Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
2016 SAW AN increase in the number of jobs being advertised in Ireland.
In the final quarter of last year, there was an 11% increase in the number of jobs advertised online compared to the same period in 2015.
The figures, published today by IrishJobs.ie, show that all counties experienced an improvement in the number of jobs available, particularly Carlow, Dublin and Limerick.
Here’s how much the number of jobs advertised increased in certain sectors:
The Jobseeker Sentiment Survey, in which the website asked the views of 1,223 people, found that 67% of Irish employees felt very confident about the Irish jobs market.
Trump and Brexit
In terms of international affairs affecting jobs here, 49% of Irish employees said they don’t know what their employer’s Brexit plans are (17% are aware), while 66% of jobseekers said they’re not worried about Donald Trump’s election as US President impacting their current job situation.
Orla Moran, General Manager of IrishJobs.ie, said, despite the challenges of 2016, the figures “show a strong increase in jobs advertised online throughout the year, which has been matched by positive sentiment from jobseekers and optimism for the year ahead”.
We would, however, raise a concern about what appears to be a lack of preparation amongst employers for the UK’s triggering of Article 50 in March to start the Brexit process.
“In our survey Irish workers tell us they are unsure whether their employers have begun Brexit planning. Given that Ireland trades over 40% of its exports with the UK, it’s important Irish companies start to think about the potential implications of Brexit and plan accordingly,” Moran said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Looking at the Police, the Judicial system, the people, I think Mauritius would be one of the last places on earth I would visit !
It’s a good thing the French didn’t say that about Ireland after our high profile case in west Cork…
Yea because we’re overwhelmed with French tourists every year………..
Only about 400,000 every year… our fourth largest tourist market.
She wasn’t a tourist and he wasn’t irish.
Who wasn’t Irish? The case is unsolved… Do you know something the Gardaí don’t?
Why should they Peter. Do you no something the rest of us don’t no???
If Mauritius is interested in justice they should break up that cabal of police officers who secured a confession through the use of torture on Avinash Treebhoowoon. Seems over 80% of convictions in Mauritius are secured through confessions.
Right he should ! And the police should hold the husband for further investigations
The two defendants have admitted to stealing ,but they walk free,justice has not been, if the judgement is they are not guilty, then the case should be investigated again, somebody killed her!!!
Dumbest post so far I’ve read on this and there’s a fair few on boards.ie as well….did you even read up on this trial Peter? It’s fairly obvious you didn’t ..maybe you should and give your brain a chance to think before opening your mouth.
@Peter
You are a fool, ignorant and inhuman. I hope you never get on to a jury of any kind. They may be, may be found innocent of murdering but they were in her room, they did steal. To me, the police screwed up here. This case should be opened again, for Michaela, her husband and her family. Justice has to prevail here.
They may have stolen from the room, but thats no reason to charge them with murder.
If the police had done their damn job properly and not be in such a rush then the right people would have been caught
Im not one bit surprised. Police job was a farce. Poor family though.
What a bunch of crap. The trial should be made void and an appeal lodged. The Judge has blundered while giving his last instructions to the jury prior to them retiring and this has had a great impact on the jury’s decision.
There wasn’t a shred of evidence against the accused men so it’s difficult to see where the judge blundered in giving instructions to the jury. A more important question is why the bellboy wasn’t questioned in court. He, along with Michelle’s husband, found the body yet only his statement was introduced.
THe judge told the jury they are not politicians and were not there to send the world signals about the island’s police or judicial system. This has had great impact on jury’s decision and that is why the whole verdict should be annulled and debated again before the Privy Council. The DPP must lodge an appeal before the latter court in UK.
Judge Prithviraj Fekna told the jury before they retired to make their decision to ignore the wider implications of the trial, and focus ONLY on evidence presented in court.
“”You have been told that this will have an international ramification and will affect the image of Mauritius… this is not your role. You must not allow yourself to be influenced by this, you are not politicians, you have to base yourself on what has happened.”"
Reads to me like a standard instruction from a judge to a jury in a high profile case.
As I said in another thread Fotocrat, your whole attitude seems to be “they’re guilty because everyone knows they’re guilty – why would we need any evidence?”.
The Ian Bailey case springs to mind…
I have been commenting and making MY own opinion according to what has been reported read in the press. And anyway, the whole process has only been a joke, sadly yes, and also a shame for the nation of Mauritius and its incompetent, protectionist and corrupt authorities at the highest level. I reiterate that It’s high time for a public enquiry into processes and procedures within the Mauritius Police itself, which is under the authority of the Commissioner of Police who has to report directly to the Prime Minister only.
POLL:
Should a private investigation lead by volunteer experienced Criminal Investigators be launched to find the culprit(s) in late Michaela’s murder case?
Red/Green thumbs will do.
Apparently my comments are “potentially libellous” so i will have to rephrase.
If these two guys are Not Guilty, but the room was definitely accessed by staff member(s) key card, then does it not appear that the murderer may very well be still working at the Lux Grande Garb hotel? In my opinion potential customers should know this.
Hotel records indicated that someone gained access using a FALSE electronic key card at 3.42pm, two minutes before Michelle entered the room. Then there’s the reports of ‘skin tissue’ under Michelle’s fingernails as she fought off her attacker(s). No DNA from the cleared men was found in the room.
Her poor family. Something does not add up here – 8 weeks of evidence reviewed and digested in less than 2 hours? That’s fishy to start with.
Nothing fishy at all about it, that’s plenty of time to come to a decision, especially when you consider that chances are they’d have been reviewing it daily on personal levels, and weighing new evidence as it came, up against old, chances are a lot of their minds would have been well made up before they went of to deliberate.
The McAreaveys should sue the cops for making a cockup of the whole thing. Idiots
When Enda Kenny stood up this morning and said justice was not done. It’s a pity the journal didn’t have the balls to report on it. Fair play Enda
why fair play to enda?
it is not for him to be making any comment on this (he has no problem not making comments on plenty of other things)
if he had to make a comment why not ‘justice hasn’t been done yet’? which would have been a true and fair comment?
I’m going to be watching that damages case. Hopefully if he is awarded money Michaela’s husband John will take a civil action for damages under the less stringent ‘balance of probabilities’ legal system… Then new evidence might be uncovered that might just lead to a new criminal prosecution … Hopefully their laws provide for this…
Actually he should take a civil claim against the investigating officers.
It was their inability to do the job properly that lead to the sham of a trial.
All the two workers have been guilty of is going into the room to steal, not actually murdering her.
lux*
That woman has a huge forearm
have your say