Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE DISCLOSURES TRIBUNAL has spent the last few weeks taking a deep dive into how false allegations against garda whistleblower Maurice McCabe came to be widely circulated.
Over the past decade, McCabe highlighted damaging examples of garda practice, leading to numerous reports and a commission of investigation.
Concurrently, allegations of sexual abuse incorrectly made it into a file on McCabe, and was distributed by Tusla to the gardaí.
After intense political pressure, the government set up this tribunal to establish whether or not there was a campaign to smear McCabe.
Over 16 days so far, it has heard evidence from gardaí, social workers, journalists and others, including Ms D who made the initial allegation against McCabe back in 2006.
Here’s a timeline to get you up to speed on what the people involved in all of this say happened, and when they say it happened:
McCabe was one of the whistleblowers who had brought the penalty points scandal to light. There were further developments on this front in 2013, while the “copy/paste” error that took place in the summer set in motion the events that were to follow.
It is here we come to a crucial few months in the timeline. With the error already on the file, it begins to come to light that a mistake has been made.
Critical aspects of this case have been teased out through events between March and May 2014 by the tribunal so far. Alongside the events of the tribunal, there were also significant developments in the situation with the gardaí at this time.
This is a crucial month in the whole chain of events that preceded and followed. A notice is sent by Tusla to Bailieboro Garda Station containing the false allegations against McCabe.
After the error in the file was spotted, but not yet fully corrected, gardaí appeared keen to establish what was going on.
Despite clarifications on the file about the false allegations pertaining to Ms Y, the perception that the allegations did refer to McCabe persist this year.
The errors were compounded this year with McCabe’s legal team going on the attack over a letter sent to him containing the allegations.
The groundswell of criticism for how McCabe’s case was handled left the government with no choice but to launch a full, public inquiry into the affair.
And that’s just the evidence to date. There is plenty more to come in this complex, murky tale.
We still have to hear what many others have to say about these events. There are four names atop that list: Maurice McCabe, David Taylor, Martin Callinan and Nóirín O’Sullivan.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say