Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE IRISH PROPERTY Owners’ Association (IPOA) has said it has “deep-rooted” reservations about a possible move to introduce eviction bans on landlords whose tenants cannot pay their rents.
The group said it is its contention that such a measure “would be disastrous for the sector and it will only serve to dissuade landlords from continuing to maintain properties to rent”.
The IPOA’s statement comes after Minister for Housing Darragh O’Brien yesterday said that while no decision has been made regarding a blanket eviction ban yet, he has been “exploring options”.
“We’ve got to be very careful that any measures that could potentially be taken don’t have unintended consequences either, such as further diminishing the rental supply that is there,” O’Brien told Newstalk’s On The Record.
“We’re doing this while thankfully, in a positive way, we’re seeing an increase in new build supply right across social and affordable housing and indeed private housing and we need to see that continue,” the Minister said.
A number of opposition parties have been calling for an eviction ban, with TDs in many parties stating that their constituency offices are filling up with people with notice to quit evictions that are due to come into effect in the winter and new year.
On Thursday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the introduction of a ban on evictions this winter is being kept under review by Government.
Speaking to reporters at the inaugural summit of the “European Political Community” in Prague, he said Housing Minister Darragh O’Brien had consulted with the attorney general about a ban.
It is understood the Department of Housing is in consultation with the AG’s office, but the minister is very conscious of need to carefully assess whether restricting property rights would be the subject of a legal challenge or would lead to more ordinary landlords leaving the system.
Advertisement
There are also concerns interference could jeopardise continued investment in the rental accommodation market.
The IPOA claimed the recent Budget provided an opportunity to introduce fiscal supports for the sector, which would have alleviated supply issues, but that support was not forthcoming.
“As the representative body for small landlords, we have grave reservations about such moves happening without consultation with the sector, and particuarly so because the proposed measures could have the effect of completely eroding the constitutional rights and protections desgined to protect property owners,” IPOA chairperson Mary Conway said.
Conway said landlords are “not immune to the cost of living crisis”, adding that many of them “depend on their rental income to pay their mortgages, and other business expenses, while trying to make provisions for their families and pensions in the years to come”.
“We are calling on Government to avoid this highly discriminatory and divisive proposal and instead work with the sector to help to increase supply in the market,” she said.
“Through such meaningful engagement, measures could be designed to stave off the ever-increasing numbers who are leaving the residential property sector becasue of their deep disillusionment with the increasing regulatory and financial burdens associated with letting a property,” she said.
Speaking in the Dáil on Thursday afternoon, Tánaiste Leo Varadkar said a winter eviction ban would just “store up the problem” for Spring.
He said evictions are relatively uncommon in Ireland and if someone gets a notice to quit, they have a period of time before they have to leave the property.
“I think the difficulty with a ban on evictions is that it stores up the problem for when you lift the ban. And that’s part of what we’re experiencing now. So I know some people say you have a blanket ban over the winter period, but what then happens in the spring? It doesn’t necessarily solve the problem. It just defers and makes it worse a little bit later,” he added.
The IPOA has written to the coalition party leaders to oppose a potential eviction ban.
With reporting by Christina Finn
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
61 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Probably not and he is raising awareness around an issue that so many young people are struggling so he is to be commended in that regard however I’m tired of all these celebrities selling out via books, newspapers and interviews. He does profit from the book after all. There is a possibility that some of the profits are being donated to mental health organisations and if so then fair play to him. He is highlighting an important issue.
Youre “tired of”?? Are you for real? It doesnt matter WHO he is, god love you and you ever suffering life you have to put up with this. Disgusting attitude.
Ye know jack shit about the man, he is great for highlighting this issue, crawl back under your rock, it’s people like you on this island that are toxic, always whinging and moaning. Go get your leg over or something.
You might perceive it as cynicism, I see it as a health dose of skepticism. As someone who personally knows the struggle of mental illness ( on medication since 16 and 4 periods of in- patient treatment in hospital) I’m wary of seeing a celebrity that I perceive ( perhaps wrongly) hijack the issue for financial gain. What I would like to know is if he penned the book himself or had a ghost writer? I’ve read countless of his interviews this week where he talks about “his book” if he didn’t write the words himself, that is in itself disingenuous. It might not matter to you but as someone who has felt the stigma of mental illness it really matters to me. He is a “celebrity” and the reaction he is going to get is clearly not what a young 18 year man is going to get off his friends. People are fickle when it comes to how they treat people and my worry is Bressie will be treated like a hero when the people who are suffering from mental illness will still be ridiculed and made little of.
I’ve always found Bressie to be very sincere! It is not a crime to make some money on his book the main thing he is helping to bring awareness of a horrible isolating illness! This is a good thing and he and others who talk about their experience help bring those suffering out from the cold! I wish him well
Antidepressants don’t work for everyone. They did work for me. As my doctor said, they are not a magic bullet but are intended to help you out of depression. I still have low days (sometimes weeks) but am no longer suicidal. I no longer see life as a pointless journey. No doubt, pharmaceutical companies are making a fortune off the back of people’s suffering but antidepressants have a place on the road to recovery. Also, the quote saying depression is a natural response to trauma is true but it ignores the depression that has no external cause. That is brain chemistry. Statements like “what have you to be depressed about” are ignorant and damaging.
There have been NO proof that the “chemical imbalance” theories are correct. That’s a fact. I’m not saying that depression isn’t real and that some suffer more than others, but the chemical imbalance nonsense is a myth. Please look it up for yourself, absolutely no evidence of it at all, not a single lab test. It’s the drug companies and paid off (and sometimes plainly gullible doctors) who sprout this stuff. Has no basis in reality, but is great for selling drugs.
He did. And so did many of us injured by these drugs. Not forgetting the placebo effect that comes when taking a drug. It is not possible to measure neurotransmitter levels in the brain of a live human so claims that anti-depressants “rebalance brain neurotransmitter levels” is fraud. The public have been duped. Time for mainstream Psychiatry to come clean about their delusion.
Keep the flag flying Bressie, even more so after the interview with Helen O Driscoll on the Late Late Show last night,on how her Son battled so much with mental illness and the devastating outcome for her and her family.
Just went back to listen to the interview. The assumption being that the drugs are the cure not one of the potential causes and triggers. As I remember my brain ‘spinning out of control’ on the “anti-depressant” Citalopram 7 years ago. I was put on it for anxiety. Luckily I didn’t harm anyone but now I know that sometimes people have harmed others. Withdrawal from the drug is also a difficult time if not stopped correctly. I was taken off the drug ‘cold turkey’ but our mental “health” system. A nightmare time.
There can be increased risk of suicidal thinking in Jonathan O’Driscoll’s age group. Hence the black box warning on these drugs in the US for 18 to 24 year olds. Also NOT suitable for children as I think of Jake McGill who was 14 ~
PS I went into mania / ‘Psychosis’ thanks to the anti-depressant. Psychosis is a temporary loss of touch will reality. Most people do not harm others in this state.
The majority of people in mental distress do not harm others and are no more dangerous than the rest of society, unless psychotropic drugs or alcohol is involved. Or when withdrawal from these drugs is not managed correctly.
PS While I think Helen O’Driscoll is an amazing lady, been in front of a live studio audience, considering the stress and trauma she has already been through not so long ago, seemed a little insensitive. Being on TV has it’s own stresses. As long as she was comfortable with it. a pre-recording may have been a little bit less stressful.
Sadly it looks like Jonathan O’Driscoll never got the correct Psychological and therapeutic help that he needed to help him deal with his issues. It was plastered over with mind altering drugs, with tragic consequences.
“a postmortem revealed no evidence of medication in his system”.
From listening to other mother’s eg Maria Bradshaw mother of Toran Henry ( a 17 yr old who took his own life on Prozac in New Zealand) sometimes the tests do not show up the drug.
“My son’s first two toxicology tests showed no Prozac in his blood while the 3rd showed it was present. The difference? The first two tests were the cheapest available and actually not able to detect the drug below fatal levels. The third, more sensitive test was far more expensive and therefore not used by our authorities” Maria Bradshaw
If Jonathan O’Driscoll did stop the drugs before this tragedy that can lead to akathisia. A severe inner restlessness. Something I have experienced and it’s a pretty unbearable experience. One of the experts in this area is forensic Psychiatrist Yolande Lucire. Some people also have difficulty metabolizing the drugs.
Aine it’s probably time to pipe down on this. U know very little on this case. Akathisia results in constant shuffling around, with an inability to keep still. A common side effect for neuroleptics (which decrease dopamine) but also a symptom of Parkinson’s disease (where there is a deficiency of dopamine in a particular region of the brain).
Akathisia is not aggression and making fly away remarks like that instil fear & propagate misinformation.
U don’t know what that lads history with recreational drugs was, if there was a predisposition to a psychotic break. U kno relatively little about his childhood. And actually none of u know or ever will, what was going on in his mind that day.
we all know your position on psychopharmaceuticals, but your attempts to blame them for everything are unfounded. Many people can’t actually function without some pharmaceutical intervention. They can’t stay down, or up, or lucid. They can’t sleep enough, stop compulsions or eat.
If medication can help 5%, it’s better than nothing.
My own experience ? There is a Yale study which shows that I am far from alone. The link between SSRIs and mania / psychosis. I didn’t become violent on the drugs but it was a possibility eg the Donal Schell case above but there are so many examples I have lost track. There is also the David Crespi case in the US which is one of the saddest I’ve come across. No more than the O’Driscoll case. David Crespi was experiencing akathisia on a cocktail of drugs. He is now in prison. His wife Kim is an activist in the area. She managed to see the TRUTH of the situation. As does his other children. Their tragedy even featured in “The Darkside of a Pill” on TG4.
It’s not me that is saying it. It’s top world experts eg Prof David Healy ~
Psychotropic Drugs and Violence ~ https://vimeo.com/67245935
Again the attempt to silence those who speak out on this. Been told to “pipe down”. I know as much as anyone else on the Jonathan O’Driscoll case from listening to his mother. I never claimed to be an expert on his background. That would have taken the work of a trained therapist. Seems like he never got the therapy he needed.
As for Akathisia I have experienced it 1st hand. That pretty much makes me quite knowledgeable on it considering I have been through it !
I have also listened to experts speak about it eg forensic Psychiatrist Yolande Lucire.
Adverse Reactions to Psychiatric Drugs: Yolande Lucire ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEoSs6Yo0DA
Dr Peter Breggin and Prof David Healy also talks about this drug induced condition.
Family members don’t always fully comprehend the drugging regime. If someone has been on the drugs long term the chances are that they will need to continue. As they have become so dependent on them. But there is also a good possibility that their underlying difficulties were never addressed correctly in the first place.
There are many working in the Psychiatric industry that would probably like me to be silent. You have to remember it was ye that created me in ye’re drug fueled dens. Pretending to help. When you brought nothing but misery to my life. Pay back time. But even if I didn’t exist the growing network of Psychiatric survivors and some family members who can see through the system is getting larger by the day.
“Akathisia has two sides, or faces: outer, objective restlessness and inner, subjective agitation. The outer, visible restlessness caused by akathisia particularly affects the legs and may be mild, moderate, or severe. In mild cases, patients find it difficult to sit or stand comfortably. They may adjust their posture frequently, shifting their weight from one foot to the other while standing, or crossing and uncrossing their legs white sitting. In moderate cases, patients are more visibly jittery and fidgety, tapping their feet on the floor or pacing. In severe cases, patients are visibly agitated, find it difficult to sit still, and are driven to pace back and forth. (Page 66, The Antidepressant Solution.)
“Akathisia can be extremely dangerous, especially in patients who have not been warned about the side effect and mistake it for a worsening of their psychiatric condition. Akathisia can trigger panic reactions in patients, increase paranoia, and drive patients to suicide and violence.” (Page 66, The Antidepressant Solution)
Joseph Glenmullen MD ~
A graduate of Harvard Medical School, I am a Clinical Instructor in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, on the staff of the Harvard Law School Health Services, and in private practice in Harvard Square. I am Board Certified in Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. I am the author of two books on the side effects of antidepressants: Prozac Backlash (Simon & Schuster, 2000) and The Antidepressant Solution (Simon & Schuster, 2005).
In the last four years, I have given expert testimony in over two dozen state and federal cases regarding the side effects of psychiatric medications.
Citalopram and piradel working for me, I’d rather big business had these than not as the repercussions of not bring on the meds doesn’t warrant thinking of
Not everyone feels damaged by Citalopram (in fact I was on it for 3 years before the obvious damage kicked in) but in the latest statistics from the UK as the % of prescriptions go up year on year, “The majority of SSRI deaths involve the drug Citalopram” ~
Yeah there is a study by Yale. There are also thousands upon thousands of studies showing marked benefit from drugs. I can’t actually believe I’m arguing this, because I’m not a pharma-phile per se. But you are insistent that ur way is the right way, and that is not correct.
Your way is the right way *for you*. There are many people who don’t need therapy. Who’s issue is primarily pharmacological. I think most medication interventions are ameliorated by therapy, but you can’t talk someone down from an extreme high.
I too have experienced akathisia and it is unpleasant. I have been agitated on medication, my inhibitions lowered, my appetite increased, electric shock feelings.
But also (and I am not on meds now) I can recognise over the years, that there was fear and panic beyond any logical control and reasoning and without medication (which was administered involuntarily in an acute setting), I would have caused fatal damage to myself. Without it, I would not have survived abuse going on in my teenage years.
It certainly isn’t the cure for me, but it brought the distress down to a degree where I could stay alive. U can do shag all therapy if you are dead.
If you benefit from the drugs then good for you. That doesn’t mean that anyone who questions the link between these drugs and violence & highlights the knowledge that is out there on this should be forced into silence. There have been too many tragedies. Swept under the the carpet and scapegoat term “mental illness”. These are mind altering Psychotropic drugs. When used ethically they can help. When overused or not managed correctly (eg the withdrawal process) they can harm.
“The ethical use of psychotropic drugs is perhaps the single most important aspect of
Psychiatric care that requires urgent attention” Dr Phil Thomas. We do NOT have ethical use of these drugs. To try to cover up the damage done by Citalopram I was put on various drugs ~ Zyprexa, Seroquel, Lithium, Lamictal, Rivotril, sleeping pills, Xanax etc etc 9 foolscap pages listing them all. Over a 3.5 year period. I was on these drugs at far too high a dose and for too long.
Not forgetting the cost of these drugs and the cost of disabling me. Before that I had a number of
good careers and was a productive member of society. I had studied hard and worked hard.
Take Zyprexa / Olanzapine for example. I know that it can help some people calm down as it is a major tranquilizer. And that short term usage benefited me in my last episode 3 years ago, as I withdrew from everything. I had been on it long term and at 10 mg. I also had a 3 month manic / ‘psychotic’ episode on the drugs as they fueled my symptoms when used long term. I am now free of these symptoms for a number of years.
20 people died in the trials for Zyprexa / Olanzapine, it causes diabetes and rapid weight gain. As well as damage to the brain / brain shrinkage. “significant reduction in brain volume that affects both gray and white matter”. That comes from a study funded by the maker Lilly ! I first learned this from honest doctors Psychiatrists Joanna Moncrieff and Peter Breggin.
{ Do not stop or change prescribed psychoactive drugs without talking to a good doctor, due to the dangers of withdrawal }
Interview with Peter Gøtzsche (co-founder of the respected Cochrane Collaboration, where doctors are supposed to go for evidence based medicine) ~ 4 mins in he speaks about Zyprexa / Olanzapine ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIIQVll7DYY
PS Thousands of studies but funded by who ? Be sure to check any conflicts of interest. Which sometimes are hidden. Psychiatrists have even gone into court as experts in murder trials without declaring conflicts of interests.
There are “buckloads of research funding” coming from pharma and too close a link between pharma and Psychiatry. Affecting the outcome of some studies. 69 % of the taskforce involved in writing the DSM-5 (Psychiatric ‘bible’) had links to pharma.
Here is just one example of these ethically challenged doctors.
“Dr. Charles Nemeroff.
A renowned chairman of Psychiatry at Emory University, Nemeroff was a proponent for drugs sold by GlaxoSmithKline, such as the antidepressant Paxil (Seroxat). While earning hundreds of thousands of dollars jetting around the country and giving talks about Paxil to doctors at fancy restaurants, Nemeroff also managed a multi-million dollar grant from the NIH to research drugs under development by Glaxo”
fair play to bressie for puttin it all out there hes really using his celebrity to push this taboo topic it needs to be discussed and hes a great role model. hats off to him.
While I commend Bressie for bringing awareness to mental health and depression. It concerns me that he doesn’t seem to have an in depth knowledge about depression, and in particular the bio-psychiatry medical model (and the pharmaceutical industry which it supports). If he is asking people to seek help he should also make them aware that for the majority of public patients they will be prescribed SSRI drugs as first line ‘treatments’ Bressie says he doesn’t take them himself, but even if this is the case, most who seek help will be offered them before talk therapy. The mental health system in Ireland relies on medications because proper therapy supports are dire, and often people are left languishing on waiting lists for months of not years. They say that SSRI anti depressants are ‘useful’ in conjunction with psychotherapy yet most people (in the public health system) will not be given psycho-therapy in conjunction with SSRI’s so how useful are they? and what about side effects? and withdrawals? these are important questions, and it’s all very well advocating for people to get help for depression, but when the reality is all they will be offered is dodgy SSRI drugs, which could make them worse- then Bressie should be warning them of that!…
SSRI’s are only one of many meds offered to people who are seeking help for mental health issues. They aren’t all “dodgy”, side effects are rare and usually subside within a few weeks, which is usually something that most people, given their situation, can deal with if it means it can start them on a path to recovery. Therapy helps in conjunction with the drugs, and medication won’t be applicable to everyone. You can take a “one method fixes all” stance when it comes to mental health treatments.
That’s what the prescribers tell you and the brochures in their surgeries. That anti-depressants “rebalance brain neurotransmitters”. Has anyone out there had a neurotransmitter test before they were prescribed these drugs? And after ?
An honest medical doctor should be able to tell you it is NOT possible to measure brain neurotransmitter levels in a live person. Sadly this is one of the biggest delusions in modern medicine. And the public continue to be misled through various channels. Including some mental health charities and their brochures.
As these drug prescriptions rise every year, in this billion dollar industry, to quote an honest medical doctor from his recent book on the subject of this delusion “Medical knowledge should be open to public scrutiny”.
Some of us blindly listened to our doctors when it came to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors / SSRIs / anti-depressants and similar drugs. We allowed our brain and it’s mechanisms to be messed with. We have paid a heavy price. But at least we are still alive. Unlike many others ~
The hiding of negative trials on these drugs. Presentation by Psychiatrist and Psychopharmacologist Prof David Healy. See 6 mins into this presentation ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3YB59EKMKw
Time for Irish people to start asking questions and not to blinding accept was is effectively an excellent marketing campaign. But one that lacks an honest Scientific basis.
Adverse and side effects are not so rare. It can also be quite difficult to get off these drugs once started. A database of registered side effects on drugs ~ http://www.rxisk.org
The person can then end up quickly labelled “Bipolar” / Manic Depression and on even stronger drugs. Manic Depression used to be a rare condition. Now it’s become a lot more common. The mass prescribing of anti-depressants is one of the causes of this explosion in diagnosis. As well as some changes in criteria in the DSM. Diagnostic and Statistics Manual. Not forgetting that 69 % of the taskforce involved in writing the latest Psychiatric bible DSM-5 had links to the pharma industry. Big business.
With their bulging pockets human suffering caused seems to be of little concern.
The SSRI’s are all dodgy, and those that can tolerate the side effects are the exception rather than the rule- particularly for long term users. They don’t subside within a few weeks either, that’s bollocks. It’s what the drug companies say, because they have been playing down the side effects for years, as have psychiatrists because it’s in their interest to keep people drugged, and compliant. Indeed, you cannot take a ‘one method fixes all’ stance, but unfortunately, in Ireland, if you seek help for any kin dof mental health problem, you will be offered these drugs as first line treatment and most doctors con’t inform about the risks,. If Bressie is advocating for people to get help, then he is encouraging them into that quagmire where the first line treatment they will be offered when they seek help is medication, all I am saying is he has a duty to warn people that that is the situation they will find themselves in, that’s the reality- let’s not sugar coat it..
It was barbiturates in the 50′s, then they were classed as evil due to addiction and overdosages, then came the miracle first benzo in the 60′s, diazepam, which was handed out like candy and earned the name ‘Mothers little helper’, now they’re the devil due to dependency, withdrawal effects and overdosages (hard to overdose on benzos alone, but combined with opiates/alcohol it’s a different story), so now big pharma focuses on SSRI or SNRI medication, (all to do with patents), once they run out they will already have a new miracle replacement ready. There’s trials on mice using Ketamine as a new anti-depressant therapy. It’s all about the $$
No idea. And even if I did I’m getting sick of people using catch-all terms like depression. Depression is serious and not simply a down day here and there. Sooner we start dismantling useless terminology like this the better.
Depression: An Emotion not a Disease ~ by Dr Michael Corry and Dr Aine Tubridy ~
“Depression is an emotion, just like fear, anger or love. It is the imprint felt after a stressful or traumatic experience. Depression is natural. It is not a disease process reflecting a change in brain chemistry. The sick brain model of depression is a hideous and terrifying concept, as it turns us into cogs in a machine where, if we find the going difficult and want to disengage, we are prescribed an emotional painkiller and advised to carry on regardless. Chemically-induced slavery has arrived. This book offers hope and understanding, and effective ways to create a new identity”
Since no true biomarkers have been found that is not based on Scientific fact. What the purpose of masses of people going around thinking they are mentally ill ? Who benefits from that ? There are many vested interests. The “mental illness” industry is big business. While I’m sure Bressie has his heart in the right place, I hope he is not just been used to suck more people onto the drugs. The biomedical model is still the main route of treatment.
William Glasser MD is an internationally recognized Psychiatrist who is best known as the author of Reality Therapy, a method of Psychotherapy he created in 1965 and that is now taught all over the world. Like many of the older generation he was trained properly in Psychology and therapy.
“William Glasser describes in ‘Warning: Psychiatry Can Be Hazardous to Your Mental Health’ the sea change that has taken place in the treatment of mental health in the last few years. Millions of patients are now routinely being given prescriptions for a wide range of drugs including Ritalin, Prosac, Zoloft and related drugs which can be harmful to the brain. A previous generation of patients would have had a course of Psychotherapy without brain–damaging chemicals. Glasser explains the wide implications of this radical change in treatment”
Anyone on such drugs should discuss this with their doctor and not make any changes without good medical advice, due to withdrawal.
Be sure to reach out and get help if in distress. The Samaritans are a good backup service 116 123 but some talk therapy and lifestyle changes may also be needed to truly address any emotional distress.
Depression is not an emotion. Depression is an illness that kills people. It is not ‘natural’. Insomnia, loss of appetite, loss of ability to interact, to concentrate. These are not ‘natural’. It is not ‘natural’ to have thoughts of hurting oneself. Or to act out on those thoughts. In fact it goes directly *against* nature to do that.
Certainly not all psychopharmacological interventions are helpful. And there is mass overprescribing of neuroleptic and sedatives which serve to lower mood and motivation.
But your argument is nonsense. I saw Dr aine tubridy for a while. I was on medication when I saw her. I suffered with crippling panic and her intervention was ‘chakra healing’. I know she was a medical doctor but illinformed attitudes like yours tend (imo) to prolong the suffering of people under the guise that it’s all ‘just a natural feeling’. Enough people in this country have lost sons, daughters, parents, siblings and friends to suicide. Don’t patronise us all.
As someone that suffers from ‘Depression’ and who has been seriously misled by the Psychopharmalogical approach, t I’ve experienced the insomnia, loss of appetite etc etc Even in the past week or two as there was an anniversary of a traumatic event and certain people had cut themselves off from me.
I took the “illness” approach for a number of years. I ended up in bed most of the time with no quality of life. Completely disempowered by the approach taken by the doctors I attended at the time. And highly sedated by their drugs.
I now take a different approach. It’s up to me to do the work. I have started to see an experienced therapist again and am looking into getting more therapy. I’ve also tackled lifestyle and diet. Long term anti-depressant and other drugs I was put on has left it’s legacy. Anti-depressants can turn mild, moderate depression into a more chronic condition. This was pointed out by medical journalist Robert Whitaker in his book “Anatomy of an Epidemic”.
I know of many people who have lost a son or family member. Emotional distress can have many consequences. Sadly including suicide. Things do get better. But sadly at the time some people find it hard to stay with their pain and to reach out. The drugs prescribed can also be a factor. Hence the black box warning in the US for younger people.
Aine Tubridy’s book and CD on Panic was quite helpful to me “When Panic Attacks”. I have had chakra / Reiki work done in the past that has also helped. As part of a holistic approach to healing.
Bressie (35 next month), is a good looking Irish musician and former Westmeath Gaelic footballer and Leinster Rugby player. Breslin found success as the lead singer, guitarist and songwriter with pop band The Blizzards, as a co-writer and producer with XIX Entertainment and as a solo artist. He was the winning coach on the first and third seasons of The Voice of Ireland
To “pull yaself up by ya boot straps” you need supportive people around you and sometimes a supportive person to guide you (eg therapist and at least one good friend to turn to. Or Samaritans).
I’ve had the ‘imaginary elephant sitting on your chest’ days where you feel like you cannot move. On those days you have to particularly kind to yourself,. The development of self-awareness over time has helped. Having a daily maintenance plan in place can help and also what to do if a person feels they are slipping. There is also a WRAP App.
Are other countries going around claiming that a large % of the population are ‘mentally ill’ eg the Germans or French ? I doubt it ! Belittling ourselves instead of recognizing our strengths. Yes. Some people struggle. But that doesn’t mean we are diseased.
@mary excellent post. I watched an interview with Bressie on Ireland AM and he genuinely wants to help. He’s a man of great integrity in my opinion. The only thing I would disagree on is that addiction (classified as a disease by WHO) is more prevalent than depression. Smoking, gambling and alcohol for example.
Just finished reading a new book about Depression by a medical doctor and Psychotherapist. As this book points out, considering it is not possible to measure neurotransmitters in the brain of a live human, not sure how much longer that drug companies and prescribers can continue to mislead people about pills fixing ‘chemical imbalances’ in the brain or “rebalancing brain neurotransmitters”. This lie has been costly and damaging for many of us.
“Depression Delusion, Volume One: The Myth of the Brain Chemical Imbalance” ~
Even an article that I’ve read last week in the Irish Times compared the use of anti-depressants to using a ‘blunt hammer’.
“Researchers looking to develop treatments beyond ‘blunt hammer’ of antidepressants”. I’ve felt the effect of this blunt hammer on my life for the last number of years due to the damage caused to my health. And so has many others.
Paul’s recovery from antidepressants ~ https://vimeo.com/81584778 ( From Recovery stories on the Council for Evidence Based Psychiatry webpage)
The amount of red thumbs you’ve received for stating nothing but facts shows that people don’t want to know the truth, they just believe what comforts them. It’s pathetic. There is no chemical imbalance. FACT.
With so many vested interests and so much brainwashing over the decades the red thumbs are just a reflection of that. Time for the tide to turn. The battle is on.
Denise’s understanding of Talentless;
- inter county GAA player
- Ireland rugby u20 player
- Leinster rugby professional
- 1st class honors degree
- 4 double platinum selling albums
-Countless works for charities such as LARC and cycle against suicide
I clicked on the article thinking I was going to learn some of the things we shouldn’t say to a person suffering with depression and I read two things , I guess he tells us the rest of the things in his new book that he wants us to buy .
Bressie, i’d love to believe you, but i don’t believe you had it ‘that’ bad if ya know what I mean.
Raising awareness? We’re aware. This whole raising awareness is code word for ‘seeking attention’
Give us a story from a non-celebrity to raise awareness because I can tell you from experience, those suffering will relate to it much easier.
stigma attached to mental health is a joke in this country my son was stillborn and i was told by a shrink i should just get on with it as i didnt bond with him…. and be happy ive another child.
I think Niall Breslin is doing good work but he will wear himself out running around trying to convince us all that “it’s ok” to have mental issues and to talk about them. Meanwhile, most of the people I know already acknowledge that they have serious issues, be they mental health or otherwise. I agree that often people should be less harsh on others but neither that in itself or talking about it, will solve the core issues. Such as, the fact is that we reflect ourselves onto the world. I don’t think there are any easy solutions to this interlacing or that one person should be expected to solve these issues.
I think Niall Breslin is doing good work but he will wear himself running around trying to convince us all that “it’s ok” to have mental issues and to talk about them. Also, most of the people I know already acknowledge that they have serious issues, be they mental health or otherwise. I agree that, often, people should be less harsh on others but neither easing that itself, or talking about it, will solve the core issues. We reflect ourselves onto the world. I think there are no easy solutions to this interlacing.
US stock index suffers biggest one-day fall since 2020 as Trump insists 'markets are going to boom'
47 mins ago
3.1k
17
Uncertain Future
The last time tariffs like this were imposed it led to the Great Depression, ministers warn
Updated
20 mins ago
12.9k
68
As it happened
Trump hits EU goods with 20% tariff and rails against foreigners 'pillaging' US
Updated
23 hrs ago
118k
216
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say