Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
INDONESIA WILL BEGIN chemically castrating convicted paedophiles in an effort to combat child sex abuse, an official said, after a string of high-profile attacks.
“(It) will make people think a thousand times before committing such crimes,” Attorney-General Muhammad Prasetyo said late Tuesday after the move was agreed at a cabinet meeting led by President Joko Widodo.
“This crime is extraordinary and there have been so many victims.”
He said the punishment would be authorised soon through a presidential directive, which means it will automatically become law without parliament having to vote on it.
Advertisement
It would be carried out by injecting paedophiles with female hormones, he said.
Indonesia joins a small group of places that use chemical castration against child sex offenders, including Poland and some states in the US. In 2011, South Korea became the first Asian country to legalise the punishment.
Indonesia has been shocked by a series of high-profile child sex attacks. The most recent case was the kidnap, rape and murder of a nine-year-old girl.
Her body was discovered stuffed in a cardboard box in the capital Jakarta earlier this month, and an autopsy revealed that she had been repeatedly sexually assaulted.
Under current laws, child sex abuse is punishable by 15 years in jail but in many cases paedophiles have been handed short sentences.
He’s not wrong about small countries counting for little, both ourselves and Greece were treated disgracefully to protect the interests of the big boys during the financial crisis.
@Liam Doyle: Those were locally created problems. Did you expect other countries to bail us out indefinitely?
Are you suggesting we bail Italy out indefinitely?
No – you’re not.
So why are you pinning that rubbish on the EU?
He couldn’t care less for any country or anyone else but himself.
@Chucky Arlaw: what’s the point in Britain staying? Once they stayed out of the single currency, very sensibly so as it’s transpired, they’ve been largely sidetracked in the EU. Makes more sense to be outside completely with a trade deal than remaining a semi member of the club.
@Liam Doyle: please give some facts. Ireland are Greece were reckless and it was not due to the EU. We got caught out same as Greece. The problems in Ireland are home grown.
@Danny Rafferty: they weren’t locally created problems. Interest rates were kept far too low for some of the peripheral economies due to Germany and France’s weaker economic growth. This was predicted when the Euro was designed, but nothing put in place to deal with it. Result of excessively cheap cash was bubble like growth and inevitable crash which wouldn’t have happened if not for the poorly designed euro.
@Liam Doyle: Nobody held a gun to Irish people’s heads and forced them to borrow just because interests rates were low.
We need to take responsibility for our own actions instead of constantly trying to blame others.
@Liam Doyle: Finance and taxes are local competencies. The banks were meant to be governed by the central bank of Ireland.
Why did other countries manage the credit boom much better?
Why couldn’t the Greeks tax appropriately?
Trying to lay this at the door of the EU is weak.
@Ricky Spanish: so why have base interest rates at all? People respond to incentives, if you make money very cheap to borrow then people buy today instead of save for tomorrow. Interest rates were kept too low for our economy (just like they are again now) to protect the interests of others. This will keep happening because they have no mechanisms in place to deal with this still and we have cost alignment with non EU economies. The EU has French and German interests at heart, we’re just an afterthought.
@Chucky Arlaw: As it now stands Britain due to leaving the Eu a major building contractor has gone to the wall Is this the start of the decline in jobs in Britain and what else is around the corner
@Liam Doyle: Can you imagine what would have happened to Ireland if we still had the punt during the collapse? We would have been bringing barrow loads of cash to buy a loaf of bread, It’s only that the value of the Euro is spread across so many economies that we had any sort of stability at all
@Francis Devenney: the Euro caused the crash Francis, and youre praising it’s impact on limiting the damage it caused? It’s happening again right now as we plod through yet another inevitable currency crisis in the zone. Haven’t you noticed prices increasing across the board while incomes stagnate? ECB working its magic again!
@Francis Devenney: wow, such a well thought out rebuttal Francis, you have obviously researched these matters in some debt and haven’t just mindlessly parroted whatever media sources have told you think with regards to our persistent currency crises.
@Francis Devenney: spurious argument being that interest rates impact money supply and thus economic growth? Think you’ll find that’s an established fact Francis. Your inability to defend your positions and beliefs is entertainingly pathetic though.
@Liam Doyle: Are you seriously blaming the economic crash in Ireland solely on low interest rates? I’m sorry but that is the most simplistic argument I’ve seen on here in quite awhile.
@Ricky Spanish: did I say solely? It was primarily caused by excess money supply, same as spiralling costs across the board now is primarily caused by excess money supply. A lot of you seem determined to avoid addressing that, is it because you can’t?
@Liam Doyle: Your idea of research: Watch youtube, read rants, listen to liars like Farage.
The crash happened because of the reckless lending policies of our banks, the government who turned a blind eye, and the developers who failed spectacularily in both foresight and business.
The banks invested their long term ‘secure’ investments in property, and their short term investments in properties. When the property market collapsed, almost all investments failed. Add to that that it was far too easy to get a mortgage that people would not be able to pay back from the start.
Then we have the lax laws in Ireland which allowed the developers to close their company as they were not able to pay back the debt they accumulated, and just opened another company in the same business.
The Euro saved Ireland from going bankrupt completely, and is now even allowing people own and purchase property. If our currency would have failed, all your life savings would be used to buy some food for the week. And you would have to do it fast as your money will be worthless next week due to inflation rates.
Offering low rates does not cause a recession. Infact, low rates were offered by the ECB after the recession to aid in recovery.
@Nick Allen: Ireland were under no obligation to pay the senior bondholders and the government were advised of this by the NTMA. However, the ECB blocked attempts by Ireland to burn senior bondholders, through financial blackmail. Costing Ireland at the very least €9 billion.
@Andy K: But the reckless lending practices even you admit was the starting point was directly caused by ECB policy. The idea the Euro stopped us going completely bust is incredibly disjointed thinking, if we hadn’t been in the Euro that excess money supply wouldn’t have existed in the first place (where would it have come from?) so property etc. could never have gotten so expensive.
The starting point will always be the excess money supply, even in your wall of text trying to deny that you admit that it’s fact.
@Andy K: bubble caused by excess money supply, bubbles inevitably burst which leads to recession. Same thing happened in Japan in the 80s, Germany in the 20s, Holland in the 17th century etc. If you think otherwise you’re just wrong in afraid.
@Liam Doyle: And what caused the “excess money supply” in your view? Btw you are yet to explain how Irish people were forced to run up unsustainable debts or explain why the govt was forced to run up a massive current budget deficit. Who forced them to lower taxes and raise spending exactly? Someone in the ECB I’m sure as they seem to be the cause of all our problems right?
@Ricky Spanish: honestly? Economics obviously isn’t your thing if you can’t even understand what excess money supply means. Shouldn’t talk about things you don’t understand, makes you appear foolish.
@Liam Doyle: true , but it wasn’t Europe that issued bank guarantees bailed out Anglo and didn’t want to burn bond holders – that was Ireland ! We managed to screw up a whole bunch of stuff all by ourselves / you don’t need to go finger pointing to the big boys in Europe mate we are well capable to screwing our own people many times over in Ireland with or with out European big boys
@Liam Doyle: I have a masters degree in economics so I feel I have a decent understanding. Are you going to address the points about the current budget deficit or are you just going to regurgitate phrases like “excess money supply” and throw around insults?
@Ricky Spanish: if you have to ask where an excess money supply came from then you don’t have a masters in economics. That’s covered in leaving cert economics. The rest of your questions are equally as pointless and mundane as your first, you’re applying microeconomic theories and principles to macroeconomic matters, further revealing your lack of economic understanding, and dare I say, qualification.
@Liam Doyle: No one disagrees that the interest rates were too low for our economy: that was well known even at the time.
But just because the supermarket halves the price of lemons doesn’t mean I can blow the next year’s wages on gin and tonic and then blame the supermarket manager.
Sorry, your argument is still lacking.
@Danny Rafferty: applying microeconomic principles to macroeconomic matters is just wrong. economies don’t act the same way as households. Your inability to grasp and understand these pretty basic realities does not mean my argument is lacking, it just means your understanding is lacking.
@Liam Doyle: Firstly I was asking for your understanding of excess money supply as to be frank I doubt your understanding of basic economics.
Secondly the current budget deficit is not microeconomic theory it is macroeconomics.
But putting all that aside my point which I have repeatedly made and which you have repeatedly failed to address is that your entire argument seems to be based on failures of monetary policy. You have completely ignored fiscal policy as a key determinant of economic performance. My suspicion is that this is based not only out of your own ignorance but also by a political belief rather than economic theory. It is always easier to blame others rather than take responsibility ourselves and the EU is a prime target for people with a political agenda.
@Liam Doyle: It’s called Analogy Liam and you still haven’t explained why corruption and lack of governance in Ireland is the EU’s fault just because they lowered interest rates. Your argument is still not convincing.
@Ricky Spanish: but I havent said a single thing against the EU, every criticism I’ve made has been of the ECB. That you so easily conflate the two is a large part of the reason the UK is leaving the EU IMHO. And our fiscal policy certainly played it’s part I agree, particularly some of the tax breaks offered on property fanned the flames, but monetary policy from the ECB was the ignition spark without which there’d have been few flames to fan.
@Danny Rafferty: it’s called a wrong analogy Danny. You cannot apply microeconomic principles on a macro level. Your analogy is based on the principle of linear liquidity flows which is what we all experience on the micro level, but liquidity flows at the macro level are circular. The scenarios are simply not comparable in any way. Until you can properly understand that you won’t understand the impact monetary policies have on economies.
@Liam Doyle: might I suggest you read back on some of your earlier posts when you described us as an “afterthought” to the EU.
Also I’d love to know how conflating the EU and the ECB contributed to the UKs decision to leave as they are not under the remit of the ECB.
Whilst I would strongly criticize the ECB for its attitude towards burning bondholders, I think it’s a bit much to blame them for pursuing a monetary policy that was broadly in line with the policies of other major central banks around the world because it resulted in excess borrowing in Ireland.
Again nobody forced Irish people/business/govt to borrow or ignore the warnings issued by the ECB and EU in the years leading up to the crash.
@Andy K: Where do you get your information from? MSN? I have watched and listened to Nigel Farage debating several times in the European parliament, and on several political shows, he does not rant. The man is brilliant, i have heard no other politician speak like him, you can’t stand him because he speaks the truth. He is an English patriot, and millions of English people are very proud of him.
@Liam Doyle: Nice try Liam. Noticed you completely avoided the corruption and governance issues. I think you’ll find the Central bank should have been competent with regard to the local governance and that the management of our banks didn’t really care about the characterisation of the liquidity flows. But you stick with criticising my analogy – I’m sure you’ll convince thousands.
On the other hand, I think people well understand that you need to be responsible with how you run your own affairs regardless of the credit conditions.
Now, there are some lemons, tonic and gin with my name on them.
Happy weekend.
@James Mc Loughlin: whats around the corner is mother of all foocing crashes which will make 2008 look like a minor hiccup.
24 to 30 months maximum before it hits us.
@Mick Tobin:
If events of the last decade should have taught us anything it’s that even as an EU member, small countries still count for nothing in the eyes of the Germany-France axis.
We of all people should know that.
@Walt Jabsco: the bank guarantee screwed us. Unfortunately FF didn’t realize that our economic crisis was an opportunity and at that point we were in the driving seat of the Eurozone economy. Had we insisted the banks be economically autonomous, European Central Bank would have provided guarantee. In effect Ireland saved the euro but we have never capitalized on our central role in this. In reality Ireland’s economy was central to eu but our mindset and confidence was peripheral.
@Danny Rafferty: You really are obsessed, Danny. You go on as though you’re some kind of hero for apparently using your real name. I think it’s a very foolish thing to do. There are a lot of very unhinged, malicious and vindictive people on the internet. Let’s imagine for a second that you got into some kind of exchange with one of them and they decided to do something to get at you. It wouldn’t be very hard to do some digging and find out where you work, through LinkedIn or FB, whatever. Suppose they sent an anonymous letter to your employer, claiming to be a relative who you had repeatedly molested while babysitting them when they were younger (or some other such evil scheme). I don’t see the harm in choosing to protect one’s identity online.
@Danny Rafferty: Perhaps a little, but I’d prefer to be safe than sorry. What about your own obsessive behaviour; that’s not a very healthy mindset either. It’s actually a bit unsettling.
@Danny Rafferty: Maybe they’re beginning to implement their comments policy fairly. Or maybe they’re as sick of you spamming the forum with “anonymous/fake account” guff as I am.
@Boutros Boutros-Ghali: Now that’s not very Boutros Boutros of you. Maybe they think it’s too direct. How about dotard?
Would you be dreadfully offended if I called you an anonymous dotard Boutros?
He is realising that, if the UK got another chance to vote to leave the EEC, they will vote to stay in the EEC, because the English now realise what a big mistake they have made.
@James Moore: Its EU not EEC and its not English it would be British, English refers only to England don’t forget the rest of the country, a common mistake made usually by English people.
And you are right they would vote yes especially when they realised all the lies told by Nigel and his followers.
Just look at what Nigel did when the vote was won – disappeared off the scene.
@B9xiRspG: He always said he would. He had accomplished his goal to free Britain from the ball and chain of the EU. He has not gone anywhere though, he is staying to see this through. A good decent politician, the world is sadly lacking in honest politicians who care for their own people, the people that they are governing, a fine patriotic English man.
@Tom&Gerry: yes the UK will be free of all the social laws that stifle business. Business will flourish without those meddling Eurocrats and their working time directives and environmental protections damn them. Free to be in the Iron Grip of capitalism.
This guy is so good at pushing people’s buttons espeically in Ireland. I had a lot of respect for him once…. then he achieved the YES vote, and immediately stood back to let someone else clean up the mess.
@Tom&Gerry: wrong he has no status in uk politics people wheel him out because he’s good for a laugh his comments are a joke and not based on any reality. He can say what he likes because he doesn’t have to actually achieve anything nor could he. He’s a caricature of the type of brainless idiot whose stories are funny but not to be taken seriously by anyone with any sense. Even he doesn’t believe what he says.
He quoted some incorrect figures during that debate – not unusual for UK politicians.
He pretends to be concerned for the independence of small countries, once they’re not called Scotland.
He believes the United States of Europe is a bad idea, even though no proposals have been put forward.
And has no issues sucking up to a highly militarised USA.
Farage – cherrypicker extraordinaire.
@Danny Rafferty: Christian Schulz put proposals for a United States of Europe forward. Guess it’s not just British politicians that lie when the truth is uncomfortable, eh Danny?
@Pat Aherne: no we’re not. He wants constitutional uniformity across the EU by 2025 and any states that reject it to be immediately thrown out of the EU. Tired this about 15 years back, overwhelmingly rejected by the French and Dutch electorates.
@Liam Doyle: I’m very comfortable thank you.
Did you mean Martin Schulz?
The leader of the SPD?
A party with 20% of the vote?
Well it’s a perfectly valid opinion to hold and he can push for adopting such a policy democratically he likes. So what?
Is it being discussed by the Commission or Parliament?
Is there actually a documented proposal that we can debate Liam?
Do send me a link to the documents so I can see if the sky is in fact falling.
If a serious proposal does actually arrive before the parliament or commission I’ll be happy to read and debate it then.
@Danny Rafferty: Yes he is wonderful, is he not. I get great enjoyment watching him put Eurocrats in their place in the European parliament, if only we had a an honest decent man like him who actually speaks the truth.
@Tom&Gerry: except he doesn’t. Would you enjoy me working along side you in your job and calling you lazy meanwhile doing little work myself ? That’s you type of guy you admire?
@Deborah Behan: He’s very popular, in England, across Europe and the US. The difference between Farage and Varadaker is, Farage actually loves his country and people and does not want to see England destroyed, Varadaker only cares for himself. England are doing the right thing by leaving the EU, They voted for it and they know exactly what they are doing.
@Anthony Gallagher:
He’s an objectionable dolt – of that there’s little doubt – but I think history will be quite kind to him as one of the few voices warning of the creeping slide towards a European superstate.
@Walt Jabsco: An European Superstate…of which we will be part?
Congrats. Even the EU haven’t projected that far ahead…..but it sounds great…a world leader…a “super state”.
@Anthony Gallagher: What exactly is a little englander?, sounds like something a kid would say, but i do get it, it is your way of trying to demoralize him. The vote was put to the people, the people voted because of what they see happening to their country. The main reason for Brexit is the migrant crisis. The majority of people want no more migrants coming into their country. People like you would have called those who objected to the invasion of migrants, racist, xenophobes and other such stupid names, this is meant to shut people up. Farage is not like you, he told the truth. He told the people they had a right to be outraged at what was happening to their country, and he was right, an awful pity we dont have an honest one like him. Well done England .
This guy is nothing but an opportunist hypocrite. Preying on people’s fears to make a name for himself at any cost. As the damage from brexit unfolds he will finally be held to account alongside the odious Michael Gove and the clown Doris Johnson.
@Marc Power: Stupid stupid comment, Farage is brilliant, an amazing human being. More interested in his country and his people than profit, shame on you The fact that you have to call people clowns who have an opposing view than you speaks volumes about you.
He’s desperate to define the debate as one between remaining and a hard brexit – that’s what this new referendum will be about. Too many people realising that a soft brexit is the only workable solution for Farage to be comfortable. He and his fellow followers need to see any bridges alight to count as a win
We all want, the EU and the UK is the UK to leave, but leave fast, but the UK is trying to buy time, because they don’t know what they are doing obviously.
The whole European debate is one that has many facets and a lot more complex then just “In” or “Out” – but it is interesting to see how Farage called him “a real smart cookie” when he met the man…..
What happened with our double vote is quite interesting and often forgotten, we voted “No” and went back to the negotiating table and the treaty was changed and we voted “Yes” then – while it was a re-run it was a changed treaty that we voted on. The UK could do the same, vote to Exit but if they are unable to negotiate a proper deal and the EU has changed some of it’s rules too then a re-run could produce a different result, particularly if the people of the UK see the real consequences of Brexit.
To be honest it would be quite reasonable to have a second referendum once they’ve ironed out exactly what terms Britain would be leaving the EU on. You’d expect all but the most hardline Leavers to be glad to accept or reject on the specifics of the deal.
hum !!??? could it be that as he says himself that he is skin .. if there is a 2nd referendum he will still be MEP and therefore well paid by the EU that he worked so hard to destroy ??
@MarkS: explain how he misled the people. Taking into account the main reason for Brexit was the migrant situation, which the people are living with on a daily basis, they needed no one to make up their minds for them, stupid of you to think so.
@Ooby Dooby: What does your comment mean, of course Brexit was about independence, “as long as you’re English” explain?, is it not the English that want independence? A lot of people here are very envious, imagine, they can now govern themselves.
Please stop giving this pathetic, irrelevant, racist waster coverage.. The only person that cares about anything this POS says is him and a handful of window lickers.
@Jay Warner: You are very wrong, and your name calling is childish silly and pathetic. Nigel is very very popular in Ireland, England, across Europe and USA. He is an amazing individual, if only we had one like him here.
i really think that Ireland should have been asked to rejoin the UK before the referendum took place. With Ireland on board the UK would truly be united and be a formidable force.There also wouldn’t be any problems with borders as the EU territories would end at France, the waters around the UK would be reclaimed and interference from the EU need not be tolerated. So if there’s any talk of another referendum let it be one that unites us all against everything that the EU stands for and one that would liberate us all. Give the Irish people a vote
@Derek Teeling: Put it into context, he said, to shut Blair and the rest of the whingers up, who do not believe that people knew what they were doing when they voted, maybe just maybe there should be another referendum. He said that knowing that there will not be another referendum. Theresa May said the people have spoken and she will stand by the decision of the people. It is not nice to call people names especially people you don’t know, very childish of you.
There won’t be a 2nd referendum. Neither the PM or Corbyn want it, they’ve reiterated this a number of times. When neither of the two main parties want it, it won’t happen.
The UK leaves the EU in 14 months time, and that’s it. They will enter a transition period, and will have a framework for a trade agreement based on the Canadian model with a few add ons.
Over €13m spent by OPW on controversial Cork flood defence scheme before construction begins
Conor O'Carroll
6 hrs ago
2.6k
18
vaping
Letter sent to retailers about new €800 licence fee to sell vaping products
15 mins ago
258
1
Courts
Three men jailed for 'cruel and depraved' rape of woman they encountered in Dublin nightclub
17 hrs ago
46.3k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say