Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Should you don a beret and think in French the next time you play chess? dsb nola via Flickr/Creative Commons

People think more rationally in a foreign language

However lead author tells TheJournal.ie that people should not necessarily make important financial decisions in their second tongue.

PEOPLE THINK MORE rationally in their second, less familiar language, according to a new study.

Looking at the decision making processes of bilinguals, a team of  psychologists at the University of Chicago found that the extra work of thinking and speaking in a foreign tongue makes people more reliant on unconscious, automatic mental processes.

This is because our decisions are often heavily influenced by the emotions surrounding the words we read or hear in our first language. However, this bias is removed when we use a language that is less familiar to us.

“We demonstrated that some biases are reduced when made in a foreign language,” Boaz Keysar told TheJournal.ie. “That could suggest in some situations you would be less biased and make more benefical decisions” he added.

However, he cautioned against people making important financial or investment decisions in a second tongue.

Keysar and his research team randomly assigned a problem solving task to  a group of bilinguals in one of the two languages they knew.

Everyone in the group started by reading the following scenario:

Recently, a dangerous new disease has been going around. Without medicine, 600,000 people will die from it. In order to save these people, two types of medicine are being made.

Some people then read…

If you choose Medicine A, 200,000 people will be saved.

If you choose Medicine B, there is a 33.3% chance that 600,000 people will be saved and a 66.6% chance that no one will be saved.

Which medicine do you choose?

While others read…

If you choose Medicine A, 400,000 people will die.

If you choose Medicine B, there is a 33.3% chance no one will die and a 66.6% chance that 600,000 people will die.

Both scenarios give the same result. However, because the question has been framed differently, the decisions people made were different.

This is because the first question is referred to in terms of ‘gains’, while the second one is referred to in terms of losses. And because people are more risk averse when things are termed to them in terms of gains and losses, when they were presented with the problem in their native tongue, 77% of people preferred medicine A in the first scenario. Meanwhile, 47% of people took  medicine A in the second scenario.

However, when people made the decision in a foreign tongue, Medicine A was chosen equally as much regardless of whether people were given the first or second scenario.

Whether this means you should start using Irish or French in your daily decision making processes has yet to be seen.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 12 comments
Close
12 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds