Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Former solictor Michael Lynn wearing a face mask while leaving the Criminal Courts of Justice earlier this month. Leah Farrell via RollingNews.ie

Michael Lynn moved to Brazil in 2011 without telling gardaí, court hears

Lynn has pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of theft in Dublin between October 23, 2006 and April 20, 2007.

FORMER SOLICITOR MICHAEL Lynn moved to Brazil in 2011 without telling gardaí, who had arranged to interview him in Portugal, his multi-million euro theft trial has heard.

Mr Lynn (53) agreed on a number of occasions to be interviewed by gardaí between 2008 and 2011 but the interview was cancelled several times, Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard today.

In 2009 Mr Lynn sought assurances that no European arrest warrant would be issued until at least four weeks after being interviewed, the court heard.

Mr Lynn, of Millbrook Court, Red Cross, Co Wicklow is on trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court accused of the theft of around €27 million from seven financial institutions.

He has pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of theft in Dublin between October 23, 2006 and April 20, 2007.

It is the prosecution case that Mr Lynn obtained multiple mortgages on the same properties in a situation where banks were unaware that other institutions were also providing finance.

Mr Lynn has told his trial that the banks were aware he had multiple loans on the same properties and that this was “custom and practice” among bankers in Celtic Tiger Ireland.

On Mr Lynn’s seventh day in the witness box today, Patrick McGrath SC, prosecuting, brought the court through a number of meetings that were arranged for Mr Lynn to be interviewed by gardaí between 2008 and 2011.

Mr Lynn agreed to meet gardaí from the Garda Bureau of Fraud Investigation in London in November 2008, but this interview was cancelled because his solicitor was unavailable, the court heard.

Another interview was scheduled for February 2009, with Mr Lynn seeking the assurance in relation to the European Arrest Warrant, the court heard. By this time Mr Lynn was living in Portugal and the meeting did not take place, the jury was told.

Further interviews were arranged for gardaí to come to Portugal in January, May and June 2011, but these did not occur, the court heard.

Mr Lynn moved to Brazil on June 13, 2011, the court heard. At that time, gardaí were preparing to travel to Portugal to interview him at the end of the month.

“Did you tell the guards you were in Brazil in June 2011?” Judge Martin Nolan asked Mr Lynn. “No I did not,” Mr Lynn replied.

Another garda interview was scheduled for October 2011, the court heard. Mr Lynn told the court he did not inform gardaí he was living in Brazil. “I was willing to fly back,” he told the court.

“Yet you stayed in Brazil and resisted extradition for four years,” Mr McGrath replied.

Earlier, Mr McGrath brought Mr Lynn through statements of affairs which the court heard were submitted to financial institutions as part of his loan applications.

Mr Lynn agreed that the statements contained forged signatures of his accountants Kinsella Mitchell and Associates and a forged company stamp. Going through the documents, Mr Lynn said his own signature was forged on one, while another contained his real signature.

He told the court he didn’t know who forged the stamps or signatures. He rejected the evidence of his former legal executive, Liz Doyle, who told the trial that Mr Lynn asked her to forge the accountant’s signature on similar documents.

“The idea I would come to Liz with a statement of affairs in my hand and say: ‘You sign John Kinsella’s name there’ – that is outlandish, it never happened, it’s not true,” Mr Lynn said.

In one statement of affairs before the court, which the court heard was submitted to Irish Nationwide in April 2007 in order to purchase the €5.5million Howth property, Glenlion, Mr Lynn agreed that there was €13 million in debt not declared on the document.

Mr McGrath asked him if it was “pure coincidence” that the document didn’t include any of the loans with the other institutions.

Mr Lynn said he did not prepare the statement of affairs and it was “tardiness and oversight” on the part of whoever did. He agreed that one of his Kendar employees or consultants must have prepared the document, but he said he didn’t know who.

“I’m not responsible for the preparation of the statement of affairs,” he said. “Ultimately I’m responsible for the borrowings. But I’m abroad at this stage. That’s the honest answer.”

Mr Lynn told the court it was important to note that by the time this statement of affairs was submitted, the loan offer letter had already been sent out. He said the statement of affairs was about “ticking a box”.

“That’s how it was during the Celtic Tiger,” he said. “I’m not saying it’s right but there’s no intention in any shape or form to mislead Irish Nationwide because they were happy to give the loan.”

Mr McGrath said Mr Lynn was coming up with “these extraordinary convoluted explanations” for all these matters, “always designed to put the blame on someone else”. Mr Lynn disagreed.

Mr McGrath also questioned Mr Lynn in relation to the server from his property company, Kendar. Mr Lynn has told the trial there are emails on the server that would prove he was involved in secret deals with senior Irish bankers in relation to his loans.

Mr McGrath put it to Mr Lynn that when his practice was raided by the Law Society in 2007, all of the exhibits which were seized were then sent on to gardaí. Mr Lynn said both the law practice server and Kendar server “should have been together”.

Mr McGrath told the court the gardaí do not have the Kendar server.

“I suggest to you that just like the emails, just like the secret deals, this is all another example of you making all of this up in an attempt to confuse what is very, very straightforward,” Mr McGrath said.

“Absolutely not, I reject that completely,” Mr Lynn replied. The trial continues.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds