ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION authorities in EU countries can verify that an asylum-seeker is gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, but can’t demand, or even accept proof in a way that violates their privacy and dignity.
That’s the ruling of the European Court of Justice this week, in a case brought by three asylum-seekers against the Netherlands.
The court, based in Luxembourg, agreed that if a refugee is applying for asylum on the grounds of feared or experienced persecution based on their sexual orientation, it’s reasonable for authorities to try to confirm their claim.
However, the judges said:
David Carroll, Executive Director of BeLonG To, which runs a service for young LGBT asylum seekers, told TheJournal.ie the ruling would have a “really positive impact.”
It’s very difficult to try to have an objective assessment of a complex, personal, individual thing like sexual orientation, especially when you’re dealing with cultural differences.
We’ve seen people being asked to ‘prove’ their sexual identity using outdated and stereotyped notions of gay culture, as well as being asked to provide letters and other evidence.
In our experience, these young people are extremely vulnerable, and fleeing their country, so they’re highly unlikely to make a point of packing their ‘gay suitcase’ before they do.
The court also ruled that just because an asylum seeker declares their sexual orientation late in their application should not affect the credibility of their claim.
It cannot be concluded that the declared sexuality lacks credibility simple because, due to his reticence in revealing intimate aspects of his life, that person did not declare his homosexuality at the outset.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say