawed. How is it an insult to democracy seen that it has been put in place by our elective representatives who had promised such legislation in their election manifesto .
    “The legislation and the referendum come from the same ideology, which is built on destroying the roles of mothers and fathers.” How will it destroy the roles of mothers and fathers. Amusing that you are a good parent no body is going to take away your children from you . You will still be a father to them when the legislation is enacted and if the referendum passes. The role of a mother and father is only relevant where they are present and they are capable and do good parenting. Gender is of no relevance when it comes to parenting a child.
    “Sorry James but there is no evidence that children of gay couples do as well as others” I have provided you with several links on other ssm related articles that prove that they do. Do I relay need to repeat my self every time and provide these links on every article for you. “The most recent study indicates some problems.” What study Paddy. Are you referring the one that was carried out for the so call Iona “Instituted” The one that was designed to come up with a fore gone conclusion to suite their agenda. How long will it take the authors for this study to admit that it is flawed as so many of the studies that Iona have presented to us in the past have been proven to be flawed. Why dose Iona try to miss lead the public by calling its self an Institute considering they have never carried out any creditable research of there own. Or are they trying to redefine the word instituted. It would be illegal to refer to them self as an instituted just across the water in England.
    “However the evidence that exists indicates a preference for the blood relatives of a child.” What makes you think that one parent in a same sex relationship can not be a blood relative or a biological parent?
    “Children are demoted to been the pawns of adult whims.” What has that got to do with gay parenting or a gay couples desire to have a child no more than it has to do with a straight couples parenting or their desire to have a child?
    “I never attended a wedding ceremony where the married couple were asked if the love each other, as a condition for marriage. So clearly marriage is not about love only, even though that is a bonus” wow that is a big turn around from your previous position. Are you now advocating for lovelies marriages. You have previously stated and I quota. “Marriage has always been about creating the best environment for children, that is the only reason why the state has an interest in it. Marriage between a man and a woman became natural when they both loved each other enough to want to have children together” So now you position appears to be that marriage is the best place for a child to be reared even if there is no love in that marriage and that the marriage of a man and women is no longer natural as they don’t need to love each other to want a child. Make up your mind Paddy what is your position?
    ” The heterosexual couple of men who married in New Zealand last year, were clearly not in love, but the SSM legislation there makes an ass of the law and marriage in general facilitated their “marriage”. What those that even mean. “The heterosexual couple of men” ???? Did you mean to say homosexual. Assuming that you did are you saying that you know of a case where two men were married who didn’t love each oater and because of this one lovelies marriage all same sex marriages makes an ass of the law.? Thats hilarious Paddy. Could the same not be said for a straight couple in a similar position.? . Any way? I thought your position now was that love is not a requirement for marriage. A little bit (well a big bit) of a contraction there Paddy.
    “The rest of your points are just old hat” What dose that mean??? I don’t wear a hat.
    “If children are acquired by gay couples,” “acquired” Are you now suggesting that gay couples view children as property. Such an insulting thing to say. Paddy most gay couples desire to have a child and raise a family is the very same as most straight couples desire to have a child and raise a family. Surly you are not one of those bigoted ignoramuses that would suggest other wise.
    “then these children need protection, and that should be enacted under civil partnership law. But marriage is a different thing, and children happen in 85% of marriages. Have you changed your mind again? what happen to your view that marriage was the best place to raise a child. Do you believe that children being raised by gay parents should some how be treated differently and raise in an unconstitutionally protected family? I thought that you were all about what is best for the children. when did that change Paddy?
    “In this case the children come from their mother and father. No external genomes to the couple were required.” So are you suggesting that children who are being abused by their natural parents or there natural parents for what ever reason can not look after them should remain with these parents. Are you saying that the state dose not have a duty to protect these children by placing them with the most suitable foster or adoptive parents? Most right minded people would find such a thought unthinkable. How is such a concept a case against ssm. One thing has noting to do with the other.
    ” If two adult men, or two adult women, choose to satisfy their whims, without regards to the rights of children the choose to create; then I object to redefining marriage to make these adults feel better about what they inflict on a child.” All righted minded would agree with that paddy as they would agree a adult man and a adult woman choosing to satisfy their whims, without regards to the rights of children the choose to create; they would also object to redefining marriage to make these adults feel better about what they inflict on a child.” Those reasons have noting to do with allowing ssm. No child should be created on a whim despite the fact that the Catholic Voice would have us believe they should by trowing the idea of using contraception out the window and take the attitude that sure if the come the way what about it. Do you know that publication Paddy? A little birdy told me you are associated with it.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 2:22 PM

    My apologies paddy. I now see that you were referring to a case where two heterosexual who maried in New Zealand how ever the premis of my argument never the less remains valid.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cecilia Ní Choileáin
    Favourite Cecilia Ní Choileáin
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:19 PM

    The problem, in a nutshell, Paddy is that some people are denied equality and they are denied it for no rational reason. To disguise or justify the blatant inequality that forms the basis of many of your objections, you employ straw-man arguments which are, at best, misguided and at worst, disingenuous and in some cases, bordering on hysterical. Your comments about the abuse of children are in the realm of hate-speech.

    Marriage may, and often does, involve children, but neither they nor a desire to have them, is a pre-requisite of a marriage. If, as you suggest, marriage is solely to protect children and ‘primarily to ensure men did not abandon the relationship after the children arrived’, then it has clearly not achieved this. Nor, in fact, is it capable of doing so.

    As someone who is married, I had many reasons for doing so. Primarily, I married the person I love for the simple reason that I love him. I didn’t join an ‘institution’ and my marriage is not in any way threatened by the extension of equality to any family member, friend, neighbour, or colleague who just happens to be gay. Far from it.

    So, please, next time you feel like championing the cause of marriage, please do not assume that you speak for everyone who is married. Neither my marriage nor that of anyone I know is as brittle and fragile as the type of marriage you describe. It does not need your protection nor that of the group for which you speak.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sheik Yahbouti
    Favourite Sheik Yahbouti
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:24 PM

    Is this some sort of joke? This is a country where women carrying a child whose defects are inimical to life cannot access an abortion. On the actual subject of the thread – mammies of my mother’s generation, and indeed my generation, would be pushing their gay sons to “find a nice girl and rear a family” which many of them did, and for all we know are still doing. A bit of a dirty deal for the wife in that situation but, hey, everything looks normal, right? All of a sudden we have become so hip, and so libertarian? I don’t think so. This is on a par with our miraculous ‘economic recovery’.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 3:48 PM

    Care to give me one logical reason to vote no, instead of the usual “ohh, it’s too libertarian” BS?

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 4:32 PM

    One reason to vote no would be because you agree with the idea that marriage should only be as between one man and one woman.
    If you disagree, you can vote yes and see what way the government intend to define marriage.
    The wording is suspect in the extreme, and that alone is a good reason for rejecting the referendum proposal..

    25
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 4:43 PM

    How is the wording suspect?

    The wording is: ‘Marriage may be contracted in accordance with law by two persons without distinction as to their sex’

    There’s nothing sinister or suspect about this.

    45
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 5:23 PM

    Larissa,
    There’s nothing in the constitution at present that prevents marriage from being contracted without distinction to the sex of either party. It’s unnecessary, and if it’s unnecessary why add “in accordance with law”?
    The legal requirements for marriage are also defined without distinction to sex.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Harding
    Favourite Keith Harding
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:22 PM

    @Paddy. Hundreds of thousands of unwanted children are born every year. Hundreds of people are brought up in single parent family units, either through the parents not being together, or someone’s partner dying.

    How on earth does the marriage of two people affect parenthood. You are an troll, and idiot, and someone who needs to pull his head out of his arse and the 1850′s and come live in the 21st century where the right attitude is that everyone is equal, and everyone should be allowed to marry what partner they choose, as admissible by law. None of this “marry your sons, marry your sister” nonsense. Its between two non related people falling in love and entering a loving relationship. Seeing as many children born these days are born out of wedlock, your argument is a moot point last relevant in the 1950′s so please , sling your hook and go off and die like the rest of your idiotic generation that would deny people the right to be in a loving relationship.

    SSM has NOTHING to do with family units or children.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sinead Hanley
    Favourite Sinead Hanley
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 6:43 PM

    Keith..

    In your opinion Paddys comments are backwards. I wouldnt agree. I would call them conservative or maybe old fashioned.. There are plenty of gay people who will be voting no. Whats your opinion on them??

    However “go off and die like the rest of your idiotic generation” ?????

    Well thats ageist, cruel and downright disrespectful. And you wont be doing the Yes campaign any favours with that attitude..

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Madden
    Favourite Brian Madden
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:10 PM

    @sinead, any idea his many gay people will be voting no? What percentage do you reckon is “plenty”? I doubt very much if “plenty” gay people are going to deny themselves equality.

    19
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Harding
    Favourite Keith Harding
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:20 PM

    Sinead,

    I am sick and tired of the backwards victorian rhetoric spouted by fear mongers the likes of whom voted on the 8th amendment to the constitution. There are a small few (two that RTE pull out the the back of a cobweb infested cupboard) many think that people should vote no. One of the most prolific, Keith Mills, will be at the Eurovision instead of voting, so there ya go.

    I don’t understand why anyone would stand in the way of someone else’s happiness, especially as its civil marriage, as opposed to the sacrement of matrimony.

    I am far from ageist. but as far as I am concerned, people with the outdated homophobic views should be confined to the annals of history.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Harding
    Favourite Keith Harding
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:36 PM

    to clarify, I don’t want all older people to die, I would just like the draconian ideals to die out

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Martin
    Favourite Chris Martin
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:13 PM

    Ill be voting no. A man and woman are designed to be together physically and biologically. 2 members of the same sex are not.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute dave donovan
    Favourite dave donovan
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 7:51 PM

    We weren’t ‘designed’. Not a one of us.
    Homosexuality is found in over 150 species on the planet.
    Homophobia is only found in one.

    You’re not a homophobic. You’re just a dick if you vote against other people’s happiness which will not affect you or your life one single bit

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Martin
    Favourite Chris Martin
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:28 PM

    Well if animals are doing it then that MUST mean its ok. Animals sometimes kill their young and eat them. Do you think thats something we should start doing too?

    10
    See 5 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:46 PM

    “A man and woman are designed to be together physically and biologically. 2 members of the same sex are not.” And what qualifies you to come up what that conclusion? Did you study at the Institute of homophobia?

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Martin
    Favourite Chris Martin
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 9:55 PM

    No I studied biology..you obviousy didnt.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:08 PM

    Care to enlighten us as to who ‘designed’ you?

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Martin
    Favourite Chris Martin
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:05 PM

    Not really. Im talking biology here, not creationism v atheism.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:08 PM

    Chris. For a fella that studied biology you clearly don’t know much about it.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian White
    Favourite Ian White
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:03 PM

    Please take your time to read this piece I wrote and let me know if it has any relevance. I think it’s a flaw that needs addressing before any vote is cast.

    Why Ireland Should Not Vote.

    As a once heavily influenced religious government, Ireland was never fully ‘democratic’, but more so a puppet to the Catholic Church in regards to certain matters. ( i.e; abortion, homosexuality )
    The Catholic Churches narrow minded, stern views enforced strict ideologies which took away the fundamental right to freedom of speech and ones ability to question right from wrong without judgement and possible jail-time.
    As history tends to follow us, it leaves negative and positive effects.These effects can ad a cognitive bias without anyone questioning the future results.The ‘Catholic Church’ effect is one among many to why the Gay Marriage vote may be a ‘No” on May 22nd.

    Another effect which continuously slips through the cracks of re-invention is the current antiquated voting method. As a democracy, it should be a priority to reach its citizens ( full audience ) when holding an election, not just a percentage. Since the invention of the internet this is has become a fundamental flaw in the Irish voting system which has not been addressed. As habits change and peoples surroundings adapt so should its voting methods.

    The most recent and last effect that ads to a flawed voting system is emigration. With 1 in 4 people effected by emigration this factor stretches further then our emotional ties and pushes its effects to the ballot box.

    The result;
    The majority of the ‘Yes’ vote will most likely come from the age group between 18-35. This age group will either be in University, at an entry or middle level job or will have already emigrated. For the first two cases, a high number of students and newly employed will be stuck in university/work and not be able to travel to there local town to vote on May 22nd ( a Friday ). That is the first unfair advantage.

    A second disadvantage to the ‘Yes’ vote is the population that are able to vote on the day.
    The majority of the 45+, now grown up, holding strong ‘moral’ views on why to vote ‘No’. This elderly majority still live in there home communities and have the ease of walking down to there local ballot station to vote ‘No’.

    Why this is wrong; it’s antiquated and bias. The process already favors a side, whether you want to vote ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, it’s logically incorrect.

    What Should be done;
    Before any voting is cast, the government, now once removed from the Catholic Church, should look at its voting process and change it so that it’s a fair non-bias vote.
    By making it both internet and not internet based, the vote has the ability to reach its actual audience and not a select few. We ( I ) should be aloud to vote from abroad. Just because I’m not home now, doesn’t mean I never want to return. Being a citizen of Ireland should give me that right. In the case for the Gay Marriage bill, I would like to return to a country where people can live equally. To disregard an educated and highly skilled percentage of the Irish population is an unwise choice by the government.

    The ‘funny’ thing is, one should not have the ability in the first instance to deny someone the right to equality, so voting on such is a contradiction to freedom and a practicing democracy (Ireland ).

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute dave donovan
    Favourite dave donovan
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:25 PM

    Abstaining from voting is not a solution to inequality.

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian White
    Favourite Ian White
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:33 PM

    Agree with you Dave. All I’m saying is I’m in full favor of equality. I just feel the odds are unfairly stacked against the ‘Yes’ vote. That should be addressed before any voting is cast so that we get a genuine outcome. not just a percentage. Many other countries can vote from abroad or online. It’s a simple step that could be implemented. If we want equality, the voting system should mirror that.

    7
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Buggy
    Favourite Conor Buggy
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 9:36 PM

    I agree with you Ian. Over 300,000 citizens under the age of 30 have left the country in the last 6 years. The youth of Ireland would in the majority vote for equal marriage, so yes the Yes to Equality campaign is on the back foot.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:04 PM

    I don’t really understand why votes and referendums here in Ireland have to be held on a Friday, why aren’t Irish people allowed to vote on a Sunday, like in most European countries?

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Martin
    Favourite Chris Martin
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:24 PM

    Well I mean if animals are doing it then that MUST mean its ok. Animals sometimes kill their young and eat them. Do you think thats something we should start doing too?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Joseph Superior Power
    Favourite James Joseph Superior Power
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:39 PM

    Are you sure you are on commenting on the right article there Chris. What has your comment got to do with same sex marriage? surly you are not equating same sex marriage with eating children.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Carmody
    Favourite John Carmody
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 1:33 PM

    Will be voting YES! Can’t wait.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Katie Next
    Favourite Katie Next
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 10:48 PM

    I wouldn’t by a licence for my dog, I wont be buying one for my telly. Not for my Marriage not if I can help it.
    Why would anyone need or demand anything from the state, stand on your own two feet. Benefits are a trap. Don’t buy into their control. The local school cant have a cake sale, a young lad cant go into temple bar with his guitar and sing a song. By voting yes you are voting for more state control of private matters. Start saying NO.
    All that will happen by voting yes is that this rotten corrupt government can say we have the support of the people for our policy’s and laughing at you behind your back. While you are busy getting all emotive about what ever distraction tactic or begrudgery they are throwing at you the pigs are at the trough. Wake up see the scam.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Wall
    Favourite Stephen Wall
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 11:36 PM

    This referendum has nothing to do with the government of the day. Voting against it to spite the government will not be recognised as a protest vote, it will simply be interpreted that you do not want marriage equality. Put the politics aside and do your gay fellow citizens a favour.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Katie Next
    Favourite Katie Next
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:07 AM

    I think Stephen you might be a bit right, lt”s a pity people can’t see the bigger picture and stop looking to big daddy state to validate them. A massive No which I would love could be double edged sword in that some might mistake as homophobia. Given that you have the state that thinks it owns everything the trees the fish the seaweed and is selling off everything it can while planning to bomb Leitrim why you would want to give them more is beyond me!!!

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Sands
    Favourite Michael Sands
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:39 PM

    How many eejits will spoil their vote I wonder, they always do…

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Sands
    Favourite Michael Sands
    Report
    Mar 2nd 2015, 8:42 PM

    I must say no matter what anyone believes on the subject, someone will always use an insult in a reply, and that is very intellectual for any debate lol.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 3:01 AM

    If its about equality then why is the referendum about SSM.it should be about you ,in civil partnership in the law of the land have the same rights as a normal married couple.the equality issue is a red herring for to get your own way,and emotionally blackmail people into voting yes.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 12:42 PM

    Because if you amend civil partnership to have the same rights as any other heterosexual couple, you are basically creating a second system of marriage?

    And why would one do that, if one can achieve the same by extending the existing terms of marriage to include same sex couples?

    Would you care to back up your point with a logical reason for this?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 1:51 AM

    The biology does matter.can one yes voter tell me why men and women have the bits that we have,which is meant to be for obvious reasons, and why men cannot conceive, explain that with a proper answer,until then I’m voting no.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Larissa Nikolaus
    Favourite Larissa Nikolaus
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 2:06 PM

    What has biology to do with marriage?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 3:49 PM

    Ailbhe ,stop telling lies for god sake.it cannot be defended ,equality argument is a red herring as you have nothing to argue the point with

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 6:15 PM

    That all you got? ‘Stop telling lies’ because you can’t possibly argue back. Ha, you’re all the same

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 6:16 PM

    And try using the reply button.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 1:57 PM

    The argument all along was equality, so don’t change what you have change what others have to suit you.giving civil partnership the same rights as all married couples does not create two tier system,it creates what you are supposed to be looking for,equalityin law to normal marriage,so what you said is silly.its obvious it is not about equality.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 3:00 PM

    Marriage equality will not change anything for heterosexual couples in terms of marriage. If civil partnership was exactly the same legally, there would be a legal conflict and it would be unconstitutional. You really need to read more before you post, because your posts scream ignorance for the sake of ignorance.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 10:32 PM

    A red thumb is not an answer to men not able to give birth,proves I am right

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute @mdmak33
    Favourite @mdmak33
    Report
    Mar 3rd 2015, 7:24 PM

    Not one can answer the question on childbirth, as it cannot be answered and it destroys the yes argument

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds