Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE CHAIRPERSON OF the RTÉ board Moya Doherty has defended the station’s output and says pressure must be put on the government to fix the failing licence fee collection system.
“We have the most expensive collection fee system in Europe. Why? Why do we pay 12 million to have our license collected poorly,” Doherty said today.
Why do we not have a better database? Why don’t government look and think ‘TV is now a large old screen on somebody’s wall? We need to look at other ways’. Because so many people now are downloading and taking RTÉ content on their screens, and they should pay for that.
“And actually, I feel very sorry for those who do pay and do stay within the law and pay their license fee and are allowed, by government and others, to have a vast swathe of people, to allow 25 million pounds a year bleed out under the door that could be used for content,” she added.
Doherty said she doesn’t think people want to hear “the minutiae detail” about RTÉ’s finances but “want to know we can be nimble, efficient, use their money well to get the stories across and have a place in Irish life.”
Asked by Finucane if politicians are likely to insists on the public paying more for RTÉ following the failed introduction of water charges, Doherty said the result of that should be an example for people.
“Other countries in Europe have managed to fix their collection method, I don’t see why RTÉ should be the outlier here. And actually on the water charges, how extraordinary that twice in the last two weeks we have a boil water notice and we have buckets of rain falling from the sky,” she said.
Related Reads
If everyone with a TV paid their licence fee in 2018, RTÉ would have an extra €32 million
RTÉ director general says more land at Donnybrook campus will be sold
Doherty said part of the reason RTÉ has been put in this position is due to the obligations placed on it by Broadcasting Act 2009.
She also defended RTÉ’s programming, saying “it’s difficult to please everybody with content”.
I think you can look back, even this week at the tribute show that was turned around for our great colleague Gay Byrne to the investigative programmes that Prime Time do. There’s so much good television, everybody’s taste is different Marian, but what we want to do and RTÉ should do is not compete commercially but be unique and have its own voice.
“Take that wonderful Nationwide programme going around the country,” she added.
“What other commercial organisation is going to deliver that programme? What other commercial organisation is going to ask the hard facts about housing, the medical system, who else is going to spend a lot of money on investigative programmes if the public service media isn’t given the support to do that?”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
207 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@@at:
Everyone, especially a smart presenter, has the right to ask for the best possible price for their services. Employees and unions do this every day.
Former DGs and managers negotiated the contracts and the Board of Directors signed off on them. They were the guys out of their depth.
@Liam Armstrong: I’ve never seen Irish news, nationwide, ear to the ground, Francis Brennan, Ireland’s fittest family, late late show on sky. So it’s ok to pay €900 to sky on average and we shouldn’t pay RTÉ €160. I think you need to come out of the fog, I bet you were in the do not pay Irish water brigade also
@Liam Armstrong: Maybe the Journal should conduct a poll as to who watches Rte and then deside if they are worth all of this money. Personally I think they should fend for themselves. I would a big share of this fee to local radio who seem way ahead of what Rte is offering
So RTÉ are circling the wagons and blaming everyone except themselves for the state of their finances.
The media paradigm has shifted in the last 20 years and they failed to keep pace. They are sowing what they reap. How do they think someone on minimum wage working 40+ hours a week just to keep a roof over their head and food on their table feels when they have to hand over their very hard earned €160 to people earning large 3 figure sums?
To say they are out of touch is an understatement.
Get rid of the licence fee and put RTÉ behind a paywall and see how far they get.
@Ted Logan: Their best strategy is to pivot and become similar to BBC or PBS, stop trying to do mass entertainment and focus on providing things people shouldn’t be paying for such as news, the arts and culture of Ireland.
Let Sky, Virgin, Netflix and the rest provide the tv shows, movies and junk that people crave.
@Cynical: Best answer to RTEs problems I’ve heard yet. RTE doesn’t fund new drama anyways. The young offenders basically dragged itself into existence and RTE jumped on the bandwagon at the end. Any organisation with a few Bob can do that. When I hear them talking about stimulating new talent, makes me laugh.
@Ted Logan: There are those on a minimum wage, and even on benefits that seem to have no problem forking out well over €160 a year on smartphones tablets, computers etc as well as all the various subscriptions such as Netflix and Spotify… And they’ll probably all be glued to their sets in a couple of weeks for the Toy Show yet claim that they never watch RTÉ.
@Liz O’Neill: Here’s IPhone Joan on to tell us what to spend our money on., All the things you listed off there are things we can buy or sign up to if we see fit.. The licence fee is mandatory and we have to pay it regardless of the garbage they produce
@Cynical: Have to agree. Licence fee could be smaller or, to make collecting it a lot less expensive, take it from property tax. Property tax wouldn’t have to rise much to cover it.
@Cynical: nail on the head there. PBS have done some amazing stuff. RTE could also do a holiday show or something similar that is only based on hoildays in Ireland. Try and think outside the box for a change instead of trying to compete with other channels.
@Thomas O’ Donnell: Private property, as in home tax is both illegal and unconstitutional in this jurisdiction and it only exists because it hasn’t been properly challenged yet. Add a TV licence fee to it and both will die a very quick death.
@Liz O’Neill: but you see a phone is something you will use at least six times a day if not more. It can call people check the time message with people be used as a torch pay bills make a booking be used as a payment media find out information. Rte can only be used to raise blood pressure and find out what happened to Dermot Bannon in the last month since he was last interviewed a month before.
I haven’t watched rte since I got the internet. When I sit in front of the TV I know what I want to watch and it does not consist of panellists asking each other what they think and flogging their new book I have 2day FM on the drive home for that
The RTE player is Terrible. It doesn’t work half the time, it repeatedly makes you start programs again after ever ad break. Get the digital stuff right before asking for more money.
@Joe Bloggs: absolutely woeful app. managable when used through sky go app which displays rte player content through its own superior platform. i dont pay a licence fee, cant stomach it with the top 10 salaries currently, a small % of overall spend but a symbol of how place is ran. used to pay it but feels like throwing money away.
@Joe Bloggs: exactly. I thought they would have sorted it with the last relaunch but not a chance! If you change to another app for 10 secs you have to watch another 2 mins of ads before it starts again. If they’re so concerned with being a public service broadcaster which the constantly bleat, then do the public a service for once!!
Thank you!! It is shocking. There are many programs I’d actually watch back on demand, but can’t seem to get past first ad break without having to start again. I’ve given up on it.
@Manbackonboard: Sky charge a fortune for producing quality content. People who want it, pay for it. If they don’t want to watch it, then they don’t pay. And they’re not threatened with a Court summons or Prison for doing so.
@Da Vid: I’ve never seen Irish news, nationwide, ear to the ground, Francis Brennan, Ireland’s fittest family, late late show on sky. So it’s ok to pay €900 to sky on average and we shouldn’t pay RTÉ €160. I think you need to come out of the fog, I bet you were in the do not pay Irish water brigade also
If RTE are so confident about their business chops that they can dictate how much people should pay for their licence fees and then charge for additional content, then they should go fully commercial without a state subsidy. The BBC have no commercials and don’t charge for online content, and rightly can demand a licence fee as state broadcaster. RTE has the best of both funding models and can’t balance their books.
@The Risen: Higher population to fund the bbc, they take in over a billion between the license fee,publishing and the programs they sell around the world like top gear etc. What’s rte income maybe around 100 million or less. They don’t cut their cloth to suit.
@brendan H: Yes but BBC has far better programming, is much larger than RTE (many many more salaries), their technology actually works and works at a larger scale and they make it work. Let’s call it as it is. That tool that presents the late late is on way too high a salary as with many others. The real reason they are struggling is because of OTE – nobody watches, nobody cares and we still pay an outrageous license fee. Would love to know what it the fees are elsewhere (not just across the pond).
Some real toxic attitudes of entitlement within RTE revealing themselves this week, they genuinely seem to believe all of their problems are from the public rather than their own mismanagement through excessive salaries, they refuse to even consider that as a possibility. With every word they speak the public turns more and more against them as a result.
@Rochelle: surely the elephant in the room is not just primarily cost cutting as if that was a cure for all rte cash problems.. But what about the quality. Of their presenters.. Just how truly talented are they… To what degree do they engage with their audience.. Just how indispisensible are they.. To what degree do they represent modern day Ireland in all its diverse peoples… Seems to me that rte has been living in its own cosy bubble.
Why do criminals walk freely around the place on suspended sentences while ordinarily decent folks sit in jail cells for not paying Ryan tubridys over inflated and down right insulting wages? The mind boggles.
@Benny: Right… but what about those of us that don’t use any of this stuff? Should we be forced to pay this “subscription”, like the government are intending?
If I watch something on RTE, it will be at my parents’ house, where there is a paid TV license. I never watch RTE in my own home, ever.
@Mirabelle Stonegate: I hear that from a lad at work that he never watches rte but every once in a while he mentions rte programmes that he watched , I think everyone has a peek at them weekly and would just prefer to moan
It’s difficult to please everybody with content…. Everyone’s taste is different”. Make it a subscription service and only pay for the content you want? Seems reasonable
@Gavin Cronin: Someone said during the week that RTÉ are so deluded as to believe the public love them, Moya Doherty certainly came across that way and presumed to want to tell Marian Finucane what the people really wanted to hear about the goings on in montrose. She promptly got a flea in her ear when Marian read out a text from a listener telling her made it clear that the public didn’t want to be told by Doherty, or RTÉ management what they didn’t want to hear about the goings on in RTÉ but would rather make up their own mind on the matter, thank you very much.
If RTÉ are so concerned about people viewing their wares on other devices then why don’t they offer a fair subscription based model, just like those companies they’re comparing themselves to. If they were to do this there’s the likely possibility that they’d lose even more revenue, as a significant number of people would only bother to subscribe for a very small number of RTÉ broadcasts. They’d be reliant upon an ever decreasing core audience, and it might become tricky to nail down exactly who needs a licence and who views by a subscription, both would be viewing legally.
Then Marian Finucane herself gave an example of trying to use the RTÉ Player recently only to find it didn’t work, although the adds played, Doherty conceded it wasn’t up to scratch and claimed it needed investment. Ahem… license fee hike…?
@Arch Angel: this interview should be required listening. If you ever wondered why RTÉ has to go, then this interview explains all. In fairness to finucane, all the right questions were asked. Doherty’s answers highlighted what a lost cause the whole set up is. Appalling stuff.
Showing live coverage of former employees funerals. This wouldn’t go on in any other TV station on the planet. Would love to see RTÉ go under! Woeful broadcaster!
Those two own Tyrone Productions. It is a privately owned company producing programmes for TV. They sell products to RTE. How can they both sit on the board of a company they sell to?
What Moya didnt say is more revealing than what she did say. For a country of 6 million people is Ryan Tubridy & co worth their salaries. She didnt even address salaries including her own. If RTE stopped being the propaganda arm of the govt then people might have some faith in them. As for their sports coverage and broadcasting of games in the north, they may blame contract issues but why sign the contract then? Have they not a responsibility as a GAA sponsor to make sure all games they show are accessible to all.
The App is dreadful, who ever designed it should not be getting paid. It is clunky and cumbersome.
RTE should go back to basics, they cannot compete with digital platforms, they have missed the boat. They should concentrate providing good public service broadcasts on one tv station and one radio station. Ireland is too small to have RTE 1, RTE 2 and TG 4, combine all these stations into one good one and do the same with the Radio.
@Ed Cooper: best suggestion here.
Also they should stop paying big money for imported shows. Rte can’t compete commercially with the big uk channels so just do what they are good at. And keep the orchrestra.
The last RTE content I watched was the Greyhound investigation thing they did, prior to that I’ve not watched RTE content in years. I don’t even have a ariel capable of receiing their digital signal and I don’t have the app installed.
if people that download RTE content should pay for it, what about people that have no intent on watching that same content.
RTE is the company equivalent of being so obese the fat cats can no longer get out of bed. Now that it has been told to go on a diet, it is trying to make its granny feel sorry for them by asking for more chocolate to stuff its face with as some sort of God given right.
“Not compete commercially” she said. WTF? Of course RTE needs to compete commercially but they also need to make programs that actually sell abroad and don’t just pander to the 59 year old female demographic that RTE currently appeals to. Enough is enough, the remit is public service broadcasting and RTE do not fulfil this remit. It is a rogue organisation writing its own rules & cheques
Maybe get rid of the licence fee and then let people choose if they wish to pay for rte productions. I’d happily go without rte. I pay my licence but rarely watch rte
Anyone see the Climate Crisis ads for next weeks ‘week of climate programing’.
Pure fear and scaremongering -“will we survive beyond 2050”. Any gulible clown watching that will gladly pay more taxes the government throws at us.
Banks still lending to developers to build along potential flood plains along Dublins docks. Even Google bought a few buildings. If its all going to be under water would they have invested?
Who.. who is that bad off that they’re downloading RTE content? Have they data on the amount of times Fair City has been downloaded? Release the data! More RTE propoganda lol
Things they need to address for me to take any suggestion of paying more seriously.
-Air less repeats
-Stop buying year old shows, 90% of the population has satellite, we’ve likely seen 70% of RTE new content on other channels up to 12 months earlier.
- Pay presenters appropriately for Irish market, not U.K. salaries to keep them here. If they want to go let them go and give new people a shot.
-Stop spending fortunes for the rights to things you don’t air, or air at ridiculous hours of the night and occasionally only in highlights format. MotoGP some years ago for example.
-Make an attempt to become up to date and people will miraculously pay.
-my most contentious issue for me. I already have Sky who you have a revenue stream from. Why am I also paying you directly?
Essentials such as housing are left to the free market by this FFG government, yet their mouth piece is forced on us to pay for.
Let the Free market decide. Drop licence and put subscription by choice and see how these overpaid lackies get on..
I’ve never paid the RTE tax and I never will.
I can download great stuff from all over the world, why on earth would I download any of RTE’s putrid garbage?
Enough! I worked so hard enough to pay my mortgage enough to feed my 2 children, taking poor public transport that I have to walk a mile to the bus stop but we will survive.
And them they live in posh estate with big houses, driving big cars, kids in private schools, holiday in the sun, ski holiday and now blaming us.
I don’t give a s**t!
License for to have a smart phone??? What will they think of next to rob the people? Window tax and salt tax were tried historically and failed. Perhaps they will now put a license fee on cat’s.
How can you download when the R.T.E.player never works…..like Irish water money down the drain. Listened to interview with Dorothy this morning…Spin followed by more spin.
If she’s so convinced that we cannot live without RTE and that we’re all sneakily watching it, she should be willing to put it to a test. Turn RTE into a subscription package deal and let’s see how many people sub.
Also, if RTE keeps wanting to complain about ”the numbers” they should show us – the better half and I were trying to figure out the last time we watch RTE and couldn’t remember – not once this year – and we pay the licence.
On the Marian Finucane show….. A woman who gets over 300 grand a year. When she can bother her hole showing up…. I love this country. This is next level bolloxolgy this is
Worst mainstream app I ever used. Four long adds and then the programm fails to run.
Ironically it is the platform that rte could control through conditional access linked to TV licence number.
In an age where there is so many avenues to watch tv, Netflix’s, google and apple for example. Why do I have to pay RTÉ for something I don’t use? Why do I have to pay to put money into the pockets of people that are grossly overpaid? Independent tv in this country get very little from the tv licence but produce great tv. In a country that has already taken so much from its citizens to bail out people that live a lavish life style, there needs to be a line that is not crossed. If I want to watch Netflix or British tv programs, why do I have to pay RTÉ for that right? I subscribe to Netflix, I pay them for that. I subscribe to google play. I pay for that. Why do I have to pay for having a tv on my premises? RTÉ is a relic of a bygone era and is not suitable for the 21st century.
Why should I pay the same as my neighbour who watches far more RTÉ than I do? They also leave their TV on all day & night regardless. I should only pay for what I use!
@Niall Hickey-Horan: I did drama with moya in the seventies and remember her telling me that she was due to be interviewed by rte.. Since she got her foot in the door she has rode her luck well!!!
There is a concerted attempt to push a “Save RTÉ” agenda. All you wonderful people here and on every other forum are making it clear that the people of Ireland would be happy to see it gone.
The British TV licence is just over 154 pounds; of course the population is far beyond our own. However, RTE have ridiculous advertising on TV and digital; BBC do not. The standard of the four BBC channels and their massive website, not including the iPlayer, is far, far superior to RTE’s. It is hit or miss whether the bloody RTE player will work. The ads put me off using it and it isn’t seem less like watching Netflix – far from it. When RTE stop producing terrible programming like Doireann Project and Salon Confidential – programme a class of teenagers could put together in a day with- and start turning the finger away from us, the audience who are constantly being hit with bill after bill for other people’s mistakes – then maybe might we consider paying extra. BUT NOT FOR EXTRA DEVICES!
Ding pay the 12 million to have the licence fee collected . Go subscription . See what money you make . Go pay these clown presenters from your own pot of money.
I pay the licence. I do not watch or listen to RTE channels in any form. I pay for a subscription service. I do not see why I should have to pay for RTE. RTE should be on subscription, those who want to watch it should pay for it.
Wont dont they have a workable download of content that can be accessed on just one of your devices with a specific mac address, with a serial number you receive when you pay your TV license every year, also chromecast streaming would be a good option.
So he is saying people who download/watch RTE online should pay for it? So does that then mean If you have a tv and dont watch RTE then you dont pay? Think that would be very fair.
@Siobhan Rosemary:
No what he’s saying is that if you own a tablet or a computer he wants you included and charged for the perceived privilege to install and watch via rte player.
I would agree to pay for their content rather tv license ie pay per view. Or I agree to pay tv license but I don’t want to see any adds on rte then. It’s very unfair system to viewers and other commercial broadcasters. Public funded and add free tv stations are running all across Europe and in much smaller/poorer countries so it can be done. Don’t be greedy rte
There’s a very simple solution if she thinks people should pay to have RTE on their screens. Charge them for it. I don’t see a problem with this so long as you don’t charge me for not watching RTE.
Now; Personally I’d hardly notice the €160, but object in sheer principle to paying RTE, so that I can watch Sky.
Make it pay to view and see how many would WANT to watch it. Tv3 channels don’t get any licence support, but operate in the real world.
Cut the salary of Tubs, Darcy finnigan, Duffy,
And Marty Wheelan by 75% for a start.If they
don’t like it, they are looking for staff in Aldi.
Where is the opt out button? I would gladly have these stations stopped and not pay for them. Let those who want it willingly pay…. I mean the 100 or so of them!!
All this trash from Doherty and Forbes and the rest of them is very hard to take. What is Doherty getting out of it.? Forges is being paid three times too much, Finnucane, Darcy, Tubridy and all these useless presenters are being paid three times too much. All this foam about the “Licence Fees” is just a smoke screen, CUT the big earners, give them all 100,000 each per year, cut out the ” hangers on” , get rid on the dead wood. They are only fooling themselves talking about high content of RTE programmes. How many times now have we seen “Reeling in the Years” . The same with Ear to the Ground,. Nationwide is the only one a person could watch. They couldn’t even show Gaelic Football last Summer. A waste of time, that is RTE.
That’s an illegal tax. Most of the people do not watch local Tv programs at all, everything is streamed online from abroad. Why should people who not watch rte, etc local channels pay an illegal fee?
You must be off your tists
downloading or streaming
I pay good money for broadband and I pay good money for Netflix why would anyone want to go out of their way to download rte player when they have everything else at their disposal without ad breaks to watch self important people talk up their colleagues up every week rte is a big circle jerk. Trust me it’s long past its expiry date.the internet made it obselete and they did themselves no favours. The TV license idea works against the whole purpose of itself. You pay the license so they can work without having to worry about biting the hands that feeds it yet the government can control who gets the lion’s share of the fee so they go pro government to keep riding the gravy train the whole thing is a farce.
I would liken myself to a conscientious objector.
They talk about people not paying the license few
But no mention of the money they take in on adds
Commentators are all old school and should retire
New blood needed
Just make rte player a pay-for/subscription app. With a limited-use waiver/code on your tv license to bypass the paywall. That way those who want the content can pay for it one way or another.
A general mandatory charge for everyone in the country with a smart device? Eh, no.
I read on the RTÉ news site Moya Brennan wants a debate on the future of public service broadcasting to be chaired by British film producer David Puttnam personally I think if there is to be a debate the public should have a say and not just be behind closed doors. The best way it should be done is through the CSO RTÉ will then get accurate feedback as to how we the public feel about public service broadcasting.
Can someone relay to that old f*rt that I want none of his precious content and the presence of multi-purpose devices in my home used for far superior content from dozens of superior sources in no way shape or form justifies their demands of money under threat?
RTE contributes absolutely nothing to my life, nor anything of any real value to anyone under the age of 75. If it cannot survive as a commercial entity then it should survive as a bare-bones functional service, and be funded as such.
I think people living outside Irealnd would be willing to pay an annual fee for the rte player if it was more reliable and showed all programs including GAA matches etc.
RTE is a semi-State broadcaster that doesn’t know whether its Arthur or Martha.
IMO it should be significantly downsized , fully Nationalised and financed by TV licence fees & an equal amount from Treasury.
It then can concentrate on News, Current Affairs, Free to Air GAA & worthwhile in-house produced documentaries that promote National Unity free from political or commercial interference.
Being dpendant on advertising revenue, it is difficult for RTE to say that it presents programming withour fear or favour.
Otherwise, just drop the TV licencing alltogether and go commercial. Like pregnancy,
its hard to be half commercial.
I pay my licence purely to have a TV in.the house which I use for streaming Netflix, YouTube etc. I never watch RTE – not absolutely everything on it is tripe but their app is so bad, it’s not worth tuning in.
“Doherty said she doesn’t think people want to hear “the minutiae detail” about RTÉ’s finances”
- I actually do want to see the detail. I always have been interested to know how they spend our money. I had heard Fair City makes a massive loss. I would love to know more.
Who does this clown think is paying for it? Also if there is so much traffic and downloading on rte sites what’s happening all the lucrative advertising revenues?
One of the saddest and most ignored cuts by RTÉ is the summary dropping of their sponsorship of the RTÉ Con Tempo Quartet. This vibrant ensemble has brought live and recorded music to every isolated outlying outpost of our beautiful and cultured island. Not only that, they have brought excellence and pedagogy to our third level conservatoires. Our young musical talent needs nurture, inspiration and cultivation. RTÉ seems to prioritise eminently replicable streamable pop music over supporting our young and talented artistes. Equally, why would young sports persons be valued more, for their potential advertisement revenue ? Shame on our public broadcasters and their slavish pursuit of advertisement revenue over culture and excellence.
They can collect from the licence dodgers before I will pay more. And like any other financially pressured company move out of their city centre property and relocate to the suburbs.
Put your RTE content behind a paywall Ms. Doherty. You won’t be long finding out how many are not downloading any of your mediocre many times repeated drivel.
Agree with everyone else who said they’ve totally missed the ‘digital’ boat – when I lived in Ireland, the app never worked or streamed for ages, and then stopped. Living overseas, they launched RTE International, and while I wouldn’t mind paying a reasonable amount, I am not willing to pay the same for RTE shows as a monthly Netflix subscription – the RTE international app of course only working on iOS in the first place.
Comparing RTE with sky is like comparing Apples to Carrots.
I believe part of the problem is that the Heads of RTE believe thet they are in the same league as Sky. Also, If all the high paid presenters are Contractors/ self employed but full time contractors then RTE as a public funded body is in breach of state employment law. These guys should all be PAYE. Also because they are contractors, with no other obvious contracts available to them a 50% pay cut would be acceptable.
Did anyone ask Ms Doherty and Mr McColgan about their tax arrangements for the money they earned from Riverdance, a production mad possible for them by RTE. I believe their combined net worth is about €100,000,000. I am assuming she wouldn’t have the gall to lecture poorer people about paying their TV license if she hadn’t all paid all her Irish Income tax.
However given that the Production was a global phenomenon I suspect there may have been alternative tax arrangements made. Wont someone please ask her.
Why should they pay RTE if they never watch RTE, how is that fair? If RTE went off the air tomorrow I wouldn’t care because their news service seems to be lacking in up to date news, they seem to go on a months holidays after major holidays and I never truth their weather forecasts. Then anything interesting they show I saw it before on other non Irish stations and I fear that their news service is government propaganda… Why pay a licence for that. They recently changed their news studio at what cost and yet they cry poverty. So what does their stars and board staff earn then is another question?
We always buy our TV licence. Value for money? Absolutely not. The only reason we buy a licence is not to be guilty of a ‘criminal offence’. The content is mostly dreadful, bulked up by repeat programs or programs were presenters are singing the praises of other RTÉ colleagues & programmes! Admittedly I watch the RTÉ news every day & also Fair City (
If people want it – they’ll pay €52/year for access (on any device)
If a Million of them do it – €52million
—————
They laud themselves as a public broadcaster – yet they try to have “celebs” and “stars” and syndicate prime time shows long after their best before date – they should only be producing and airing local content – or scientific content such as documentaries
They shouldn’t be showing movies or American TV shots or a English and Australian Soaps.
The likes of Nationwide that was mentioned is a good example – ear to the ground is another – that is the sort of thing they should be doing.
But not paying “stars” to host em.
They should be doing more educational content in the Irish language – Irish history – Irish wildlife – etc.
But they should not be allowed sell advertising – that is not a public service.
They think they are a BBC – which collects a license form 40 million people and can afford to be extravagant …… They are not – at best they collect a license from 1 million people and are somewhere between the Farmers journal and Irelands Own.
We don’t have a tv in our house. I rarely watch RTE player and wouldn’t mind paying a modest monthly fee for streaming services like RTE player…but only if it didn’t mean I have to watch any advertisements. 5 advertisements every 15 minutes or so is so frustrating. And surely all those ads and revenue they generate should justify the free streaming?? The player regularly freezes so I think I watched about 60 ads trying to get through an episode of Dublin Murders.
Restrict access to RTE Online to those pay the TV License. Leave those who don’t have a TV, don’t stream RTE and don’t pay TV License alone!
Charging a device is a dictatorship!
One of the saddest and most ignored cuts by RTÉ is the summary dropping of their sponsorship of the RTÉ Con Tempo Quartet. This vibrant ensemble has brought live and recorded music to every isolated outlying outpost of our beautiful and cultured island. Not only that, they have brought excellence and pedagogy to our third level conservatoires. Our young musical talent needs nurture, inspiration and cultivation. RTÉ seems to prioritise eminent low replicable streamable pop music over supporting our young and talented artistes. Equally, why would young sports persons be valued more, for their potential advertisement revenue ? Shame on our public broadcasters and their slavish pursuit of advertisement revenue over culture and excellence.
We always buy our TV licence. Value for money? Absolutely not. The only reason we buy a licence is not to be guilty of a ‘criminal offence’. The content is generally dreadful, bulked up by repeat programmes or programmes where presenters are singing the praises of other RTÉ colleagues & programmes! Admittedly I watch the RTÉ news every day & also Fair City. The Late Late is past its sell by date for me & The Sunday Game without Michael Lyster & now without Joe Brolly doesn’t appeal to me. For radio, I now tune into Newstalk and LBC. I also find it quite strange that independent programme makers who sell their shows to the National broadcaster can be on the board of RTÉ. This seems like a conflict of interest in my opinion.
We always buy our TV licence. Value for money? Absolutely not. The only reason we buy a licence is not to be guilty of a ‘criminal offence’. The content is mostly dreadful, bulked up by repeat programs or programs were presenters are singing the praises of other RTÉ colleagues & programmes! Admittedly I watch the RTÉ news every day & also Fair City (
We always buy our TV licence. Value for money? Absolutely not. The only reason we buy a licence is not to be guilty of a ‘criminal offence’. The content is generally dreadful, bulked up by repeat programmes or programmes where presenters are singing the praises of other RTÉ colleagues & programmes! Admittedly I watch the RTÉ news every day & also Fair City (
Government to make cabin homes in back gardens exempt from planning
Christina Finn
8 hrs ago
56.4k
70
Good Morning
The 9 at 9: Wednesday
Updated
16 mins ago
1.1k
The Morning Lead
Government to make cabin homes in back gardens exempt from planning
Christina Finn
8 hrs ago
56.4k
70
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 148 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 102 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 133 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 103 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 75 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 74 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 36 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 32 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 124 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 72 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 79 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 42 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 24 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 82 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 65 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 48 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 81 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 60 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say