Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
NORTHERN IRELAND FIRST Minister Peter Robinson has again said that his party was unaware of the letters given to IRA suspects indicating that they were no longer wanted by police.
Robinson was speaking in the Northern Assembly this afternoon at a special debate convened following the collapse of the James Downey Hyde Park bomb trial and the subsequent controversy.
The DUP leader Robinson said that “while there was much speculation in the media” about the issue of ‘on-the-runs’ in the period after the Good Friday Agreement, he told members that his predecessor Ian Paisley had written to former British Prime Minister Tony Blair to seek assurances that no deal had been made.
The First Minster said that Paisley was told that “no action has been made” on the issue of on-the-runs. What followed therefore was “deception by omission” on behalf of the British Government he claimed.
Robinson last night withdrew his threat to resign after British Prime Minister David Cameron announced an inquiry to review the deal.
“The inquiry must satisfy public confidence. Individuals should not be able to use the letters as a get out of jail free card….nobody should evade justice or prosecution,” he said.
Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness told the recalled assembly that both the British and Irish Governments had publicly acknowledged the issue of on-the-run suspects as far back as the year 2000 when they said that they recognised there was an ongoing issue.
Advertisement
He said that that they agreed that it would be problematic for prosecutions to continue into events that happened before 10 April 1998 when the Good Friday Agreement was signed.
“This is not an amnesty or a get out of jail free card,” he said.
McGuinness said that this week’s controversy has been about political positioning ahead of upcoming elections and that he was “frustrated that the stability of these institutions have been questioned” as a result.
He said that he would not accept it from people who were “historically opposed to the peace process”.
“I have never kowtowed to so-called dissident republicans and I am worried that there are those who are being influenced by those at the extremes of unionist politics,” he said.
McGuinness said that if people are serious about getting justice for victims than “there is no alternative but to return to the Haas proposals and move forward”.
SDLP leader Alasdair McDonnell attacked what he said was the “cynicism” of the UK Government in working with Sinn Féin to demonstrate a disdain for victims.
“We must know if there were any other secret deals done,” he said.
The UUP’s Mike Nesbitt said that the controversy this week demonstrated a “perversion of justice” where suspects rang the police to ask if there was any evidence against them.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
How many loyalists received similar letters. ? Let’s not forget, the Shankill butchers got out on amnesty. A disgusting thought for families of their victims but a reality in conflict resolution. Former combatants receive amnesty. End of story.
Not very many I’d say, most of them were being run by British agents so in that sense there was no need for them to literally run away after their offences as most of them would have been safe from prosecution anyways!
The `For UK Eyes Only’ documents, uncovered by the Pat Finucane Centre, reveal how:
• Army chiefs feared that 70 soldiers in one UDR unit were linked to the UVF in west Belfast, INCLUDING ONE MEMBER OF THE NOTORIOUS SHANKILL BUTCHER GANG;”
John Crawford was murdered by William Moore (one of the Shankill Butchers). The gang leader in that attack? A member of the British Army’s MRF called Jimmy McKenna.
So the UVF infiltrated the UDR, sure we all know that. The UDR were criticised for their vetting procedure, maybe the same way current Irish army members are involved in republican terrorism.
The point is that it is now known that the army chiefs KNEW about members in the UVF and that one of the butchers was on an RUC suspects list….BUT WAS ALLOWED FREE REIGN TO MURDER. You asked for proof (again), and have been provided with it (again).
Good man Tir Eoghain Gael
Go home jamesy ye clown defending serial killers while calling the IRA murderers
I hear that head butcher Murphy started crying and pleading for his life when the gunmen approached to do society a favour
The butchers weren’t an orginasation they were a couple of serial killing bigoted parasites whose head butcher whinged like a little girl instead of saying fcuk you and taking it like a man
Whataboutery/subject changing. You said you didn’t believe the Shankill Butchers were protected by the RUC and asked for evidence that they were. Don’t run to change the subject when you get that evidence handed to you.
Irrelevant. The issue is whether or not they were being protected. I have shown you evidence that at least one of them was known to the RUC who allowed him to continue his murderous ways for three years. In other words, he was being protected while he was engaged in murdering innocent people.
How is it irrelevant? If you had a family member murdered by someone who the police knew about, but allowed a free reign for three years, would you consider it irrelevant?
You have been provided with the evidence you asked for on whether or not the Shankil Butchers were protected. I provided evidence showing they were protected by the both UDR and the RUC and that at least one was also a MEMBER of the UDR. I provided evidence that one was known to the RUC for three years while he was murdering innocent people.
And you believe that he wasn’t being protected for those three years (and more)?
Jamesy Boy – which one of the 17 Unionist Parties should I vote for ?
I’m thinking of becoming a totally bigoted Unionist like you and I need some guidance please ?
Oh so im a bigot now because I openly renounce scvmbag paramilitaries from BOTH sides. Strange logic, id rather be a bigot then than a supporter of child murdering terrorists.
Anybody on this thread that supports the IRA are the true bigots of this land, why? Because you support what happened at Kingsmills, you support what happened in Enniskillen and in Birmingham and hundreds of other locations in this country. Bigots one and all.
Completely off topic but, I was working in East Belfast a few weeks ago. A deeply traditional loyalist area, and I was working with men who were clearly loyalists, probably in a band, supported ‘Norn Iron’ (judging by the tattoos) and most likely have never set foot in the south and probably never will. I am clearly from Donegal, and my name is more than a hint at my cultural identity. I have to say we got on well. We laughed about the politics, had a bit of craic about what to call ‘Derry’ and generally enjoyed working with them. I did not sense any hatred or bigotry, to me they seemed like ordinary decent people on the face of it. Later on that week it struck me, that somewhere along the line some sort of collective insanity grips these people and drives them to despise me and everything I stand for. I can only conclude that the Orange Order is the true force of evil in Northern Ireland. It perpetuates an ancient myth that somehow Protestants are superior to Catholics and that their ‘ascendancy’ is a god and crown given right. I say ban sectarian parades, sectarian flags, public displays of hatred, including murals, bonfires and songs. It might take another generation, but as long as the Orange Order exists, there will always be sectarian tension in the north.
Jamesy, are you allergic to reason? You dismiss every negative statement about unionism and demand evidence. When evidence is provided, you refuse to acknowledge it.
Ready to admit that you were wrong about British collusion with terror forces? You were provided with a litany of evidence.
I dismissed the republican take on collusion and I still do. Given the circumstances there were always going to be soldiers/police sympathetic to the loyalist cause and maybe using loyalist terrorists to exact revenge on the republicans or their communities. So to answer your question -
YES COLLUSION DID EXIST DURING THE CONFLICT
On both sides of the border might I add!
Any more questions? I feel like im in Antrim police station here!!
What republican take? I’m basing my argument off of the Stevens Inquiries, held by the British government. The British government accept that collusion occurred.
You’re either lying or completely delusional. You claimed that no collusion occurred, none. And that you wouldn’t accept that any (yes, any) collusion occurred until an inquiry had concluded such. Of course, you hadn’t heard of the aforementioned Stevens Inquiries. Embarrassing. I’ll quote your actual posts, verbatim, if you like? You’re so pig headed. Sometimes it’s better to just accept that you are wrong and move on, backtracking just digs the hole deeper.
Im well used to people disagreeing with me on here. If you actually studies the conflict though and looked at some of the things your community perpetrated on mine then youd know that there were some sick insance hoodlums in your community, the whole world knows it, thats why they designated them a terrorist organisation in most countries.
Fang I told you that collusion did take place, just not on the scale that you boys seem to think. Your mate Tyrone said there 500/600 murders via collusion, republicans think that loyalists didnt do one thing themselves and that every killing they ever carried out was ordered by the state. This is a ludicrous view to hold and one I will argue against at all times.
“What secret deals between the British army and the UVF? Name one.”
“Until inquiries uncover this collusion then I’m treating it as a republican myth.”
It’s there for all to see, you clearly hadn’t heard of the Stevens Inquiries.
Look, here you are arguing that Brian Nelson was a member of the UDA, not the UFF.
“Brian Nelson was UDA”
“I said earlier that Brian Nelson was in the UDA which is a fact, look how many red thumbs it received.”
The UDA used the name UFF to claim responsibility for attacks. Because the two claimed to be separate organisations, the UDA was able to retain it’s legal status.
They are the very same organisation. Something else you clearly didn’t know. Your ignorance is astounding, mate. You clearly haven’t a clue what you’re taking about.
Of course there were. La Mon, Enniskillen, Shankill, Warrington and many others, all shameful, despicable acts. No arguments here. However, the IRA guns fell silent. Weapons decommissioned, war declared over. Yet still we have the annual display of openly sectarian, bigoted hatred perpetrated by the OO. When will they say, enough is enough, where is their declaration of peace? If you were to set up an organisation like the OO tomorrow it would be banned in an instant.
All the guns fell silent here and im happy they did. It wasnt just the IRA that stopped, the place is fully demilitarised now compared to what it used to be. A lot of bickering continues though.
The UDA is the umbrella group, the UFF were its militant wing, the UYM its youth wing and the LPA its prisoners welfare wing. I never ever said they were different organisations, they are different branches of the same group.
PS Fang I told you a few posts back that collusion did take place, it happened a lot less than you seem to think though.
Can you not just accept what im saying here? I think you just have it in for me for some reason. Im a unionist that opposes violence, if that doesnt stand well with you then tough dung.
You backtracked a couple of posts ago because you were presented with irrefutable evidence of collusion. Yesterday, you were arguing that NO collusion occurred. You were wrong. Now you’re trying to claim that you always accepted that collusion occurred. Like I said, you’re either lying or delusional.
A lot less than I think? My entire argument is based on the findings of the Stevens Inquiries. It’s not what I think, it’s what the British government has confirmed. How can you not see that? I really do think you’re delusional.
hahaha Aidy McBride makes a reappearance by mistake, caught rapid you troll. Haven’t seen him in ages. Lads yisser wastin yisser time talkin to this fella, he’s a pure walter mitty type with a hape of accounts who only comes on here to stir the proverbial.
So, you’re not man enough to admit that you were wrong? You would gain back a bit of credibility if you did. We’re all wrong from time to time. Ignorance can be cured. Stupidity, such as the refusal to acknowledge demonstrated ignorance, can’t be.
Fang I’ll admit I worded certain things wrong but in my defence I was engaging 2 or 3 different posters at the same time, it can get a bit confusing.
In a nutshell I was trying to say that collusion happened to an extent, I said it didnt happen the way some others put it. The proof and inquiries I want are for the claims that upwards of 500 murders were carried out by loyalists under the guidance of state security, when I see these claims proven I’ll accept the republican view of collusion then. In the meantime im putting it down to a few rogue members of the security forces.
Nearly every loyalist was been run by the Brits.. A republican IRA volunteer were good at what they done, they were fighting one of the biggest and most sophisticated armies in the world. Loyalists on the other hand were local skumbags with tattoos and full of steroids. They murdered innocent catholics with the help of all the NI security forces..
So the IRA who bombed innocent men women and children and lined innocent men up and shot them at Kingsmills were ‘good at what they done’ were they, you people have no morals mate, none at all.
Id love to see the reaction id get if I came on here and said loyalist terrorists were good at what they done, them and the republicans done fcuk all good for this land, terrorist vermin the lot of them.
I truly hope that this is just internet boasting, it pains me to think that there could be so many poisioned minds out there. Surely most of Ireland rejects ALL these murderous groups?
“Did the people at Kingmills or Enniskillen deserve to die and were the IRA justified in murdering them?”
No, they weren’t justified in it. I think the OP meant that the IRA were “functional” at what they did, which was engage in a Guerrilla war against a sophisticated modern army. I don’t think he means that any attacks on civilians by the IRA was “good”.
The same cannot be said about Loyalists as they did not engage in attacks against a modern traditional army.
The man with the multi million dollar baby killing machine for his Twitter avatar want’s to talk about what people deserve to die. Come back to us when you find the slightest bit of credibility.
And to answer your question, The Kings Mill massacre was a heinous, despicable, cowardly attack carried out by vile people.
I would suggest though, that you read what suspicions sole survivor Alan Black has about British state involvement in the massacre, and in particular Willie Frazer’s Daddy’s gang the Glenanne Gang. I wouldn’t be surprised in the slightest. With that being said, if it was an IRA did organise and carry out the attack, my sentiments on the killers are the very same.
Its common knowledge that the IRA did carry out Kingsmills, a supposedly non sectarian (cough cough) organisation murdering 10 men because they happened to be Protestants.
The fella above said the IRA were good at what they did, he didnt specify what. How can you be a wee bit of an IRA supporter anyway, you either support them and all their attacks or dont support them at all.
Jamesy, some of the families of the murder victims from Kingsmill have taken a case recently against the British Government over the slaughter. Guess what they are saying … The leader of the murder squad was an undercover British Agent. In other words, your beloved British Govmnt supported and encouraged the slaughter of innocent men on their way home from work.
The purpose of the attack was to try and show the world that the IRA were plain and simple murderers.
The same thing was attempted during the slaughter of the Miami Show Band. British Army/UDR colluded in the attempt to blow up the band members in order to make it look like the IRA carried it out. Again the purpose being to discredit the IRA. When the bomb exploded prematurely, they just reverted to gunning the band members down in cold blood.
The same was attempted with the Dublin Monaghan Bombings. At the outset the people believed the IRA was responsible. Turns out the British Army organized it.
The same thing happened with the British army MRF murder squads. In many of their drive-by shootings, they used IRA weaponery to try and convince the population that the IRA were behind the attacks.
How many more examples do you need to try and work out who the REAL terrorists were during the war in the North.
Agreed … planned and orchestrated by the British Security Services. Its doesn’t excuse the individual IRA members involved, but damn, it definitely shows what a terrorist grouping the IRA were fighting against.
It was solely an IRA operation, are you seriously suggesting a British army officer got the south armagh IRA to murder 10 people? You are deluded if thats what you think.
What about Tullyvallen? Suppose that was the UDA was it?
Or Enniskillen, maybe that was a stray RAF bomb.
Man up and just accept that the IRA were just a group of murdering scvm. The rest of the country accepts it including 90% of the Irish people.
The IRA have always denied responsibility for it. It’s also interesting that Alan Black has stated it was an English accent he heard amongst the attackers.
False flag operations, just one of the many dirty tools of war your beloved British army and government like to use. I know it doesn’t bother you that they killed thousands of nationalists, but does it not bother you that they used the blood of the community you say you belong to as pawns in their filthy war of occupation? By the way I don’t like to put labels on people. When I look north I just see Irish people and confused Irish people and so does the rest of the world.
Thousands of nationalists? The IRA themselves killed more nationalists than any other group you fool, open your eyes.
And an inquiry into Kingsmills found that the IRA were responsible, weapons used in other IRA attacks were traced back to Kingsmills. The hunger striker Raymond McCreesh was caught in possession of a rifle that was used at Kingsmills. Dont try your republican revisionism with me.
is that the same paisley who robinson and his crew more or less accused of becoming doddery in his old age when it came to the heave to get rid of him ….. yet his memory is razor sharp over the good friday agreement …. that him and his party walked out of …. lets not try to rewrite history there Peter…. you knew there was a deal and if as you claim you didnt you’re politically naive to an incredible level ….
Has Robo received his letter from the Irish government informing him he will not be sought again for the attack he perpetrated, with his armed militia on border town of Clontibret? Just like Paisley his protégé Robo has as much blood on his hands as anybody he points his self righteous finger at.
The lost tribe of Israel are well and truly lost. With the likes of Robo, Dodds, Allister and self proclaimed leaders, ex hunger striker, sorry lunch skipper, and Cher impersonator Jamie B along with his hero mad Mullah dressing, charity thief, Willie Tazer and their ilk at the helm, Unionism/Loyalism will do more to unite Ireland than any Republican could ever dream of.
Not long Now.
Robinson was already in court in Dundalk for that incident and was punished by the Irish govt. Not very well informed are you? Do you want him done twice for the same incident?
Not long now lol I dont like the idea of the Euro but if the majority of NI votes for it I’ll happily join your republic, cant see us being well accepted but what other choice will be open to us?
In the meantime I’ll be a proud Ulster unionist and only cross bridges as I come to them. Even if a UI took place tomorrow id still dislike republicans and particularly IRA loving vermin. The only thing then is they’d have defeated us which would be pretty hard to live with in my humble opinion.
These murderers must face justice, reality is if they are found guilty and imprisoned they will be out in 2 years under terms of GFA. But at least families will see the thugs who murdered their loved ones being convicted.
Delay to plans to have pharmacies prescribe for UTIs, thrush, and cold sores in Ireland
Eimer McAuley
10 hrs ago
10.8k
12
Ballyfermot
Fundaiser launched after Dublin family loses home and dog in mistaken identity firebomb attack
18 mins ago
5
Dublin
Garda seriously injured after being struck by motorbike in Finglas
14 hrs ago
34.0k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 197 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 137 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 177 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 139 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 101 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 102 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 47 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 43 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 161 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 73 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 96 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 102 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 45 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 60 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 112 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 115 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 84 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 63 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 107 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say