Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
MARY LOU MCDONALD has reiterated that she stands over naming former politicians in the Dáil chamber who were accused of having held offshore Ansbacher accounts to evade tax.
Those named have denied the allegations. McDonald said she accepts “people’s right to their good name”, but won’t be apologising as she has done nothing wrong.
Sinn Féin’s deaputy leader said: “I absolutely refute any suggestion that I abused Dáil privilege”, stating that she exercised it in a “very mindful, thoughtful and responsible way”.
She said the allegations raised were of “the most grave public concern” and called on Enda Kenny and the government to launch an investigation.
McDonald added that the dossier in question contained “very serious allegations that go to the core of good governance and good political practice” and “will not go away”.
The Committee on Procedures and Privileges (CPP) recently ruled that she abused her Dáil privilege by naming the individuals.
McDonald said she has “huge reservations and concerns about the entire procedure embarked upon by the CPP” and “will write to them again” to highlight this. She said she was “fully compliant with standing orders” and was “solely an exclusively driven by the public interest and the seriousness of the allegations made”.
Responding to reports that government chief whip Paul Kehoe is going to write to Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett recommending she be sanctioned, McDonald said: “There’s no merit, no reason for any motion of censure in respect of myself.”
Advertisement
McDonald also claimed that some “political insiders” have been unfairly critical of her:
A harsh commentary has been adopted by political insiders in respect to me and that contrasts quite dramatically with lack of commentary in respect of other public figures or political figures now or in the past – who, in the real world, people would have judged to have done real damage to people’s lives, to their livelihoods to their standard of living. I just want to make that point.
“I’m well able for the slings and arrows of politics,” she added.
Party leader Gerry Adams said Sinn Féin “stands shoulder to shoulder with Mary Lou”.
Distraction
McDonald suggested criticism of her may be a distractionary tactic.
Unsurprisingly, Jobs Minister Richard Bruton disagrees, describing it as “totally untrue”.
Richard Bruton: I question why Mary Lou refuses to accept tax claims against politicians were fully investigated pic.twitter.com/EwngaVrnaw
He told reporters this afternoon: “This matter has been investigated fully by the Revenue Commissioner, by the gardaí, by two tribunals, and by the ODCE [the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement]. What other investigations are necessary?”
I think you’d have to question what Mary Lou McDonald is looking for and what are her motives in not accepting such allegations have been fully investigated.
He said the Oireachtas committees involved will decide whether or not to proceed with censure of motion and he’s “not going to express a view at this point”.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
The whistle blower has stated that the issue of the ‘black briefcase’ had not been and never was properly investigated and he was curtailed in that line of investigation. If this is correct then everything that Bruton is pointing to are the usual whitewash from the elites.
Didn’t they try to tell us there was nothing behind the Garda whistleblowers as well.
SF in power up the north were shown in a spotlight program to have false companies etc set up for siphoning off falsely claimed expenses from stormont (as were the DUP)
Their supporters line was it was Brit money, no mention of the fact it was money for the ordinary person up north or at least for their services.
They justify their behavior and are critical of everyone else. Classic two rules, one for you and one for me.
If you think SF aren’t a bunch of hypocrites you are deluded
If it’s been fully investigated and everyone’s “clean” I would assume the findings in the investigation will be made public then, or if not and guilt was found hopefully some arrests.
ask harney how fully it was investigated, another non inquiry so all are innocent. pity they forgot to tell the investigator.. the usual huff and puff from career politicians surrounding a white wash, good on any member of the dail for airing the dirt let the offended get justice and explain the misunderstanding…….I would call the revenue out to deny or explain what the fuss is about
the non prosecution of the HSCB criminal tax evaders doesn’t bode well for this story either, even when they were caught red handed. open & shut case. How can not prosecuting ppl who defrauded the state on €3.6 billion of untaxed income not be in the public interest? i very much interested, as i’m sure all reasonably minded ppl are also… the golden circle doesn’t prosecute its own membership evidently..
Justin if you dont like it dont read it.I am not a member of any party i want change i am fed up of the crap in this country it has to stop.If you want to keep going down that road by all means do but i have enough. sf ind ddi the hub the ncm who ever they will get my vote.Ff fg labour sold us out and now is the time for change party loyalty is what ruined this country justin thats the problem.Justin its healthy for democracy to have protest if you didn’t you would get a dictatorship you should nt let words hurt your feelings! Hear watch this.Your backing this company thats going to fleece you and your family.Wake up
Not a SF supported but it does make a nice change that there is someone in there with a backbone that stands up for themselves and doesn’t just keep the head down and do what they are told.
The immortal line that gets repeated on every SF-related article. Funny how the “not a SF supporter” commentators spend so much of their time defending the party.
Supposing she announces that you are a tax dodger Bill? She has no evidence (I’m sure) to support that assertion, and if you want to say the whistleblower made the accusation so that is enough, then I would ask why is an accusation (or several of them in fact) not enough when it comes to Gerry protecting child rapists, obstructing justice, not ordering murder and not being in the IRA?
SF don’t do apologies just ask the McConville family etc etc etc. Mary’s allegations were just purely a deflection tactic at the height of the sex abuse allegations against this particular strain of republicans. The problem for SF now is people can now see through their smoke screens .
SF is in meltdown, the shinnerbots haven’t being told what to think so they are turning on themselves – hilarious. SF always good for laughing at anyways :D
SF and the other left wing loons are in a confused spin, since their policies started to be played out in Greece. We can all see what a disaster that is.
So was the whistleblower a liar then. Is that what we are meant to believe. That’s there is nothing in this. Wasn’t it the same with the gardai whistleblowers. We know how that turned out. So whether you like Mary Lou or sf . at least she is highlighting something that should be highlighted. People talk about sf reflection then deflect themselves from the article itself. Irony of it.
I not talking about guidelines. I was talking about the actual allegations and the whistleblower. According to what Richard Briton has said . then he is saying the whistleblower is lying and and that there is nothing to see hear. So if there is nothing to see will we see the reports or will they be put away for 30 years.
A guideline is a statement by which to determine a course of action. A guideline aims to streamline particular processes according to a set routine or sound practice. By definition, following a guideline is never mandatory. Guidelines are not binding and are not enforced.
Basically their just pissed because they can’t control what she’s saying.
Sorry . but the story is about it all. Mary Lou, guidelines, whistleblower, Richard bruton . if you want to ignore the full story ,( conveniently ) that’s up to you. But I am interested in all aspects of the story.
No it’s not, although you’d like to make it about that.
It’s about Mary Lou v the Dail, read the headline.
The Committee on Procedures and Privileges are there to make sure people don’t abuse the syatem, in this case they say she did.
Why can’t she do like others and do her business within the guidelines ?
Because her desire was to deflect away the negative spotlight that was on SF at the time, She could easily have raised this issue while staying within the guidelines
Tom I don’t know what your implying that I would like to make it about anything. Unlike you I read more than the headline and there is more above in the article about not only the guidelines, but the committee, what Mary Lou herself said and what Richard Bruton said. So I will make any comment I want about the above article and not just the headline. Some of us in this country would like the truth to come out in relation to this matter and care more about that than guidelines. But you seem transfixed on the guidelines and nothing else. So that’s up to you. But I would like to know if there’s more to the actual crux of what she said.
If she believes it to be true, why doesn’t she repeat it outside the dail ?
Because she done it to create a smoke screen.
I’m implying that you are using the same smoke screen tactic to move the focus away from her breach of Procedures and Privileges to allegations that she won’t make outside the chamber
Don’t be so naive littleone, there is no moral crusade being undertaken by Mary Lou here, it’s sh*t stirring and digging for dirt on opposition any time SF get an opportunity. Sure look at the presidential election, a character assassination through unsubstantiated accusations on a man heavily favoured to win the election, his vote collapsed and he lost, and is currently embroiled in a legal action suing RTE as a result, as the claims were never followed up or substantiated, but it was broadcast as though there was a shred of evidence at the time… They tickled the mood though, it was the most anti-FF election ever, so they accused him of being a FF bag man and claimed to have a witness and evidence – neither of which were ever produced or mentioned again when challenged on it.
Also, why are you mentioning Richard Bruton? He was not named by Mary Lou – in fact no government party member was – it was exclusively FF/PD politicians named and SF are claiming this dossier went through the hands of several ministers without anything being done about it, but it had actually been in several domains already, including the tribunals.
I also don’t know why the Journal don’t post the video of the exchange or publish the transcript, as it is merely reproducing publically available transcript from the Dail – not publishing libelous content and national print media have published the names in full that were mentioned.
But anyway, my main point is SF are VERY good at manipulating the fickle minds of the electorate and tapping into the mood. They throw out insinuations and/or open ended suggestions and allow the more cynical of us do the rest without actually saying it.
Much like their economic policy, it all sounds great and lets you fill in the dots, but in reality there is little to no substance to it at all.
Has anyone here actually asked “What was the investigation?”, “What was in the dossier?” Well, if you want to know, the dossier was reviewed by the Revenue Commissioners, the Garda Bureau of Fraud Investigation, the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement and the Moriarty and Mahon tribunals as well as the Director of Public Prosecutions. It has gone the length and breadth of the country and everyone from senior gardai, opposition politicians, high court judges have found that there is not evidence that would be sufficient to commence legal action against any of the people he accuses and the claims that there was a cover up also coincide with the investigation being halted by the civil service as it was then the subject of a tribunal and garda investigation, so would no longer be in the remit of the civil service…
But why let facts get in the way of a good ould “Dem politicians are all de same!”
So she disclosed the names of people suspected of wrong doing and now the knives are out for her and they want to impose sanctions on her. Irish politics makes me sick.
Revenue will never publish the out come of the investigation because all those mentioned by Mary Lou would be shown to be guilty and let off with a slap on the hand.
Just to remind people that the committee who found that she breached Dail privilege is filled in proportion to Dail representation i.e. it enjoys the same large majority of government TDs as the chamber.
Just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you…she abused Dail privilege by namng people who were not present to defend themselves.
Jammin you (and everyone in SF)seem to have a real problem with any form of authority.
You were saying yesterday that people were free to do as they please (on thread about woman and glass door)
Mary lou seems to be of the same opinion, but it’s wrong.
The problem is with the committee you say, funny how when it comes to SF the problem is always someone else.
Nothing to do with her at all, she & SF are right, everyone else is wrong.
I think SF and their supporters have a definite persecution complex, that or hard necks
Typical Mary Lou.
Will never accept that she is wrong and SF are always right.
Happy to defend rapists murderers pedophiles and kangaroo courts because Comrade Gerry does.
Happy to slander people in the Dail and yet fails to do the same outside because she is so sure of her facts and knows that they will sue her ass.
More attempts by her to distract people.
She has no problem naming alleged tax dodgers but won’t name alleged republican child abusers and rapists. (Journal note the alleged before deciding on wether to delete) I love a politician who stands on the high moral ground.
Just heard her interviewed on today fm. Kept giving the same answer to every question, she’s gone down in my estimation… we don’t need politicians like this in Ireland. She’s lost my vote.
Just read about thirty FG Rightwing Trolls repeating their hateful almost racist, type remarks .
It’s quite amusing , but sad too , how these people live their miserable so sad lives.
Their only means of argument is attack like schoolyard Bullies. Together with their multiple fake trolling Twitter names.
The latest Were Jammin fake Troll one, is so pathetic in its childish content.
How these so miserable people are so much on the run now – that their pathetic way of life and putdowns have been found out, by the ordinary Citizens of Ireland .
It beefs out their comments section so they probably love it. The sad thing is that all the troll comments come one after another, yano, because they are all the same person backslapping themselves. It truly is sad.
She has been hiding for a while. It is easy to find a hiding place when you live in a luxurious11-room detached villa close to the Phoenix Park. It is also easy to run a 254s.q.m house when you take home the average industrial wage.
A side show they ma be, however the government needs to be held to account. As someone who believes in water charges (modest, user pays, conservation, etc.) the whole IW thing is such a debacle.If they tried they couldn’t have made a bigger balls of it.
I find the whole thing a joke except it just isn’t funny.
Can we not have competent people running the country. Out of our population you’d think we could find a few honest, competent people to put in charge of running the country.
The government may have had quite a few successes, jobs etc that they deserve credit for but they’ve burned a lot of that credit with this whole IW fiasco
She’s a nasty piece of work. People are entitled to their good name? Well then why do you viciously try to destroy their good name in the one place where they cannot defend themselves. A pure bully.
Repeat your allegations outside the Dail or else shut your face.
Alan, for somebody who likes to remark on your good manners and how much class you have, you seem to be very quick to make derogatory comments about women.
And what part of my comment is offensive about/towards her as a woman? I refer to her as a nasty piece of work, as a bully and suggest that she repeats her allegations where they can be tested or else shut up.
None of those are things you say only about women.
Stop trying to be offended, and on someone else’s behalf too.
Fair play mary lou exposing the filty corrupt right wing thieves that have robbed this country for decades ,
Expose them all i say
The elite establishment have &ucked this country over and over with out been accountable to the irish people
Fine gael fianna fail labour pds have destroyed ireland and the stupid sheep on here defend them
Fools
If this were anybody else she’d be demanding ‘justice’ ‘fairness’ ‘accountability’ ‘transparacy’ and a load of other buzzwords. One law for them and another for everyone else. God help the country if this shower of populist idiots ever get into power
If Enda had any shame he would have resigned when he first went to meet angela and came back with bruised knees and a brown tongue. But then nobody expected anything else from this coward.
Interesting that the shinners got very upset when dail privilege was used to criticise them. That wasn’t on at all, at all but I suppose that’s what happens when you have a monopoly on virtue.
This is a woman who sat in the dail and smirked as a debate went on about the child rape of Marie Cahill while Marie Cahill sat in the gallery watching. She’s not fit to be called a woman or a mother let alone a TD.
Unlike Sinn Fein who laugh at victims of paedophilia while protecting the paedophile most decent minded people whatever their politics try and support the victim in their struggle for justice. If you have children I hope they never end up alone with one of these patriots.
Well we all know Marie Cahill outgrew her usefulness to Sinn Fein supporters a long time ago. Around her 16th birthday. Imagine sitting in the audience at a Sinn Fein ard fheis? Now that would make my skin crawl.
Double standards,from kenny and Burton, as they sup cheek by jowl with two very unsavoury Carachters,both were members of the “workers party” whose Crimes knew no bounds. Pot/Kettle comes to mind.
Cork blitz Galway to reach hurling league final as Tipperary defeat Clare
The 42
12 mins ago
1
1
Quiz
Quiz: How much do you know about the original Snow White film?
59 mins ago
4.2k
18
Heathrow
Heathrow closure: Limited flights resume this evening as fire thought to be 'non-suspicious'
Updated
23 hrs ago
59.7k
94
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say