Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Trump calls for Senate to consider his Ginsburg replacement ‘without delay’

The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg has triggered debate on whether her replacement should be nominated before or after the election.

LAST UPDATE | 19 Sep 2020

2.55578142 PA Images PA Images

US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has vowed to instate a new Supreme Court justice “without delay”, hours after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The legal titan’s passing comes little more than six weeks before the election and has cast an immediate spotlight on the high court vacancy, with senate majority leader Mitch McConnell quickly vowing to bring a vote on whoever President Donald Trump nominates.

On Twitter, Trump said: “We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us, the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court Justices.

“We have this obligation, without delay!”

Democratic nominee Joe Biden has vigorously disagreed, declaring “voters should pick the president and the president should pick the justice to consider”.

McConnell, in a statement some 90 minutes after Ginsburg’s death was announced, declared unequivocally that Trump’s nominee would go to a vote, even though he had stalled then-president Barack Obama’s choice for months ahead of the 2016 election, eventually preventing a ballot.

Trump, in brief remarks to reporters after learning of her death, called Ginsburg “an amazing woman” who “led an amazing life”.

He had continued with a campaign speech for more than an hour after her death was announced, saying later he had been unaware of her passing.

Trump had said in the speech that the next presidential term could offer him as many as four appointments to the nine-member court, whose members are confirmed for life, and added: “This is going to be the most important election in the history of our country and we have to get it right.”

2.55577295 Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Biden, returning to Delaware from his own campaign stop in Minnesota, praised Ms Ginsburg on his arrival.

She was “not only a giant of the legal profession but a beloved figure,” he said, adding she “stood for all of us”.

The process of replacing her should not begin until after the election, he made clear.

Ms Ginsburg’s death could significantly affect the presidential race, further stirring passions in the deeply divided nation as the campaign pushes into its stretch run ahead of the November poll.

Trump took the stage for a Minnesota rally soon before Ms Ginsburg’s death was announced. He spoke for more than 90 minutes and did not mention it, apparently having not been alerted to the development. He spoke to reporters about her passing as he boarded Air Force One to return to Washington.

A confirmation vote in the US senate is not guaranteed, even with a Republican majority.

Typically it takes several months to vet and hold hearings on a supreme court nominee, and time is short ahead of the election.

Key senators may be reluctant to cast votes so close to the election. With a slim majority of Republicans – 53 seats in the 100-member chamber – Trump’s choice could afford to lose only a few.

McConnell did not specify the timing, but pushing a confirmation off to the post-election “lame-duck” session would carry other complications, including the political tangle of trying to push it through in the final weeks of the year after voters have decided who controls the White House and the Senate.

2.55578213 Joe Biden says the vote on Ms Ginsburg’s replacement should be held after the election. PA Images PA Images

Trump has made the appointing of federal judiciary figures – including two supreme court justices – part of his legacy. He said last month he would “absolutely” try to fill a vacancy on the high court if one came up before the end of his first term.

“Absolutely, I’d do it,” Trump said in an August 11 interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt.

“I would move quickly. Why not? I mean, they would. The Democrats would if they were in this position.”

Trump last week added 20 names to the list of candidates he has pledged to choose from if he had future vacancies to fill.

The president tried to cast the list in contrast with judges who could be nominated if  Biden wins in November, warning Biden would select “radical justices” who would “fundamentally transform America without a single vote of congress”. This came even though Biden has never outlined his list of potential picks, and the fact the Senate must confirm any nominee.

Naming his possible choices, less than two months before the election, is aimed at repeating the strategy Trump employed during his 2016 campaign, when he released a similar list of potential judges in a bid to win over conservative and evangelical voters who had doubts about his conservative credentials.

The average number of days to confirm a justice, according to the Congressional Research Service, is 69 days, which would be after the election.

Biden has promised to nominate a black woman to the high court if given the chance.

He has said he is also working on a list of potential nominees, but the campaign has given no indication it will release names before the election.

Democrats believe doing so would unnecessarily distract from Biden’s focus on Trump’s handling of the pandemic and the economy, while also giving the president and his allies fresh targets to attack.

Trump, however, insisted presidential candidates “owe the American people” a list of figures they would consider because, aside from “matters of war and peace, the nomination of a supreme court justice is the most important decision an American president can make”.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Nora Creamer
View 74 comments
Close
74 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds