Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The accused was sentenced to four years in prison. PA Images

Dublin man jailed for abusing his sister-in-law during the late 1970s

Aileen Ryan Wright said that while the court process was difficult, she did not regret coming forward.

A DUBLIN MAN has been found guilty of multiple counts of indecent assault on his sister-in-law during the late 1970s.

Albert Tucker (66) of Rockford Park, Blackrock, Dublin, pleaded not guilty to all counts but was found guilty by a jury earlier this month. The offences took place on dates between 1976 and 1979. 

Garda Sergeant Georgina Reilly of Dun Laoghaire Garda Station told Fíona Crawford BL, prosecuting, that gardaí received a complaint from Aileen Ryan Wright that she had been assaulted by her brother-in-law at multiple locations in Dublin during the 1970s.

The court heard that Tucker had moved back to Ireland from the UK in the 1970s and had moved into his parents-in-laws’ house.

Gda Sgt Reilly told the court that Tucker told the young girl she would be disowned if she told anyone about the incidents. Tucker went on to carry out systematic abuse over the next two years.

After receiving a complaint, gardaí interviewed Tucker by arrangement. He denied that these incidents took place, but said that one act of consensual intercourse did take place when his sister-in-law was of legal age.

Tucker and his family moved to Shankill, and as Ryan Wright still had a good relationship with her sister at the time, she would visit her in Shankill. Her sister would insist on Tucker driving her younger sister home, and on these occasions, Tucker would assault her in his car.

Fíona Crawford BL, prosecuting, told the court that Tucker lost no opportunity to advance on Ryan Wright when she was alone and would grope her breasts and genital areas.

Tucker has no previous convictions.

A victim impact statement was read to the court by Crawford on behalf of Ryan Wright, which said, “My world became dark and scary, and I was unable to tell anyone.” “At 14 years of age, I tried to kill myself, and when that did not work, I began to self-harm,” she wrote.

The court heard that Ryan Wright suffers from anxiety, and as her sons grew up, she was afraid to let them out of her sight.

Speaking outside the court, Ryan Wright said, “This entire process has taken six years, and I have re-lived every moment. But as hard as this process has been, I do not regret coming forward.”

She gave her sincere thanks to her family, the Victim Impact Services, the prosecuting team, in particular Sergeant Georgina Reilly.

Michael Bowman SC, defending, told the court that his client was previously of good character and suffers from numerous medical conditions. He said if a prison sentence is imposed, his client will require ongoing treatment and medication while in custody.

The court heard that Tucker still asserts his position of not guilty and has not accepted the jury’s verdict.

Justice Paul McDermott outlined the seriousness of the offences carried out on Ryan Wright while she was aged 11 to 17. He said Ryan Wright was left in fear in her own home and that the accused showed a high level of disrespect for her.

He said Tucker told Ryan Wright that no one would believe her and that if she told anyone, they would disown her, leaving the young girl terrified. He said that the offences are of a very serious nature and lie in the mid-range.

Justice McDermott said he must also consider the mitigating factors such as Tucker’s lack of previous convictions, his strong work record, his many medical conditions, and the fact that entering prison life at the age of 66 would undoubtedly be difficult for him.

He sentenced Tucker to four years in prison and stated there was no basis to suspend any part of the sentence. Tucker will be required to remain under supervision of the probation services for two years post-release.

Close
Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds