Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Debunked: Safety sheet used to show an edible coating is risky is actually for a cleaning fluid

A safety sheet says people should seek immediate medical attention after swallowing Apeel.

AN EDIBLE COATING used to keep food fresh has been falsely described as being dangerous based on a safety data sheet for a product with the same name.

Apeel’s product Edipeel, which is described as a colourless, tasteless “peel” made from plant oils, is designed to slow water loss and oxidisation, making fruit and vegetables last longer.

The Edipeel powder is distributed by Apeel as a powder, before being mixed with water and applied to the fruit where it is packaged.  

 The solution appears to mostly be used on very perishable foods, such as avocados and citrus fruits. Both Asda and Tesco have begun trials of Apeel, so see if it can reduce food waste. 

However, posts shared thousands of times on Facebook have suggested that the edible coating is made out to be something much more risky than it actually is.

“Don’t eat anything with the ‘Apeel’ sticker on it,” one Facebook post begins.

“I checked their website out, you can’t find any information about what exactly is apeel,” the post reads.

“The company is very mysterious about what the product actually is. And, it can’t be washed off no mater how hard you scrub.”

The post then goes on to link to a safety data sheet, claiming that the sheet shows that Apeel causes serious eye damage, and should only be used while wearing protective clothing, including gloves and eye and face protection. 

However, these claims are false and the sharing of the safety sheet is misleading.

According to the product’s website, Apeel is “composed entirely of purified monoglycerides and diglycerides, edible compounds that can be found in a variety of foods”.

“They are safe to eat as verified by regulatory authorities around the world, including Health Canada, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the World Health Organization (WHO),” it continues.

“In fact, they are so safe they can be found in products designed for the most sensitive populations, including infant formula and nutrition shakes for the elderly.”

A study commissioned by the European Food Safety Authority into monoglycerides and diglycerides found that there was “no indication of adverse effects from the available animal studies at the highest dose tested and from the post marketing data” and, when these are used as a food additive, “there is no reason for a safety concern”. 

Apeel’s website also provides product safety information for Edipeel, including product information sheets for various national markets, including in the United States, where the manufacturer, Apeel Sciences, is based.

While the safety sheet shared as part of the misleading claim does suggest that Apeel can be unsafe and that people should seek immediate medical attention if they swallow it, that safety data sheet does not refer to the same product used to preserve food.

The safety sheet shown in the Facebook post is actually for a different Apeel product; a hard-surface cleaning product made in the UK, by a company called Evans Vanodine, made in part from potentially harmful alcohols.

The product page for the cleaning solution on the website of Evans Vanodine, which also hosts the safety sheet linked to on the Facebook post, says in large capital letters: “EVANS APEEL HAS NO RELATION TO APEEL SCIENCES AND SHOULD NOT BE USED TO PRESERVE FRUITS AND VEGETABLES.”

The edible Apeel coating is a different product to the hard surface cleaning product and there is no indication that it is harmful in the same way. The hard surface cleaning product shares the same name and should not be ingested. 

The Journal’s FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network’s Code of Principles. You can read it here. For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader’s Guide here. You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds