Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Conor McGregor at the O2 Arena, London on 12 August, 2023. Alamy Stock Photo

High Court date confirmed for woman's damages claim against Conor McGregor for alleged assault

The woman’s claim against McGregor is one of two initiated against the sportsman over events alleged to have taken place in 2018 in Dublin.

AFTER SEVERAL DELAYS, a woman’s damages claim for alleged assault against Conor McGregor, which was lodged three years ago, is to go before a High Court jury next month.

At the High Court today, Mr Justice Alexander Owens fixed 5 November for the personal injury case against McGregor, who was once the highest-paid athlete in the world.

The action was brought in 2021 by a young woman who is allegedly known to McGregor and seeks damages against the fighter.

The action, which will be before a jury and presided over by a judge of the High Court, was due to be heard in late June or early July.

However, it was put back after McGregor succeeded in an application to adjourn the hearing to allow him take part in a UFC comeback bout against Michael Chandler in Las Vegas.

That contest, however, was cancelled after McGregor broke his toe in training.

At a sitting of the High Court in May, Remy Farrell SC for McGregor said his client had entered into a contract regarding the fight and it would not be practical for the trial to occur in and around the contest, particularly if his client were to sustain any injuries in the bout. 

The application for an adjournment was opposed by the plaintiff. 

John Gordan SC, for the woman, said that his client had been waiting for some time to get a hearing for the case, which has attracted “a lot of media attention”. 

Counsel said his side has been unhappy since the defendant indicated he was seeking another adjournment, this time to take part in a “boxing match”.

The hearing, counsel said, had previously been adjourned following an earlier request by McGregor.

At that May sitting, Mr Justice Owens told the court that he is well aware of who McGregor is and said that he was doing the plaintiff “a favour” by listing the case for hearing during the civil juries sessions in November, as it would definitely go ahead then.

The woman’s claim against McGregor is one of two initiated against the sportsman over events alleged to have taken place in 2018 in Dublin.

She has also sued an associate o McGregor.

The actions were filed in the High Court over three years ago; however no details of her claim have been aired in open court.

The allegations in the actions are fully denied.

The plaintiff is represented by Ray Boland SC, John Gordon SC and Siún Leonowicz BL.

McGregor is represented by Remy Farrell SC.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds