Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE IRISH WING of international jobs site Indeed has hit a snag as it fine-tunes the development of its new offices on St Stephen’s Green.
The US multinational opened its EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) base in Dublin nearly six years ago. Since then, revenues at the Irish firm have surpassed the €208 million mark, although it continues to post losses as it expands its workforce.
Three years ago Indeed announced plans to relocate to the old headquarters of the Bank of Scotland in Ireland near Grafton Street to accommodate rising staff numbers.
There are now roughly 750 staff based out of its new premises facing St Stephen’s Green, which had its grand opening last year.
Indeed also applied for planning permission in June to place an illuminated company logo inside the premises on the ground floor level.
The 8.4m x 2.45m sign has already been installed and faces out towards St Stephen’s Green and the Luas tracks.
Indeed noted in its planning application that the sign would be a “positive contribution to the streetscape”.
“By giving a warm glow and colour both in the street and the interior of the building. An attractive daytime and night-time streetscene is created for passers-by, with low-key visual impact – being internal signage and being set back from the facade.”
However, since the first application, Dublin City Council has refused numerous attempts by the firm to secure permission for the sign.
Timeline
The planning authority deemed Indeed’s first application invalid because the company’s name was spelled incorrectly on some documentation submitted and the wrong address was also included on some forms.
It was also refused by the council because the firm did not pay the correct €420 fee for the planning request to be reviewed.
In June, Indeed addressed the issues raised by the council and lodged the planning request again.
In its ruling on the second application, the council said it has “serious concerns” about the signage since the building is located within the conservation area around St Stephen’s Green.
It added that the ”stark white” sign would “read loud” on the surrounding area, adding it was not an appropriate design.
The council asked for further information about the development from Indeed but the firm withdrew its planning request.
In October, Indeed made another application to the council and asked for clarification if the erection of an illuminated advertisement at the office is, or is not, a development and if the sign is exempted from the planning process.
Dublin council refused Indeed’s request for an exemption certificate. Last month the firm appealed the local authority’s decision to An Bord Pleanála to try and reverse the council’s decision.
Fora contacted Indeed but the firm said it had no comment to make on the matter. A decision from An Bord Pleanála is expected in the coming months.
Regulations
Dublin council has a number of regulations in place to control the development of illuminated signs in the capital.
Signage for any commercial unit on the ground floor should be mounted on the business’s fascia.
The authority’s rules also state that internal signage in a premises which obscure views into a commercial unit are not permitted.
Corporate signs are only permitted if the council has deemed they are compatible with the character of the building and those of adjoining buildings.
Sign up to our newsletter to receive a regular digest of Fora’s top articles delivered to your inbox.
Written by Killian Woods and posted on Fora.ie
Written by Fora Staff and posted on TheJournal.ie
Another calamity averted by the services, both staffed and voluntary, who respond promptly and efficiently at all times.
People need to put their brains in gear as well as their protective equipment, which has been instrumental in saving up to nine lives in the last two days alone.
Tramore RNLI seem to be involved quite often in these articles!
Any fish for the table salvaged!
Well done Tramore lifeboat crew, these guys are real heroes & deserve far better support from government than what they get.
Sadly it was around the same spot that a number of fisherman from the locality between Tramore and Dunmore East have also lost their lives recently and In the past by the same coastal tides around this area. None of them were ignorant of the sea nor what the consequences are but I do know that there are a lot of freak waves and swells that can have the ability to turn over / capsize a boat just after you sail / motor around Brownstown head….. This area has had a fair share of drowning/ sinkings/ capsizes and deaths so thankfully all those on board were recovered safely…..
Will they ever learn from other souls’ tragedies
And do what lillian not work and not feed their families.
They were anglers dude,not out for profit .
I don’t see anywhere in the article that error on their part was to blame?? The fact that they were wearing their life jackets possibly saved them long enough to be rescued, so what puts them at fault?
The lad who swam ashore took a big risk leaving the upturned boat. He wouldn’t have to do so if they brought some form of communication such as VHF radio or even flares. Going pooly equipped is a massive fault in itself
Accidents do happen….as the wife of the owner of the boat, I cannot thank the RNLI enough for their swift rescue and if there is a lesson for all to learn it’s that the sea is not a playground. When a tragedy occurs, the crew of the RNLI are putting their lives at risk as well. Please, I beg you all, DO NOT TAKE THE SEA FOR GRANTED. I thank GOD that I did not have to bury my husband and friends after Sundays incident,
have your say