Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Dogs chasing a hare during a coursing event in Clonmel (file photo) RollingNews.ie
High Court

Irish Coursing Club fails to secure injunction to allow activities to resume under Level 5 Covid restrictions

A judge said the court lacks the jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction.

THE IRISH COURSING Club (ICC) has failed to secure a High Court injunction that would have allowed coursing to resume during the current Covid-19 restrictions.

In a written judgement delivered on Monday, Ms Justice Niamh Hyland said she was not satisfied to grant the ICC an injunction which would have seen coursing resume.

That order would have remained, pending the outcome of the final outcome of judicial proceedings brought by the ICC after the government de-listed coursing as a permitted activity during the current Level 5 restrictions.

The judge said that she accepted that at least some of the grounds advanced by the ICC were “sufficiently strong”.

These included whether Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly was obliged to consult with other minsters before deciding to exclude coursing from a list of permitted sports.

However, she said the court lacks the jurisdiction to grant what would be a mandatory injunction directing the minister to allow coursing resume.

The granting of an injunction in this case would be effectively asking the Minister for Health to ignore matters relating to the risk of Covid-19 and act outside his powers, the judge said.

The injunction would “usurp the exclusive function of the Oireachtas”, in circumstances where the court has no public health qualifications nor public health advice available to it, and where the court “is not democratically elected”.

Even if the court had such a power the balance of convenience, and the risk of injustice dictates that the court should not grant the injunction, the judge added.

The court had put sufficient weight on the severity of the current Covid-19 situation and the need for the current regime to be left “undisturbed” in circumstances where the entire Cabinet took a decision that only the sports identified should be permitted to go ahead.

The judge further added that she had to take into account the state’s expert medical evidence regarding the risk involved to public health if coursing was allowed resume.

A significant number of people, including two handlers for each dog, as well as stewards and security personnel, are involved in the running of a coursing meeting the court noted.

The court fully accepted evidence that the ICC has made strenuous efforts to be Covid-19 compliant in any of its events prior to Christmas.

However, the granting of a mandatory injunction “could entail a risk to life”, the judge said.

Granting the injunction would have allowed 36 coursing meetings go ahead under Level 5 restrictions with potentially 3,000 people attending, she said.

The court noted the possible financial losses suffering by breeders and trainers due to the cancellation of meetings.

When the risk to public health and life caused by Covid-19 was taken into account the balance of convenience favoured dismissing the injunction application, the judge concluded.

End of coursing season 

The ICC brought proceedings over the government’s decision last month not to include coursing in a list of activities permitted during the current Covid-19 restrictions.

The ICC’s challenge against the Minister’s decision to de-list coursing as a permitted activity will now proceed to a full hearing.

No date has been fixed for that hearing; however, it is unlikely the full hearing to be determined before the end of next month when the coursing season would normally conclude.

The ICC sought the injunction as part of its action against the Minister for Health and Minister Housing, Local Government and Heritage because of the limited time left before the end coursing season ends.

The ministers, represented by Michael Cush SC and Caren Geoghegan Bl, opposed the injunction application as well as the main action.

They argued that it is “unsafe in the current climate” to allow coursing take place, and the government is fully entitled not to allow the sport go ahead.

They also rejected the ICC’s claims that the coursing is being singled out, and is being discriminated against because members of the government are opposed to coursing.

The ICC, represented by Martin Hayden SC, and Eoin O’Shea Bl, claims the minister’s decision to de-list coursing as a permitted event was “absolutely lacking in transparency.” and discriminated against those involved in coursing.

The ICC says while its activities were de-listed other similar sports, including its sister sport greyhound racing, horse racing and other equine activities, were allowed by the government to proceed.

The ICC also claimed that coursing is being treated unfairly because members of the government, including the Minster for Health Stephen Donnelly, want the sport banned.

Earlier this month the ICC, which regulates hare coursing in Ireland, launched its action against the State’s failure to include it in a list of activities allowed to operate during the current Covid-19 restrictions.

In its action the ICC seeks various declarations and orders from the court including one setting aside the Minister for Health’s decision to de-list coursing set out in statutory instrument under the 1947 Health Act.

The ICC says coursing was allowed take place before Christmas, due to its inclusion on a government approved list of permitted sports. When the government announced its latest round of restrictions on Christmas Eve, coursing was de-listed.

No reasons were given for coursing’s de-listing, it claims.

The ICC says its exclusion from the list of permitted sports is flawed, irrational and unreasonable because the Minister for Health de-listed coursing without consulting either the Departments of Agriculture or Housing, Local Government and Heritage.

Those departments are responsible for coursing, the ICC claims.

It also alleges that the decision to de-list it is tainted by a perception of bias because Minister Donnelly had in 2015 voted in favour of legislation banning coursing.

The ICC also alleges that in advance of the de-listing decision Minister Donnelly had consulted with Green Party Ministers Eamon Ryan and Catherine Martin, who are also want coursing prohibited.

The claims are denied.

Comments are closed for legal reasons.

Author
Aodhan O Faolain