Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated 6.30pm
A FAMOUS HOUSE of Cards line was quoted at the banking inquiry today, as the committee questioned Dr Elaine Byrne on corruption.
Byrne spoke extensively about the amount of donations received by political parties. Committee chair Ciarán Lynch asked her if there was a link between money spent and the level of success at elections.
To which she quoted Frank Underwood’s famous line: “I’ve always said that power is more important than money, but when it comes to elections, money gives power, well, a run for its money.”
Byrne said there is some evidence to suggest a correlation between the best-financed election campaigns and the most successful. However, she noted that the SIPO figures on how much parties spent in last year’s local and European elections are not yet available so no solid findings on this issue could be made for 2014.
Byrne discussed how “serious concerns” about political donations were exposed in the Hamilton, McCracken, Moriarty and Mahon Tribunals.
She recalled how the Moriarity Tribunal found that Charles Haughey’s level of indebtedness “spiralled” from from £188,844 to £1,143,839 between 1975 and 1979, and described the €393,000 debt writedown he received as “somewhat unorthodox”.
From 1979-1996 Haughey received at least £9,106,369 in donations.
Byrne said she was using “brief history lessons” to “illustrate that a culture of deference between State authorities, political parties, elected representatives, supervisory authorities, banking institutions and the property sector was already well established by the 1990s”.
She noted that since the introduction of the Electoral (Amendment) Act in 2001 – which introduced a limit on the value of donations to be disclosed – a pattern emerged whereby all political parties disclosed under the limit.
The disclosed donations by all political parties amounted to €753,523 in 2001, the year before the 2002 election. In contrast, disclosed donations by all political parties amounted to €17,000 in 2006, the year before the 2007 election. These figures exclude politicians donating to their political parties.
“This is perhaps due to the relatively small difference in the maximum donation that can be accepted by a political party (€6,349) and the amount that must be disclosed (€5,078).”
Byrne said it is “impossible to present a complete picture of how political parties were financed”.
Of the €10.1 million spent by parties and candidates in the 2007 general elections, €1.3 million was disclosed with no information available as to the origin of the remaining €8.8 million.
She added that the €10.1 million figure itself only covered the period between the dissolution of the Dáil to polling day, usually three to five weeks – not the entirety of the campaign.
When discussing more recent donations made to Fianna Fáil, Byrne said it appears that “the property barons of the 1990s and 2000s replaced the beef barons of the 1980s”.
Between 1997-2009, she noted that the opposition did not disclose any donations from property interests.
“Fine Gael disclosed €197,914 in donations between 1997 and 2000 from a variety of businesses and individuals, but did not disclose donations above the legal threshold from 2001-09.
Almost two thirds of the Labour party’s €392,255 disclosed donations came from the trade union movement. Sinn Féin were in receipt of €1,299,608 in disclosed donations in this period – much of it from the salaries of elected representatives (north and south) and organisations such as Friends of Sinn Féin Australia and Friends of Sinn Féin America.
Denis O’Brien
Byrne criticised Enda Kenny for ringing the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange alongside businessman Denis O’Brien, given the findings of the Moriarty Tribunal.
She told the committee: “Instead of the Taoiseach standing up, he rang a bell.” Byrne said this gave the public the impression there are “different rules depending on who you are”.
The Moriarty Tribunal had found that former Fine Gael TD and Minister for Communications Michael Lowry had an “insidious and pervasive” influence over how the second mobile phone licence was awarded to Denis O’Brien’s company, Esat Digifone, in 1996.
‘Corruption is sexy’
Byrne said she believed corruption is “not about a particular party or individual”, rather
“proximity to power and how long they are in power”.
It’s very easy to do it, corruption is sexy.
Byrne noted that Ireland ranks on a similar footing as Germany and the UK in terms of corruption worldwide, adding: “We need to stop blaming our small population as the reason for why we have bad governance.”
She said this was a “bogeyman” and “lazy” argument.
Recommendations
Byrne said there needs to be an independent audit of the “capacity and operational ability of oversight agencies” such as the Criminal Assets Bureau, the ODCE, the Central Bank, Revenue, and the Competition Authority.
She also recommended that monetary awards are introduced for whistleblowers, and advised the committee to examine the tax reliefs given to property developers from 1997-2007 and why they were “extended beyond their natural lifespan”.
Byrne also called for the establishment of an independent commission to decide how political activity in Ireland is funded, and the introduction of a web-based centralised information platform to coordinate consultations with individuals, stakeholders and lobby groups.
In 2012, Byrne was appointed as the Irish expert on corruption to the European Commission. She has also penned a book entitled Political Corruption in Ireland 1922-2010: A Crooked Harp?
Originally published 11.11am
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Is it just me or does Denis o brien have a chubby finger in every pie in Ireland
He won’t be happy until every Irishman and woman us paying him something for something else, aided and abetted by Fianna Fail and Fine Gael
Except the tax pie
Ah, is that the same Elaine Byrne who has Michael McDowell, an unapologetically corrupt Irish politician as her bff? This is well known. She’ll do anything to publicise herself.
In fact he even launched her book.
She’s an expert on corruption alright! And hypocrisy.
H.S.B.C. , NAMA , Ansbacher …
Of course politicians aren’t corrupt – sure they know what will happen to them if they were and ever found out …surely they understand Ireland enough to know that !
Lynch is an Irish name for a reason !
How do all you union members out there feel about some if your union fees going directly to the Labour party? Surely you must be feeling proud to be directly contributing to the party who has stood up for workers rights in government, protected the lowest paid in society from extra taxes and rates, ensured employers cant use people as free labour on various government schemes etc.
The union leaders do not bank in H.S.B.C. !
Elaine byrne is in the E.U. on a corruption committee …
Yet we have a report from the E.U. that we should check the banking details of politicians and more importantly their families – that means Europe knows more than its telling .
Surely Ms. Byrne has access to this information and should be publishing it or reporting it to Europol instead of suggesting solutions that would prevent it !
On a lighter note Fionnuala Kenny, Mrs. Teashock, was Charlie Haughey’s secretary !
Frank is some man for the quotes: “For those of us climbing to the top of the food chain, there can be no mercy. There is but one rule: hunt or be hunted.”
We must hqave the sexiest politicians in the world.
The road to power is paved with hypocrisy and casualties. Never regret.
All political parties must be forced to publish their accounts yearly. We should demand the right to know if the same banks that fund political parties also have advisers working for ministers in departments and also lobbyists plying Backbenchers with drink on a daily basis in the private Dáil bar. It seems that even in 2004 this crisis was unstoppable and still they partied for four more years. But then they always had the army to fall back on if paddy failed to pay whatever the bankers wanted. Bonuses for the bankers and politicians while emigration, unemployment and crippling taxes for those who don’t have weapons to protect them.
Do you have any proof for any of these allegations?
I ask, because I haven’t seen any of these being written about anywhere else.
It’s so easy to throw out unfounded allegations and let then hang there.
It’s a “When did you stop hitting your wife” type statement.
If you have proof, then I apologise.
Theres no politician in Ireland with the savvy to be as corrupt ar Frank Underwood!!
Is it just me, or what relevance has this to a Banking inquiry?
Post 2001, the rules have changed in regards to political donations.
Is she saying that SIPPO rules have been broken, if so by whom?
If not, what is the relevance?
So, what we can glean from this is that neither the Irish Public, nor our political classes, can distinguish fiction from real life?
His wife is sexy…
While at the same time a former high-class prostitute …. remind us of anyone ?
Completely off topic but has anyone else noticed that daily edge articles have disappeared from the journal in one of the recent updates?
have your say