Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
TODAY MARKS THE third day of industrial action taken by nurses and midwives over a dispute about pay and working conditions.
Thousands of patient procedures have been postponed due to the strikes. It’s estimated that 37,000 nurses and midwives are on strike; there are three further days of strike action planned for next Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.
These will include mental health appointments, as psychiatric nurses and their ambulance staff have also announced that they will join the strike action next Friday.
This is over the government’s refusal to recognise their union, Nasra.
Speaking on RTÉ’s Today with Sean O’Rourke, Deputy General Secretary of the INMO David Hughes defended claims that the public sector agreement was a sealed agreement, and that opening it to raise nurses’ pay would “open up the door for a pay free-for-all”, as claimed by Sunday Times columnist Cormac Lucey.
“If Clause 3 in the Public Sector Pay Agreement had that been properly honoured we wouldn’t be in this strike situation,” Hughes said. “It said that if anything is done to solve recruitment and retention issue, there will be no sectoral claims.”
He added that Clause 4 of the Agreement concerned new entrants, and said that they would be valued and their pay dealt with after the agreement, but that it was “now being solved within the agreement”.
The Department of Expenditure and Public Reform (DEPR) said that it would solve the issue, which it hasn’t.
Out on the picket line at the Coombe maternity hospital on Dublin’s southside, the nurses were receiving the usual high-level of support from the public they have experienced on previous days of strikes – mainly expressed through near-constant beeping from passing motorists.
Advertisement
Nurses are eager to stress that the continuing strike action isn’t an easy move to take, and that anyone arriving at the Coombe today will receive the care they need.
“Desperate times call for desperate measures,” Nicole Mention, currently working as a midwife stenographer, told TheJournal.ie.
Nicky Ryan / TheJournal.ie
Nicky Ryan / TheJournal.ie / TheJournal.ie
“We really are worried about the state of the health service,” she added, explaining that the “neglect that has gone on for years and years” needs to stop.
It’s not about pay, it’s about safe care. It’s about the care that people deserve.
This was echoed by Laura McGovern, an oncology liaison nurse at the Coombe:
“We have horrific staffing levels in Ireland at the moment. We can’t retain any nurses – every young nurse is just on the plane, they’re gone, straight away.”
McGovern said that with better staffing levels, better care could be given to patients, and the difficult in doing this right now takes a toll on nurses themselves:
You can’t go home and feel that you’ve done your job well.
Speaking on RTÉ’s Morning Ireland, Communications Minister Richard Bruton said the government believes engagement is needed and that the Workplace Relations Commission and Labour Court could be useful.
Asked whether the government is prepared to discuss pay increases with the nurses, he said this would only be possible as part of a wider discussion on public sector pay.
“The only precondition that the Taoiseach has set out is that he wants the solution to this to be fair, to be affordable to the taxpayer and not to have a greater knock-on impact on 400,000 other public servants who need to be treated fairly,” he said.
We are prepared to talk about pay in the context of an agreement that is collectively negotiated and those agreements bind everyone. I’m not going to start negotiating on the airwaves because I can’t do that. What we need to do here is get into a room with both sides so.
With reporting from Daragh Brophy, Rónán Duffy, and Nicky Ryan
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
77 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@GrumpyAulFella: enough would probably be when there are enough applications submitted for vacant posts so that the employer can be confident they can recruit a suitably competent / skilled person
@Ciaran Bolger: where did that average come from? Have a look at the pay scales and you’ll see staff nurse pay tops out way below that. Way below that of other professions too. There are ways to increase pay, like working lots of overtime and working night shifts more than day shifts.
@Adam Power: strike not for staff nurse pay but ALL nurses pay. Staff nurse pay scales always trotted out but not relevant when strike is for ALL nurses including those that manage the health service
@Ciaran Bolger: The top wage for a staff nurse after 15 years service is €45000. That €57000 is the average of every nurse from the top of management to the just qualified student and divided by the number of nurses. If you had a company with 11 staff. The CEO gets paid €1000000 and the other 10 staff get paid €50000 each. That’s a wage bill of €1500000 and divided by 11 is €136000. So the average wage of the company is €136000 based on that calculation. Can you not see what the government is doing peddling these lies that the average wage is €57000? Do your own research and don’t believe everything you read especially from a government in the middle of an industrial dispute which is essentially a public image war.
@Ciaran Bolger: people need to stop bandying the figure around as it was plainly pulled out of thin air, I have yet to meet a nurse on 57k… It’s so goddamn irritating…
Random journal commenters: according to the politicians who don’t want to pay them more and rte nurses are on €57,000 what are they complaining about how is that not well paid?
Nurses: we’re not getting paid €57,000 in fact the vast majority of us have wages far lower than that
Random journal commenters: …..
…..HOW was €57,000 not well paid!?
@Ciaran Bolger: Politicians would take that in secret unvouched expenses. That 57,000 would be to little for them. Yet they contribute SFA when compared to what nurses do.
@Liam Neeson: it is the INMO responsibility were they not involved in the collective bargaining for all public servants. If the nurses say this is not about pay and the average is 56k then that 12% they are looking for will also be added to overtime allowances etc. Bring in a decent rate of pay for incoming nurses and reduce the ludicrous 16 year pay scale. If you are not at the top of your game after 6 years your employer is taking the piss.
@Liam Neeson: so are plenty other public servants. Clerical officers in the civil service start on 25k which is considerably lower. Executive officers also lower at 29k.
@Keith Simcox: thanks for explaining what an average is. Had no idea!. Point is that nurses on strike to increase pay of ALL nurses which includes managers administrators and those not working in stressed or short staffed areas
@Sarah: what are you talking about. There are nurses on 80k!. What you may mean is that you have never met a STAFF nurse in 57k but there are plenty of nurses paid way in excess of even 57k who are also in for a pay hike if the strike succeeds
@Ciaran Bolger: and there are surgeons on a million that’s not even remotely representative of the majority. Are you seriously implying that nurses shouldn’t seek fair wages because some nurses, somewhere are making more than them? Hahaha love the logic there ..
@Sarah: There may be surgeons on a million, or even more, but they are not being paid that million out of public money. They are earning it through private patients.
@Sarah: no, I have total support for frontline nurses seeking better pay and conditions. However when u seek across the board pay rises for all nurses, including those that manage the system you remove any possibility of keeping nurses onthe frontline because they are still incentivised to move to better paid admin jobs. The frontline nurses should be the highest paid, so I don’t agree with a pay rise that maintains the status quo, increases the pay of nurses that are already well. If not overpaid, incentivises nurses to leave the frontline and rewards the very people who are responsible for managing a completely miss managed system
@Ciaran Bolger: It’s a bit unfair to hold nurses in managerial roles responsible for the failings of the whole system, don’t you think? They are nurse managers, they can potentially be held responsible for any failings there, but they are not hospital managers and certainly not the managers of the department of health.
@Gerard McDermott: yes they are. CEO’s of our teaching hospitals and deputyCeos’s mostly nurses. Everyone of the ceos of our hospital groups except 1 are nurses. Last head of the HSE, tony o Brien was a nurse. Suspect you are right about department of health tho
There are many issues that nurses can genuinely point to, the trolley crisis, patient safety etc. however they’re linking all of these to pay. They’re claiming all of these issues can be solved if they’re paid more, this is simply untrue. They’re looking at other colleagues, in other grades and asking why are they paid X, Y and Z, I want the same, I want parity. Well here’s what everyone gets;
Nurses had signed up to the agreement last year and have now turned their back on it, it not rocket science to say there’s only so much money in the pot, only so much money to pay increases to the entire Public Service. If they’re given their demands that’ll cost an additional €300 million which will mean the rest of the PS cannot get what they’re entitled to, low paid workers won’t get their increases. But the nurses will be happy, for now.
@Arch Angel: majority of people want people in front line public services paid well. The problem is that the rest of the public sector unions will immediately demand more money, regardless of how unsustainable it is and regardless of how well paid the people they represent are. It’s a terrible situation.
Have to laugh at the narrative being pushed here. FG reneged on its pledge to fully reverse the FEMPI measures, but is trying to convince people that its the public service that are less than honest brokers.
@The Risen: They have not reneged they have said as recent as last Autumn they want to fully reverse FEMPI but not at once. It was quoted extensively.
The unions signed up to the reversal over time, now the Inmo are breaking that agreement.
Reversing FEMPI at once would increase our already huge debt and would break the EU budgetary pact.
Those are simply the facts of the situation.
Some might feel higher national debt is a good thing but those who work and are burdened with high income tax really don’t want to be paying for increase interest.
I wouldn’t be a fan of our government but on this they are correct
@The Risen: ah sure, but you know apparently all the nurses are on €57,000!! (Which let’s be honest after tax doesn’t get you very far if you live in any Irish city or large town) Did you not hear that? They’re just being greedy!
@Paul O Mahoney: True, most, if not all, of the PS signed up to the Public Service Stability Agreement 2013-2018, including the nursing unions, who then promptly broke it again. The government, who granted, had dragged their feet on this issue, had finally committed to pay all PS’s who signed the agreement 7% by 2020. Personally I feel if they took A with a commitment to pay it back by B date then just do so, there shouldn’t be preconditions and agreements. In a manner of speaking they’ve made a rod for their own backs with all this subterfuge.
The nurses meanwhile are being less than honest with the public by linking their claims of patient safety and staff retentions issues with a pay claim. In reality this is just a simple money grab for them, they’ve seen what other grades earn and want more money, they’re exploiting the publics heart strings. They’re hoping the nation, and other PS’s, support them while they take all the available money in the pot, but they won’t support others.
@Arch Angel: 100% agree, its very difficult to agree with the union when they are the ones who broke the agreement that they signed up to.
On a broader point its very hard for any government to control the public purse if what they thought was agreed is actually not worth the paper its written on.
Nowhere in commercial life would a breach like this be tolerated, it would be immediately sent to the commercial court for adjudication.
Of course the claptrap that should they get what they want, it wouldn’t affect others in the PS…..every union would do the same.
Our debt wasn’t caused by the banks alone, we had to borrow billions since the crash to simply keep the lights on, but now many are clamouring for a return to boom and bust.
Will we ever learn?
@Paul O Mahoney: “They have not reneged they have said as recent as last Autumn they want to fully reverse FEMPI but not at once.”
They have no intention of reversing the effective 6% cut in hourly rate brought in as a temporary measure. It was not even allowed on the table for discussion for the latest agreement.
@The Risen: Then why did the unions sign up for it?
And can you please link to what you said regarding the 6% cut in hourly rate not being reversed, just for verification purposes.
I doubt very much that the unions would have signed if as you claim the 6% cut wouldn’t be reversed.
If its true, the unions threw its members under another bus.
@The Risen: really? How so? It is reversing FEMPI. Wage increases, PRD pared back to ASC taking more out of the net. Any evidence to support your claim?
@Adrian: Of course this is nonsense. They avail of the same increases as other public servants. Are you suggesting that public servants should not get pay restoration?
@For Goodness Sake: i’m not talking about pay for the politicians. They claim ridiculuous amounts in expenses. Almost everything is paid for the politicians through their expenses claims, so you can’t really compare what politicians get paid to live on, with the rest of the public sector.
@For Goodness Sake: this public sector pay agreement really means nothing. The politicians largely live off their expenses, but conveniently bring out this public sector pay agreement argument to justify not giving other public sector workers while claiming the max of all their expense allowances which are already very generous.
@Tom Tom: in the private sector where we suffered job losses and similar reductions we call these annual performance related pay increases. Some times you get one some times you don’t. We don’t call them annual performance related pay restoration. But perhaps we should for sympathy.
@Sarah: I thought those payrises are part of the overall agreement negotiated with the unions, thats designed to reverse FEMPI overtime. Agreements are meant to be kept by all sides.
You can be your life that a nurses payrise would lead to public sector ‘free-for-all’. Would all the people honking horns in support be happy to have top end tax increases to pay for pay rises across the whole of the public sector. And please enlighten me…how would a pay rise for well enough paid medical staff make the hospital lists decrease?. They signed an agreement already so should just abide by it until it lapses. Then they can renegotiate for whatever. During the crash many people in the private lost jobs,savings and homes. The public sector had to take some financial hits but kept their jobs. They might remember that
Watching the Dail debate this morning was painful Minister’s Harris and Donohue said they wanted to be fair to other public servants no word about being fair to nurses.
Did any other public servant say they didn’t want nurses to get a fair pay for the work, responsibility, and their contribution to society. ? The same Minister Donohue wants to left the cap on €500,000 on bankers pay to get better bankers from abroad but won’t apply the same logic to bring home Irish nurses.
@Charles Williams: Nurses are public servants. So, if the government conceeds all the other unions will do the same.
To say they won’t is fanciful, and a dereliction of duty on the unions.
Unions rarely comment on others disputes, as there is money to be made.
@Charles Williams: its crazy stupid stuff. Yesterday these two muppets were squirming through their excuses as to how their gov depts wasted over 1 billion of taxpayers money while they’re both still fully expecting to keep their jobs.
There is shortfall of over 2000 frontline nurses for decade plus in 2017 there were 9000 nurses over 50years entitled to retire at 60 years (in 2027)so that is why there should be a sence of URGENCY on Government’s part to sort this out!There is flexibility where eg retention and recruitment a concern.I have shown the facts re understaffing now plus in 8years time 9000 nurses entitled to retire!!Plus population estimated to increase to 1.85m+ over 30-33 years.
I despair at the failure yet again to recognise crisis after crisis developing into emergencies!IF Government recognised this,there would have been fully engaged talks last year re ALL the nurses concerns!
How can Government who sees how Brexit could affect Ireland…fail to recognise National emergencies in Ireland NOW and effects on Irish society,etc!!
@Nuala Mc Namara: Great post, however for this issue to be resolved would require pragmatism from everyone but that has been in short supply in Ireland since the dawn of time.
@Nuala Mc Namara: You repost the same “stuff” again and again. You still miss the point that giving the nurses a pay rise will do little or nothing to resolve the health issues.
@For Goodness Sake: I use facts,figures,& common sense in my posts & I’ve no patience for spin& deflection from very serious issues AFFECTING PATIENTS as well as FRONTLINE staff CONSTANTLY highlighted by nurses, doctors and consultants! Despite your weak transparent attempt to dismiss my comments as “stuff”, you’re unable to adequately debate them one by one!
Pay restoration will tackle retention and recruitment crisis,more nurses will tackle understaffing in hospitals,reducing stressful unsafe work conditions will equally tackle retention, recruitment and nurses retiring (9000 nurses due to retire in 8years!),more nurses more wards open when provided,etc&all of these are what’s needed for PATIENTS too because because the very best care,health&safety in hospitals for patients and frontline staff and outcomes for patients are what matters to nurses,they have year after year been highlighting these issues.
There is an easy fix to this…. We need special legislation enacted immediately. We need to unhook all front line public workers from the rest of the civil service. IE Nurses, midwives, ambulance workers, doctors, guards and firemen. Everyday these people show up for work they are saving lives. There decisions could affect the lives of our parents, aunties, uncles and children. One bad call and they die.
Pay them what there worth. Pay them more than they are worth. In my opinion a nurses salary should start at 35k and top out at 100k. If a nurse doesn’t show up for work people die. If an assistant to the minister for finance doesn’t show up to work, there is no risk. Its the same for teachers and other civil servants. I’m sorry but when the S@@t hits the fan no one calls for a teacher to come and save someones life.
@Diarmuid O’Braonáin: I also meant to add, the govt have no issue enacting special legislation to bail out bankers. Charles Haughey enacted legislation to bail out his friend Larry Goodman in the 1990′s. We will have depend on nurses at some stage in our lives.. pay them what they are worth and take the pressure off them.
What a joke of a country we live in. Yesterday, harris was explaining why his dept has wasted 1 billion plus of taxpayers money while still fully expecting to keep his job. Today, he’s telling the nurses the gov has no money for their pay increase.
@Adrian: what other sector of society could you have a fella in a job who is so wasteful with the money he’s supposed to manage, and expect to keep his job. Even the biggest companies in the world wouldn’t accept this incompetence and mismanagement in their workforce.
Why not use my simple solution – give the nurses and indeed the young hospital docs a “critical workers tax credit” of €5000 per annum. They would be all that much better off without breaching tbe civil service pay deal.
@Rory Quinn: Great idea, however everyone else in the PS would want the same. Equality, parity of esteem, et al would be dragged up to justify everyone getting it.
Is union lady being sidelined.?her deapty seems to be doing all the radio shows. Is dare a split in the camp.?heard him on Sean o rourke show he seems to b prepared to talk with no preconditions.
Shortage of young nurses, How about investing in the nurses at college level? It’s a 4 year course @3k registration fee each year, waive this fee on condition you stay and work for HSE for 2-3 years,On an agreed suitable salary…
At present foreign recruitment agencies are in the colleges offering nurses jobs to leave … and they do…
obviously it’s more complicated than this but there might be some merit in the idea?
It was a bit farsical yesterday when harris appeared at the pac meeting, surrounded by the civil servants and officials from his own dept (who are all probably qualified for their jobs, except harris), and at a time when we have a housing crisis, and still have austerity taxes (usc), and harris defends his 1 billion wastage of taxpayers money by saying, “look, lets forget about the money, ye’ll all be delighted when its built”, followed today by “i have no money for yer pay increases”.
Unfortunately, the nurses may find the public turning from them the longer it drags on. That’s simply human nature, the goodwill only lasts a limited time under duress.
There should b moves by the government to sort this dispute immediately .Listening and reading about the torture very sick people are enduring Leo Varadkar should b all over this pronto.Im not saying the INMO are right in everything. they are saying and doing .But the government must move straight away.We are talking about the very essence of life.Im sure people have already lost their lives
'Ireland was very smart': Trump namechecks Ireland as he pledges tariffs on pharma imports
Keith Kelly
10 hrs ago
51.5k
131
The Daily Poll
Should Verona Murphy step down as Ceann Comhairle?
14 mins ago
1.9k
6
As it happened
Verona Murphy 'fully intends' to continue as Ceann Comhairle as opposition parties draft no confidence motion
13 hrs ago
54.2k
101
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say