Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE MASSIVE MISTAKE that saw La La Land being named best film by mistake will dominate the headlines, but there was a political edge to last night’s Oscars ceremony.
Last year, several black screen stars boycotted the ceremony, citing a lack of diversity after minorities weren’t represented among the nominations in the best actor and actress, and best supporting actor and actress categories.
This year, from the host’s opening monologue to some of the victory speeches, issues of diversity and current political events got a wide airing at the awards ceremony.
Ruth Negga
Irish actress Ruth Negga, who missed out on the best actress gong to Emma Stone, sported a blue ribbon on her dress in support of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
The ACLU represented the woman that Negga portrayed in the film, Loving, in the landmark 1967 Supreme Court Case that saw Mildred Loving fight against her incarceration for marrying a white man.
Jimmy Kimmel
The host of the Oscars used his platform to make a string of pointed political statements in his opening speech.
I want to say thank you to President Trump. I mean, remember last year when it seemed like the Oscars were racist?
Mel Gibson’s film Hacksaw Ridge was nominated for a few awards, and Kimmel referenced one of Gibson’s most famous roles in another section of his monologue, when he said that people had been telling him that he needs to unite people with his speech.
Let’s just get something straight off the top: I can’t do that. There’s only one Braveheart in this room and he’s not going to unite us either.
He added that the Oscars were being broadcast in “225 countries that now hate us”, and expressed his relief that French Oscar nominee Isabelle Huppert was allowed into the country by Homeland Security.
He also said that he was surprised that Trump hadn’t tweeted about the Oscars yet, so sent him one of his own.
He then added a reference to Meryl Streep’s recent criticism of Trump, by complimenting her dress and asking “Is that an Ivanka?”
Using the platform
Several stars used the platform of the Oscars stage to issue messages embracing diversity and rejecting any form of division.
Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal came on stage to introduce the nominees for best animated feature, but instead chose to make a statement on current relations between his home country and the US.
I’m against any form of wall that wants to separate us.
The President of the Academy, Cheryl Boone Isaacs, echoed this speech saying that films aren’t for any single person, and are meant for all, in a clear reference to the furore over a lack of diversity in recent years.
She said that “art has no borders” and that it “does not belong to a single faith”.
Iranian filmmaker Asghar Farhadi, who won an award for “The Salesman”, did not attend the ceremony.
He didn’t even travel to the United States because of the travel ban, but sent a speech to be read out on his behalf.
Dividing the world into the us and our enemies categories creates fear. [Filmmakers] create empathy between us and others, an empathy we need today more than ever.
Director Ava DuVernay, whose film 13 was nominated for best documentary, tweeted a message of support for Trayvon Martin, the teenager shot in a Florida neighbourhood on the same day five years ago.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Can anyone that voted to keep this house of failed politicians please enlighten me on why they did so?
@Sean: promises of reform and great things to follow, didn’t happen, we were treated to more of the same craziness afterwards.
@Sean: gravy train rolling
@Sean: very few understood the ballot paper which was very confusing
@Ross: Highly original and thought provoking.
@Sean: That’s not what the Seanad is for and a lot of the people there are not failed party politicians at all. Which it is why it is there in the first place.
Study up on your history or just Google it
Either that house should be a national election or get rid of it. It’s not democratic in the national sense.
@Laughable: We had a referendum on 4th Oct 2013 with the proposition being to abolish the Seanad as promised by then Taoiseach Enda Kenny. Only 39% the electorate turned out to vote and the proposal was defeated 52% to 48%.!
Seanad later promised to reform … but meanwhile neither the Dail or Seanad gave the reformation much of priority as there were always bigger issues to concentrate on….
But we got our chance to change it, approx 1 Million decided to have a say and two million decided to stay at home!
It cannot be abolished without amending our constitution, personally I prefer if we kept it but it needs a radical transformation… and everyone should have a vote ! …not just a privileged few ; county councillors and graduates of NUI ..and of all those less than 50K even vote.
@XvSv: And BTW whether we like or not the Seanad has to be re-constituted in the coming 2 weeks or else the Dail cannot pass any new legislation on anything including Covid19 crisis … unless less it also approved by the Seanad . Both houses of the Oireachtas must pass legislation before the President can sign it into law …. under our Constitution of 1937…that’s the reality things right now…
So we just have to hold our noses and suck it up for now …
hopefully this can be radically reformed by time the next Seanad Election happens ….which should be 2024/2025 ….unless of course we have an early general election for the Dail before then..
@XvSv: horse 5hite nonsense of the highest order. Top drawer twit talk as all rules to wriggle out have left the room now and the action is a forced response to an non fiscal catastrophe which they don’t understand
@Agenda21: your post is incomprehensible compared to xlsv although I admire your top drawer twit talk comment. Did you board with Boris in Eton?
@XvSv: Another every person vote takes away its reason for being formed in the first place. You would then have two competing houses like in the US.
The reasons behind its formation are still valid but reform is needed and is being worked upon.
It should be postponed until this emergency is over.
@Des Doran: Think.
@Des Doran: no Seanad, no legislation, no way of legislating anything during a crisis. That’s a pretty stupid way of thinking, to suggest that we should abandon government during a time when government is urgently needed.
@Des Doran: constitutionally it can’t be postponed. The Seanad must be dissolved not later than 90 days after the Dail is dissolved, and I think yesterday was the 90 days, hence the old Seanad is now dissolved and the count, and hence new seanad, today
@Brian Ó Dálaigh: I think your way of thinking is a bit silly.
Where did he say it would be shut down?
Just keep the current members there until this is over. As they have been members for a few years and presumably been briefed extensively on the pandemic, why would we want new people entering who have to be briefed again?
@milton friedman: my way of thinking is silly? It’s called the Law, Milton. He said it should be postponed. As it will be outside the 90 day constitutional requirement, it would then be automatically dissolved. That’s the same as being shut if no one is there. “Keep the current members there until it is over.” That’s the problem. That’s illegal and unconstitutional. We can’t just “keep the current members there” as any legislation they put their hands to would instantly be rendered void.
Considering the state of the country at the moment,and the fact that nothing can be challenged, would it not be morally correct to pass no motions,legislation or declarations that are not in the immediate intrest of the state of the nation?…
It’s already restricted to a small minority of voters.
People voted to keep the Seanad. You need it to process legislation. Laws needed to protect and look after us in this pandemic.So enough guff about why is this process necessary.
Or the usual brigade of FFG 100 years, all politicians snout in trough, SF have a divine right to be in Government and sure the politicos just do as their medicos tell them. Let’s take Italy. In power some 5 STAR MOVEMENT founded by a comedian and the Northern League pursuing an Italy first anti immigration populist politics. What can go wrong when you empower neophyte? Funeral directors threatening withdrawal of services as they are overwhelmed. We need a stable government now.
This has a way to run. We can’t have another election now given the circumstances. Each TD has an equal vote and mandated it now.
@David Glynn: FFG took a hammering at the election because of their failure to rein in banks, refusing to pay heroes in the HSE a decent salary while wasting hundreds of millions annually through mismanagement with the intention of privatisation, let people loose their homes after a recession by inviting unregulated vulture funds into Ireland and letting rent get so costly our youth will never be able to save for a mortgage with intentions of privatisation while giving the banks 20 years charitable tax status, put our children in dept and then hit us with the USC “temporarily”. Says a lot to see the resources, money and caretaker on show now when their hand is forced. Especially considering the last election
@Agenda21: Bull. Thank God we had a booming economy and full employment to fall back on and rainy day fund.
Your privatisation argument is just stupid. We have a private profitable sector and no one would buy a HSE which gobbles money.
@David Glynn: there is no such thing as Full employment especially when the figures are false through government manipulation David as you well know
@Agenda21: Are you for real. Anything less than 5% is full employment. That includes those changing jobs and those who you maybe simpatico with who would prefer to scratcher stay and sponge off the rest of us.
@David Glynn: you mean the people on the dole but forced into slave labour while claiming social benefits being included in your fantastic full employment mantra
@David Glynn: water, health, big business and property… Are you having a laugh at the hard pressed electorate in your vested interest posts or are you simply simple
@David Glynn: privatisation = so let the public section of health care collapse and forse us all to pay for medical intervention to survive in your classist utopia. Can’t pay, no stay. NICE
@Agenda21: We’ll leave it that. You haven’t a clue.
No such thing as a full stomach either
@Agenda21: Are you clueless. Nobody in their right mind would favour a public health service that was not robust.
If people want to pay for private insurance then that’s their right.
They do it because they want to avoid to be in queues
You are completely off the beam.
@David Glynn: but private health insurance should be a choice not a mandatory survival aspect of life.. Please explain to us all why we pay tax within the European Union yet pay VAT on cars and no competition in banks and insurance, would that be because the magic circle must not be broken at all costs David?
@David Glynn: The figures are false and if you dont realise that you really believe the spin. In the disability community our unemployment rate is 46% and thats even tweaked with putting people on invalidity pensions until they are OAPs. They then stop being disabled and are just OAPS. Thats why the Persons With Disabilities is one of the lowest in the EU.
@Gary Kearney: Up the 3% employment target to 5% in the public sector. Simple as. Also police benifit ystem better. A lot of people on disability who are well capable of work are milking the system.
And we all know at least one. Problems with ” nerves”.
They are reducing the pot for the genuinely disabled.
Seanad = Democracy for privaleged.
Suits FFG..
@Willy Mc Entire: = ignorant of the Seanad and its reason for being formed.
“…..about 1169”
Screwed as usual
Everything has changed; this process must be adjourned generally.
@Pat Coyne: but then we could not pass any emergency legislation, even dealing with Covid-19. Our entire government’s hands would be tied and we would have no way of legally reacting to any event in what is a fast-changing situation.
@Brian Ó Dálaigh: Adjourn does not mean abolish.
@Pat Coyne: So ignore the constitution, do that once and its a slippery road to hell
@Pat Coyne: no, but adjourning beyond the 90 day term limit (today) automatically abolishes it. You’ve spouted off an opinion without the slightest understanding of our political structure. Imagine if we “adjourned” it as you say. All legislation by the Dáil MUST pass through the Seanad. As these members would be outside their term limit, every single piece of legislation would be rendered null and void from this point on, meaning the government would not be able to pass a single piece of Covid-19 legislation. Educate yourself, please.
A bunch of gombeens with there snouts in the trough….totally undemocratic…..
@Michael Hanley: Have you ever seen the great work some of the Senators do and the causes they bring to the public realm.
I know the work a lot of them have done for the vulnerable sections of our society.
Is this the same Seanad that Enda Kenny promised to get rid of once he became leader of the country!!!
@Mike Breathnach: there was a referendum and people voted to keep it. Nobody can abolish it.
@Mike Breathnach: He said it would go to an constitutional amendment and it did and it was kept. He wanted rid of it as it had caused his government all sorts of problems by doing its job properly
There are some politicians that wanted the Seanad gone are now trying to get elected.
How many homes would be built with the cost of this waste of space
have your say