Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Niall Carson

Complaint upheld after children were fined for riding Luas for free

The children misunderstood a message that advertised free park and ride facilities.

A WOMAN WHO complained about a Luas ad that gave the impression that journeys were free has had her complaint against Transdev upheld.

In August of this year the woman dropped two under 18s to the Cherrywood Luas stop before they travelled on the tram into St Stephen’s Green.

A display at the stop advertised free park and ride facilities for the Bank Holiday weekend. It read: ’Luas P+R Free Aug Hol’.

The woman said that the children had never used the Luas before and interpreted the message to mean that the journey was free. The pair were subsequently fined by ticket inspectors for not having a valid ticket.

According to the complaint made to the Advertising Standards Authority of Ireland (ASAI):

The complainant said that as there was no park and ride facility at the Cherrywood stop she considered the offer text to be misleading.

In its response, Transdev said that “P + R” was the “universal name” associated with park and ride facilities and that the ad was there to let people know that parking was free.

The company said that this was “clearly stated” at park and ride sites and that this was also made clear on the Luas website.

The ASAI, however, concluded that it was “feasible” for a commuter who was not familiar with the Luas to interpret the message as meaning that the journey was also free.

The committee also noted that the message had appeared at Luas stops that did not have the park and ride facility on site.

In the absence of any clarification the ad was deemed to be in breach of the code of practice.

Read: New rules for businesses who want to call their food ‘artisan’ or ‘natural’ >

Read: 1916 exhibition should have alluded to Hunger Strike section, says advert regulator >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Rónán Duffy
View 42 comments
Close
42 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds