We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
LAST UPDATE | 26 May 2022
THREE CONSERVATIVE MPS have demanded Boris Johnson’s resignation for the first time following the publication of Sue Gray’s report into Covid-19 breaches inside Downing Street.
Tory MPs David Simmonds and John Baron urged the Prime Minister to step down on Thursday, adding their names to the growing discontentment towards the party leader.
Johnson “apologised in person” to cleaning and security staff in Number 10 who were treated poorly during partygate, a minister has confirmed to MPs.
Commons Leader Mark Spencer also told MPs that the Prime Minister had “addressed the culture” within Number 10 following the publication of the Sue Gray report.
The report into parties at the heart of Government during the Covid pandemic lockdowns revealed that security staff had been mocked by those revelling in Number 10, and cleaners had to deal with wine stains and vomit.
At Business Questions, Spencer told MPs: “I am glad that Sue Gray has finally managed to get her report out there.
“I think it does identify the challenges that were ongoing in Number 10, but I think it also – as the Prime Minister made clear – he has addressed the culture within Number 10, he has changed the senior management team.
“I think he was also shocked, as many colleagues would be, by the treatment of security and cleaning staff.
“That is why the Prime Minister yesterday personally went around and apologised in person to those security and cleaning teams on behalf of those people who were rude to those people. I think that was the right thing to do.”
Spencer added: “He has made it clear that the culture has now changed within Number 10 and what the Prime Minister is now doing, he is focused on what matters to the British people, which is the global fight against inflation, Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, and making sure our constituents’ priorities are the Government’s priorities as they always have been.”
Shadow Commons leader Thangam Debbonaire had said it was “particularly sickening to learn of the total lack of respect and poor treatment of security staff, being mocked, and cleaners being left to mop up”.
She asked: “Could the Leader clarify if any of those who mocked staff are special advisers? If so has the Prime Minister sacked them and if not, why not?”
Debbonaire also called on the Commons Leader to reveal “whether anyone in Government received a copy of Sue Gray’s report in advance of its publication” or “whether they attempted to change it”.
SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart called for a debate on the Sue Gray report and “the appalling culture in Number 10”.
He said: “The Prime Minister might think that moving on at lightning speed to do something he could have and should have done weeks ago on the cost-of-living crisis will make this go away, but it won’t. It simply won’t go away.
“Our constituents are utterly furious, and they’re simply not satisfied with his mealy mouthed apologies and this drivel about being humbled. They want us to debate, they want us to debate why it’s OK for Number 10 to have these parties to say goodbye to employees but no other workplace in this country was offered that facility.”
He added: “The people of the United Kingdom want this Prime Minister gone and in democratic countries, what usually happens is that people get their way.”
Spencer replied: “He says this is the one topic that everybody wants to debate. I think that my experience is that people are sick and tired of hearing about this.
“They want the Government to be focused on actually what matters to them.”
***
Backbencher Julian Sturdy had begun the trickle of fresh voices demanding Johnson’s exit after the damning inquiry from the senior civil servant was published yesterday.
The 60-page report detailed events at which officials drank so much they were sick, sang karaoke, became involved in altercations and abused security and cleaning staff at a time when millions of people across the country were unable to see friends and family.
A total of 19 Tory MPs have so far publicly called for his resignation, with many critics of Johnson holding back due to the war in Ukraine.
Under Conservative Party rules, there must be a vote on the Prime Minister’s future if 54 MPs write to the chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee, Sir Graham Brady, saying they have lost confidence in their leader.
But the public calls do not equate to formal letters being submitted to Sir Graham. The total number of letters which have been sent to the committee is also kept secret, meaning it is unclear how many the chairman has received.
Meanwhile, Downing Street’s chief of staff said the Prime Minister has made a “significant change” to No 10 by shaking up his team and apologising for the lockdown-busting events.
Steve Barclay said he and Johnson were both “shocked” and “appalled” by the report’s findings after it was issued yesterday, nearly a week after the Metropolitan Police concluded its investigation.
The force handed out 126 fines for rule breaches in No 10 and Whitehall, with the Prime Minister receiving a single fixed-penalty notice for his birthday party in June 2020.
In a statement, Simmonds, the MP for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner, said: “I listened to what the Prime Minister had to say at Prime Minister’s Questions, his statement and the 1922 Committee yesterday following the publication of the Sue Gray report.
“Having reflected on what he said, and the views of the constituents and my Conservative association, it is clear that while the Government and our policies enjoy the confidence of the public, the Prime Minister does not.
“Accordingly, it is time for him to step down so that new leadership can take forward the important work of the Government in ensuring that our people and country prosper.”
Minutes earlier, Baron accused Johnson of misleading Parliament, and said he “no longer enjoys my support.”
“Given the scale of rule-breaking in No 10, I can not accept that the Prime Minister was unaware,” he said in a statement on his website.
“Therefore, his repeated assurances in Parliament that there was no rule-breaking is simply not credible.
“Having always said I would consider all the available evidence before deciding, I’m afraid the Prime Minister no longer enjoys my support – I can no longer give him the benefit of the doubt.”
Former minister Tobias Ellwood has also been repeating his challenge to Tory colleagues to oust their leader.
Barclay, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said he and Johnson were “shocked and appalled” by Gray’s report, in particular around how cleaning staff were treated.
He told Sky News: “We had an all-staff meeting yesterday in Downing Street further to that.
“It is why we’ve had so many changes in terms of both myself going into Downing Street, the permanent secretary, a new director of communication, a new principal private secretary, it’s why we put procedures now in place.
“We were appalled. That’s why the Prime Minister apologised, it’s why he went to the House of Commons. He said how humbled he was to read about what had happened.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Cue the Stoners defending drug use and wanting it legalised.
@Abdul Abhaile: Can you give one good reason why it should remain illegal?
@Tomaldo: Did you even bother reading the article and you want a reason why it should remain illegal?
Jeez, Stoner’s brains really are wired differently.
@Abdul Abhaile: I read it twice. Jim Walsh (Dept of Health) said we should treat it a as health issue, not justice, the guy from Portugal said we’ll never have a drugs free society and there never has been. 6 out of 10 deaths were caused by benzodiazepenes (legal), twice as many as cocaine, 3 out 10 Methadone (legal) and more from prescription drugs. There are no plans to ban any of them and rightly so. Can I have some of what you’re smoking.
@Abdul Abhaile: btw you didn’t answer my question, you mentioned the article which backs up my opinion that they should be legal.
@Abdul Abhaile: the only thing stoner, is your Stone Age attitude . Why not suggest burnings at the stake or tarring and feathering .
Alcohol poses more danger .. oh wait, but they are well looked after by lobbyists
Why are so many resorting to drug taking, are their lives so miserable that they are trying to escape reality some of the time. Past generations suffered wars, sickness, hunger , poverty lack of opportunity , forced emigration and they coped , what’s wrong with people. Why do they think it’s ok to make criminals rich by buying the stuff.
@Aine O Connor: they didn’t cope, they used alcohol, drugs , food , sex and lots of other things to take away the pain . Drug use isn’t some new thing, drug use has been around as long as humans have been around
@Aine O Connor: they didn’t cope, they used alcohol, drugs , food , sex and lots of other things to take away the pain . Drug use isn’t some new thing, drug use has been around as long as humans have been around Cee
@Aine O Connor: Enjoyment is the reason. I don’t think it’s ok to make criminals rich, that’s why I’d love to see legalisation tried.
@Aine O Connor: Many of the addicts you walk past in the city every day are child abuse victims. Children of generations of abuse victim unfit parents, etc. It’s a part of our cultural heritage.
@Aine O Connor: This is a reflection of the vast minority, the majority of recreational users move on with their lives.
While speaking, an individual proposed that only those with expertise in the field should have a say, and the issue should not be politicized. However, I respectfully disagree, as it is a crucial political matter.
Must be FG FF and The Greens fault that people use cocaine and heroin
@Peter: well their policies have directly lead to deprivation, criminality increasing and all the things that make up the ingredients of drug misuse.. so yes FFG are directly responsible. Martin and Varadkar do not give two hoots about us Irish
The reason why cannabis was made illegal was by fake news by the rich newspaper magnets in America long ago who owned forests so they could print their papers and didn’t want the hemp plant to be used
No one has ever died from a cannabis over dose, yet because it remains illegal in this country it gets first mention in terms of toxins found. The language around this is almost embarrassingly bias, especially when “excluding those attributable to alcohol alone”… completely ridiculous, propaganda almost.
Funny how alcohol is left out of the debate, the biggest killer of them all. Your a criminal for smoking a joint at home but its OK to drink 10 pints and fall around the streets abusing people. Hardly an independent forum either with the make up of the panel. People take drugs including the biggest of them all booze because they enjoy them. We should be concentrating on making them safe, ensuring kids don’t get their hand on them (although we failed on the alcohol front) and having controlled sale via head shops where the state will get tax from the sale of same and at the same time take the market away from the mafia.
The report clearly refers to the cause of such deaths as poisonings, converting them to overdoses is wrong and inaccurate. If someone injests Paraguay,for example, intentionally or accidentally it is not an overdose.
@Pato: agree, they are just inflating the figures to justify their forgone conclusion.
Judge’s are putting dealers back on the street with lenient sentences. Time to cut the head off the snake.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say