Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
General view of passenger plane at East Midlands airport.
rocky landing
Irish cargo plane's landing gear failure causes runway closure at UK airport
East Midlands Airport state that the runway is closed until further notice.
8.54am, 29 Apr 2014
12.4k
14
THE RUNWAY AT East Midlands Airport in the UK is closed this morning following an incident overnight in which an Irish cargo plane’s landing gear failed.
There were two flight crew on board Boeing 737 cargo plane but neither was hurt.
It is believed the left-hand landing gear of the aircraft suffered a failure after the aircraft had successfully landed and whilst slowing for taxi off the runway.
Advertisement
Investigation
The aircraft is on the runway and the Irish Air Accident Investigation Unit (AAIU) and UK Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) have been informed.
In a statement, Air Contractors Limited, the company operates the plane stated that the Airline’s Emergency Response plan had been activated and the Crisis Control Team (CCT) has been convened.
“The CCT are currently investigating the facts related to this incident and are liaising with all relevant authorities,” they said.
The runway remains closed whilst technical examinations take place, but the aircraft will be removed as soon as possible.
East Midlands Airport state that the runway is closed until further notice. For those travelling to and from the airport, they are urged to contact the airlines they are travelling with.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
He can deny it all he wants, doesn’t mean it’s not true. Who do we rely on to scramble their jets when Russian jets fly over our airspace? The UK. Our “air force” (a bunch or propeller planes by international standards) is a joke not even worth maintaining at this point. We don’t even have radar systems to detect these incursions. Out understaffed navy that consists of a whopping 6 ships with 4 in reserve to guard one of the biggest coastlines in Europe is yet another joke and we’d rely on the UK to protect our offshore cabling. Ireland is a joke of a neutral country, a truly neutral country can defend its neutrality, like Switzerland.
@Matt Rogers: Most countries are only one bomb away from annihilation, the US have a semi-circle ring of bases surrounding China/Russia, all it takes is one power mad amadan to hit the button, ground troops and military aircraft will be vaporised.
@Sean Murphy: But Ireland could spare a ship to send to the Mediterranean last summer and has ordered a new navy ship at a cost of €300 million (obviously, that will be €700 million by the time it’s delivered).
The MRV will serve as the new flagship of the Naval Service and will be equipped with a helicopter landing pad, hospital facilities and the ability to transport vehicles and troops. One of the ship’s main tasks will be to support Irish overseas deployments, negating the need to rely on private shipping.
Now, some might say it seems more suitable for picking up illegal migrants that are being trafficked across the Mediterranean and that the stated purpose is BS.
No mention of patrolling undersea cables or even fishing in any case.
@Sean Murphy: Fair enough. How much more in taxes would you be prepared to pay? On the other hand it’s quite laudable that we are one of the few countries who spend more on overseas aid than on military spending. If only the rest of the world could follow our example.
@Sean Murphy: don’t you know that Ireland can’t be wasting money defending the country when our corrupt politicians have their own and their cronies pockets to look after
@Sean Murphy: The real question is why are certain countries neutral? I suspect that countries that are traditionally neutral such as Switzerland because it sits geographically between traditional great powers (French / Prussian / Australia Hungarian Empires). Switzerland needed to defend itself from attack but equally could not afford to take one side or the other. On the other hand, Irish nationalists as far back as the 17th Century, saw an independent Ireland as neutral. Yet fought with the Spanish and then the French against a common enemy. The leaders of the 1916 rising even sought financial aid from Germany. Irish neutrality was born from a position which viewed Britain as an enemy and therefore our neutrality has never been traditional in the way Switzerland is or Sweden was.
Then Varadkar is in denial. It is a catch 22 for the British. They defend us otherwise there is a huge back door. We should have a proper military presence. It is.embarrassing.
@Itsme83: Seeing as we are too stingy to pay for our own defence we should grant the US naval, air and army bases here. Lots of other European have US bases on their territory and that doesn’t undermine their sovereignty
@Pat O Dwyer: you want the USA to dig their claws deeper into Europe by getting a base in Ireland, where we then become a target for long range missiles. Go off and think about that again.
I’m sure Russia regard Shannon Airport as a US base and would be on their target list. I’m sure our port facilities would get pounded by the Russians as well Cork, Limerick, Roslare port and Dublin port so they could not be used by allied forces to reinforce positions.
@Injustice Cop: We are a tiny country in the grand scale of things and have never really invested in not only ordinary infrastructure but military infrastructure and even if we did it would be like firing slingshots against deadly bombs. Thousands of Irishmen fought in WW1/WW2 to aid the British & Allied defences against Hitlers’s Nazi’s, I’m quite happy for them to return the favour and continue looking out for us. Let’s face it, we are never going to have the capability of defending ourselves on a solo basis.
@Injustice Cop: Embarrassed about neutrality, I’m embarrassed that my beloved country cannot house its people or build infrastructure. I’m embarrassed about what’s happening in RTE on FFG’s watch especially when you consider the Coveney connection. We should have the best of everything but years of corruption saw that horse bolt a very long time ago.
@Injustice Cop: Absolutely not. Massive waste of money. Even if we did we’d still be a tiny tiny nation that any global power would brush aside with ease, our best weapon is how pointless it would be to attack us. Why would they bother? Same as the Romans.
@Mr Inbetween: My position is that we should have proper military presence, not one that would beat Russia head-to-head. It’s about doing our bit and not freeloading. I wonder if Finland, with their 5.5 million people – very similar to Ireland, took your advice would Russia think to take yet another bite off their land? We are a laughingstock when it comes to our military and rightly so.
@Thesaltyurchin: Ireland is a great back door to the UK. The world has moved on since the Romans. Finland, comparable in population to Ireland, have a world class military. You, like Mr Inbetween think I am asking that we would win head-to-head with Russia. I’m stating that we should have enough of a military to contribute something meaningful and stop freeloading which is immoral.
@brendan C5: I wonder would one of the closest European airports to the USA that had one of the longest runways in Europe not be a target? And is currently used by American military?
@DGQ: They wanted to commemorate (not celebrate) the ordinary RIC men. Unfortunately, that proved to be impossible as the Black & Tans technically were part of the same force. They handled it badly: they should have made a clear distinction.
@Michael o connor: Fine Gael wanted to commemorate a bunch of psychos imposed upon us by the British to police our people. They didn’t want to re-instate them. It was absurd.
@Mr Inbetween: so what about a place for everyone in this ‘new Ireland’ I hear about? You do realise those men, were our grandfathers etc? Seriously now, how should they be commemorated? They WERE Irishmen after all. I would imagine they were patriots too.
How can I celebrate my ancestors in a ‘new ireland’?
If we were to invest in a navy and airforce capable of defending the country, it would require tens of billions of Euros. One F35 costs €120 million per aircraft and tens of millions per annum to maintain. A decent fully armed warship costs half a billion. Imagine the waiting lists then! No thank you..
@Paul whitehead: That’s a self serving statement if ever I read one. There’s lots of good cheaper alternatives. Not having a military and calling our selves neutral is a sick joke. We could not defend ourselves nor would we be neutral for long. We’re lazy and apathetic because of history and geography and freeloading of the British.
It’s clear both historically and present day that a for a country to stand on it’s own two legs and be respected, it requires a strong military presence.
@Paul whitehead: Ireland does not need billions in fighter jets.
A functional navy would be at least a start. 2 ships out of the lot in active service is a joke.
@Paul whitehead: @Paul whitehead: Why F-35s? We don’t need stealthy planes that primary use is to attack well defended ground targets in other countries. Why not do a deal with the Swedes and lease Gripens for air defence of this island?
The Spitfires we had in the 50s would be just as useful at air defense than the dinky wee planes we use now.
@Paul whitehead: Why are we talking about this? Because the arms dealing net is closing around us, they’ve supplied everyone and are looking to ‘break new ground’. Ridiculous to pretend to ‘defend ourselves’. 5 million people ffs..
Thousands of Irish serve in the UK armed forces, so it’s only natural that we get our seas and skies protected. It has kept us safe for many decades, no need to be so insecure about the reality.
@RT TR: That’s a ridiculous and selfish statement. How about this. There’s millions of people with Irish roots in the UK and US, so it’s only fair that they defend us. Your sense of entitlement is exceptionally large. We have zero autonomy. We’re holding the British hostage because if they don’t defend us, it’s a back door.
@Injustice Cop: How about this. These islands are so interconnected that the British army has Irish-only regiments and its forces have thousands of southern Irish in their military.
No matter what sort of future upgrade to Irish defence might mean, we still won’t have anywhere near the capability that the UK provides for us (5 eyes, submarines, nuclear umbrella, intelligence), and therefore aren’t we better to just be less insecure about it and say that we enjoy the protection, thanks.
The thickidity of some posters here and of some cheerleaders in the media is unbelievable. How are we expected to “defend” ourselves, put everyone of serviceable age in the country into the defence forces – get real.
@Padraig O’Brien: Exactly,the same people giving out the most would run a mile away from military service…. And probably contribute very little towards the billions needed to defend ourselves.
I recall seeing RAF Tornado fighter bombers flying over Louth after 9/11.
We’ve all read about the RAF escorting Russian long range bombers off the West coast.
Don’t act silly Varadkar.
@Robert smith: don’t be facile!! We don’t have the radar capability to detect them in our airspace .. they and anyone else who has fast jets, can fly around our airspace with impunity.
@Robert smith: actually we often ask them to do this. There was a documentary about a GB Warship and it featured Russian ships in Irish waters and we asked them to come and help. We should be ashamed at this.
Hands up for increasing our naval capacity, hands up for investing in fighters, hands up for investing in radar and anti aircraft capabilities… Hands up for paying substantially more taxes to fund it…. Thought not.
@richard griffin: Almost no one in the comments is talking about significantly increasing the capacity in navy, air or whatever defence.
This would be a moot point, since we don’t have enough personal for what Ireland does have already, e.g. the Navy and the lack of personal to put the ships on duty.
The government is wasting away millions/billions every year on NGO’s and whatever fancy projects. Redirecting a few millions is not breaking the bank or will put an additional burden on any taxpayer.
Let’s see for a start:
Take the over 70 million (or is it more?) Horse Racing Ireland is getting this year and put it to support and attract personal for the Navy.
Horse Racing vs. Navy and defence = I know where I would put the money.
Favourite ahhhhh Ted...... Tubridys going into comedy
Report
Feb 17th 2024, 1:50 PM
What are you prepared to forego to have several navy frigates, multi million jet fighters(fuel, man and train and maintain) support logistics, new runways, docks etc, etc.
And the Brits dutch and French do it for nothing.
@ahhhhh Ted…… Tubridys going into comedy:
Ireland don’t need these “multi million jet fighters”, getting the already exiting navy ships manned and in service would be a good start.
There’s so little left in service, even the navy won’t disclose if they have actually 2 or maybe 3 ships in active service.
“And the Brits dutch and French do it for nothing.” – Always looking for freebies, aren’t we?
@Robert smith: Why?
The pay seems not to be that bad from what I found on the web.
Is it the work conditions? Internal structure problems?
Or is it that younger generations in general have an issue with taking orders – essential for a functioning army?
Honest questions, because don’t know.
It is strange that when the war starts the people that is taking about it always head for the hill or the bunkers and leve the rest to fend for them selves like the son of the leader of Israel sitting safe and .in America
The irony, where would we get all our new weapons from? Oh the UK. Don’t get fooled into thinking you can be anything except a people’s army. It’s all a con to take your money.
@Thesaltyurchin: Why is everyone focused on getting “more weapons”?
The first point would be to get enough personnel to man existing equipment,
e.g.: the Navy ships.
Ireland has a couple of ships. 2 are usually on duty right now.
If it it happens, a 3rd one will be send to some mission.
Ireland does not “need” fighter jets, battle tanks, or whatever.
But at least some form of a working Navy to patrol and protect the coast should be considered essential.
The hypocrisy of how the collective west deals with Russia vs Israel. Also of note is the amount of countries that the US have dropped bombs on. I certainly would not want to be aligned with NATO or an EU army. I do think we need to beef up our own defences to some extent if possible. I don’t believe that Russia has any intention of moving beyond the complex Ukraine situation. However, if NATO are stupid enough to go up against the Russians then there will be no winners. No doubt, in some circles I’ll be branded as Putin sympathiser or whatever.
@Mario: Sorry, but what is “the complex Ukraine situation” you’re talking about?
The “Russian minority”?
No side can win a full blown Russian – NATO conflict.
However: I believe that the NATO countries bordering Russia or Belarus, like Estonia, Latvia, are more than happy than being happy to be a member of NATO for this very same reason.
And yes: Your wording of the “complex Ukraine situation” does make you sound a bit like a Putin sympathiser.
Talk is cheap, but our days of freeloading are coming to an end. It’s remarkable how little respect we have for our own sovereignty and hard-won independence considering we lack credible air, sea and land defenses, but we’ve fudged the issue of military alignment since the foundation of the State, relying on genuflection towards neighbouring countries and the US as well as our small size and relative obscurity to deflect attention away from us and it’s no longer sustainable.
There’s no way I’m signing up for any of these ‘scam’ wars. And for the idiots in this comment section, put your money where your mouth is and sign up to the British army or head over to the Ukraine instead of mouthing off here!
And if we were to spend billions(and that’s what we are talking about)the same people would be whinging about the waste of money…..and ‘how many houses would you get for that’?….damned if they do or don’t.
@John Terry: Personally I’d rather the money spent on housing rather than defence. Our need for housing is much greater than our need for defence. We are on the peripherary of Europe and despite anything Leo says we are protected by the UK. The circumstances are what they are, we should take advantage of them.
@Diarmuid Hunt: So, Ireland is free-loading of the UK (and other EU countries) and that’s fine with you?
“The circumstances are what they are” – they are not.
At least, Ireland should ensure to have what it has (navy ships) fully in service.
@Wolfgang Bonow: Don’t get suckered into the arms race. Any global power who wants to take this place can do so in the morning regardless of how many ‘navy ships’ we have ffs. Ridiculous bs. It’s more provocative to have them.
@Thesaltyurchin:
I don’t think that I’m suckered in the arms race.
If someone is slapping me in the face, I rather have him/her to believe that I will punch him back instead he/she thinks I’m handing out flowers.
I might/will lose, but rolling over before something might even happen seems to be a poor choice of defence.
@Wolfgang Bonow: It’s bsolutely fine with me, every nation plays to it’s advantages/opportunities. The circumstances aren’t what they are? – I think you’re going to have to check your logic on that one or elaborate. We should have some level of naval force and airforce but we should be smart/careful about how much we dedicate to them in our situation.
@Wolfgang Bonow: That’s not really a fair comparison, but I agree with your earlier sentiment (above) I was leaning into this heavily the first time around, but you don’t have to do either. It’s not one or the other, like what are the logical outcomes after all the variables have been considered? If any larger nation wants to do that, it can. BUT they need to understand that the ‘punch back’ happens over hundreds of years of hate and terrorism.
@Brendan Fitzsimons:
Ireland is not an insulated island in Europe or the world.
A lot of vital infrastructure is going out of Ireland, like the undersea cables.
You want to hit the US – European trade = you hit these cables.
There’s your threat.
We can argue all day long about what happened in the past, what the US or the UK did, but that’s not changing the current issue.
Remember 9/11, when flights were suspended and the impact of the stock trading and other?
Now imagine if the internet, all trading, banking, over the internet is down between
the US and Europe for for a day or more.
I’m sure, or at least hope, there’s some limited backup in place, but the impact would be massive.
So, because Ireland is geographical at the corner of Europe, this doesn’t make it a less of a target. At least, that’s what I think.
@Wolfgang Bonow: So we should be responsible for US-EU undersea cables because our land was used to make it easier/feasible? Surely if it is that important then everyone would have an interest in them being protected and it wouldn’t be up to just the Irish Navy…
In order to have a secure form of neutrality, Ireland really needs to invest in a much bigger and better equipped Army and Navy – as soon as possible !! No delays, just get it done !! Warships, tanks, manpower, womanpower, radar – NOW !!
Every time, almost, when he opens his mouth, nonsense pours forth! We don’t have an air force. 6 of our 8 navy ships can’t be staffed and we don’t even have a radar to monitor our own air space!! What is wrong with this man??
Mr Varakar is defensive of successive Irish Governments running the Defence Forces into the ground to the point of been operationally unable to fulfil their role. He may hide behind rethoric and deflection but the reality is what it is, Ireland has no meaningful defense no matter what he says. We as a nation need to seriously rethink our attitude to our own defense and be prepared to fund and resource the Defence Forces to do so. Or we can continue to believe we’re grand !.
The UK and others should just stop protecting international companies assets where they are registered in Ireland. These companies are in Ireland for the miniscule tax. Pay a ‘eurosaver’ price and get a eurosaver service.
If they want their international infrastructure protected, then domicile your companies in a NATO, G7 or Five Eyes country, and pay the tax that pays for a proper level of international protection. They cant (but do) have it both ways.
Oh my God, biggest mistake of his career. The UK does protect us and the fact that he will not officially recognize and be grateful for UK support is now going to result in Ireland getting thought a lesson next time Russia comes calling. He is completely out of step with UK (our most important relationship by far) ,EU,NATO,US. He is going to have to apologize for this one. Fast.He understands nothing about the English if he thinks they will let this slight slide.
We will run screaming to NATO headquarters begging to join the day an undersea cable gets cut. The Russians know exactly where they all are. We really need to be in NATO.
Powering through and praying: Our readers' stories about the GP crisis in Ireland
9 hrs ago
11.3k
48
Holy Show
Opposition mulls confidence in Ceann Comhairle as Tánaiste criticises 'unseemly' Dáil scenes
Updated
1 hr ago
5.1k
42
speaking time row
Michael Lowry says he was telling Paul Murphy 'to sit down with my fingers'
17 hrs ago
57.5k
115
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say