Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Paul White/AP

Ireland wins at EU's top court over legality of its VAT laws

The European Court of Justice rejects a challenge from the European Commission over the structure of Irish VAT laws.

THE EUROPEAN UNION’S uppermost court has rejected a complaint from the European Commission about the structure of Ireland’s VAT laws.

The Luxembourg-based court rejected the Commission’s arguments that Ireland was in breach of a European directive which governs how VAT is levied on groups of companies.

Under Irish law a holding company, whose only role is to hold shares in other companies, is not obliged to pay VAT because it does not engage in any trading itself.

However, Ireland groups those non-taxable holding companies together with their subsidiaries when calculating their joint VAT liabilities, on the basis that a holding company can be held responsible for the liabilities of its subsidiary if it was to go bust.

The Commission opposed this, believing that a directive agreed by member states in 2006 did not provide for taxable and non-taxable entities to be grouped together for this purpose.

The European Court of Justice ruled this morning that it was ‘not evident’ that Ireland’s VAT laws were contrary to the objectives of the directive.

It found, “on the contrary”, that Ireland’s laws made it simpler for both companies and tax authorities to evaluate the financial affairs of a group of companies, and helped to cut down on fraud by ensuring close links between each of the companies concerned.

The case had been expected to fall in Ireland’s favour since last year, when an advocate-general – who issues non-binding opinions on cases before the ECJ’s judges make a final decision – had found in Ireland’s favour.

The Commission was ordered to pay Ireland’s legal costs.

Four other EU member states – the UK, Denmark, Finland and the Czech Republic – had been joined in the case as ‘interveners’, as they operated similar systems to Ireland and also wanted to put forward arguments in Ireland’s favour.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
18 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Egan
    Favourite Mark Egan
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 12:29 PM

    Another win for old Ireland against Europe :D

    112
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Leonard Annett
    Favourite Leonard Annett
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 12:59 PM

    It just shows Ireland has the potential to fight the European bullies.

    86
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mjhint
    Favourite Mjhint
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 1:37 PM

    Plus 1

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean ORegan
    Favourite Sean ORegan
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 4:27 PM

    On a point of law. And Ireland has entered into a lawful contract with Europe.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Getard Lanslanger
    Favourite Getard Lanslanger
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 1:30 PM

    Yessss! Get in there! Nearly as good as winning the European Championship

    74
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Francis Sally
    Favourite Francis Sally
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 1:20 PM

    Has the potential but lack the right leadership…..

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adam Hurley
    Favourite Adam Hurley
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 2:37 PM

    Whenever someone says that an EU court ruling in Ireland’s favour is ”a victory for Ireland over the EU” that person is obviously in need of a mental examination.

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute damien chaney
    Favourite damien chaney
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 1:57 PM

    Ole ole ole ole, ole ole, ole ole

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jonny Rigley
    Favourite Jonny Rigley
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 4:42 PM

    A victory for ireland? don’t make me laugh. More like a victory for speculators and financiers operating out of ireland.

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean ORegan
    Favourite Sean ORegan
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 5:02 PM

    Why? Ireland says that just because a holding company does not trade it is liable for VAT when its subsidiary goes bust with unpaid VAT. Or did I misunderstand?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jonny Rigley
    Favourite Jonny Rigley
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 11:34 PM

    Yeah but the company doesn’t have to pay VAT during the normal course of events only the odd time when their holdings go bust with unpaid VAT.

    Do you not think it unfair that financiers and speculators (largely responsible for the financial mess in Ireland/ the western world) should be exempt from VAT and pay far less corporate taxes than they would in most other EU countries.. not to mention any back hand deals we probably don’t know about; at a time when the Irish populace (largely unresponsible for said financial mess) are getting taxed through every single hole??

    1
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean ORegan
    Favourite Sean ORegan
    Report
    Apr 10th 2013, 1:24 AM

    If it does not trade how does it become liable for VAT. But it is liable if its trading subsidiary goes bust. This cuts out fraud.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Isaac Hunt
    Favourite Isaac Hunt
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 2:56 PM

    I’m not sure about this whole Europe thing

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Fallon
    Favourite David Fallon
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 6:01 PM

    Ridiculous superficial argument. The VAT system has been extracting human capital in the form of monetary gain since the 60′s. we should have a sales Tax like Switzerland, Montana, Nevada, Caman islands. That’s how you keep money in a country!!!!!

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dáithí Mac Thomáis
    Favourite Dáithí Mac Thomáis
    Report
    Apr 9th 2013, 6:54 PM

    Watch them change the law now!

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean ORegan
    Favourite Sean ORegan
    Report
    Apr 10th 2013, 1:26 AM

    It is the Government that defended the case; why would they change the law. This allows them to collect more tax.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ocean Wave
    Favourite Ocean Wave
    Report
    Apr 10th 2013, 8:12 PM

    The VAT is legal daylight ROBBERY anyhow.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dáithí Mac Thomáis
    Favourite Dáithí Mac Thomáis
    Report
    Apr 10th 2013, 2:11 AM

    The EU I mean Sean. Not even our bunch are that thick :-)

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds