Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

infomatique via Flickr/Creative Commons

High Court directs Twitter to reveal info on anonymous user

A man who appeared in an RTÉ Prime Time programme earlier this year claims he was defamed by the user.

A WHISTLEBLOWER WHO took part in an RTÉ Prime Time programme, and who was allegedly afterwards defamed on social media, has asked the High Court to help direct the unmasking of the anonymous user.

Stephen Walsh, of Crinken Glen, Shankill, Co Dublin, was today granted an order directing Twitter to provide information that may lead to identifying the author of the tweet.

Barrister Daniel Fennelly said during a late sitting of the High Court tonight that Walsh, a whistleblower on an RTÉ Prime Time programme, had been subject to alleged defamatory messages on Twitter.

Fennelly told Justice Colm Mac Eochaidh that Walsh was seeking information from Twitter International Company to help identify the anonymous user.

Counsel said the matter was urgent as there was a concern that the computer or phone, used to send the alleged defamatory messages, might be disposed of.

The programme, which was broadcast on July 16 last, was investigating procurement practices in Irish hospitals.

Reporting restrictions were initially applied to the matter, but following an application by solicitor Hugh Hannigan, for the Sunday Times, the judge ordered that Twitter International Company give today the name of the anonymous user.

Following a brief adjournment, Fennelly said Twitter had not given the user’s name, but had provided details including an email address.

Judge Mac Eochaidh, who then lifted the reporting restrictions, made an injunction prohibiting any person/persons having access to the anonymous user’s Twitter account from destroying the computer/phone from which the tweets were sent.

The court heard that defamation proceedings will be issued against the anonymous user.

Comments are closed due as the matter is before the courts.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds