Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Economist Paul Krugman (L) and Irish Ambassador to the US Daniel Mulhall

New York Times columnist's 'leprechaun' reference criticised by Irish Ambassador

“So let me tell you about Apple and the leprechauns,” economist Paul Krugman wrote in reference to Ireland’s corporate tax regime.

THE IRISH AMBASSADOR to the US has criticised a New York Times columnist for his use of the term “leprechaun” when referring to Ireland.

The paper published a column by economist Paul Krugman entitled ‘Yellen’s New Alliance Against Leprechauns’.

“So let me tell you about Apple and the leprechauns,” Krugman wrote in reference to Ireland’s corporate tax regime.

Krugman coined the phrase ‘leprechaun economics’ when describing the impact of multinational companies on Ireland’s GDP.

In a letter to the New York Times, Irish Ambassador to the US Daniel Mulhall said he was writing to the paper to express his disappointment.

“This is not the first time your columnist has used the word ‘leprechaun’ when referring to Ireland, and I see it as my duty to point out that this represents an unacceptable slur,” Mulhall wrote.

“I do not go along with Mr Krugman’s disingenuous excuse that ‘the Irish have a sense of humour’ about his attacks on us,” the letter read, adding that “derogatory references in a leading newspaper like yours are no laughing matter”.

Mulhall said that Ireland has been fully engaged in international discussions on corporate tax reform, and had changed its tax code in line with new international norms agreed to thus far.

“Further agreement in this area cannot be arrived at through name-calling and national stereotyping,” he wrote.

Mulhall said on Twitter today that he wrote to the New York Times because he “got tired” of Krugman’s “repeated leprechaun gibes, with the implication that the interests of small countries can be casually dimissed”.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
108 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds