Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE MUNSTER EXPRESS newspaper was banned from the JobBridge scheme for two months after the Department of Social Protection found that they breached rules under the scheme.
At press conference in Dublin this morning organised by ScamBridge.ie, journalism graduate Martin Malone said that he was given no mentoring at the Munster Express, claiming it is now selling photographs he took to benefit the newspaper:
I very rarely had any contact with the assigned mentor apart for the odd nod in the offices. The Munster Express clearly used JobBridge to provide them with services that they would otherwise have to pay for. They were aware that it was displacing work. They had no intention of providing any training or development of the intern they took on.
Malone made an official complaint to the department alleging that he was required to supply his own equipment for the role and that the hours of work exceeded the 60 hours a week allowed.
The newspaper denied the allegations saying that he was indeed given mentoring “commensurate with our judgement and his abilities”. They rejected that he was required to work more than the allowable hours, saying that the position was assignment based and would take 30 hours a week to complete.
The company also said that there was “no substance” to the allegation that they were using JobBridge to displace paid labour.
Advertisement
The Department of Social Protection say they launched an investigation after Malone’s complaint to them and, in a addition to banning them from hiring photographers in JobBridge, they say that:
Future JobBridge placements will be regularly monitored to ensure that appropriate mentoring is provided and that therms and conditions of the scheme are adhered to.
The Munster Express was also banned completely from the JobBridge scheme for a period of two months from October. But Malone said their penalty is insufficient:
The sanction they applied, does not, in my opinion, really penalise the company. They have been barred from hiring a photographer or videographer under the scheme but are still free to hire interns in other areas. I feel that this has largely let them off the hook and is no real punishment.
Socialist Party MEP Paul Murphy also criticised the penalty and added that all companies who have been investigated by the department should be named.
“There are apparently 35 companies which have been banned so far from JobBridge. Munster Express is the first to be named as Minister Joan Burton has allowed the rest of them to hide. This must be ended,” he said.
Murphy also wants the money that was paid to the Munster Express to be repaid to the state and Malone be compensated for the work he did while an intern there.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
NUJ are made mainly of state tools so don’t hold your breath. 2 months! what sort of punishment is that, the editor could easily take the photos himself in that time till they can hire another intern.
Now anybody who is agreeing to work 60 hours a week on job bridge must be a bit touched. The lad must have been born with a saddle on his back! Grow a pair for yourself man!
Suppose he was on the maximum amount he could earn; a kingly sum of €238 a week. If he actually was doing a 60 hour week he was making about €3.50 an hour. That is GROSS exploitation on the part of the employer and it is shocking that the terms and conditions of Jobbridge haven’t been at least tightened at this stage but it was also gross idiocy on his part, in fairness. Should’ve told them to go fcuk themselves.
I was on a similar scheme and treated great until I asked when I was going to be paid. He told me to f*ck off and not to come back. My contract was for 300 hours and at that point I’d worked under conditions that are illegal for 350 hours. Why? Because I was “guaranteed” a paid job after it. I can’t describe what being treated like that feels like. Still not over it.
This scheme has failed. It is a complete disgrace and all exploiters should be brought to court. Replacing job bridge with something sustainable should be high on the agenda but as long as people can get cheap labour it may continue. Sickening to see this happening in my country.
She should be ashamed of herself for endorsing this sham of a scheme. The success stories are such a tiny fraction that there is no justification for keeping this in place.
Do you know that she was trying to say that 60% of Jobbridge interns get full employment after completing the internship? The same woman wouldn’t scratch her back for €50 on top of a SW payment, never mind out in 60 hours for nothing like this poor sap.
If they are now in their twenties, it’s plain they’re gonna get a job after they leave JoBridge, what she forgets to tell people is that they have FORTY years to get that job!!!!
The irony of a “Labour” minister who is protecting the identities of companies who are using this scheme as a means to line their own pockets by not paying their staff. Name and shame, Joan, if you want to cling onto any credibility at all. Let the people know what companies are willing to treat their own people like slaves in the name of profit.
The irony of a “Labour” minister hiding the identities of companies that have used this scheme as a means of free labour, Name and shame, Joan, let the people know what companies are willing to treat their own people like slaves in the name of profit.
Joan Bruton would have to google how to orgainise a piss up in a brewery.That woman is a special kinda stupid…
And then thinks she is doing a great job.
Cop on to F%&k Joan….
The very least they should do is pay the intern the going rate for the work he did, they should also be fined This is completely taking the piss of the entire system which has potential to be a great scheme if run properly.
Job-bridge was never more than a political scam to move numbers off the live register. Employers were always going to exploit an opportunity like this, it is not their duty to regulate. It is their duty to take every advantage they can in this recession. The blame lies only with the government again who have left it’s citizens open for exploitation, nae marched them forceably into exploitation!
Nope. The employers who take advantage of people desperate for gainful employment should be named and shamed too. The government are a disgrace but it takes a special kind of a**hole to willfully exploit someone trying to make ends meet.
My sister is a manager who refused to participate in the jobbridge scheme even when she was asked to. She told them the company was in good shape and could afford it so she fought to ensure they were enumerated correctly. I am very proud of her.
I put this on another report but it is relevant here too:
Architecture firms are the biggest abusers of this scheme. I have contacted Minister Burton’s office on a number of occasions about this but never once have I got a satisfactory response. From my own experience it is nigh impossible to find a paid position in this country and it is due to scambridge. Before I did my internship I was told by a friendly enough architect of whom had the decency to reply to my application that it was difficult to get an internship because firms are advertising graduate positions and filling them with experienced architects many of whom they know or they are friendly with. Choosing interns with experience over those without is in direct violation of the core rules of this scheme. Minister Burton did not agree.
When I did do my internship I was asked by the company to supply my own computer and use my own car for trips to and from the office during the day about two weeks. I didn’t mind at first but 4 months later I was not receiving any remunification for travel during work, my computer was near enough on meltdown and coffee machines and apple computers were showing up around the office for everyone except me. I raised the issue and it took another month and the threat of leaving ( 5 months into a 9 month internship) to get another computer and even then I was giving an older computer that someone else was using. I had to fix this computer to make it usable.
At the end of the internship I had to tell the manager on the last day that the internship was finished and that I will not be back in on Monday. It was so demoralizing. I worked for 9 months, destroyed a laptop and ran up thousands of miles on my car for that. Before I left that evening I was asked would I work afterwards for my social welfare plus what would take me up to minimum wage in cash and I declined. It took me weeks to get my reference. And even when I finally received it, it was very basic. It just stated that I was present for nine months and that I was helpful.
Don’t get me wrong I have good experience and I got on well with the people in the company including the boss, but a year later I am in a job that is so far removed from what I set out to do, while the practice that used this scheme is searching for another intern. And another thing that many people don’t know and Minister Burton I challenge you if you are reading this. How come Architecture firms are charging per hour for the work their interns do (in the region of e50- e100) per hour while they rely on the state to pay the wages of that person?
I did an internship over 3 years when FAS was still running it. I got a great job with a charity and got fantastic experience that helped me in the long run. The jobs available back then were proper jobs where actual skills were being taught.
Since the government promoted Job-bridge it has been exploited to no end by anyone who needs cheap labour. What skills are you learning when stocking selves for 9 months?
Since when is a person allowed to work 60 hours a week? Doesn’t the European working times directive state that a person can only work for a maximum of 48 hours per week!?! Or am I mistaken?
I’ve personally found the scheme quite beneficial here in Waterford, I’m not sure the account of a disgruntled intern is to be trusted fully. JobBridge is a fine and rewarding program to be part of.
The guy was prepared to work for free as a photographer and he got to work for free as a photographer so why exactly would he be disgruntled. He signed up to a scheme that didn’t offer what it says it does. It was an internship. learning is more important than getting work done. Do you also think that internships for deli assistants are rewarding.
@FLorence. This was a response to Kevin saying he was disgruntled, my point was that he isn’t simply ‘disgruntled’ the man in the article is outraged at this exploitation as he should be. Being a disgruntled employee is when you get forced to do more overtime then you expected, get passed over for a promotion, the term ‘disgruntled employee’ does not cover total exploitation.
I was an unpaid intern at the Munster Express in the days before Job-bridge. I can’t say much about Job-Bridge (since I don’t qualify for/want to get unemployment, I am ineligible for it) so I can’t really comment on the particulars, but I do know enough about working at the Munster and the staff there to stick up for them.
I did not receive much in the way of training while working there either, but I understand why. Print media is ailing and the Munster has been fighting to stay alive. I don’t think these difficulties reflect some flaw in the character of the people working there or even those running the paper. The situation the paper finds itself in is hardly unique, either in Ireland or abroad. The realities of the economy and competition from online media (such as the Journal) have made it difficult to keep a traditional print paper afloat.
Up until two or so years ago it was the last local paper in Ireland to have an in-house printing press. Not a bad record for a paper that’s been around since 1860. The management did what it could to go against the trend and keep these jobs going, but when you’re not even the only paper in a town like Waterford it’s quite the task keeping the doors open at all. After I left much of the production and printing staff had to be let go. Before I arrived the paper had also lost a number of their regular writers, either through retirement or further job losses. Job losses are hard to defend but in this case I think it was an effort to keep another workplace in Waterford from shutting down altogether.
Even though I didn’t have somebody at hand to walk me through my work, I had my own desk and computer to work from and most importantly I had the trust that I could manage well enough on my own. Within the first two weeks I had an article printed and went on to help edit most sections of the paper, as well as getting to write advertising supplements and articles for the news, business and entertainment sections. If I really needed help, I could ask somebody in the news room. The few journalists still working were often overloaded with work and hadn’t too much time to help but they still lent me their ear and took the time to go over what I’d written and helped me improve it.
I was also made to feel welcome. Though my desk was tucked away in recess on an upper floor everyone I met knew my name and had a chat with me when they saw me and invited me for workplace functions like birthdays or meetings over tea. Plus, unlike some interns in other workplaces I wasn’t expected to spend the first few months or years doing nothing but making tea for the rest of the staff. When I started working there I had barely finished my leaving cert and my work experience consisted of a few weeks covering for somebody in the local shop, but I still got a chance to get involved in the workings of the paper and within a short time I had effectively become a published journalist. I left the Munster to return to college and finish my degree but as far as I know, the other intern who had been working there went on to become a full time journalist at the Munster. Two degrees later and still looking for employment in my chosen career, I can say that those months working in the Munster did more for my confidence and professionalism than all of my college education combined. It was cheaper in the long run too.
I don’t want to discredit Martin Malone or defend Job-Bridge, but I still want to show my gratitude for the opportunity I was given and provide some context. Things have changed at Munster and I’m sure it’s not getting any easier, with the recent retirement Johnny O’Connor, the deputy editor. Johnny and the other newsroom staff are some of the hardest working people I have known but still took me seriously, even being the whippersnapper I was (and still am). I also could rely on them for references and support throughout my search for jobs and during college career. I miss the days when I could get an internship. It’s easy to underestimate how much work of any kind, even unpaid work can make somebody feel useful.
Maybe some things were done wrong. Pursue this case, and by all means let there be justice – but if we’re looking for somebody to go after, I don’t think small community employers are the best place to start. I can think of plenty of politicians and bankers who could use your attention and outrage.
You can do what some people are advocating on Twitter and boycott the Munster, but you will likely only help bring about more job losses in Waterford. The few people the paper can still afford to employ aren’t big shots with six figure pensions, they’ve families to support. I hope Martin finds a steady paid job, and I hope I do too.
Comments highlighting this news are being deleted from the Munster Express Facebook page. Put one up and see what happens. Interesting editorial decision. If this was another Waterford-based company making the RTE news after being banned by JobBridge the paper would be highlighting the case, I suggest.
I have seen quite a few public sector jobs advertised – it just stinks I suspect it was a big plan mini plate the live registrar figures and avail of free workers especially in the public sector.
There needs to be a change in attitude and these companies shunned. Like there should be a campaign where people bombard these employers with cvs and email and bring the system down. I’m on a roll here but if every job advertised got hundreds of replies would that make the system unworkable?
Over 300 people losing their jobs as US firm Carelon to pull out of Ireland by end of the year
Eimer McAuley
1 hr ago
11.6k
53
Palestine
US-Israeli-backed aid centre 'humiliating and insulting' to people in Gaza
David MacRedmond & Muiris O'Cearbhaill
Updated
10 mins ago
6.9k
Further Education
The government has announced the free college courses on offer for the next academic year
Updated
23 hrs ago
70.4k
28
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 197 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 137 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 177 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 139 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 101 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 102 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 47 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 43 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 161 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 73 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 96 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 102 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 45 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 60 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 112 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 115 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 84 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 63 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 107 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say