Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Youtube/Screengrab

'Anti-Pantigate' bill tabled in the Dáil to stop "the litigious and thin-skinned"

Stephen Donnelly says that he feels broadcasters are already being more cautious as a result of the controversy.

INDEPENDENT TD STEPHEN Donnelly has tabled a bill which aims to remove the the term “offence” from the Broadcasting Act as he believes its inclusion can be used to “gag free speech”.

Donnelly told the Dáil this afternoon that he is introducing the bill in the wake of the Pantigate controversy which he says, along with the current legislation, has already caused broadcasters to “err on the side of caution”.

“I don’t believe people should be censored for saying offensive things, whether or not that offence is reasonably taken or not,” the Wicklow TD told deputies.

The legislation in its current form gags free speech, harms public debate and means broadcasters can be bullied by the litigious and thin-skinned.

The TD referenced the letter from RTÉ’s head of television Glen Killane to staff explaining the rationale behind the station’s payout to the Iona Institute as evidence of how the current rules restrict broadcasters.

The TD said that it has been suggested in the media that Minister for Communications Pat Rabbitte is considering amending the act so that it instead refers to “reasonable offence”. He argued that this would still “hamstring broadcasters” and wants no reference at all to “offence” in the Broadcasting Act.

The private members bill would change the current wording of paragraph (d) of the Broadcasting Act 2009 from:

anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm or offence, or as being likely to promote, or incite to, crime or as tending to undermine the authority of the State, is not broadcast by the broadcaster

to:

anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm, or as being likely to promote, or incite to, crime or as tending to undermine the authority of the State, is not broadcast by the broadcaster.

Donnelly argues that his suggestion “removes just two words from the Broadcasting Act” and would “immediately fix one of the biggest flaws in the legislation”.

Taoiseach Enda Kenny said that the Government was not opposing the bill’s entrance to the house and would be looked at by Minister Rabbitte.

Read: Priest says Iona Institute didn’t handle homophobia debate well >

Column: RTÉ thinks it played safe on Pantigate, I beg to differ – Damien Kiberd >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
66 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Catherine Mayock
    Favourite Catherine Mayock
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 2:12 PM

    I hope and pray that something comes from this renewed search. She has been one of the missing too long. And the agony her family is going through is horrendous.

    487
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Castalla Villas
    Favourite Castalla Villas
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 2:31 PM

    Someone other than the person responsible knows the truth of what happened to Fiona and they should come forward with the information. There is no reason whatsoever why anyone should protect such an animal.

    307
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute 3monkey
    Favourite 3monkey
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 2:35 PM

    How do you know that ?

    35
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Hagin Meade
    Favourite John Hagin Meade
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 7:13 PM

    @Mary Costello:

    Again I say Mary that if somehow, new evidence is uncovered that leads to a new suspect that you are unaware of and that this suspect is subsequently found guilty in court, it could prove difficult for you. I am not trying to discredit you, only asking you, for your own sake, to be careful making accusations that only the perpetuator or close contact could possibly know, beyond reasonable doubt. If those that you implicate are indeed found guilty then you may be considered to have withheld evidence. Without wanting to sound rude, please “make sure brain is in gear before operating mouth”.

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mike Clinton
    Favourite Mike Clinton
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 6:24 PM

    With every fibre of my being I hope there is closure for Fiona’s family and it might lead to others like Jojo Dollard and Annie McCarrick.

    227
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Monica Meighan
    Favourite Monica Meighan
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 7:34 PM

    Why is this girl referred to by her. Surname and not by her Christian name all thru the
    Report ,very disrespectful not only to her But to her. Family

    100
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Trevor Hayden
    Favourite Trevor Hayden
    Report
    Dec 4th 2014, 2:34 PM

    Fingers crossed

    95
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds