Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Liam Payne, Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik, Harry Styles, pictured in 2014. Shutterstock/Kathy Hutchins

Copyright claim against One Direction song resolved at High Court

David Lewis Smith had claimed the One Direction release ‘Night Changes’ infringes his musical work.

A SINGER SONGWRITER’S High Court action against all five original members of boy band One Direction and others for alleged copyright infringement has been struck out on consent. 

David Lewis Smith had claimed the One Direction release ‘Night Changes’ infringes his musical work and sought various reliefs including damages.

The song ‘Night Changes’ was released by One Direction in 2014 and featured on their fourth studio album “Four.”

The claim, which was denied, was against the four current members of the band Niall Horan, Harry Styles, Liam Payne and Louis Tomlinson, and Zayn Malik who left One Direction in 2015.

The claim was also against parties including UK songwriter Jamie Scott and US songwriters Julian Bunetta and John Ryan who wrote and produced ‘Night Changes’.

The other defendants were Simco, the production company behind The X Factor; Big Deal Music, a publishing company that in 2013 Ryan allegedly signed a contract with; Universal Music Publishing; EMI Music Publishing and Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd.

OneDirectionVEVO / YouTube

The case was briefly mentioned before the High Court on Thursday. 

Justice Leonie Reynolds was due to fix a date for the hearing of a pretrial discovery motion brought by lawyers acting for the plaintiff.

However, the court was informed that hearing date was not required and with the consent of all the parties the entire proceedings could be struck out

View 12 comments
Close
12 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds