Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA Images

Johnny Depp’s libel trial against The Sun enters final days

The court case relates to a 2018 newspaper article which labelled Depp a “wife beater”.

LAST UPDATE | 27 Jul 2020

THERE IS “NO doubt” that Johnny Depp “regularly and systematically abused his wife”, lawyers for The Sun have told the High Court, as the Hollywood star’s libel case against the newspaper neared its end.

The Pirates Of The Caribbean actor has “spent his entire adult life doing exactly what he wanted” and was “not about to answer to a woman at this stage in his life”, it was alleged.

Depp (57) is suing the tabloid’s publisher, News Group Newspapers (NGN) and its executive editor, Dan Wootton, over a 2018 article which labelled him a “wife beater”.

Depp denies the allegations of violence made against him by Amber Heard (34).

Today, the case – the biggest English libel trial of the 21st century – entered its closing stages as NGN’s legal team began making closing submissions.

Sasha Wass QC, for NGN, told the court: “Having heard all the evidence in this case and all the supporting evidence of the incidents of violence, we suggest that there is no doubt that Mr Depp regularly and systematically abused his wife.

“The characterisation that he is a wife-beater is entirely truthful.”

Wass told the court Depp has “spent his life surrounded by a clique of ageing, male rabble-rousers with alcohol and drugs shared together”, and by the time the Hollywood star turned 50, “that lifestyle had taken its toll”.

Referencing the Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas author, Hunter S. Thompson, who was a close friend of Depp, Wass said: “Contrary to the experience of Hunter S. Thompson, drugs and insanity were not working for him.

“They were destroying his life, his career and his health, and he identified ‘the monster’ long before Ms Heard did.

“Mr Depp believed he could find himself stability with Ms Heard … she was supportive and indicated a dedication to save him from himself and his demons, but he grew to hate her for her protectiveness.

“He grew to resent her for telling him how he could kick his addiction, telling him how he could banish ‘the monster’.

“Mr Depp has spent his entire adult life doing exactly what he wanted, and he was not about to answer to a woman at this stage in his life.”

Wass described Depp and Heard’s relationship as “a clash of cultures and clash of generations”.

She added: “Ms Heard was a modern and ambitious woman. It was not in her nature to wait until he got home so she could take his boots off, and the self-scripted Southern gentleman required a supplicant wife.

“When Mr Depp chose Ms Heard as his life partner, he did not expect her to carry on acting in films with young and attractive actors.

“Mr Depp was unable to control Ms Heard and … it had a detrimental effect on his state of mind. It may have literally driven him back to the drink and drugs which he knew would unleash the monster.”

Earlier, Wass suggested that Depp’s memory of his “disgraceful conduct” towards Amber Heard is “so severely impaired by drug use” that he may not have been aware of the extent of his “violence and terrifying behaviour” the High Court has heard.

She said evidence of the actor’s “drug and alcohol-fuelled lifestyle provides a backdrop to the events in question”.

She said: “Firstly, it demonstrates that the claimant was subject to irrational mood swings and abnormal behavioural patterns, which would not have been present when Mr Depp was clean and sober, and Mr Depp has a name for this metamorphosed entity, namely ‘The Monster’.

“The other aspect which is important in terms of substance abuse is Mr Depp’s recollection of his own disgraceful conduct, which is so severely impaired by drug misuse that he may not even have been aware of the extent of his violence and terrifying behaviour, which, on more than one of these pleaded incidents, put Ms Heard in fear of her life.”

At the outset of Monday’s hearing, Wass said that the defence to the article complained about by Depp is “one of truth, namely that Mr Depp did indeed beat his wife”.

She said: “For the defence of truth to be substantiated, the defendants need to prove on a balance of probabilities that Mr Depp assaulted Ms Heard on at least one occasion.

“During the last two weeks, the defendants have established that many more than one incident of wife-beating took place over the course of the relationship between the claimant [Depp] and Amber Heard.”

Depp is suing NGN and Wootton over an April 27 2018 article with the headline: “Gone Potty: How can JK Rowling be ‘genuinely happy’ casting wife beater Johnny Depp in the new Fantastic Beasts film?”

His lawyers say the article bore the meaning there was “overwhelming evidence” Depp assaulted Heard on a number of occasions and left her “in fear for her life”.

NGN is defending the article as true, and says Depp was “controlling and verbally and physically abusive towards Ms Heard, particularly when he was under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs”.

Mr Justice Nicol has said that his judgment will be reserved.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds