We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
LAST UPDATE | 4 Nov 2022
FORMER PAKISTAN PRIME minister Imran Khan has accused his successor of involvement in a plot to kill him as he recovered in hospital from gunshot wounds following an assassination attempt.
Khan told reporters that Shehbaz Sharif, who replaced him as premier following a vote of no confidence in April, masterminded the attack along with Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah and a senior army commander.
“These three decided to kill me,” Khan said in his first public appearance since yesterday’s shooting, adding that two gunmen were involved.
The government has denied any part, and blamed the assassination attempt on a lone assailant fueled by religious extremism.
The attack on Khan’s convoy killed one man and wounded at least 10, significantly raising the stakes in a political crisis that has gripped the South Asian nation since Khan’s ousting.
The 70-year-old former international cricket star had been leading a campaign convoy of thousands since last week from Lahore to the capital Islamabad.
Sitting in a wheelchair — his right leg in a cast and left leg heavily bandaged — Khan spoke for over an hour, railing against the government and establishment he accuses of unseating him.
He said his opponents wanted to accuse him of “desecrating religion, or desecrating the prophet” and would then blame a religious extremist for killing him.
Khan offered no evidence to support his claims.
Sanaullah had earlier said the attack was “a very clear case of religious extremism”.
The suspect in police custody, named by Punjab government officials as Naveed Ahmad, said in a video leaked by police to the media that Khan was “misleading the public”.
He added he was angry with Khan’s noisy convoy for interrupting the call to prayer that summons Muslims to the mosque five times a day.
Khan was looking out at the crowd when bullets were sprayed at his modified container truck as it slowly inched through a thick crowd in Wazirabad, around 170 kilometres (105 miles) east of Islamabad.
“Bullets hit my leg, and when I was falling there was another burst,” Khan told reporters.
“There were two men. Had they synchronised well, I would have not survived.
“One of them was caught and he is being touted as a religious fanatic. He was not a religious fanatic — there was an elaborate plan behind this.”
Threats
Naveed Ahmad, the man in custody, comes from a poor village near the rally site where Khan was shot.
Neighbours told AFP the father was a “simple boy” with no obvious religious or political leanings.
Pakistan has long grappled with Islamist militancy, with right-wing religious groups having huge sway over the population.
Khan has previously been accused of stoking religious sentiments to broaden his support base.
Pakistan has been no stranger to assassination attempts during decades of political instability, and the powerful military has led the country several times.
Pakistan’s first prime minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, was shot dead at a rally in Rawalpindi in 1951.
Another former prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, was killed in 2007 when a huge bomb detonated near her vehicle as she greeted supporters in the city of Rawalpindi.
‘I’ll hit the streets again’
Khan was booted from office in April by a no-confidence vote after defections by some of his coalition partners, but he retains huge support.
He was voted into power in 2018 on an anti-corruption platform by an electorate tired of dynastic politics, but his mishandling of the economy — and falling out with a military accused of helping his rise — sealed his fate.
Since then, he has railed against the establishment and Sharif’s government, which he says was imposed on Pakistan by a “conspiracy” involving the United States.
Khan and Sharif have for months traded bitter accusations of corruption and incompetence, raising the political temperature in a nation that is frequently at boiling point.
Khan said he would resume his so-called “long march” on the capital when he had recovered from his wounds.
“One bullet hit the upper part of my leg, one bullet passed near my main artery and another stopped near it,” he said, calling his survival “mercy from Allah”.
“The day I’m well, I’ll hit the streets again.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
That’s right, now hand it over to KPMG.
Irish Nationwide’s fine auditors.
So that they can shred all the dodgy paperwork.
Thats the scary part..they just put KPMG in charge of whats left of Anglo who is currently after Quinn. Talk about a recipe for Disaster. while I don’t have any love for Quinn or the quinn group did not journalist go and ask quinn what he thought of prom night or is he rubbing his hands together Mr Burns style…excellent….
The fox is in charge of the hen house. Surely kpmg are being investigated for for possible criminal practice, never mind civil actions for the apparent incompetent manner in which the audited the books, and they have now been given control of, not just the evidence, but decisions to further civil actions.
We need to look at the possibility of corruption here, incompetence is unbelievable.
I can actually smell the bullshit gloating down my broadband line Michael ,
Nobody believes a word U say
Even if its true theyll be sorted with another job in a week or two.
Sean
I presume the “Michael” you were referring to is Mr Noonan and your point is that he is somehow pleased that the CEO of the IBRC is to receive only Statutory redundance levels. What sort of sense is there in that comment ?
500 grand a year he was on …he won’t go hungry.
Given that they squandered hundreds of millions of our money, they should be behind bars instead of Paul Begley.
With Paul Begley I would think
Yeh but statutory minimum could half a million p.a. With a hefty pension
If you believe he gets two weeks pay off then Im daffy duck.
Such Bull. I suppose you will be calling for all redundant workers to get the statutory minimumnext
What are you on about. My point is his statutory minimum will be far higher than you or i.
Les
Goodbye and hello Daffy!
The piece outlines that the statutory amount is capped at €600 per week, meaning his statutory minimum termination payment is €3,600.
As regards his statutory notice period: Aynsley has been working at IBRC since 2008, meaning he is entitled only to two weeks’ notice (or pay in lieu of his notice) of termination. This would work out at around €19,200.
Diseased Snake Pit.
The Decaying, Pestilence Ridden, Stinking, Zombie, Corpse Of Anglo and Irish Nationwide.
Thanks to our “Fine Governments” This €55 Billion Stink Will Remain With Us For a Half A Century if Not Longer.
Europuppet Stoogeens!!
@ Les
Its capped at 600 per week at 2 weeks per year of service. This is the law. They will not be paid anymore.
Fully aware what it is Orion. But with such a state this countries in and the fact there’s something New everyday, it wouldn’t surprise ye if they got a massive pay off.
What the piece fails to mention is that while Noonan is spinning it as these senior managers will get the same as the other staff..2 weeks per year and patting himself on the back the reality is that the 600+ normal workers who were not on stupid salaries over 100k and were promised 4 weeks per year if they stayed until IBRC was wound down are only getting 2 weeks instead of the promised 4 that was agreed. So they will lose out more than any of these managers, while the figures look huge for the managers the publics perception is great stuff no big pay-offs for the fat cats, the reality is no little pay-offs for the innocent everyday staff.
Severance pay???
This €55 Billion Filth Hole should have been allowed to go bust from day 1.
There are Millions people in our country more deserving of this taxpayer money.
Id say Les you will be hugely dissapointed if they only get the minimum.
That’s what the law says, but what about his contract? We’ve seen all these dodgy contracts before. If he just gets statutory it will be an historic first.
Surprised yes disappointed no Sean.
@censored
It will not be a historic first as you put it. Evertime a company is put into liquidation everday in this country, then all employment contracts are void. There is no room for secret pay-offs or anything like that. The law is there, KPMG are hardly going to break the law at their own cost, are they?
Not at their own cost. I would love to see a committee of inspection put in place representing the creditors, to insure a fair winding up is carried out in the interest of the creditors.
The committee are paid by the creditors, and meet the receiver once a month to review his work and authorise expenditure, as well as having access to all his work
I bet his pension will be tweaked and fortified so that he doesn’t lose out, and with some quickly created add on special input accumulator processes he comes out on top.
Nice to see The Republic’s Biggest Mistake Ever coming to an abrupt end for the overpaid ‘top dogs’.
Fair play to Aynsley, he’s probably a decent guy and was hired into the moronic set-up.
I question Alan Dukes suitability as Chairman if he couldn’t see from the start that this was a doomed money train for a pointless purpose that could be wrapped up with the stroke of a pen.
I’m not convinced this was the right move by the goverment, ofc it was a popular move as shown but I can see this causing issues down the line, with court case’s againest some major players like Quinn ect in the works rocking the cradle like this could cause issues in the long run, vital info lost or something overlooked or misplaced. I know its sounds like a conspiracy theroy but time will tell, I could see the whole quinn fiasco blowing up in the goverments faces and guess who will have to repay everything back to quinn if its shown there was negligence in the state’s dealings with Quinn and company.
@ Derek Boyle, excellent point unfortunately. The individual in charge if the entire Quinn and other related litigation declined the offer of staying on as a consultant and immense knowledge is now lost. My primary concern is that this development greatly diminishes the prospect of partial recovery from the Quinns. From a litigation perspective, it was a less than ideal move.
There may be other costs and losses which will swallow up more than the eur 8 billion, not 20 billion saved and that is not to mention the danger of protracted deflationary consequences.
I remain unconvinced that this was a sensible and prudent move. Only time will tell but there are no winnings yet on this to be banked, if you will pardon that expression.
Good riddance to fat cats. They squandered hundreds of millions of OUR money following QUinn when the legitimacy of the debt has yet to be ruled on. And to think that all of this could have been avoided if the Quinn Proposal which would have saved thousands of jobs and paid the State 2.8billion euros, had not been inappropriately discarded. You could not make this up and its no wonder that Martina Devlin mixes up fact and fiction.
Peter, IBRC has control of Quinn assets and companies in the UK, Ireland, Poland, Turkey, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Sweden, Cyprus as well as some assets in Ukraine and Russia. In addition they have control of the Quinn Group and own 49% of Liberty Insurance. I am sure even IBRC can get a “partial” recovery with all these assets.
@ Tom, the new legislation is potentially vulnerable to three Constitutional law challenges and one procedural weakness. Add to this the fact that the leader of the recovery group has left. That loses a lot of legacy knowledge. I am partially reassurd that you are so confident and I truly hope that my apprehensions are misplaced. We will see.
i see rusty9 is STILL peddling the bullshit that the quinn proposal was “inappropriately discarded”….the facts admitted by Sean Quinn himself are that he had done wrong in handling funds in the insurance company and had to rightly step down as chairman of quinn insurance as a result….it is inconceivable that the state could then have agreed to allow him re take control , get significant additional funding given to the group and not pay intereest for 8 years on the promise that they could repay the 2bn due – which of course he now claims is not his debt anyway- but he was willing to repay it in FULL…..seriously you have got to stop peddling that nonsense….its just not credible.
We know what they are entitled to but what will they get?
Eric
They will get what the Minister and the Law permits. Are you suggesting that the administer is lying and will break the Law?
You might say that, but I could not possibly comment.
He might make a new law?
Kpmg told us , a short few days before the collapse, that’ll was ok in Nationwide, they should never have been appointed.
Interesting to see what these people are entitled to. Compare this with failed politicians who lose their seats or resign them. That’s ENTITLED.
Good point
yippee dippy doo dah… big swinging meeehaul..! are we sposed to be consoled by that michael noonan??
I think you’ll find he was answering a question so I don’t he gave much consideration to your need for consolation…
it was rhetorical on my behalf ciaran
Sounds like there’ll soon be a new highest earning portner in KPMG.
I want to see the people who corruptly/criminally ran Anglo and Irish Nationwide in Jail,
along with Denis Casey and Gillian Bowler from PTSB and all the other Schiesters in PTSB, BOI, AIB, EBS.
I want to see the bosses from Ulster Bank and all the other foreign banks prosecuted and jailed for their acts of financial terrorism against the Irish People.
Then this private debt from these private criminal organizations must be written off.
Do yess not believe the minister
Of course they will
Am i the only person who believes that the fat cats in Anglo should recieve no payment for been made redundant.It was only a few weeks ago that the chairman defended the high wages of staff in the bank as they were winding down the bank annd were in his words the only group of employees that were making themselves redundant,So why should we the tax payer have to now stump up a redundancy package for people who were earing obscene wages in a bankrupt bank that we paid to rescue and who knew that they were eventually making themself redundant….
Fair enough Michael ….but what will super Mario say ?
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say