Take our survey • Win a prize
Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The Old Bakery Site at Cross Guns Bridge in Phibsborough, Dublin. Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie

Developer seeks permission for almost 200 apartments on site of old bakery in Phibsborough

A previous planning permission decision for the site was quashed by the High Court.

A DEVELOPER HAS sought planning permission to build almost 200 apartments in buildings up to 12 storeys in height on the site of an old bakery in Phibsborough, Co. Dublin, after a previous decision was quashed by the High Court.

Bindford Limited has submitted a Large-scale Residential Development (LRD) application to Dublin City Council to build 196 apartments.

This will include 118 build-to-sell apartments and 78 build-to-rent apartments at 113 Phibsborough Road, which is also known as the Old Bakery Site.

The build-to-sell apartments will include 58 one-bed and 60 two-bed apartments.

The build-to-rent will be made up of 52 studio, 22 one-bed and four two-bed apartments.

The proposed development will be located at Cross Guns Bridge along the Royal Canal.

The development will include the demolition of the existing buildings on the site which are connected with the old bakery and have been derelict for over 35 years, and replacing them with three apartment blocks.

Two of the block will reach seven storeys with the remaining block being 12 storeys in height.

Bindford was previously granted planning permission in May 2021 by An Bord Pleanála (ABP) for a Strategic Housing Development (SHD) of 205 build-to-rent apartments on the site.

The planning permission was strongly contested by local residents, who took a judicial review to the High Court against the ABP decision.

ABP withdrew from the case earlier this year, and the planning permission decision was overturned.

In a 200-page planning report compiled by Brenda Butterly acting for consultants McGill Planning, it is argued that while the planning permission was quashed, the original ABP decision showed that the “principle of redevelopment of this site for residential is acceptable in principle”.

“While this application was quashed following a judicial review it is considered that, given the grant of permission, the views of Dublin City Council and the An Bord Pleanála Inspector are an important planning consideration for any future development on this site,” Butterly states.

“With regard to Dublin City Council, while the overall recommendation was for refusal, they also found that many aspects of the development were appropriate.”

The site was added to DCC’s Vacant Site Register in 2017. Since 2017 all local authorities have had to maintain a register of vacant sites that are suitable for development.

These sites are then subject to a levy, currently charged at 7% per annum.

Bindford appealed its entry on the register to ABP, but the challenge failed.

It has since brought a judicial review to the High Court, with legal proceedings ongoing.

In the planning report, Butterly said that the developers were “anxious” to develop the land, and may have to look into temporary uses if permission was not granted.

“It is also noted that the applicant is anxious to develop the lands, as the site has been targeted for site activation measures, including vacant site levy and residential zoned land tax,” Butterly stated.

“Where the planning process or legal challenge process is protracted, it may be necessary to activate the lands for meanwhile uses that are exempted development, temporarily, pending the freedom to implement a permission for development of the lands.”

Large-scale Residential Development (LRD) applications are for developments of over 100 homes or 200 beds of student accommodation.

They are made to local authorities and are set to replace Strategic Housing Developments (SHDs), which are applications made directly to An Bord Pleanála.

SHD decisions have been challenged frequently in the High Court in recent years via judicial reviews, with a significant number being overturned as a result.

The last date for the public to make observations on the planning application is 6 July.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
18 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Whelan
    Favourite Anthony Whelan
    Report
    Jun 16th 2011, 2:10 PM

    Which bill makes us all responsible for other people’s debts? Which bill allows them to steal my pension?

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mad Gerald
    Favourite Mad Gerald
    Report
    Jun 16th 2011, 12:51 PM

    More window dressing,sort out the debt problem and let us see what we can then afford.Muppets.

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Robert Scally
    Favourite Robert Scally
    Report
    Jun 16th 2011, 4:35 PM

    if they are getting 100,000 or whatever obscene amount every year, why do they get a big long summer holiday? Only 15 days of the Dail left before summer break. Ireland is in hard times and a serious amount of work is needed to get us back to glory and they still keep their summer recess.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eoin Sheehy
    Favourite Eoin Sheehy
    Report
    Jun 16th 2011, 4:45 PM

    Ironic that they said in opposition that they should have 3 weeks break last year as the finances were in too bad a state, now that they’re in Government the finances are worse than last June, yet they have just as long a holiday.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Yer auld one
    Favourite Yer auld one
    Report
    Jun 17th 2011, 12:23 AM

    Re the pic above:
    Pat to Enda – “did u smell the bogies at the back of the bus?”
    Joan “theres some bird stalking me”!
    Brendan “seriously Leo, my da would kill your da because he’s this big”!
    Leo “I am king of the universe, show me excaliber!”

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Nugent
    Favourite Mick Nugent
    Report
    Jun 17th 2011, 1:33 AM

    Is Leo tall or is it Brendan who is small?

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds