A MAN WHO sexually assaulted his “extremely vulnerable” girlfriend over a number of weeks during a coercive and controlling relationship has received a two and a half year prison sentence.

The Central Criminal Court heard that there had been significant delays in the case due to the intellectual and mental health difficulties of the injured party. She described in her victim impact statement how it had been the worst experience of her life.

The 62-year-old accused man, who cannot be named to protect the woman’s identity, pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual assault of the woman at the home they shared in Waterford, on dates in 2001.

Passing sentence today, Mr Justice Paul McDermott said the violent and abusive actions of the defendant were brutally executed for his own gratification. He said the offences were a serious breach of trust placed in the man by the victim and caused her serious harm.

He noted that while the man has stated his regret and apologised, a Probation Service assessment found that he didn’t demonstrate any insight into the effect of his actions and that the violence was targeted and not impulsive.

He noted that the man has lived a productive life since these assaults and there was no suggestion that he has committed any other offences since.

He backdated the sentence to February last year when the man went into custody after pleading guilty to the two offences.

The investigating Garda told Maurice Coffey BL, prosecuting, that the woman reported a series of assaults on her involving vaginal and anal penetration during a five week period in 2001. She identified the accused man as the perpetrator.

The woman said the relationship between the pair had been initially happy and developed quickly but she was subjected to two incidents in her home involving anal and vaginal penetration by the accused man without her consent.

The Garda said the man was interviewed in 2001 and released without charge. During interview he initially denied having sexual intercourse without consent but later admitted having anal sex in circumstances where it was clear she did not consent.

The Garda told the court that the woman suffered learning difficulties and serious issues with her memory that made it difficult to further the prosecution.

“She is very, very, very vulnerable,” the Garda said. A family liaison worker had monitored the woman over the years in relation to the case.

In the intervening time, the accused man had begun living and working outside the jurisdiction. He later co-operated with his extradition in 2020. The Garda witness agreed that the man’s guilty plea had been helpful in terms of a trial situation which would have been difficult from the State’s point of view.

In her victim impact statement, the woman, who was not present, outlined to the court that this had been the worst experience of her life and had caused her to look at men differently. She said she had lost self belief and thought no one believed her.

The Garda agreed with Colman Cody SC, defending, that by the end of his interviews the man agreed he had acted aggressively and made full admissions.

The Garda agreed with counsel that there had initially been consensual sex but as the relationship deteriorated the accused began making demands and acting controllingly and coercively.

Cody said his client had written a letter of apology in which he told the woman his actions were unforgivable, that she did not deserve what had happened and he hoped she could move on with her life. He said it was a brief, concise but heartfelt, recognition of the hurt caused by his actions.

Counsel asked the court to take into account the way the man had met the allegations and that most of the delay between the allegations and now were due to the significant issues that beset the injured party.

He said the accused man had been living a productive life with no adverse attention in the mean time and was unlikely to come before the courts again. He has no relevant previous convictions.