Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

House of Commons

Once again, MPs fail to reach consensus on any Brexit option in series of votes

One proposal lost by just three votes tonight – and an MP has quit the Tory whip.

LAST UPDATE | 1 Apr 2019

MPS IN THE House of Commons have once again rejected all of the alternative options put before them in the latest round of indicative Brexit votes this evening – with one option backing a customs union losing by just three votes. 

There were only four non-binding options before MPs tonight. A similar effort to reach a consensus on Brexit last Wednesday – when eight options were tabled – also failed. 

Here’s how they voted:

  • Customs Union – Ayes 273, Nos 276
  • Common Market 2.0 – Ayes 261, Nos 282 
  • Confirmatory Public Vote – Ayes 280, Nos 292
  • Revoke Article 50 if faced with no-deal Brexit – Ayes 191, Nos 292 

As these votes were not binding, Prime Minister Theresa May would have had the option of ignoring them if she so wished.

Nick Boles, the pro-EU Tory MP who had backed the Common Market 2.0 option, resigned the party whip in the immediate aftermath of the results being announced. 

May will hold the next meeting of her cabinet tomorrow, and there’s speculation she could yet bring her thrice-rejected withdrawal deal before the House later this week – possibly on Wednesday. 

The prime minister did not address MPs in the Commons in the wake of the voting process, but Brexit secretary Stephen Barclay said that the country could still avoid a no-deal exit by backing May’s battered deal. 

“The default legal position is that the UK will leave the EU in just 11 days’ time” without a deal, he said.

If the House were to agree a deal this week it may still be possible to avoid European parliamentary elections.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that if May could put her agreement to the House over and over again, other options should be put to votes again too. 

Corbyn had attempted to whip his MPs in favour of backing the Customs Union. There were, however, 10 Labour MPs who voted against, swinging the vote against the motion.

The first reaction from Europe came from Guy Verhofstadt, the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator, who said a hard Brexit is now “nearly inevitable”.

Here’s what was put to MPs this evening:

(C) Customs union

  • Backed by Ken Clarke.

The veteran Tory MP’s motion would have instructed the government to ensure “that any Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration negotiated with the EU must include, as a minimum, a commitment to negotiate a permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union with the EU”.

(D) Common Market 2.0

  • Backed by Nick Boles.

The pro-EU Tory wanted the UK to join the European Free Trade Association (Efta) and enter the European Economic Area (EEA) and for a deal to allow continued participation in the single market and a “comprehensive customs arrangement” with the EU. There’s quite a bit to this one, in fact – more details here.

(E) Confirmatory Public Vote

  • Backed by Peter Kyle.

The Labour MP’s bill would have put any Brexit deal passed by parliament to the people before ratification.

(G) Revoke Article 50 if faced with no-deal Brexit

  • Backed by Joanna Cherry.

This motion from the SNP MP said that if there was no deal by 10 April an extension should be sought. If no extension was granted by the EU, it mandated the government to put a vote on no-deal to the House of Commons. If no-deal was rejected, the government would have been compelled to revoke Article 50 (which it can do unilaterally). 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
94 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds